skip to main content
10.1145/3283590.3283592acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the Predictability of a User's Next Check-in Using Data from Different Social Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Predicting a person's whereabouts is important in several scenarios. However, it is hard to obtain data that reliably reflects users' mobility patterns. This difficulty has led researchers to use social media data as a proxy to understand and predict human mobility. It has been shown, however, that such data is inherently biased and error-prone, and that such drawbacks may produce sub-par mobility prediction models. In a more narrow context, researchers have used social media data to predict users' check-in patterns. A common approach to alleviate the biases in social media data is to use more than one data source. We here show, however, that the use of data from different social networks does not necessarily increase the predictability of a person next check-in. Our experiments indicate that this result is due to how and where people use different social networks, and that user behavioral characteristics play an important role on the predictability of the next check-in.

References

  1. Mariano G. Beiró, André Panisson, Michele Tizzoni, and Ciro Cattuto. 2016. Predicting human mobility through the assimilation of social media traces into mobility models. EPJ Data Science 5, 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Thomas M Cover and Joy A Thomas. 2012. Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wei Dong, Nick Duffield, Zihui Ge, Seungjoon Lee, and Jeffrey Pang. 2013. Modeling Cellular User Mobility Using a Leap Graph. In Proc. 14th International Conference on Passive and Active Measurement. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Robert M Fano. 1961. Transmission of Information: A Statistical Theory of Communications. American Journal of Physics 29, 11 (1961).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Marta C Gonzalez, Cesar A Hidalgo, and A-L Barabasi. 2008. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Juan C. Herrera, Daniel B. Work, Ryan Herring, Xuegang Ban, Quinn Jacobson, and Alexandre M. Bayen. 2010. Evaluation of traffic data obtained via GPS-enabled mobile phones: The Mobile Century field experiment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 18, 4 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrea Hess, Karin Anna Hummel, Wilfried N. Gansterer, and Günter Haring. 2016. Data-driven Human Mobility Modeling: A Survey and Engineering Guidance for Mobile Networking. Comput. Surveys 48, 3 (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Shan Jiang, Gaston A. Fiore, Yingxiang Yang, Joseph Ferreira, Jr., Emilio Frazzoli, and Marta C. González. 2013. A Review of Urban Computing for Mobile Phone Traces: Current Methods, Challenges and Opportunities. In Proc. 2nd ACM International Workshop on Urban Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Raja Jurdak, Kun Zhao, Jiajun Liu, Maurice AbouJaoude, Mark Cameron, and David Newth. 2015. Understanding Human Mobility from Twitter. PLOS ONE (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. I. Kontoyiannis, P. H. Algoet, Yu. M. Suhov, and A. J. Wyner. 2006. Nonparametric Entropy Estimation for Stationary Processes and Random Fields, with Applications to English Text. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 44, 3 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Maxime Lenormand, Miguel Picornell, Oliva G. Cantú-Ros, Antònia Tugores, Thomas Louail, Ricardo Herranz, Marc Barthelemy, Enrique Frías-Martínez, and José J. Ramasco. 2014. Cross-Checking Different Sources of Mobility Information. PLOS ONE 9, 8 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Xin Lu, Erik Wetter, Nita Bharti, Andrew J. Tatem, and Linus Bengtsson. 2013. Approaching the Limit of Predictability in Human Mobility. Scientific Reports (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Aarti Munjal, Tracy Camp, and William C. Navidi. 2011. SMOOTH: A Simple Way to Model Human Mobility. In Proc. 14th ACM Int. Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Noulas, S. Scellato, N. Lathia, and C. Mascolo. 2012. Mining User Mobility Features for Next Place Prediction in Location-Based Services. In 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Claude E Shannon and Warren Weaver. 1998. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Thiago H. Silva, Pedro O. S. Vaz de Melo, Jussara M. Almeida, Juliana Salles, and Antonio A. F. Loureiro. 2013. A Comparison of Foursquare and Instagram to the Study of City Dynamics and Urban Social Behavior. In Proc. ACM International Workshop on Urban Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lucas Maia Silveira, Jussara M. Almeida, Humberto Torres Marques-Neto, Carlos Sarraute, and Artur Ziviani. 2016. MobHet: Predicting human mobility using heterogeneous data sources. Computer Communications 95 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Chaoming Song, Zehui Qu, Nicholas Blumm, and Albert-László Barabási. 2010. Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility. Science 327, 5968 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Joanne Treurniet. 2014. A Taxonomy and Survey of Microscopic Mobility Models from the Mobile Networking Domain. Comput. Surveys (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yingzi Wang, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Defu Lian, Linli Xu, Xing Xie, Enhong Chen, and Yong Rui. 2015. Regularity and Conformity: Location Prediction Using Heterogeneous Mobility Data. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '15). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Zengbin Zhang, Lin Zhou, Xiaohan Zhao, Gang Wang, Yu Su, Miriam Metzger, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Y. Zhao. 2013. On the Validity of Geosocial Mobility Traces. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-XII). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. K. Zhao, D. Khryashchev, J. Freire, C. Silva, and H. Vo. 2016. Predicting taxi demand at high spatial resolution: Approaching the limit of predictability. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Big Data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu Zheng, Licia Capra, Ouri Wolfson, and Hai Yang. 2014. Urban Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 5 (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yu Zheng, Yanchi Liu, Jing Yuan, and Xing Xie. 2011. Urban Computing with Taxicabs. In Proc. 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the Predictability of a User's Next Check-in Using Data from Different Social Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        PredictGIS 2018: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Prediction of Human Mobility
        November 2018
        50 pages
        ISBN:9781450360425
        DOI:10.1145/3283590

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 November 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader