skip to main content
10.1145/3284432.3284459acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Virtual Hug Induces Modulated Impression on Hearsay Information

Published: 04 December 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Although it is perceivable that interpersonal touch affects recipient's impression of touch provider as well as the information relating to the provider alike, its utility in touch mediated through communication devices (virtual interpersonal touch) remains unclear to date. In this article, we report the alleviating effect of virtual interpersonal touch on social judgment. In particular, we show that virtual hug with a remote person modulates the impression of the hearsay information about an absentee. In our experiment, participants rate their impressions as well as note down their recall of information about a third person. We communicate this information through either a speaker or a huggable medium. Our results show that virtual hug reduces the negative inferences in the recalls of information about a target person. Furthermore, they suggest the potential that the mediated communication offers in moderating the spread of negative information in human community via virtual hug.

References

[1]
Nader Amir, Courtney Beard, and Emily Bower. 2005. Interpretation bias and social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 29, 4 (2005), 433--443.
[2]
Jeremy N Bailenson, Nick Yee, Scott Brave, Dan Merget, and David Koslow. 2007. Virtual interpersonal touch: expressing and recognizing emotions through haptic devices. Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 22, 3 (2007), 325--353.
[3]
Judee K Burgoon. 1991. Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture. Journal of Nonverbal behavior, Vol. 15, 4 (1991), 233--259.
[4]
Judee K Burgoon, Joseph B Walther, and E James Baesler. 1992. Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch. Human Communication Research, Vol. 19, 2 (1992), 237--263.
[5]
John-John Cabibihan, Lihao Zheng, and Chin Kiang Terence Cher. 2012. Affective tele-touch. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 348--356.
[6]
April H Crusco and Christopher G Wetzel. 1984. The midas touch the effects of interpersonal touch on restaurant tipping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 10, 4 (1984), 512--517.
[7]
Carl DiSalvo, Francine Gemperle, Jodi Forlizzi, and Elliott Montgomery. 2003. The hug: an exploration of robotic form for intimate communication. In Robot and human interactive communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. The 12th IEEE international workshop on. IEEE, 403--408.
[8]
Beate Ditzen, Inga D Neumann, Guy Bodenmann, Bernadette von Dawans, Rebecca A Turner, Ulrike Ehlert, and Markus Heinrichs. 2007. Effects of different kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, Vol. 32, 5 (2007), 565--574.
[9]
Gerald Echterhoff, E Tory Higgins, and Stephan Groll. 2005. Audience-tuning effects on memory: the role of shared reality. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 89, 3 (2005), 257.
[10]
Stephen M Edelson, Meredyth Goldberg Edelson, David CR Kerr, and Temple Grandin. 1999. Behavioral and physiological effects of deep pressure on children with autism: A pilot study evaluating the efficacy of Grandin's Hug Machine. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 53, 2 (1999), 145--152.
[11]
Ruth Feldman, Magi Singer, and Orna Zagoory. 2010. Touch attenuates infants' physiological reactivity to stress. Developmental science, Vol. 13, 2 (2010), 271--278.
[12]
Jeffrey D Fisher, Marvin Rytting, and Richard Heslin. 1976. Hands touching hands: Affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. Sociometry (1976), 416--421.
[13]
Alberto Gallace and Charles Spence. 2010. The science of interpersonal touch: an overview. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 34, 2 (2010), 246--259.
[14]
Morton Goldman and Jerry Fordyce. 1983. Prosocial behavior as affected by eye contact, touch, and voice expression. The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 121, 1 (1983), 125--129.
[15]
Temple Grandin. 1984. My experiences as an autistic child and review of selected literature. Journal of Orthomolecular Psychiatry, Vol. 13, 3 (1984), 144--174.
[16]
Antal Haans, Renske de Bruijn, and Wijnand A IJsselsteijn. 2014. A virtual midas touch? Touch, compliance, and confederate bias in mediated communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Vol. 38, 3 (2014), 301--311.
[17]
Antal Haans and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2006. Mediated social touch: a review of current research and future directions. Virtual Reality, Vol. 9, 2--3 (2006), 149--159.
[18]
Antal Haans and Wijnand A IJsselsteijn. 2009. The virtual Midas touch: Helping behavior after a mediated social touch. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, Vol. 2, 3 (2009), 136--140.
[19]
E Tory Higgins. 1999. Saying is believing" effects: When sharing reality about something biases knowledge and evaluations. Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge, Vol. 1 (1999), 33--49.
[20]
E Tory Higgins and William S Rholes. 1978. "Saying is believing": Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 14, 4 (1978), 363--378.
[21]
Jacob Hornik. 1992. Tactile stimulation and consumer response. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 19, 3 (1992), 449--458.
[22]
Gijs Huisman. 2017. Social touch technology: A survey of haptic technology for social touch. IEEE transactions on haptics, Vol. 10, 3 (2017), 391--408.
[23]
Jutta Joormann and Ian H Gotlib. 2007. Selective attention to emotional faces following recovery from depression. Journal of abnormal psychology, Vol. 116, 1 (2007), 80.
[24]
Kaiko Kuwamura, Kurima Sakai, Takashi Minato, Shuichi Nishio, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2013. Hugvie: A medium that fosters love. In RO-MAN, 2013 IEEE. IEEE, 70--75.
[25]
Warren Mansell, Anke Ehlers, David Clark, and Yi-Ping Chen. 2002. Attention to positive and negative social-evaluative words: Investigating the effects of social anxiety, trait anxiety and social threat. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, Vol. 15, 1 (2002), 19--29.
[26]
Francis McGlone, Johan Wessberg, and Håkan Olausson. 2014. Discriminative and affective touch: sensing and feeling. Neuron, Vol. 82, 4 (2014), 737--755.
[27]
Vera Morhenn, Laura E Beavin, and Paul J Zak. 2012. Massage increases oxytocin and reduces adrenocorticotropin hormone in humans. Alternative therapies in health and medicine, Vol. 18, 6 (2012), 11.
[28]
Osamu Morikawa, Sayuri Hashimoto, Tsunetsugu Munakata, and Junzo Okunaka. 2006. Embrace system for remote counseling. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Multimodal interfaces. ACM, 318--325.
[29]
Florian'Floyd' Mueller, Frank Vetere, Martin R Gibbs, Jesper Kjeldskov, Sonja Pedell, and Steve Howard. 2005. Hug over a distance. In CHI'05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1673--1676.
[30]
Hideyuki Nakanishi, Kazuaki Tanaka, and Yuya Wada. 2014. Remote handshaking: touch enhances video-mediated social telepresence. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2143--2152.
[31]
Junya Nakanishi, Kaiko Kuwamura, Takashi Minato, Shuichi Nishio, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2013. Evoking affection for a communication partner by a robotic communication medium. In the First International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (iHAI 2013).
[32]
Junya Nakanishi, Hidenobu Sumioka, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2016. Impact of mediated intimate interaction on education: a huggable communication medium that encourages listening. Frontiers in psychology, Vol. 7 (2016), 510.
[33]
Kohei Ogawa, Shuichi Nishio, Kensuke Koda, Giuseppe Balistreri, Tetsuya Watanabe, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2011. Exploring the natural reaction of young and aged person with telenoid in a real world. JACIII, Vol. 15, 5 (2011), 592--597.
[34]
Miles L Patterson, Jack L Powell, and Mary G Lenihan. 1986. Touch, compliance, and interpersonal affect. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Vol. 10, 1 (1986), 41--50.
[35]
Shari Paulsell and Morton Goldman. 1984. The effect of touching different body areas on prosocial behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 122, 2 (1984), 269--273.
[36]
Michael Shermer. 2004. A bounty of science. Scientific American, Vol. 290, 2 (2004), 33--33.
[37]
Hidenobu Sumioka, Aya Nakae, Ryota Kanai, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2013. Huggable communication medium decreases cortisol levels. Scientific reports, Vol. 3 (2013).
[38]
Juulia T Suvilehto, Enrico Glerean, Robin IM Dunbar, Riitta Hari, and Lauri Nummenmaa. 2015. Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, 45 (2015), 13811--13816.
[39]
Hideyuki Takahashi, Midori Ban, Hirotaka Osawa, Junya Nakanishi, Hidenobu Sumioka, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2017. Huggable communication medium maintains level of trust during conversation game. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8 (2017), 1862.
[40]
James KS Teh, Zhenling Tsai, Jeffrey TKV Koh, and Adrian D Cheok. 2012. Mobile implementation and user evaluation of the Huggy Pajama system. In Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), 2012 IEEE. IEEE, 471--478.
[41]
Jan BF Van Erp and Alexander Toet. 2015. Social touch in human-computer interaction. Frontiers in digital humanities, Vol. 2 (2015), 2.
[42]
Sheryle J Whitcher and Jeffrey D Fisher. 1979. Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37, 1 (1979), 87.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Survey of Social Touch Interaction Between Humans and RobotsJournal of Robotics and Mechatronics10.20965/jrm.2020.p012832:1(128-135)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HAI '18: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
December 2018
402 pages
ISBN:9781450359535
DOI:10.1145/3284432
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 December 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. hearsay information
  2. huggable communication media
  3. impression bias

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • the Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO)

Conference

HAI '18
Sponsor:
HAI '18: 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
December 15 - 18, 2018
Southampton, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

HAI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 92 submissions, 43%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 121 of 404 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Survey of Social Touch Interaction Between Humans and RobotsJournal of Robotics and Mechatronics10.20965/jrm.2020.p012832:1(128-135)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media