skip to main content
10.1145/3278471.3278478acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescvmpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Method of optimal directions for visual tracking

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 December 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sparse representation is widely used in visual tracking thanks to its efficiency and ability to handle appearance changes. In this paper, we propose to improve the original mean shift tracking algorithm, by defining its target model and candidates with a sparse approximation. The Method of Optimal Directions MOD is employed to learn an over-complete dictionary, afterward the Orthogonal Matching Pursuit OMP is used to present the appearance model with the potential atoms of the dictionary. We project the generated vector into the successive frames to detect the target region. Thus, the exploitation of the spatial information is demonstrated by the process of back-projecting the signature vector template in each frame. Our tracker attempts to perfectly localize random objects in different scenarios, and proved to be robust against different challenges. In fact, the proposed approach guarantees a total separation between the target and its background. Our tracker proved to be more stable and less prone to drift away.

References

  1. Amit Adam, Ehud Rivlin, and Ilan Shimshoni. 2006. Robust fragments-based tracking using the integral histogram. In Computer vision and pattern recognition, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, Vol. 1. IEEE, 798--805. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Michal Aharon, Michael Elad, and Alfred Bruckstein. 2006. r mk-SVD: An algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on signal processing 54, 11 (2006), 4311--4322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Nasir Ahmed, T_ Natarajan, and Kamisetty R Rao. 1974. Discrete cosine transform. IEEE transactions on Computers 100, 1 (1974), 90--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Amir Aliabadian, Esmaeil Akbarpour, and Mohammad Yosefi. 2012. Kernel Based Approach toward Automatic object Detection and Tracking in Surveillance Systems. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering 2 (2012), 82--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R Venkatesh Babu, Patrick Pérez, and Patrick Bouthemy. 2007. Robust tracking with motion estimation and local kernel-based color modeling. Image and Vision Computing 25, 8 (2007), 1205--1216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sebastian Brutzer, Benjamin Höferlin, and Gunther Heidemann. 2011. Evaluation of background subtraction techniques for video surveillance. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 1937--1944. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dorin Comaniciu, Visvanathan Ramesh, and Peter Meer. 2000. Real-time tracking of non-rigid objects using mean shift. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2000. Proceedings. IEEE Conference on, vol. 2. IEEE, 142--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Dorin Comaniciu, Visvanathan Ramesh, and Peter Meer. 2003. Kernel-based object tracking. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 25, 5 (2003), 564--577. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Geoff Davis, Stephane Mallat, and Marco Avellaneda. 1997. Adaptive greedy approximations. Constructive approximation 13, 1 (1997), 57--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawei Du, Honggang Qi, Qingming Huang, Wei Zeng, and Changhua Zhang. 2013. Abnormal event detection in crowded scenes based on Structural Multi-scale Motion Interrelated Patterns. In Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kjersti Engan, Sven Ole Aase, and J Hakon Husoy. 1999. Method of optimal directions for frame design. In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1999. Proceedings., 1999 IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 5. IEEE, 2443--2446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kjersti Engan, Sven Ole Aase, and John Håkon Husøy. 2000. Multi-frame compression: Theory and design. Signal Processing 80, 10 (2000), 2121--2140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sam Hare, Stuart Golodetz, Amir Saffari, Vibhav Vineet, Ming-Ming Cheng, Stephen L Hicks, and Philip HS Torr. 2016. Struck: Structured output tracking with kernels. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 38, 10 (2016), 2096--2109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. João F Henriques, Rui Caseiro, Pedro Martins, and Jorge Batista. 2015. High-speed tracking with kernelized correlation filters. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 37, 3 (2015), 583--596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Baiyang Liu, Junzhou Huang, Casimir Kulikowski, and Lin Yang. 2013. Robust visual tracking using local sparse appearance model and k-selection. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 35, 12 (2013), 2968--2981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rhys Martin and Ognjen Arandjelović. 2010. Multiple-object tracking in cluttered and crowded public spaces. In Advances in Visual Computing. Springer, 89--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Xue Mei and Haibin Ling. 2011. Robust visual tracking and vehicle classification via sparse representation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 33, 11 (2011), 2259--2272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jifeng Ning, Lei Zhang, David Zhang, and Chengke Wu. 2012. Robust mean-shift tracking with corrected background-weighted histogram. IET computer vision 6, 1 (2012), 62--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Bruno A Olshausen and David J Field. 1996. Natural image statistics and efficient coding. Network: computation in neural systems 7, 2 (1996), 333--339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Yagyensh Chandra Pati, Ramin Rezaiifar, and PS Krishnaprasad. 1993. Orthogonal matching pursuit: Recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. In Signals, Systems and Computers, 1993. 1993 Conference Record of The Twenty-Seventh Asilomar Conference on. IEEE, 40--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Akhil Pratap Singh and Agya Mishra. 2011. Wavelet Based Watermarking on Digital Image. Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering 1, 2 (2011), 86--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Oumaima Sliti, Habib Hamam, and Hamid Amiri. 2018. CLBP for scale and orientation adaptive mean shift tracking. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences 30, 3 (2018), 416--429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Oumaima Sliti, Habib Hamam, Faouzi Benzarti, and Hamid Amiri. 2014. A more robust mean shift tracker using joint monogenic signal analysis and color histogram. In Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2014 22nd International Conference on. IEEE, 2453--2458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Chetna Sachdeva Snekha and Rajesh Birok. {n. d.}. Real Time Object Tracking Using Different Mean Shift Techniques-a Review. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE) ISSN ({n. d.}), 2231--2307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Michael J Swain and Dana H Ballard. 1991. Color indexing. International journal of computer vision 7, 1 (1991), 11--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Chongjing Wang, Xu Zhao, Zhe Wu, and Yuncai Liu. 2013. Motion pattern analysis in crowded scenes based on hybrid generative-discriminative feature maps. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2013 20th IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2837--2841.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Yi Wu, Jongwoo Lim, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. 2013. Online object tracking: A benchmark. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2411--2418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Changjiang Yang, Ramani Duraiswami, and Larry Davis. 2005. Efficient mean-shift tracking via a new similarity measure. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, Vol. 1. IEEE, 176--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Alper Yilmaz, Khurram Shafique, and Mubarak Shah. 2003. Target tracking in airborne forward looking infrared imagery. Image and Vision Computing 21, 7 (2003), 623--635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Kaihua Zhang and Huihui Song. 2013. Real-time visual tracking via online weighted multiple instance learning. Pattern Recognition 46, 1 (2013), 397--411. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kaihua Zhang, Lei Zhang, Qingshan Liu, David Zhang, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. 2014. Fast visual tracking via dense spatio-temporal context learning. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 127--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Method of optimal directions for visual tracking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CVMP '18: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGGRAPH European Conference on Visual Media Production
      December 2018
      79 pages
      ISBN:9781450360586
      DOI:10.1145/3278471

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 December 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate40of67submissions,60%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader