skip to main content
10.1145/3287324.3287418acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Increasing Capacity for Computer Science Education in Rural Areas through a Large-Scale Collective Impact Model

Published:22 February 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Students living in rural areas are less likely to attend schools that offer computer science (CS) courses largely because educational institutions in these remote areas lack the resources to staff teaching positions for these courses. This study investigated the impact of WeTeach\_CS, a program designed to train teachers to become certified to teach high school CS in Texas. The WeTeach\_CS collective impact model may be well suited to influence rural areas at scale because it utilizes an existing network of organizations across the state to bring high-quality professional development opportunities to teachers in remote areas. Results from a comparative interrupted time series analysis showed a significant, positive change in the rate in which the number of certified CS teachers in rural areas increased during the period of time after WeTeach\_CS began compared to the period before the program was implemented, whereas the number of teachers certified in technology applications showed no such change. Furthermore, the growth rate in the number of certified CS teachers was much higher for rural schools than urban, suggesting that collective impact models like WeTeach\_CS may be especially beneficial for rural communities.

References

  1. Paulo Blikstein. 2018. Pre-college computer science education: A survey of the field. Report. https://goo.gl/gmS1Vm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. College Board. 2018. AP computer science expansion. Report. https://reports. collegeboard.org/ap-program-results/ap-computer-science-expansionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Charles T. Clotfelter, Elizabeth J. Glennie, Helen F. Ladd, and Jacob L. Vigdor. 2008. Teacher bonuses and teacher retention in low-performing schools. Public Finance Review 36, 1 (2008), 63--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jane L. David. 2008. Teacher recruitment incentives. Educational Leadership 65, 7 (2008), 84--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Li Feng and Tim R. Sass. 2018. The impact of incentives to recruit and retain teachers in hard-to-staff subjects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 37, 1 (2018), 112-135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Carol L. Fletcher. 2014. Building the Texas computer science pipeline: Strategic recommendations for success. Report. The University of Texas at Austin. https://www. thetrc.org/web/assets/files/pdfs/Building-the-Texas-CS-Pipeline_Fletcher.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. National Center for Education Statistics. 2014. Rural education in America. Data Table. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/tables/a.1.a.-2.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fay Hanleybrown, John Kania, and Mark Kramer. 2012. Channeling Change: Making Collective Impact Work. Stanford Social Innovation Review (2012). https: //ssir.org/articles/entry/channeling_change_making_collective_impact_workGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley E. Huitema. 2011. The analysis of covariance and alternatives: Statistical methods for experiments, quasi-experiments, and single-case studies (2nd edition). John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Google Inc. and Gallup Inc. 2015. Searching for computer science: Access and barriers in U.S. K-12 Education. Report. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/searching-for-computer-science_report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Google Inc. and Gallup Inc. 2016. Trends in the state of computer science in U.S. K-12 schools. Report. http://goo.gl/j291E0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Google Inc. and Gallup Inc. 2017. Computer science learning: Closing the Gap: Rural and Small Town School Districts. Report. http://goo.gl/hYxqCrGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. John Kania and Mark Kramer. 2011. Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review 9, 1 (2011), 36--41. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impactGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Guodong Liang and Motoko Akiba. 2015. Characteristics of teacher incentive pay programs: a statewide district survey. Journal of Educational Administration 53, 6 (2015), 702--717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Edward Liu, Susan Moore Johnson, and Heather G. Peske. 2004. New teachers and the Massachusetts signing bonus: The limits of inducements. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 26, 3 (2004), 217--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2018. Occupational Outlook Handbook. Report. U.S. Department of Labor,. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/ computer-and-information-technology/software-developers.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Alfred S. Posamentier and Joyce R. Coppin. 2005. How the nation's largest city is managing one of its severest math teacher shortages. The Mathematics Teacher 98, 9 (2005), 582--584. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27971820Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. The Hamilton Project. 2014. Career earnings by college major. http://www. hamiltonproject.org/charts/career_earnings_by_college_major/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Megan Smith. 2016. Computer science for all. https://obamawhitehouse.archives. gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-allGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jennifer L. Steele, Richard J. Murnane, and John B. Willett. 2010. Do financial incentives help low-performing schools attract and keep academically talented teachers? Evidence from California. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29, 3 (2010), 451--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Increasing Capacity for Computer Science Education in Rural Areas through a Large-Scale Collective Impact Model

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader