skip to main content
10.1145/3279954.3279960acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Virtual Cafeteria: An Immersive Environment for Interactive Food Portion-Size Education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This work introduces the Virtual Cafeteria, a novel virtual reality simulation of a buffet-style cafeteria for use in food portion-size education of adolescents as an alternative to established approaches such as verbal education and education with fake food replicas. As user behavior is automatically recorded to the millisecond, the application also serves as a tool for assessment of food portion-size perception. The Virtual Cafeteria offers a wide range of energy and nutrient densities in 64 food and 7 beverage options. Addressing the limitations and shortcomings of the immersive environments used in previous studies on food portion-size, the Virtual Cafeteria features not only a considerably wider variety of food but also multisensory feedback coupled with a high level of interaction and photorealism, and imperceptible latency.

References

  1. Mehmet Akman, Sabah Tuzun, and Pemra C Unalan. 2012. Healthy eating patterns and physical activity status of adolescents. Nobel Medicus 8, 1 (2012), 24--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Erkan Bayraktar and Fatih Kaleli. 2007. Sanal Gerçeklik ve Uygulama Alanları. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gian Luca Cesa, Gian Mauro Manzoni, Monica Bacchetta, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Sara Conti, Andrea Gaggioli, Fabrizia Mantovani, Enrico Molinari, Georgina Cárdenas-López, and Giuseppe Riva. 2013. Virtual reality for enhancing the cognitive behavioral treatment of obesity with binge eating disorder: randomized controlled study with one-year follow-up. Journal of medical Internet research 15, 6 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Beenish M Chaudhry, Christopher Schaefbauer, Ben Jelen, Katie A Siek, and Kay Connelly. 2016. Evaluation of a Food Portion Size Estimation Interface for a Varying Literacy Population. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5645--5657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Beenish Chaudry, Kay Connelly, Katie A Siek, and Janet L Welch. 2011. The design of a mobile portion size estimation interface for a low literacy population. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2011 5th International Conference on. IEEE, 160--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chris G Christou and Poppy Aristidou. 2017. Steering Versus Teleport Locomotion for Head Mounted Displays. In International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics. Springer, 431--446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kate Collins, Jane F Watson, and Clare E Collins. 2014. Food and beverage portion sizes in Australian children: a secondary analysis of 1995 and 2007 national data. BMC Public Health 14, 1 (2014), 517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Michael J Coons, Megan Roehrig, and Bonnie Spring. 2011. The potential of virtual reality technologies to improve adherence to weight loss behaviors.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marta Ferrer-Garcia, José Gutiérrez-Maldonado, and Giuseppe Riva. 2013. Virtual reality based treatments in eating disorders and obesity: a review. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 43, 4 (2013), 207--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Andrea Grimes, Martin Bednar, Jay David Bolter, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2008. EatWell: sharing nutrition-related memories in a low-income community. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 87--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Andrea Grimes, Vasudhara Kantroo, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2010. Let's play!: mobile health games for adults. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, 241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mary Margaret Huizinga, Adam J Carlisle, Kerri L Cavanaugh, Dianne L Davis, Rebecca P Gregory, David G Schlundt, and Russell L Rothman. 2009. Literacy, numeracy, and portion-size estimation skills. American journal of preventive medicine 36, 4 (2009), 324--328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sara R Jaeger and Christelle Porcherot. 2017. Consumption context in consumer research: methodological perspectives. Current Opinion in Food Science 15 (2017), 30--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kiyoshi Kiyokawa and Haruo Takemura. 2005. A tunnel window and its variations: Seamless teleportation techniques in a virtual environment. In HCI International. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Emily Lafond, Giuseppe Riva, Jose Gutierrez-Maldonado, and Brenda K Wiederhold. 2016. Eating disorders and obesity in virtual reality: a comprehensive research chart. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 19, 2 (2016), 141--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Christopher Steven Marcum, Megan R Goldring, Colleen M McBride, and Susan Persky. 2018. Modeling Dynamic Food Choice Processes to Understand Dietary Intervention Effects. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 52, 3 (2018), 252--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. CM McBride, S Persky, LK Wagner, MS Faith, and DS Ward. 2013. Effects of providing personalized feedback of child's obesity risk on mothers' food choices using a virtual reality buffet. International Journal of Obesity 37, 10 (2013), 1322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Matthias Minderer, Christopher D Harvey, Flavio Donato, and Edvard I Moser. 2016. Neuroscience: virtual reality explored. Nature 533, 7603 (2016), 324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Michael Nelson, Mary Atkinson, James Meyer, et al. 1997. Food portion sizes: a photographic atlas. MAFF publications London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Fatih Öz. 2015. Adölesanlarda internet destekli beslenme eğnitiminin etkinliğninin değnerlendirilmesi: randomize kontrollü çalışma. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Andrea Parker, Vasudhara Kantroo, Hee Rin Lee, Miguel Osornio, Mansi Sharma, and Rebecca Grinter. 2012. Health promotion as activism: building community capacity to effect social change. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Conxa Perpiñá, María Roncero, Fernando Fernández-Aranda, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Laura Forcano, and Isabel Sánchez. 2013. Clinical validation of a virtual environment for normalizing eating patterns in eating disorders. Comprehensive psychiatry 54, 6 (2013), 680--686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Susan Persky, Megan R Goldring, Sara A Turner, Rachel W Cohen, and William D Kistler. 2017. Validity of assessing child feeding with virtual reality. Appetite (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Joana Pla-Sanjuanelo, Marta Ferrer-García, José Gutiérrez-Maldonado, Giuseppe Riva, Alexis Andreu-Gracia, Antonios Dakanalis, Fernando Fernandez-Aranda, Laura Forcano, Joan Ribas-Sabaté, Nadine Riesco, et al. 2015. Identifying specific cues and contexts related to bingeing behavior for the development of effective virtual environments. Appetite 87 (2015), 81--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Giuseppe Riva, Monica Bacchetta, Gianluca Cesa, Sara Conti, and Enrico Molinari. 2004. The use of VR in the treatment of eating disorders.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Giuseppe Riva, Luca Melis, and Mirco Bolzoni. 1997. Treating body-image disturbances. Commun. ACM 40, 8 (1997), 69--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Megan E Rollo, Tamara Bucher, Shamus P Smith, and Clare E Collins. 2017. ServAR: An augmented reality tool to guide the serving of food. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 14, 1 (2017), 65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Barb Ruppert. 2011. New directions in the use of virtual reality for food shopping: marketing and education perspectives.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rehana A Salam and Zulfiqar A Bhutta. 2015. 2.7 Adolescent Nutrition. In Pediatric Nutrition in Practice. Vol. 113. Karger Publishers, 122--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Rehana A Salam, Mehar Hooda, Jai K Das, Ahmed Arshad, Zohra S Lassi, Philippa Middleton, and Zulfiqar A Bhutta. 2016. Interventions to improve adolescent nutrition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health 59, 4 (2016), S29--S39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Susan M Sawyer, Rima A Afifi, Linda H Bearinger, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, Bruce Dick, Alex C Ezeh, and George C Patton. 2012. Adolescence: a foundation for future health. The Lancet 379, 9826 (2012), 1630--1640.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Christopher L Schaefbauer, Danish U Khan, Amy Le, Garrett Sczechowski, and Katie A Siek. 2015. Snack buddy: supporting healthy snacking in low socioeconomic status families. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1045--1057. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Fiorella Sinesio, Anna Saba, Marina Peparaio, Eleonora Saggia Civitelli, Flavio Paoletti, and Elisabetta Moneta. 2018. Capturing consumer perception of vegetable freshness in a simulated real-life taste situation. Food Research International 105 (2018), 764--771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Debra K Sullivan, Jeannine R Goetz, Cheryl A Gibson, Richard A Washburn, Bryan K Smith, Jaehoon Lee, Stephanie Gerald, Tennille Fincham, and Joseph E Donnelly. 2013. Improving weight maintenance using virtual reality (Second Life). Journal of nutrition education and behavior 45, 3 (2013), 264--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Tansel Tepe, Devkan Kaleci, and Hakan Tüzün. 2016. Eğnitim Teknolojilerinde Yeni Eğnilimler: Sanal Gerçeklik Uygulamaları. In 10th International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium (ICITS). 547--555.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Nikita Mae B Tuanquin. 2017. Immersive virtual eating and conditioned food responses. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, 618--622. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Chin-Yih Ung, Marino Menozzi, Christina Hartmann, and Michael Siegrist. 2018. Innovations in consumer research: The virtual food buffet. Food Quality and Preference 63 (2018), 12--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Yifan Yang, Wenyan Jia, Tamara Bucher, Hong Zhang, and Mingui Sun. 2018. Image-based food portion size estimation using a smartphone without a fiducial marker. Public health nutrition (2018), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Virtual Cafeteria: An Immersive Environment for Interactive Food Portion-Size Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MHFI'18: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multisensory Approaches to Human-Food Interaction
      October 2018
      59 pages
      ISBN:9781450360746
      DOI:10.1145/3279954

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6of8submissions,75%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader