skip to main content
10.1145/3277593.3277608acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards an open-standards based framework for achieving condition-based predictive maintenance

Published: 15 October 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The advent of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) technology has significantly optimized the industrial operations management by connecting industrial assets with information systems and, hence, with business processes. The IIoT forms the backbone for materializing the Industry 4.0 initiative. Actionable insights obtained from industrial analytics are one of the pivotal means for achieving intelligent operations and maintenance. Intelligence refers to making optimal decisions for both automated and human-in-the-loop decision making. Condition-based predictive maintenance (CBPdM), also known as Maintenance 4.0, is among the major focus points of the Industry 4.0 and IIoT. In this paper, we discuss the existing standards related to condition-based maintenance and the potential of the Open Industrial Interoperability Ecosystem (OIIE), a MIMOSA led initiative, as a framework which extends previous open standards for achieving CBPdM. We illustrate how the framework addresses the requirements of Industry 4.0 and CBPdM.

References

[1]
Rosmaini Ahmad and Shahrul Kamaruddin. 2012. An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application. Computers & Industrial Engineering 63, 1 (2012), 135--149.
[2]
Marcus Bengtsson. 2003. Standardization issues in condition based maintenance. Department of Innovation, Design and Product Development, Mälardalen University, Sweden (2003).
[3]
Stefan Berger, Georg Grossmann, Markus Stumptner, and Michael Schrefl. 2010. Metamodel-Based Information Integration at Industrial Scale. In Proc. MODELS 2010, Vol. LNCS 6395. Springer, 153--167.
[4]
Benjamin S Blanchard, Dinesh C Verma, Dinesh Verma, and Elmer L Peterson. 1995. Maintainability: a key to effective serviceability and maintenance management. Vol. 13. John Wiley & Sons.
[5]
Mark Bowren. 2012. Software framework for prognostic health monitoring of ocean-based power generation. Florida Atlantic University.
[6]
Carl S Byington, PW Kalgren, Brian K Dunkin, and Bryan P Donovan. 2004. Advanced diagnostic/prognostic reasoning and evidence transformation techniques for improved avionics maintenance. In Aerospace Conference, 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE, Vol. 5. IEEE, 3424--3434.
[7]
RV Canfield. 1986. Cost optimization of periodic preventive maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 35, 1 (1986), 78--81.
[8]
Bala Chidambaram, DG Gilbertson, and Kirby Keller. 2005. Condition-based monitoring of an electro-hydraulic system using open software architectures. In Aerospace Conference, 2005 IEEE. IEEE, 3532--3539.
[9]
Adolfo Crespo Márquez, P Moreu de León, JF Gómez Fernández, C Parra Márquez, and M López Campos. 2009. The maintenance management framework: A practical view to maintenance management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 15, 2 (2009), 167--178.
[10]
Bram de Jonge, Ruud Teunter, and Tiedo Tinga. 2017. The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance. Reliability engineering & system safety 158 (2017), 21--30.
[11]
Johannes Drever, Helmut Naughton, Michael Nagel, Andreas Löhr, and Matthias Buderath. 2016. Implementing MIMOSA Standards.
[12]
Danúbia Espíndola, Luca Fumagalli, Marco Garetti, Silvia Botelho, and Carlos Pereira. 2011. An adaption of OSA-CBM architecture for Human-Computer interaction through mixed interface. In Industrial Informatics (INDIN), 2011 9th IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 485--490.
[13]
David Followell, Dan Gilbertson, and Kirby Keller. 2004. Implications of an open system approach to vehicle health management. In Aerospace Conference, 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE, Vol. 6. IEEE, 3717--3724.
[14]
D. Grossmann, K. Bender, and B. Danzer. 2008. OPC UA based Field Device Integration. In 2008 SICE Annual Conference. 933--938.
[15]
Georg Grossmann, Gerald Quirchmayr, and Markus Stumptner. 2011. An Architectural Concept for the CIEAM Enterprise Bus. In Proc. of World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM). Springer-Verlag, 251--261.
[16]
Hashem M Hashemian and Wendell C Bean. 2011. State-of-the-art predictive maintenance techniques. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and measurement 60, 10 (2011), 3480--3492.
[17]
Mario Hermann, Tobias Pentek, and Boris Otto. 2016. Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 3928--3937.
[18]
Mirka Kans and Diego Galar. 2017. The Impact of Maintenance 4.0 and Big Data Analytics within Strategic Asset Management. In 6th International Conference on Maintenance Performance Measurement and Management, 28 November 2016, Luleå, Sweden. Luleå University of Technology, 96--103.
[19]
Mirka Kans, Diego Galar, and Aditya Thaduri. 2016. Maintenance 4.0 in Railway Transportation Industry. In Proc. WCEAM 2015 (LNME). Springer, 317--331.
[20]
Kirby Keller, Dave Wiegand, Kevin Swearingen, Chris Reisig, Scott Black, Alan Gillis, and Mike Vandernoot. 2001. An architecture to implement integrated vehicle health management systems. In AUTOTESTCON Proceedings, 2001. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. IEEE, 2--15.
[21]
Setrag Khoshafian and Carolyn Rostetter. 2015. Digital Prescriptive Maintenance. Internet of Things, Process of Everything, BPM Everywhere (2015).
[22]
Mitchell Lebold, Karl Reichard, and David Boylan. 2003. Utilizing DCOM in an open system architecture framework for machinery monitoring and diagnostics. In Aerospace Conference, 2003. Proceedings. 2003 IEEE, Vol. 3. IEEE, 3_1227--3_1236.
[23]
Mitchell Lebold, Karl Reichard, Carl S Byington, and Rolf Orsagh. 2002. OSA-CBM architecture development with emphasis on XML implementations. In Maintenance and Reliability Conference (MARCON). 6--8.
[24]
CKM Lee, Yi Cao, and Kam Hung Ng. 2017. Big Data Analytics for Predictive Maintenance Strategies. In Supply Chain Management in the Big Data Era. IGI Global, 50--74.
[25]
Jay Lee, Ramzi Abujamra, Andrew KS Jardine, Daming Lin, and Dragan Banjevic. 2004. An integrated platform for diagnostics, prognostics and maintenance optimization. Proceedings of the intelligent maintenance systems (2004), 15--27.
[26]
Kang Lee. 2000. IEEE 1451: A standard in support of smart transducer networking. In Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 2000. IMTC 2000. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE, Vol. 2. IEEE, 525--528.
[27]
Avin Mathew, Ken Bever, Michael Purser, and Lin Ma. 2012. Bringing the MIMOSA OSA-EAI into an Object-Oriented World. In Engineering Asset Management and Infrastructure Sustainability. Springer, 633--646.
[28]
Avin Mathew, Liqun Zhang, Sheng Zhang, and Lin Ma. 2006. A review of the MIMOSA OSA-EAI database for condition monitoring systems. In Engineering Asset Management. Springer, 837--846.
[29]
MIMOSA. 2018. OIIE Information and Systems Architecture. (2018). http://www.mimosa.org/oiie-information-and-systems-architecture
[30]
Venkatraman Narayan. 2012. Business performance and maintenance: How are safety, quality, reliability, productivity and maintenance related? Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 18, 2 (2012), 183--195.
[31]
Rolf F Orsagh, Christopher J Savage, and Kathy McClintic. 2001. Development of Performance and Effectiveness Metrics For Mechanical Diagnostic Technologies. Technical Report. Impact Technologies LLC Rochester NY.
[32]
ABI Research. 2014. Maintenance Analytics to Generate $24.7 Billion in 2019, Driven by Predictive Maintenance and Internet of Things. (22 March 2014). https://www.abiresearch.com/press/maintenance-analytics-to-generate-247-billion-in-2/.
[33]
Aileen Richardson, Dale Keairns, and Briggs White. 2018. The role of sensors and controls in transforming the energy landscape. In Micro-and Nanotechnology Sensors, Systems, and Applications X, Vol. 10639. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 106390Y.
[34]
Michael J Roemer, Gregory J Kacprzynski, Andrea Palladino, Thomas Galie, and Carl Byington. 2001. Prognostic enhancements to naval condition-based maintenance systems. Technical Report. Impact Technologies LLC Rochester NY.
[35]
Mickey Shroff, Jyrki Keskinen, Oskar Norrback, Sakari Junnila, Jaakko Takaluoma, and Pasi Tuominen. 2011. MIMOSA and OPC UA applied in wapice remote management system. In Automaatio XIX seminar, Vol. 3.
[36]
Tarapong Sreenuch, Antonios Tsourdos, and Ian K Jennions. 2013. Distributed embedded condition monitoring systems based on OSA-CBM standard. Computer Standards & Interfaces 35, 2 (2013), 238--246.
[37]
Kevin Swearingen, Wayne Majkowski, Brian Bruggeman, Dan Gilbertson, Jon Dunsdon, and Ben Sykes. 2007. An open system architecture for condition based maintenance overview. In Aerospace Conference, 2007 IEEE. IEEE, 1--8.
[38]
Sumant Tambe, Abdel-Moez E Bayoumi, Alex Cao, Rhea McCaslin, Travis Edwards, and Condition-Based Maintenance Center. 2015. An Extensible CBM Architecture for Naval Fleet Maintenance Using Open Standards. In Intelligent Ship Symposium, Boston, USA.
[39]
Michael Thurston and Mitchell Lebold. 2001. Standards developments for condition-based maintenance systems. Technical Report. Pennsylvania State Univ University Park Applied Research Lab.
[40]
Antti Tuomi. 2010. Application integration for condition based maintenance. Ph.D. Dissertation. Master Thesis, Aalto University School of Science and Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Communications and Automation Espoo, Finland, 12.5.
[41]
Shiyong Wang, Jiafu Wan, Daqiang Zhang, Di Li, and Chunhua Zhang. 2016. Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Computer Networks 101 (2016), 158--168.
[42]
Theodore J. Williams (Ed.). 1989. A Reference Model For Computer Integrated Manufacturing. Instrument Society of America. http://www.pera.net/Pera/PurdueReferenceModel/ReferenceModel.html

