skip to main content
10.1145/3284179.3284329acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Domain engineering for generating dashboards to analyze employment and employability in the academic context

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data analysis is a key process to foster knowledge generation regarding particular domains or fields of study. With a strong informative foundation derived from the analysis of collected data, decision-makers can make strategic choices with the aim of obtaining valuable benefits in their specific areas of action. However, given the steady growth of data volumes, data analysis needs to rely on powerful tools to enable knowledge extraction. Dashboards offer a software solution for visually analyzing large volumes of data in order to identify patterns and relations and make decisions according to the presented information. But decision-makers may have different goals and, consequently, different necessities regarding their dashboards. Having a methodology to efficiently generate dashboards taking into account differing needs would add a customization layer to allow particular users to reach their own goals. This approach can be achieved through domain engineering and automatic code generation processes. This paper presents the application of domain engineering within the dashboards' domain through a case study in the context of the Spanish Observatory for University Employment and Employability, in which a set of dashboards can be generated to exploit different perspectives of employment and employability data in the academic context.

References

  1. S Christian Albright, Wayne Winston, and Christopher Zappe. 2010. Data analysis and decision making. Cengage Learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dj Patil and Hilary Mason. 2015. Data Driven. "O'Reilly Media, Inc.".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ramesh Sharda, Dursun Delen, and Efraim Turban. 2013. Business intelligence: a managerial perspective on analytics. Prentice Hall Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Stephen Few. 2006. Information dashboard design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ronald W Mcquaid and Colin Lindsay. 2005. The concept of employability. Urban studies 42, 2, 197--219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Á. Fidalgo-Blanco, M. L. Sein-Echaluce, and F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2014. Knowledge spirals in higher education teaching innovation. International Journal of Knowledge Management 10, 4, 16--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Á. Fidalgo-Blanco, M. L. Sein-Echaluce, and F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2015. Epistemological and ontological spirals: From individual experience in educational innovation to the organisational knowledge in the university sector. Program: Electronic library and information systems 49, 3, 266--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. P. Campbell, P. B. Deblois, and D. G. Oblinger. 2007. Academic Analytics. A new tool for a new era. Educause Review 42, 4, 40--42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Paul Baepler and Cynthia James Murdoch. 2010. Academic analytics and data mining in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 4, 2, 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Oficina De Cooperación Universitaria. 2013. Libro Blanco Inteligencia Institucional en Universidades OCU (Oficina de Cooperación Universitaria), Madrid, España.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Francisco J García Peñalvo. 2015. Inteligencia Institucional para la Mejora de los Procesos de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Paul Clements and Linda Northrop. 2002. Software product lines. Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hassan Gomaa. 2004. Designing Software Product Lines with UML: From Use Cases to Pattern-Based Software Architectures. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Michavila, Jorge M. Martínez, Martín Martin-González, F. J. García-Peñalvo, and Juan Cruz-Benito. 2016. Barómetro de empleabilidad y empleo de los universitarios en España, 2015 (Primer informe de resultados). Observatorio de Empleabilidad y Empleo Universitarios, Madrid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. F. Michavila, J. M. Martínez, M. Martín-González, F. J. García-Peñalvo, J. Cruz-Benito, and A. Vázquez-Ingelmo. 2018. Barómetro de empleabilidad y empleo universitarios. Edición Máster 2017. Observatorio de Empleabilidad y Empleo Universitarios, Madrid, España.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kyo C Kang, Sholom G Cohen, James A Hess, William E Novak, and A Spencer Peterson. 1990. Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa Software Engineering Inst.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Critina Gacek and Michalis Anastasopoules. 2001. Implementing product line variabilities. In ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes ACM, 109--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Soheila Bashardoust Tajali, Jean-Pierre Corriveau, and Wei Shi. 2013. A Template-Based Approach to Modeling Variability. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP) The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Timo Greifenberg, Klaus Müller, Alexander Roth, Bernhard Rumpe, Christoph Schulze, and Andreas Wortmann. 2016. Modeling variability in template-based code generators for product line engineering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02903.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tim Bray, Jean Paoli, C Michael Sperberg-Mcqueen, Eve Maler, and François Yergeau. 1997. Extensible markup language (XML). World Wide Web Journal 2, 4, 27--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Armin Ronacher. 2008. Jinja2 Documentation Welcome to Jinja2---Jinja2 Documentation (2.8-dev).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Facebook. 2016. GraphQL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Andrea Vázquez-Ingelmo, Juan Cruz-Benito, and Francisco J García-Peñalvo. 2017. Improving the OEEU's data-driven technological ecosystem's interoperability with GraphQL. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (Cádiz, Spain, October 18-20, 2017 2017). ACM, 3145437, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Dhaivat Pandya. 2016. GraphQL Concepts Visualized, Web log post.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Andreas Pleuss, Stefan Wollny, and Goetz Botterweck. 2013. Model-driven development and evolution of customized user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems ACM, 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Andreas Pleuss, Benedikt Hauptmann, Markus Keunecke, and Goetz Botterweck. 2012. A case study on variability in user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 16th International Software Product Line Conference-Volume 1 ACM, 6--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Shaohua Wang, Iman Keivanloo, and Ying Zou. 2014. How do developers react to restful api evolution? In International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing Springer, 245--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Domain engineering for generating dashboards to analyze employment and employability in the academic context

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        TEEM'18: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
        October 2018
        1072 pages
        ISBN:9781450365185
        DOI:10.1145/3284179

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 October 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        TEEM'18 Paper Acceptance Rate151of243submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader