skip to main content
10.1145/3283590.3283594acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring Inter-city Network Using Digital Footprints from Twitter Users

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

City connectivity is an important measurement in characterizing human dynamics from regional to international scales. World City Network has been built based on companies' communication. The interactions between spatial and social dimensions of cities have both conceptual and practical significance. To further expand the studies of inter-city network in the big social data context, this research builds a network at the county level using digital footprints from Twitter users. Retrieving geotags from Twitter users, we identify the connection strength of each pair of counties based on the amounts of shared users who leave digital footprints on both counties. Using the shared user amount as the weighted link and each county as the node, we build a county-to-county user flow network. Various network structures have been detected at the state level. In addition, by creating a direct flow chain, we can identify influential counties and its hinterland. This network demonstrates how human mobility operate across various spatial settings and distances. Results of this study can be used in transportation planning, regional planning and metropolitan management.

References

  1. Green, N. 2007. Functional polycentricity: a formal definition in terms of social network analysis. Urban Studies, 44(11), 2077--2103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Taylor, P.J., 2001. Specification of the world city network. Geographical analysis, 33(2), pp. 181--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Taylor, P.J., Catalano, G. and Walker, D.R., 2002. Exploratory analysis of the world city network. Urban Studies, 39(13), pp. 2377--2394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. O'Connor, K. 2003. Global air travel: toward concentration or dispersal?. Journal of Transport Geography, 11(2), 83--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Neal, Z., 2014. AIRNET: A programme for generating intercity networks. Urban Studies, 51(1), pp. 136--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Liu, X., Derudder, B., & Wu, K. 2016. Measuring polycentric urban development in China: An intercity transportation network perspective. Regional Studies, 50(8), 1302--1315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Grabowicz, P.A., Ramasco, J.J., Gonçalves, B. and Eguíluz, V.M., 2014. Entangling mobility and interactions in social media. PloS one, 9(3), p.e92196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Xu, C., Wong, D.W. and Yang, C., 2013. Evaluating the "geographical awareness" of individuals: an exploratory analysis of twitter data. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(2), pp. 103--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hawelka, B., Sitko, I., Beinat, E., Sobolevsky, S., Kazakopoulos, P. and Ratti, C., 2014. Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41(3), pp. 260--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lancichinetti, A., Radicchi, F., Ramasco, J.J. and Fortunato, S., 2011. Finding statistically significant communities in networks. PloS one, 6(4), p.e18961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Taylor, P.J., 2004. World city network: a global urban analysis. Psychology Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Liu, X., Derudder, B. and Taylor, P., 2014. Mapping the evolution of hierarchical and regional tendencies in the world city network, 2000--2010. Computers, environment and urban systems, 43, pp. 51--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Vasanen, A., 2012. Functional polycentricity: examining metropolitan spatial structure through the connectivity of urban sub-centres. Urban studies, 49(16), pp. 3627--3644.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Van der Laan, L., Vogelsang, J., Schalke, R., 1998. Commuting in Multi-Nodal Urban Systems: An Empirical Comparison of Three Alternative Models. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 89(4), pp. 384--400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Derudder, B. and Witlox, F., 2005. An appraisal of the use of airline data in assessing the world city network: a research note on data. Urban Studies, 42(13), pp. 2371--2388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Neal, Z. (2010). Refining the air traffic approach to city networks. Urban Studies, 47(10), 2195--2215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Noulas, A., Scellato, S., Lambiotte, R., Pontil, M. and Mascolo, C., 2012. A tale of many cities: universal patterns in human urban mobility. PloS one, 7(5), p.e37027.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. França, U., Sayama, H., McSwiggen, C., Daneshvar, R. and Bar-Yam, Y., 2016. Visualizing the "Heartbeat" of a City with Tweets. Complexity, 21(6), pp. 280--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lenormand, M., Picornell, M., Cantú-Ros, O.G., Tugores, A., Louail, T., Herranz, R., Barthelemy, M., Frias-Martinez, E. and Ramasco, J.J., 2014. Cross-checking different sources of mobility information. PLoS One, 9(8), p.e105184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Thusoo, A., Sarma, J.S., Jain, N., Shao, Z., Chakka, P., Anthony, S., Liu, H., Wyckoff, P. and Murthy, R., 2009. Hive: a warehousing solution over a map-reduce framework. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2(2), pp. 1626--1629. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Bittorf, M.K.A.B.V., Bobrovytsky, T., Erickson, C.C.A.C.J., Hecht, M.G.D., Kuff, M.J.I.J.L., Leblang, D.K.A., Robinson, N.L.I.P.H., Rus, D.R.S., Wanderman, J.R.D.T.S. and Yoder, M.M., 2015. Impala: A modern, open-source SQL engine for Hadoop. In Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Bastian, M., Heymann, S. and Jacomy, M., 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Icwsm, 8, pp. 361--362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Hecht, B.J. and Stephens, M., 2014. A Tale of Cities: Urban Biases in Volunteered Geographic Information. ICWSM, 14, pp. 197--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Malik, M., Lamba, H., Nakos, C., & Pfeffer, J. (2015, March). Population bias in geo-tagged tweets. In ICWSM Workshop on Standards and Practices in Large-Scale Social Media Research (pp. 18--27).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiang Y., Li Z., Ye X. (2018) Understanding Demographic and Socioeconomic Bias of Geo-tagged Twitter Users at the County Level, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 15230406.2018.1434834Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu X., Huang Q., Li Z., Wu M., (2017), The impact of MTUP to explore online trajectories for human mobility studies. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on PredictGIS Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. United States Census Bureau. 2010 Census. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. Web. 15 September 2018 http://www.census.gov/2010census/data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang, X., Zhao, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, C., Ma, C., & Ye, X. (2016). TrajGraph: A Graph-Based Visual Analytics Approach to Studying Urban Network Centralities Using Taxi Trajectory Data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), 160--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Liu, Q., Wang, Z., & Ye, X (2018) Comparing Mobility Patterns between Residents and Visitors Using Geotagged Social Media Data. Transactions in GIS.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ye, X., & Liu, X. (Eds.). (2018). Cities as Spatial and Social Networks. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Measuring Inter-city Network Using Digital Footprints from Twitter Users

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        PredictGIS 2018: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Prediction of Human Mobility
        November 2018
        50 pages
        ISBN:9781450360425
        DOI:10.1145/3283590

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 November 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader