skip to main content
10.1145/3286062.3286089acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Treads: Transparency-Enhancing Ads

Published: 15 November 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Online advertising platforms such as those of Facebook and Google collect detailed data about users, which they leverage to allow advertisers to target ads to users based on various pieces of user information. While most advertising platforms have transparency mechanisms in place to reveal this collected information to users, these often present an incomplete view of the information being collected and of how it is used for targeting ads, thus necessitating further transparency.
In this paper, we describe a novel transparency mechanism that can force transparency upon online advertising platforms: transparency-enhancing advertisements (Treads), which we define as targeted advertisements where the advertiser reveals information about their targeting to the end user. We envision that Treads would allow third-party organizations to act as transparency providers, by allowing users to opt-in and then targeting them with Treads. Through this process, users will have their platform-collected information revealed to them, but the transparency provider will not learn any more information than they would by running a normal ad. We demonstrate the feasibility of Treads by playing the role of a transparency provider: running Facebook ads targeting one of the authors and revealing partner data that Facebook hides from users but provides to advertisers (e.g., net worth). Overall, we believe that Treads can tilt the balance of power back towards users in terms of transparency of advertising platforms, and open promising new avenues for transparency in online advertising.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p169-venkatadri.mp4)

References

[1]
A. Andreou, G. Venkatadri, O. Goga, K. P. Gummadi, P. Loiseau, and A. Mislove. Investigating Ad Transparency Mechanisms in Social Media: A Case Study of Facebook's Explanations. NDSS, 2018.
[2]
About Customer Match. https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/6379332?hl=en.
[3]
C. Cadwalladr and E. Graham-Harrison. Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election.
[4]
A. Datta, M. C. Tschantz, and A. Datta. Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discrimination. PETS, 2015.
[5]
C. Dewey. 98 personal data points that Facebook uses to target ads to you. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/08/19/98-personal-data-points-that-facebook-uses-to-target-ads-to-you.
[6]
Facebook (Still) Letting Housing Advertisers Exclude Users by Race. https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-advertising-discrimination-housing-race-sex-national-origin.
[7]
Facebook Ads Preferences. https://www.facebook.com/ads/preferences.
[8]
Facebook Advertising Policy: Personal Attributes. https://www.facebook.com/policies/ads/prohibitedcontent/personalattributes.
[9]
Facebook Archive of Ads with Political Content. http://facebook.com/politicalcontentads/.
[10]
Facebook Enabled Advertisers to Reach 'Jew Haters'. https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-enabled-advertisers-to-reach-jew-haters.
[11]
Facebook Leaks Usernames, User IDs, and Personal Details to Advertisers. http://www.benedelman.org/news/052010-1.html.
[12]
Facebook Lets Advertisers Exclude Users by Race. https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-lets-advertisers-exclude-users-by-race/.
[13]
Facebook Messenger Chatbots Can Leak Your Private Information. https://www.techworm.net/2016/09/facebook-messenger-chatbots-can-leak-private-information.html.
[14]
Facebook adds human reviewers after 'Jew haters' ad scandal. http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41342642.
[15]
Facebook: What are my ad preferences and how can I adjust them? https://www.facebook.com/help/247395082112892.
[16]
Improving Enforcement and Promoting Diversity: Updates to Ads Policies and Tools. http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/02/improving-enforcement-and-promoting-diversity-updates-to-ads-policies-and-tools/.
[17]
Google Ads Settings. https://adssettings.google.com/.
[18]
Google Personalised Advertising Policy. https://support.google.com/adwordspolicy/answer/143465.
[19]
Google: About audience targeting. https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2497941?hl=en.
[20]
How Google uses Customer Match data. https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/6334160.
[21]
