skip to main content
10.1145/3279954.3279958acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Eat What You Want and Be Healthy!": Comfort Food Effects: Human-Food Interaction in View of Celebratory Technology

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Food craving is one of the fundamental desires of human nature. Many HCI researchers used to define this desire as a problem and has developed its corrective technology. However, positive aspects of food craving and food reward has rarely been in the scope of research. Few studies made its efforts to evaluate how food positively interacts with mental aspects of humans but have shown inconsistent results because of user subjectivity and environmental variations. Therefore, we have evaluated the human-food interactions with an EEG as objective indicator to track the mental activity. We found that when participants have a high craving for the certain food, which makes them feel comfort (hereafter comfort food), their working memory performance and related theta signal increase and stress related high beta signal decrease. The methodology adopted in this study will contribute to the progress in food-related celebratory technologies in HCI research field.

References

  1. Schaefer Alexandre, Nils F., Sanchez Xavier and Philippot Pierre. 2010. Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films: A new tool for emotion researchers. Cognition and Emotion, 24(7), 1153--1172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hsu Anne, Yang Jing, Yilmaz Yigit Han, Haque Md Sanaul, Can Cengiz Blandford, and Ann E. 2014. Persuasive technology for overcoming food cravings and improving snack choices. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3403--3412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Grimes Andrea and Harper Richard. 2008. Celebratory technology: new directions for food research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 467--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Knäuper B., Pillay Rowena, Lacaille, Julien, McCollam Amanda, and Kelso, Evan. 2011. Replacing craving imagery with alternative pleasant imagery reduces craving intensity. Appetite, 57(1), 173--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Clifford Brian R and Bull Ray. 2017. The psychology of person identification (Vol. 6). Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Baddeley Alan. 2003. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 4(10), 829.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Baddeley Alan D. and Graham J. Hitch. 2000. Development of working memory: Should the Pascual-Leone and the Baddeley and Hitch models be merged?. Journal of experimental child psychology 77.2, 128--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Baddeley Alan D and Hitch Graham. 1974. Working memory. Psychology of learning and motivation, 8, 47--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Epstein Daniel A, Cordeiro Felicia, Fogarty James, Hsieh Gary and Munson Sean A. 2016. Crumbs: lightweight daily food challenges to promote engagement and mindfulness. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5632--5644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Grimes David, Tan Desney S, Hudson Scott E, Shenoy Pradeep and Rao Rajesh PN. 2008. Feasibility and pragmatics of classifying working memory load with an electroencephalograph. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 835--844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kemps Eva and Tiggemann Marika. 2007. Modality-specific imagery reduces cravings for food: an application of the elaborated intrusion theory of desire to food craving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(2), 95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Roux, F., and Uhlhaas, Peter J. 2014. Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha--gamma versus theta--gamma codes for distinct WM information?. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(1), 16--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Pinel Florian. 2015. What's Cooking with Chef Watson? An Interview with Lav Varshney and James Briscione. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 14(4), 58--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Andrade Jackie, Pears Sally, May Jon and Kavanagh David J. 2012. Use of a clay modeling task to reduce chocolate craving. Appetite, 58(3), 955--963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tomiyama A Janet, Dallman Mary F and Epel Elissa S. 2011. Comfort food is comforting to those most stressed: evidence of the chronic stress response network in high stress women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36(10), 1513--1519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hentschel Jasmine, Sherugar Samyukta Manjayya, Zhou Rui, Kameswaran Vaishnav, Chandwani Rajesh, and Kumar Neha. 2017. Rice Today, Roti Tomorrow: Diets and Diabetes in Urban Indian Households. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4069--4081. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kandiah Jayanthi, Yake Melissa, Jones James and Meyer Michaela. 2006. Stress influences appetite and comfort food preferences in college women. Nutrition Research, 26(3), 118--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Alonso JF, Romero S, Ballester MR, Antonijoan RM and Mañanas MA. 2015. Stress assessment based on EEG univariate features and functional connectivity measures. Physiological measurement, 36(7), 1351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pan Jinjin and Jiao Xuejun. 