skip to main content
10.1145/3276774.3276779acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Inferring occupant ties: automated inference of occupant network structure in commercial buildings

Published:07 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

To design and manage office buildings that are both energy-efficient and productive work environments, we need a better understanding of the relationship between building and occupant systems. Past data-driven building research has focused on energy efficiency and occupant comfort, but little work has used building sensor data to understand occupant organizational behavior and dynamics in buildings. In this initial work, we present a methodology for using distributed plug load energy consumption sensors to infer the social/organizational network of occupants (i.e., the relationships among occupants in a building). We demonstrate how plug load data can be used to model activities, and we introduce how statistical methods---in particular, the graphical lasso and the influence model---can be used to learn network structure from time-series activity data. We apply our method to a seven-person office environment in Northern California, and we compare the inferred networks to ground truth spatial, social, and organizational networks obtained through validated survey questions. In the end, a better understanding of how occupants organize and utilize spaces could enable more contextual control and co-optimization of building-human systems.

References

  1. Kyle Anderson, SangHyun Lee, and Carol Menassa. 2012. Effect of Social Network Type on Building Occupant Energy Use. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings (BuildSys '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jerome Friedman, Trevor Hastie, and Robert Tibshirani. 2008. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9, 3 (2008), 432--441. arXiv:0708.3517Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Simon Gächter, Chris Starmer, and Fabio Tufano. 2015. Measuring the Closeness of Relationships: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the 'Inclusion of the Other in the Self' Scale. PloS one 10, 6 (jun 2015), e0129478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. 2016. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 855--864. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Felichism Kabo, Yongha Hwang, Margaret Levenstein, and Jason Owen-Smith. 2015. Shared Paths to the Lab: A Sociospatial Network Analysis of Collaboration. Environment and Behavior 47, 1 (jan 2015), 57--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. David Krackhardt and Jeffrey R. Hanson. 1993. Informal networks: The company behind the charts. Harvard Business Review 71, 4 (jul 1993), 104 -- 111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrew Krioukov, Stephen Dawson-Haggerty, Linda Lee, Omar Rehmane, and David Culler. 2011. A Living Laboratory Study in Personalized Automated Lighting Controls. In Proceedings of the Third ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings (BuildSys '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Wei Pan, Wen Dong, Manual Cebrian, Taemie Kim, James H. Fowler, and Alex S (Sandy) Pentland. 2012. Modeling Dynamical Influence in Human Interaction: Using data to make better inferences about influence within social systems. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 29, 2 (mar 2012), 77--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kerstin Sailer, Ros Pomeroy, and Rosie Haslem. 2015. Data-driven design---Using data on human behaviour and spatial configuration to inform better workplace design. Corporate Real Estate 4, 3 (2015), 249 -- 262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andrew J. Sonta, Rishee K. Jain, Rimas Gulbinas, José M. F. Moura, and John E. Taylor. 2017. OESPG: Computational Framework for Multidimensional Analysis of Occupant Energy Use Data in Commercial Buildings. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 31, 4 (jul 2017), 04017017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Andrew J. Sonta, Perry E. Simmons, and Rishee K. Jain. 2018. Understanding building occupant activities at scale: An integrated knowledge-based and data-driven approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics 37 (2018), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Inferring occupant ties: automated inference of occupant network structure in commercial buildings

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          BuildSys '18: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Systems for Built Environments
          November 2018
          211 pages
          ISBN:9781450359511
          DOI:10.1145/3276774
          • General Chair:
          • Rajesh Gupta,
          • Program Chairs:
          • Polly Huang,
          • Marta Gonzalez

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 November 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate148of500submissions,30%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader