skip to main content
research-article

Permeability, Interoperability, and Velocity: Entangled Dimensions of Infrastructural Grind at the Intersection of Blockchain and Shipping

Published: 13 December 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Blockchain can potentially be appropriated as a social computing technology, which enables transactions across people and artefacts via a large socio-technical information infrastructure constituted by the actions of multiple people and computers. However, Blockchain is not a social computing technology a priori; instead to emerge as one, much effort and work is required to radically transform existing domains, including wrestling with traditions, standards, and legacy. In this article, we expand on previous work on Blockchain as an information infrastructure, and on the notion of infrastructural grind. Infrastructural grind allows us to analytically explore how the emerging Blockchain technology is appropriated into established business domains, in our case the shipping industry. We present ethnographic data unpacking three different accounts of infrastructural grind taking place at the intersection of the shipping and the Blockchain information infrastructures. The results demonstrate that infrastructural grind occurs as a result of various infrastructuring activities taking place at different intersections between the two infrastructures and is constituted of the sum of these activities. We propose a framework in which infrastructural grind is constituted of three entangled dimensions: permeability, interoperability, and velocity. These socio-technical dimensions relate to infrastructural properties such as legacy, embeddedness, and standards, as well as to technical properties of specific solutions deployed at specific points of infrastructural grind. Our analysis shows that these dimensions are enacted differently along the shipping supply chain, and depending on the dynamic interplay between them at various points of infrastructural grind. At different points in time, the infrastructural grind between Blockchain and the shipping domain will thus manifest itself differently and at differential velocity.

References

[1]
Madeleine Akrich, Michel Callon, and Bruno Latour. 2002. The key to success in innovation. Part 1: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management 6, 2 (2002), 187--206.
[2]
Madeleine Akrich, Michel Callon, and Bruno Latour. 2002. The key to success in innovation. Part 2: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management 6, 2 (2002), 207--225.
[3]
James Basden and Michael Cottrell. 2017. How utilities are using blockchain to modernize the grid. Harvard Business Review, March 2017.
[4]
Matthew Bietz, Eric P. S. Baumer, and Charlotte P. Lee. 2010. Synergizing in cyberinfrastructure development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (JCSCW).
[5]
Pernille Bjørn and Nina Boulus-Rødje. 2015. The multiple intersecting sites of design in CSCW research. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal 24, 3 (2015), 319--351.
[6]
Pernille Bjørn and Nina Boulus. 2011. Dissenting in reflective conversations: Critical components of doing action research. Action Research Journal 9, 3 (2011), 282--302.
[7]
Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out—Classifications and Its Consequences. MIT Press.
[8]
Geoffrey C. Bowker. 1994. Science on the run: Information management and industrial geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920--1940. MIT, Cambridge.
[9]
Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design (PDC’08). 92--101.
[10]
Xianyi Gao, Gradeigh D. Clark, and Janne Lindqvist. 2016. Of two minds, multiple addresses, and one ledger: Characterizing opinions, knowledge, and perceptions of bitcoin across users and non-users. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1656--1668.
[11]
Jonathan Grudin and Rebecca E. Grinter. 1995. Ethnography and design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal 3, 1 (1995), 55--59.
[12]
R. Stuart Geiger and David Ribes. 2011. Trace ethnography: Following coordination through documentary practices. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[13]
Ole Hanseth, Eric Monteiro, and Morten Hatling. 1996. Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardisation and flexibility. Science, Technology and Human Values 11, 4 (1996), 407--426.
[14]
Karim Jabbar and Pernille Bjørn. 2017. Growing the Blockchain information infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[15]
Karim Jabbar and Pernille Bjørn. 2018. Infrastructural grind: Introducing Blockchain technology in the shipping domain. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork (GROUP’18). 297--308.
[16]
Karim Jabbar, Deanna MacDonald, and Simon Ousager. 2017. Token Gesture? FutureNautics, Issue 15, Q2 2017, Quaterly.
[17]
Yong Ming Kow and Caitlin Lustig. 2017. Imaginaries and crystallization processes in bitcoin infrastructuring. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
[18]
Margaret Jack, Jay Chen, and Steven J. Jackson. 2017. Infrastructure as creative action: Online buying, selling, and delivery in Phnom Penh. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[19]
Helena Karasti, Karen S. Baker, and Florence Millerand. 2010. Infrastructure time: Long-term matters in collaborative development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (JCSCW).
[20]
Erol Kazan, Chee-Wee Tan, and Eric T. K. Lim. 2015. Value creation in cryptocurrency networks: Towards a taxonomy of digital business models for bitcoin companies. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2015).
[21]
Tue Odd Langhoff, Mikkel Hvid Amstrup, Peter Mørck, and Pernille Bjørn. 2016. Infrastructures for healthcare: From synergy to reverse synergy. Health Informatics Journal.
[22]
George E. Marcus. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24, 95--117.
[23]
Eric Monteiro, Neil Pollock, Ole Hanseth, and Robin Williams. 2013. From artefacts to infrastructures. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing (JCSCW). 22, 4 (2013), 575--607.
[24]
Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved form bitcoin.org (5 February 2016)
[25]
Volkmar Pipek and Volker Wulf. 2009. Infrastructuring: Towards an integrated prospective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association of Information Systems. 10, 5 (2009), 306--332.
[26]
Larissa Pschetz, Ella Tallyn, Rory Gianni, and Chris Speed. 2017. Bitbarista: Exploring perceptions of data transactions in the internet of things. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[27]
David Ribes. 2014. The kernel of a research institution. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing. 574--587.
[28]
David Ribes and Thomas A. Finholt. 2009. The long now of infrastructure: Articulating tensions in development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10, 5 (2009), 375--398.
[29]
Terje Aksel Sanner, Tiwonge Davis Manda, and Petter Nielsen. 2014. Grafting: Balancing control and cultivation in information infrastructure innovation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 15, 4, Article 1.
[30]
Corina Sas and Irni Eliana Kahairuddin. 2017. Design for trust: An exploration of the challenges and opportunities of bitcoin users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[31]
Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information systems. Information Systems Research 7, 1 (1996), 111--134.
[32]
Susan Leigh Star. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43, 377--391.
[33]
Susan Leigh Star and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science 19, 387--420.
[34]
Marcie Tyre and Wanda Orlikowski. 1994. Windows of opportunities: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science 5, 1 (1994), 98--118.
[35]
Aviv Zohar. 2015. Bitcoin under the hood. Communications of the ACM 58, 9 (2015), 104--113.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)The Ripple Effect of Information InfrastructuresComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-024-09509-7Online publication date: 4-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Achieving Symmetry in Synchronous Interaction in Hybrid Work is ImpossibleACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/364861731:4(1-34)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Blockchain in the shipping industryProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.354219:C(807-814)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Permeability, Interoperability, and Velocity: Entangled Dimensions of Infrastructural Grind at the Intersection of Blockchain and Shipping

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Social Computing
      ACM Transactions on Social Computing  Volume 1, Issue 3
      Special Issue on Group ’18 and Regular Papers
      September 2018
      95 pages
      EISSN:2469-7826
      DOI:10.1145/3297860
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 13 December 2018
      Accepted: 01 June 2018
      Revised: 01 June 2018
      Received: 01 February 2018
      Published in TSC Volume 1, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Blockchain
      2. embeddedness
      3. entrepreneurship
      4. information infrastructures
      5. shipping
      6. socio-technical
      7. supply chain

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2025)The Ripple Effect of Information InfrastructuresComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-024-09509-7Online publication date: 4-Jan-2025
      • (2024)Achieving Symmetry in Synchronous Interaction in Hybrid Work is ImpossibleACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/364861731:4(1-34)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
      • (2023)Blockchain in the shipping industryProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.354219:C(807-814)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
      • (2022)Blockchain and Beyond: Understanding Blockchains Through Prototypes and Public EngagementACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/350346229:5(1-73)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2022
      • (2021)Threats, Vulnerabilities and Security Functions in Critical Information Infrastructure2021 8th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE)10.1109/ICITACEE53184.2021.9617515(113-117)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2021
      • (2021)Use Of Blockchain As A Resource For Combating Corruption In Global Shipping: An Interpretive Case StudyJournal of Management Information Systems10.1080/07421222.2021.191291938:2(338-373)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2021
      • (2019)Blockchain in der maritimen LogistikBlockchain10.1007/978-3-658-28006-2_12(235-256)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2019

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media