2013. New application, development and aerospace prospect of fNIR. Engineering, 5(05), 47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. May Jon, Andrade Jackie, Kavanagh David J, and Hetherington Marion. 2012. Elaborated intrusion theory: a cognitive-emotional theory of food craving. Current Obesity Reports, 1(2), 114--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. May Jon, Andrade Jackie, Batey Helen, Berry Lisa-Marie and Kavanagh David J. 2010. Less food for thought. Impact of attentional instructions on intrusive thoughts about snack foods. Appetite, 55(2), 279--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. May Jon, Andrade Jackie, Panabokke Nathalie and Kavanagh, David. 2004. Images of desire: Cognitive models of craving. Memory, 12(4), 447--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Hamilton Jonathan, Fawson Sophie, May Jon, Andrade Jackie and Kavanagh David J. 2013. Brief guided imagery and body scanning interventions reduce food cravings. Appetite, 71, 158--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Maitland Julie, Chalmers Matthew and Siek Katie A. 2009. Persuasion not required Improving our understanding of the sociotechnical context of dietary behavioural change. In Pervasive computing technologies for Healthcare, PervasiveHealth 2009. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Cobb Nathan K and Poirier Jos. 2014. Effectiveness of a multimodal online well-being intervention: a randomized controlled trial. American journal of preventive medicine, 46(1), 41--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ewing Katie and Fairclough Stephen. 2010. The impact of working memory load on psychophysiological measures of mental effort and motivational disposition. Human Factors: A system view of human, technology and organisation. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Harvey Kirsty, Kemps Eva and Tiggemann Marika. 2005. The nature of imagery processes underlying food cravings. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10(1), 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Duyff Roberta Larson and American Dietetic Association. Complete food and nutrition guide (2002). Hoboken.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee Yi-Chieh, Lin Wen-Chieh, King Jung-Tai, Ko Li-Wei, Huang Yu-Ting and Cherng Fu-Yin. 2014. An EEG-based approach for evaluating audio notifications under ambient sounds. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3817--3826. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Coutand Marie, Cyr Martin, Deydier Eric, Guilet Richard and Clastres Pierre. 2008. Characteristics of industrial and laboratory meat and bone meal ashes and their potential applications. Journal of hazardous materials, 150(3), 522--532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Matthews Mark, Abdullah Saeed, Gay Geri and Choudhury Tanzeem. 2014. Tracking mental well-being: Balancing rich sensing and patient needs. Computer, 47(4), 36--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Rabbi Mashfiqui, Ali Shahid, Choudhury Tanzeem and Berke Ethan. 2011. Passive and in-situ assessment of mental and physical well-being using mobile sensors. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, 385--394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tryon MS, DeCant Rashel and Laugero KD. 2013. Having your cake and eating it too: a habit of comfort food may link chronic social stress exposure and acute stress-induced cortisol hyporesponsiveness. Physiology & behavior, 114, 32--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Comber Rob, Ganglbauer Eva, Choi Jaz Hee-jeong, Hoonhout Jettie, Rogers Yvonne, O'Hara, Kenton and Maitland Julie. 2012. Food and interaction design: designing for food in everyday life. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2767--2770. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. King Sheila and Gibney Michael. 1999. Dietary advice to reduce fat intake is more successful when it does not restrict habitual eating patterns. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 99(6), 685--689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Johanningsmeier Suzanne D, Harris G Keith and Klevorn Claire M. 2016. Metabolomic technologies for improving the quality of food: practice and promise. Annual review of food science and technology, 7, 413--438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Maurer Urs, Brem Silvia, Liechti Martina, Maurizio Stefano, Michels Lars and Brandeis Daniel. 2015. Frontal midline theta reflects individual task performance in a working memory task. Brain topography, 28(1), 127--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Mihajlović Vojkan, Grundlehner Bernard, Vullers Ruud, and Penders Julien. 2015. Wearable, wireless EEG solutions in daily life applications: what are we missing?. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 19(1), 6--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang Xiaoyi, Pina Laura R and Fogarty James. 2016. Examining Unlock Journaling with Diaries and Reminders for In Situ Self-Report in Health and Wellness. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5658--5664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "Eat What You Want and Be Healthy!": Comfort Food Effects: Human-Food Interaction in View of Celebratory Technology

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MHFI'18: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multisensory Approaches to Human-Food Interaction
      October 2018
      59 pages
      ISBN:9781450360746
      DOI:10.1145/3279954

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6of8submissions,75%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader