Abstract
Novel collaborative technologies afford new modes of behavior, which are often not regulated by established social norms. In particular, shared augmented reality (AR) - where multiple users can create, attach, and interact with the same virtual elements embedded into the physical environment - has the potential to interrupt current social norms of behavior. The objective of our study is to shed light on the ways in which shared AR challenges existing behavioral expectations. Using a simulated lab experimental design, we performed a study of users' interactions in a shared AR setting. Content analysis of participants' interviews reveals users' concerns over the preservation of their self- and social identity, as well as concerns related to personal space and the sense of psychological ownership over one's body and belongings. Our findings also point to the need for regulation of shared AR spaces and design of the technology's control mechanisms.
- David Ahlström, Khalad Hasan, and Pourang Irani. 2014. Are You Comfortable Doing That?: Acceptance Studies of Around-Device Gestures in and for Public Settings. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services - MobileHCI '14: 193--202. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Urs-Vito Albrecht, Kristian Folta-Schoofs, Marianne Behrends, and Ute von Jan. 2013. Effects of mobile augmented reality learning compared to textbook learning on medical students: randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of medical Internet research 15, 8: e182.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Irwin Altman. 1977. Privacy Regulation: Culturally Universal or Culturally Specific? Journal of Social Issues 33, 3: 66--84.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ronald T Azuma. 1997. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments 6, 4: 355--385. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henri Barki, Guy Paré, and Claude Sicotte. 2008. Linking IT implementation and acceptance via the construct of psychological ownership of information technology. Journal of Information Technology 23, 4: 269--280.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Russell Belk. 1988. Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research 15, 2: 139--168.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Russell W. Belk. 2013. Extended Self in a Digital World: Table 1. Journal of Consumer Research 40, 3: 477--500.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Billinghurst and Hirokazu Kato. 2002. Collaborative augmented reality. Communications of the ACM 45, 7. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anne Bowser, Katie Shilton, Jenny Preece, and Elizabeth Warrick. 2017. Accounting for Privacy in Citizen Science. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17: 2124--2136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott Brave, Clifford Nass, and Kevin Hutchinson. 2005. Computers that care: Investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 62, 161--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Graham Brown, Craig Crossley, and Sandra L. Robinson. 2014. Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment. Personnel Psychology 67, 2: 463--485.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreas Butz, Clifford Beshers, and Steven Feiner. 1998. Of Vampire mirrors and privacy lamps. Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '98: 171--172. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Eugene Halton. 1981. The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of. Information Technolog MIS Quarterly 13, 3: 319--340. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tamara Denning, Zakariya Dehlawi, and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2014. In situ with bystanders of augmented reality glasses. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14: 2377--2386. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helga Dittmar. 1992. The social psychology of material possessions. Harvester Wheatsheaf and St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
- Nicolas Ducheneaut, Robert J. Moore, and Eric Nickell. 2007. Virtual "third places": A case study of sociability in massively multiplayer games. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nancy G Duncan. 1981. Home ownership and social theory. Housing and identity: Cross-cultural perspectives 98: 134.Google Scholar
- Matthew S. Eastin and Robert LaRose. 2006. Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steven Feiner. 1994. Redefining the User Interface: Augmented Reality. ACM SIGGRAPH: 1--7.Google Scholar
- Jared Fong. 2015. New Citizenship for a Digital Age: 21 Century Digital Citizenship Education.Google Scholar
- Erving Goffman. 1956. Embarrassment and Social Organization. American Journal of Sociology 62, 3: 264--271.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erving Goffman. 2009. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Samuel D. Gosling, Peter J. Rentfrow, and William B. Swann. 2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37, 6: 504--528.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Graham, Matthew Zook, and Andrew Boulton. 2013. Augmented reality in urban places: contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38, 3: 464--479.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jens Grubert, Tobias Langlotz, Stefanie Zollmann, and Holger Regenbrecht. 2016. Towards Pervasive Augmented Reality: Context-Awareness in Augmented Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics PP, 99: 1--1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anders Henrysson, Mark Billinghurst, and Mark Ollila. 2005. Face to Face Collaborative AR on Mobile Phones. ISMAR '05 Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anne Hewitt and Andrea Forte. 2006. Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Poster presented at CSCW Banff Alberta 38: 1--2.Google Scholar
- Wendy A. Kellogg and Thomas Erickson. 2002. Social Translucence, Collective Awareness, and the Emergence of Place. Proceedings of CSCW2002: 1--6. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.121.2271&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle Scholar
- Young Ji Kim, David Engel, Anita Williams-Woolley, Jeffrey Yu-Ting Lin, Naomi McArthur, and Thomas W. Malone. 2017. What Makes a Strong Team? Using Collective Intelligence to Predict Team Performance in League of Legends. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, October: 2316--2329. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susan Schultz Kleine and Stacey Menzel Baker. 2004. An Integrative Review of Material Possession Attachment. Academy of Marketing Science Review 2004, 01: 1.Google Scholar
- Marion Koelle, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2017. Are you hiding it?: usage habits of lifelogging camera wearers. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marion Koelle and Shaun Kane. 2018. (Un)Acceptable?!?! -- Re-thinking the Social Acceptability of Emerging Technologies. Chi 2018: 1--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marion Koelle, Matthias Kranz, and M Andreas. 2015. Don ' t look at me that way?! -- Understanding User Attitudes Towards Data Glasses Usage. MobileHCI '15 Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services: 362--372. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D W F van Krevelen and Ronald Poelman. 2010. A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality 9, 2: 1--20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ryan Lawler. 2015. Get Ready For Even More Google Glasshole Sightings. Techcrunch.Com. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2013/01/28/glassholes/Google Scholar
- Kiron Lebeck, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. 2016. How to Safely Augment Reality. Proceedings of the 17th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications - HotMobile '16: 45--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sangwon Lee and Richard J. Koubek. 2011. The Impact of Cognitive Style on User Preference Based on Usability and Aesthetics for Computer-Based Systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27, 11: 1083--1114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Younghwa Lee and Andrew N. K. Chen. 2011. Usability Design and Psychological Ownership of a Virtual World. Journal of Management Information Systems 28, 3: 269--308.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter V. Marsden and Karen E. Campbell. 1984. Measuring Tie Strength. Social Forces 63, 2: 482--501.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roger C. Mayer and Mark B. Gavin. 2005. Trust in Management and Performance: Who Minds the Shop while the Emplyees Watch the Boss? The Academy of Management Journal 48, 5: 874--888.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ross McKerlich, Cindy Ives, and Rory McGreal. 2013. Measuring use and creation of open educational resources in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 14, 4: 90--103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joshua Mcveigh-schultz. 2018. What ' s It Mean to - Be Social " in VR: Mapping the Social VR Design Ecology. 289--294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2004. Privacy as contextual integrity. Wash. L. Rev. 1: 101--139.Google Scholar
- Pippa Norris. 2001. Digital Divide. In Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide.Google Scholar
- William Odom, John Zimmerman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. Teenagers and T heir Virtual Possessions?: Design Opportunities and Issues. 1491--1500. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Olsson. 2012. User expectations and experiences of mobile augmented reality services. Retrieved from http://dspace.cc.tut.fi/dpub/handle/123456789/21226Google Scholar
- Thomas Olsson, Else Lagerstam, Tuula Kärkkäinen, and Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila. 2013. Expected user experience of mobile augmented reality services: A user study in the context of shopping centres. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 2: 287--304. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Olsson and Markus Salo. 2012. Narratives of satisfying and unsatisfying experiences of current mobile augmented reality applications. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12, June: 2779. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janne Paavilainen, Hannu Korhonen, Kati Alha, Jaakko Stenros, Elina Koskinen, and Frans Mayra. 2017. The Pokémon GO Experience: A Location-Based Augmented Reality Mobile Game Goes Mainstream. Proceedings of the 35th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '17, Figure 1: In press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jon L. Pierce, Tatiana Kostova, and Kurt T. Dirks. 2001. Toward a Theory of Pschological Ownership in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 26, 2: 298--310.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jon L. Pierce, Tatiana Kostova, and Kurt T. Dirks. 2003. The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of general psychology 7.1, 84.Google Scholar
- Thammathip Piumsomboon, Adrian Clark, Mark Billinghurst, and Andy Canterbury. 2013. User-Defined Gestures for Augmented Reality. Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT: 282--299.Google Scholar
- Douglas J. Porteous. 1976. Home: The territorial core. Geographical Review: 383--390.Google Scholar
- Jun Rekimoto. 1996. Transvision: A hand-held augmented reality system for collaborative design. Proc. Virtual Systems and Multimedia, December: 85--90.Google Scholar
- Marsha L. Richins. 1994. Valuing Things: The Public and Private Meanings of Possessions. Journal of Consumer Research 21, 3: 504.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julie Rico and Stephen Brewster. 2009. Gestures all around us: user differences in social acceptability perceptions of gesture based interfaces. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services - MobileHCI '09: 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julie Rico and Stephen Brewster. 2010. Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability. 887--896. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Riedl, Rene Mayrhofer, Andreas Möller, Matthias Kranz, Florian Lettner, Clemens Holzmann, and Marion Koelle. 2015. Only play in your comfort zone: interaction methods for improving security awareness on mobile devices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 19, 5--6: 941--954.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrew L. Rossow. 2016. Gotta Catch a Lawsuit: A legal insight into the intellectual, civil, and criminal battlefield Pokemon Go has downloaded onto smartphones and properties around the world. J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 16: i.Google Scholar
- Floyd W. Rudmin and John W. Berry. 1987. Semantics of ownership: A free-recall study of property. The Psychological Record 37, 257--268.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stacey D. Scott, Sheelagh M.T. Carpendale, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2004. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '04, 294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Seddon. 2017. Why augmented reality is triggering cultural conflict and religious controversy. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/why-augmented-reality-is-triggering-cultural-conflict-and-religious-controversy-77976Google Scholar
- Rong An Shang, Yu Chen Chen, and Sheng Chieh Huang. 2012. A private versus a public space: Anonymity and buying decorative symbolic goods for avatars in a virtual world. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 6: 2227--2235. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gregory P. Stone. 1990. Appearance and the self: A slightly revised version. Life as theater: A dramaturgical sourcebook.Google Scholar
- Shyam Shyam Sundar. 2008. The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. 73--100.Google Scholar
- Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Maaret Posti, Olli Koskenranta, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2014. Investigating the balance between virtuality and reality in mobile mixed reality UI design. Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Fun, Fast, Foundational - NordiCHI '14: 137--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melanie Wallendorf and Eric J. Arnould. 1988. "My Favorite Things": A Cross-Cultural Inquiry into Object Attachment, Possessiveness, and Social Linkage. Journal of Consumer Research 14, 4: 531.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Warschauer. 2003. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brian D. Wassom. 2014. Augmented Reality Law, Privacy, and Ethics: Law, Society, and Emerging AR Technologies.Google Scholar
- Andrew J. Weigert. 1983. Identity: Its Emergence within Sociological Psychology. Symbolic Interaction 6, 2: 183--206.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laurie M. Wilcox, Robert S. Allison, Samuel Elfassy, and Cynthia Grelik. 2006. Personal space in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 3, 4: 412--428. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julie R. Williamson, Stephen A. Brewster, and Rama Vennelakanti. 2013. Mo!Games: Evaluating Mobile Gestures in the Wild. Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International conference on multimodal interaction - ICMI '13: 173--180. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julie R. Williamson, Andrew Crossan, and Stephen Brewster. 2011. Multimodal Mobile Interactions?: Usability Studies in Real World Settings. Interactions: 361--368. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jessica Wolfendale. 2007. My avatar, my self: Virtual harm and attachment. Ethics and Information Technology 9, 2: 111--119. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nick Yee, Jeremy N. Bailenson, Mark Urbanek, Francis Chang, and Dan Merget. 2007. The Unbearable Likeness of Being Digital: The Persistence of Nonverbal Social Norms in Online Virtual Environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, 1: 115--121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Feng Zhou, Henry Been Lirn Dun, and Mark Billinghurst. 2008. Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR. Proceedings - 7th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2008, ISMAR 2008: 193--202. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Normative Tensions in Shared Augmented Reality
Recommendations
Haptics in Augmented Reality
ICMCS '99: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems - Volume 2An augmented reality system merges synthetic sensory information into a user's perception of a three-dimensional environment. An important performance goal for an augmented reality system is that the user perceives a single seamless environment. In most ...
Multimodal augmented reality: the norm rather than the exception
MVAR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 workshop on Multimodal Virtual and Augmented RealityAugmented reality (AR) is commonly seen as a technology that overlays virtual imagery onto a participant's view of the world. In line with this, most AR research is focused on what we see. In this paper, we challenge this focus on vision and make a case ...
Augmented reality as perceptual reality
VSMM'06: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Interactive Technologies and Sociotechnical SystemsAs shown in Paul Milgram et al’s Reality-Virtuality Continuum (1994), Augmented Reality occupies a very unique status in the spectrum of Mixed Reality. Unlike Virtual Reality, which is completely made up of the virtual and has been the most important ...
Comments