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Challenges in Composite Digital Twin Models and their Impact on InteroperabilityInnovative Intelligent Industrial Production and Logistics10.1007/978-3-031-80775-6_28(413-425)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2025
  • (2024)GMM Based Fault Signature Estimation of Electromechanical Machines for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in IoT EnvironmentAutomatic Control and Computer Sciences10.3103/S014641162470113X58:6(663-678)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)High-Speed Train Health Assessment Based on Degradation Stages and Fault Classification by using Dual Task LSTM with Attention Mechanism2024 6th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety Engineering (SRSE)10.1109/SRSE63568.2024.10772528(333-341)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
IOT '18: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Internet of Things
October 2018
299 pages
ISBN:9781450365642
DOI:10.1145/3277593
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 October 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. IIoT
  2. OIIE framework
  3. OSA-CBM
  4. OSA-EAI
  5. condition-based predictive maintenance
  6. industrie 4.0
  7. maintenance 4.0

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • South Australian Premier's Research and Industry Fund

Conference

IOT '18
IOT '18: 8th International Conference on the Internet of Things
October 15 - 18, 2018
California, Santa Barbara, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 28 of 84 submissions, 33%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)45
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 19 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Challenges in Composite Digital Twin Models and their Impact on InteroperabilityInnovative Intelligent Industrial Production and Logistics10.1007/978-3-031-80775-6_28(413-425)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2025
  • (2024)GMM Based Fault Signature Estimation of Electromechanical Machines for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in IoT EnvironmentAutomatic Control and Computer Sciences10.3103/S014641162470113X58:6(663-678)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)High-Speed Train Health Assessment Based on Degradation Stages and Fault Classification by using Dual Task LSTM with Attention Mechanism2024 6th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety Engineering (SRSE)10.1109/SRSE63568.2024.10772528(333-341)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Construction Equipment Performance with Cloud Data Analysis for Predictive Maintenance2024 IEEE Recent Advances in Intelligent Computational Systems (RAICS)10.1109/RAICS61201.2024.10689847(1-6)Online publication date: 16-May-2024
  • (2024)A Holistic Review of the TinyML Stack for Predictive MaintenanceIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3512860(1-1)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2023)Comprehensive Analysis of IoT with Artificial Intelligence to Predictive Maintenance Optimization for Indian ShipbuildingInternational Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research10.37391/ijeer.11032511:3(800-807)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Need for UAI–Anatomy of the Paradigm of Usable Artificial Intelligence for Domain-Specific AI ApplicabilityMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti70300277:3(27)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis Modeling Methods in Predictive Maintenance: A Systematic Review2023 26th ACIS International Winter Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD-Winter)10.1109/SNPD-Winter57765.2023.10223733(239-244)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023
  • (2023)A Self-Powered Sensing System with Embedded TinyML for Anomaly Detection2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Industrial Electronics for Sustainable Energy Systems (IESES)10.1109/IESES53571.2023.10253705(1-6)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Discovering Actionable Knowledge for Industry 4.0: From Data Mining to Predictive and Prescriptive AnalyticsDigital Transformation10.1007/978-3-662-65004-2_14(337-362)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media