A. Korolova. Privacy Violations Using Microtargeted Ads: A Case Study. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, 3(1), 2011.
[22]
B. Krishnamurthy, K. Naryshkin, and C. E. Wills. Privacy leakage vs. Protection measures: the growing disconnect. IEEE W2SP, 2011.
[23]
B. Liu, A. Sheth, U. Weinsberg, J. Chandrashekar, and R. Govindan. AdReveal: Improving Transparency into Online Targeted Advertising. HotNets, 2013.
[24]
M. Lecuyer, G. Ducoffe, F. Lan, A. Papancea, T. Petsios, R. Spahn, A. Chaintreau, and R. Geambasu. XRay: Enhancing the Web's Transparency with Differential Correlation. USENIX Security, 2014.
[25]
M. Lecuyer, R. Spahn, Y. Spiliopolous, A. Chaintreau, R. Geambasu, and D. Hsu. Sunlight: Fine-grained Targeting Detection at Scale with Statistical Confidence. CCS, 2015.
[26]
C. Patricia, C. Ruben, C. Angel, and K. Mikko. Independent Auditing of Online Display Advertising Campaigns. HotNets, 2016.
[27]
J. Parra-Arnau, J. P. Achara, and C. Castelluccia. MyAdChoices: Bringing Transparency and Control to Online Advertising. ACM TWEB, 11, 2017.
[28]
Protecting Privacy with Referrers. Facebook Engineering's Notes. http://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/protecting-privacy-with-referrers/392382738919.
[29]
T. Speicher, M. Ali, G. Venkatadri, F. N. Ribeiro, G. Arvanitakis, F. Benevenuto, K. P. Gummadi, P. Loiseau, and A. Mislove. On the Potential for Discrimination in Online Targeted Advertising. FAT*, 2018.
[30]
Sandvig V. Sessions --- Challenge to CFAA Prohibition on Uncovering Racial Discrimination Online. https://www.aclu.org/cases/sandvig-v-sessions-challenge-cfaa-prohibition-uncovering-racial-discrimination-online.
[31]
Shutting Down Partner Categories. https://newsroom.fb.com/news/h/shutting-down-partner-categories/.
[32]
Tailored Audiences File Data. https://dev.twitter.com/ads/audiences/file-data.
[33]
Twitter Ads Policies. https://business.twitter.com/en/help/ads-policies/introduction-to-twitter-ads/twitter-ads-policies.html.
[34]
Twitter Ads Transparency Center. https://ads.twitter.com/transparency.
[35]
G. Venkatadri, E. Lucherini, P. Sapiezyński, and A. Mislove. Investigating sources of PII used in Facebook's targeted advertising. PETS, 2019.
[36]
G. Venkatadri, Y. Liu, A. Andreou, O. Goga, P. Loiseau, A. Mislove, and K. P. Gummadi. Privacy Risks with Facebook's PII-based Targeting: Auditing a Data Broker's Advertising Interface. IEEE S&P, 2018.
[37]
C. E. Wills and C. Tatar. Understanding What They Do with What They Know. WPES, 2012.
[38]
What Happens When I Upload My Customer List to Facebook? https://www.facebook.com/business/help/112061095610075.
[39]
What's a Custom Audience from a Customer List? https://www.facebook.com/business/help/341425252616329/.
[40]
Your Twitter data. https://twitter.com/settings/yourtwitterdata.
[41]
eyeWnder_Experiment. http://www.eyewnder.com/.

Cited By

View all

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HotNets '18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks
November 2018
191 pages
ISBN:9781450361200
DOI:10.1145/3286062
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 November 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

HotNets '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 110 of 460 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enhancing Transparency of Political Micro-targeting on FacebookCode and Conscience10.1007/978-3-031-52082-2_4(47-62)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
  • (2021)Blockchain-Based Smart Advertising Network With Privacy-Preserving AccountabilityIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering10.1109/TNSE.2020.30277968:3(2118-2130)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
  • (2020)Consent for targeted advertising: the case of FacebookAI & SOCIETY10.1007/s00146-020-00981-5Online publication date: 12-May-2020
  • (2020)Untangling Header Bidding LorePassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-030-44081-7_17(280-297)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2020
  • (2019)Discrimination through OptimizationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33593013:CSCW(1-30)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2019
  • (2019)Auditing Offline Data Brokers via Facebook's Advertising PlatformThe World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3308558.3313666(1920-1930)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
  • (undefined)How to Regulate (and Not Regulate) Social MediaSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.3484114

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media