skip to main content
10.1145/3287324.3287484acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Food for Thought: Supporting African American Women's Computational Algorithmic Thinking in an Intro CS Course

Published:22 February 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

African American women who have little if any experience in computer programming prior to matriculation into college often struggle in introductory CS courses that emphasize programming from the outset. These same students feel underprepared and disadvantaged, oftentimes choosing to withdraw from such courses which contributes to the underrepresentation of African American women in CS. The challenge lies in creating equitable learning environments that bridge students' everyday experiences to fundamental CS concepts. In this experience report, we introduce the Dessert Wars Challenge, an alternative pedagogical strategy that leverages students' everyday experiences with food to forge meaningful connections to CS. We examine how African American women's participation in the Dessert Wars Challenge supports the development of their Computational Algorithmic Thinking (CAT) capabilities, the ability to design, implement, assess and adapt algorithms, and contributes to their retention in a college-level introductory CS course.

References

  1. Barker, L.J., McDowell, C., and Kalahar, K. (2009). Exploring Factors that Influence Computer Science Introductory Course Students to Persist in the Major. In Proceedings of the 40th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Chattanooga, Tennessee, March 2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Choi, Jaz Hee-jeong, Comber, Robert, & Linehan, Conor (2013) Food for thought : designing for critical reflection on food practices. Interactions, 20(1), pp. 46--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Clegg, T., Bonsignore, E., Yip, J., Gelderblom, H., Kuhn, A., Valenstein, T., Lewittes, B., and Druin, A. (2012). Technology for promoting scientific practice and personal meaning in life-relevant learning. In Proc. Interaction Design and Children 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cohoon, J.M. and Aspray, W. 2008. Retaining women in undergraduate computing. In Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006, 137--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins, Patricia Hill and Bilge, Sirma. 2016. Intersectionality. Polity Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Crenshaw, K., (1993). "Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics." In Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations, edited by D. K. Weisberg, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA pp. 383--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahlberg, T., Barnes, T., Buch, K., & Rorrer, A. (2011). "The STARS Alliance: viable Strategies for Attracting, Retaining, Supporting, and Developing Underrepresented Students in Computing," ACM Transactions on Computing Education 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, J. & Rebelsky, S. A. (2007). Food-first computer science: starting the first course right with PB&J. In Proceedings of ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education Conference (SIGCSE '07), pp. 372--376. Covington, KY USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Denning, P.J. and McGettrick, A. 2005. Recentering Computer Science. Communications of the ACM, 51:8, pp. 15--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ericson, Barbara, Parker, Miranda, and Engelman, Shelly (2016). Sisters Rise Up 4 CS: Helping female students pass the advanced placement computer science A exam. In Proceedings of ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education Conference (SIGCSE '16), pp. 309--314. Memphis, TN USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gardner, C. M., Clegg, T. L., Williams, O. L. & Kolodner, J. L., (2006). Messy learning environments: busy hands and less engaged minds. In Proc. International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2006), ISLS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Google Inc. & Gallup Inc. (2016, February). Computer Science Learning: Closing the Gap: Black Students. Findings from: Diversity Gaps in Computer Science: Exploring the Underrepresentation of Girls, Blacks and Hispanics (Issue Brief No. 2). Retrieved from https://goo.gl/FIhXKp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodari, A. K., Ong, M., Ko, L. T., & Kachchaf, R. R. (2014). New Enactments of Mentoring and Activism U.S. Women of Color in Computing Education and Careers. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International Computing Education Research Pp. 83--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lewandowski, G. and Morehead, A. (1998). Computer science through the eyes of dead monkeys: Learning styles and interaction in CS I. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Atlanta, Georgia, United States, February 26 - March 01, 1998). D. Joyce and J. Impagliazzo, Eds. SIGCSE '98. ACM Press, New York, NY, 312--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: an examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly Vol. 39, No. 1 January/February/March 2004. Pp. 38--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2015. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2015. Special Report NSF 15--311. Arlington, VA. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ong, M. 2011. The Status of Women of Color in Computer Science. Communications of the ACM, 54, 7, (Jul. 2011), 1--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rankin, Y. A. & Thomas, J. O. (2017). Leveraging Food as the Context for Developing Computational Algorithmic Thinking in an Entry Level College Course. In Y. A. Rankin & J. O. Thomas (Eds.) Moving Students of Color from Consumers to Producers of Technology. IGI Global Publishers Hershey, PA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Rankin, Y. A. & Thomas, J. O. (2016). Leveraging Food to Achieve 100% Retention in an Intro CS Course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rheingans, Penny, Dias-Espinoza, Crystal, D'Eramo, Erica, and Ireland, Danyelle (2018). A Model for Increasing Gender Diversity in Technology. In Proceedings of ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education Conference (SIGCSE '18), pp. 459--464, Baltimore, MD USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rowat, A. C., Naveen, N. S., Pia, M. S., Campàs, O., Castells, P., Rosenberg, D., Brenner, M. P., & Weitz, D. A. (2014). The kitchen as a physics classroom. Physics Education, Volume 49, Number 5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Schneider, G. M. & Gersting, J. L. (2013). Invitation to Computer Science, 6th Edition. Boston, MA: Course Technology, Cengage Learning, 4--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple SmithGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott, K. A., & White, M. A. (2013). CompuGirls' Standpoint Culturally Responsive Computing and Its Effect on Girls of Color. Urban Education September 2013 Vol. 48, No. 5 pp. 657--681.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Thomas, Jakita O., (2018). The Computational Algorithmic Thinking (CAT) Capability Flow: an approach to articulating CAT Capabilities over Time in African-American Middle-School Girls. In Proceedings of ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education Conference (SIGCSE '18), pp. 149--154. Baltimore, MD USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Thomas, J. O., Joseph, N., Williams, A.*, Crum, C.*, Burge, J. (2018). Speaking Truth To Power: Exploring the Intersectional Experiences of Black women in Computing. In J. Payton and G. Thiruvathukal (Eds.). (2018). Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference for Research On Equity & Sustained Participation in Computing, Engineering, & Technology (RESPECT ' 18). Baltimore, MD, USA: IEEE Xplore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomas, J. O. (2014). Supporting Computational Algorithmic Thinking (SCAT): Development of a complex cognitive capability in African-American middle-school girls. In Proceedings of ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education Conference (SIGCSE '14), (Atlanta, Georgia USA), ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking-What and why? The Link Magazine, Spring. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Retrieved from http://link.cs.cmu.edu/article.php?a=600Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Wing, J.M. (2006). Computational Thinking. In Communications of the ACM Viewpoint, March 2006, pp. 33--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Zarrett, N. R., & Malanchuk, O. (2005). Who's Computing? Gender and race differences in young adults' decisions to pursue an information technology career. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 65--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zweben, S. & Bizot, B. (2017). Taulbee 2015 Survey Continued Booming Undergraduate CS Enrollment; Doctoral Degree Production Dips Slightly. Computing Research News May 2017 Vol 28/No. 5, pp. 2 -60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Food for Thought: Supporting African American Women's Computational Algorithmic Thinking in an Intro CS Course

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 2019
      1364 pages
      ISBN:9781450358903
      DOI:10.1145/3287324

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 February 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate169of526submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
      November 30 - December 1, 2024
      Virtual Event , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader