skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300301acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TORC: A Virtual Reality Controller for In-Hand High-Dexterity Finger Interaction

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent hand-held controllers have explored a variety of haptic feedback sensations for users in virtual reality by producing both kinesthetic and cutaneous feedback from virtual objects. These controllers are grounded to the user's hand and can only manipulate objects through arm and wrist motions, not using the dexterity of their fingers as they would in real life. In this paper, we present TORC, a rigid haptic controller that renders virtual object characteristics and behaviors such as texture and compliance. Users hold and squeeze TORC using their thumb and two fingers and interact with virtual objects by sliding their thumb on TORC's trackpad. During the interaction, vibrotactile motors produce sensations to each finger that represent the haptic feel of squeezing, shearing or turning an object. Our evaluation showed that using TORC, participants could manipulate virtual objects more precisely (e.g., position and rotate objects in 3D) than when using a conventional VR controller.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper071p.mp4

mp4

1.9 MB

pn1999.mp4

mp4

65.7 MB

paper071.mp4

mp4

266.4 MB

References

  1. Parastoo Abtahi and Sean Follmer. 2018. Visuo-Haptic Illusions for Improving the Perceived Performance of Shape Displays. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Merwan Achibet, Maud Marchal, Ferran Argelaguet, and Anatole Lecuyer. 2014. The Virtual Mitten: A novel interaction paradigm for visuo-haptic manipulation of objects using grip force. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 59--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Michael J Adams, Simon A Johnson, Philippe Lefèvre, Vincent Lévesque, Vincent Hayward, Thibaut André, and Jean-Louis Thonnard. 2013. Finger pad friction and its role in grip and touch. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 10, 80 (3 2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ferran Argelaguet, David Antonio GÃmez Jáuregui, Maud Marchal, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2013. Elastic images: Perceiving local elasticity of images through a novel pseudo-haptic deformation effect. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 10, 3 (2013), 17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hrvoje Benko, Christian Holz, Mike Sinclair, and Eyal Ofek. 2016. NormalTouch and TextureTouch: High-fidelity 3D Haptic Shape Rendering on Handheld Virtual Reality Controllers. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '16). ACM, New York, 717--728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Christopher C Berger and Mar Gonzalez-Franco. 2018. Expanding the Sense of Touch Outside the Body. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, Vol. SAP '18. ACM, Vancouver, 10:1-- 10:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Christopher C Berger, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Eyal Ofek, and Ken Hinckley. 2018. The uncanny valley of haptics. Science Robotics 3, 17 (4 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ray Bittner and Mike Sinclair. 2009. VersaPatch: A Low Cost 2.5D Capacitive Touch Sensor. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 407--416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Conrad Bullion and Hakan Gurocak. 2009. Haptic Glove with MR Brakes for Distributed Finger Force Feedback. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 18, 6 (12 2009), 421--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Francesco Chinello, Claudio Pacchierotti, Monica Malvezzi, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2018. A Three Revolute-Revolute-Spherical Wearable Fingertip Cutaneous Device for Stiffness Rendering. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 11, 1 (1 2018), 39--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Inrak Choi, Heather Culbertson, Mark R. Miller, Alex Olwal, and Sean Follmer. 2017. Grabity: A Wearable Haptic Interface for Simulating Weight and Grasping in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '17). ACM, New York, 119--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Inrak Choi, Elliot W. Hawkes, David L. Christensen, Christopher J. Ploch, and Sean Follmer. 2016. Wolverine: A wearable haptic interface for grasping in virtual reality. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 986--993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Inrak Choi, Eyal Ofek, Hrvoje Benko, Mike Sinclair, and Christian Holz. 2018. CLAW: A Multifunctional Handheld Haptic Controller for Grasping, Touching, and Triggering in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. H. Culbertson and K. J. Kuchenbecker. 2015. Should haptic texture vibrations respond to user force and speed?. In 2015 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC). 106--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. H. Culbertson, J. Unwin, and K. J. Kuchenbecker. 2014. Modeling and Rendering Realistic Textures from Unconstrained Tool-Surface Interactions. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 7, 3 (7 2014), 381--393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mark R Cutkosky. 1989. On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks. IEEE Transactions on robotics and automation 5, 3 (1989), 269--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ravin de Souza, Sahar El-Khoury, Jos Santos-Victor, and Aude Billard. 2015. Recognizing the grasp intention from human demonstration. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 74, PA (12 2015), 108--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Brian Dellon and Yoky Matsuoka. 2007. Prosthetics, exoskeletons, and rehabilitation {grand challenges of robotics}. IEEE robotics & automation magazine 14, 1 (2007), 30--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. L. Dominjon, A. Lecuyer, J. Burkhardt, P. Richard, and S. Richir. 2005. Influence of control/display ratio on the perception of mass of manipulated objects in virtual environments. In IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005. IEEE, 19--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Thomas Feix, Javier Romero, Heinz-Bodo Schmiedmayer, Aaron M. Dollar, and Danica Kragic. 2016. The GRASP Taxonomy of Human Grasp Types. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 46, 1 (2 2016), 66--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mar Gonzalez-Franco and Jaron Lanier. 2017. Model of Illusions and Virtual Reality., 1125 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Antonella Maselli, DInei Florencio, Nikolai Smolyanskiy, and Zhengyou Zhang. 2017. Concurrent talking in immersive virtual reality: On the dominance of visual speech cues. Scientific Reports (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mar Gonzalez-Franco and Tabitha C. Peck. 2018. Avatar Embodiment. Towards a Standardized Questionnaire. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (6 2018), 74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Xiaochi Gu, Yifei Zhang, Weize Sun, Yuanzhe Bian, Dao Zhou, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2016. Dexmo: An Inexpensive and Lightweight Mechanical Exoskeleton for Motion Capture and Force Feedback in VR. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, 1991-1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Seongkook Heo and Geehyuk Lee. 2017. Vibrotactile Compliance Feedback for Tangential Force Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 10, 3 (7 2017), 444--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ronan Hinchet, Velko Vechev, Herbert Shea, and Otmar Hilliges. 2018. DextrES. In The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 901-- 912. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. HyunKi In, Kyu-Jin Cho, KyuRi Kim, and BumSuk Lee. 2011. Jointless structure and under-actuation mechanism for compact hand exoskeleton. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hyunki In, Brian Byunghyun Kang, MinKi Sin, and Kyu-Jin Cho. 2015. Exo-Glove: A Wearable Robot for the Hand with a Soft Tendon Routing System. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 22, 1 (3 2015), 97--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Johan Kildal. 2011. Tangible 3D Haptics on Touch Surfaces: Virtual Compliance. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). ACM, New York, 1123--1128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Johan Kildal. 2012. Kooboh: Variable Tangible Properties in a Handheld Haptic-Illusion Box. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 191--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hwan Kim, HyeonBeom Yi, Hyein Lee, and Woohun Lee. 2018. HapCube: A Wearable Tactile Device to Provide Tangential and Normal Pseudo-Force Feedback on a Fingertip. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, 1--501. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sunjun Kim and Geehyuk Lee. 2013. Haptic feedback design for a virtual button along force-displacement curves. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '13. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 91--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Seung-Chan Kim, Chong Hui Kim, Tae-Hon Yang, Gi-Hun Yang, SungChul Kang, and Dong-Soo Kwon. 2008. SaLT: Small and lightweight tactile display using ultrasonic actuators. In RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 430--435.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Yeongmi Kim, Ian Oakley, and Jeha Ryu. 2014. Combining Point Force Haptic and Pneumatic Tactile Displays LAMS: Location Aware Multimedia Storytelling View project YouGrabber View project Combining Point Force Haptic and Pneumatic Tactile Displays. Technical Report. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252603525Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Roberta L. Klatzky and Susan Lederman. 1990. Intelligent Exploration by the Human Hand. In Dextrous Robot Hands. Springer New York, New York, NY, 66--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Inwook Koo, Brian Byunghyun Kang, and Kyu-Jin Cho. 2013. Development of Hand Exoskeleton using Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Combined with Linkage. Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering 30, 11 (11 2013), 1217--1224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Anatole Lécuyer. 2009. Simulating Haptic Feedback Using Vision: A Survey of Research and Applications of Pseudo-Haptic Feedback. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 18, 1 (2 2009), 39--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Anatole Lecuyer. 2017. Playing with Senses in VR: Alternate Perceptions Combining Vision and Touch. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 37, 1 (2017), 20--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Anatole Lécuyer, Jean-Marie Burkhardt, and Laurent Etienne. 2004. Feeling bumps and holes without a haptic interface. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '04. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 239--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. A. Lecuyer, S. Coquillart, A. Kheddar, P. Richard, and P. Coiffet. 2000. Pseudo-haptic feedback: can isometric input devices simulate force feedback?. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 (Cat. No.00CB37048). IEEE Comput. Soc, 83--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Susan J. Lederman and Lynette A. Jones. 2011. Tactile and Haptic Illusions. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 4, 4 (10 2011), 273--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Christine L MacKenzie and Thea Iberall. 1994. The grasping hand. Vol. 104. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Kouta Minamizawa, Souichiro Fukamachi, Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Naoki Kawakami, and Susumu Tachi. 2007. Gravity grabber: wearable haptic display to present virtual mass sensation. ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 emerging technologies (2007), 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. A.M. Okamura, N. Smaby, and M.R. Cutkosky. 2000. An overview of dexterous manipulation. In Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065), Vol. 1. IEEE, 255--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. George L Peterson and Thomas C Brown. 1998. Economic Valuation by the Method of Paired Comparison, with Emphasis on Evaluation of the Transitivity Axiom. Land Economics 74(2), May (1998), 240--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. William R. Provancher, Mark R. Cutkosky, Katherine J. Kuchenbecker, and Gijnter Niemeyer. 2005. Contact Location Display for Haptic Perception of Curvature and Object Motion. The International Journal of Robotics Research 24, 9 (9 2005), 691--702. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jun Rekimoto. 2013. Traxion. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '13. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 427--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. I. Sarakoglou, N. Tsagarakis, and D.G. Caldwell. 2005. A Portable Fingertip Tactile Feedback Array Transmission System Reliability and Modelling. In First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. IEEE, 547--548. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Samuel B. Schorr and Allison M. Okamura. 2017. Fingertip Tactile Devices for Virtual Object Manipulation and Exploration. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 3115--3119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Evan Strasnick, Christian Holz, Eyal Ofek, Mike Sinclair, and Hrvoje Benko. 2018. Haptic Links: Bimanual Haptics for Virtual Reality Using Variable Stiffness Actuation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, 1--644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Jacob Thorn, Rodrigo Pizarro, Bernhard Spanlang, Pablo BermellGarcia, and Mar Gonzalez-Franco. 2016. Assessing 3D Scan Quality Through Paired-comparisons Psychophysics. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference - MM '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 147--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Krist Vaesen. 2012. The cognitive bases of human tool use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35, 4 (2012), 203--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Yon Visell, Bruno L. Giordano, Guillaume Millet, and Jeremy R. Cooperstock. 2011. Vibration Influences Haptic Perception of Surface Compliance During Walking. PLoS ONE 6, 3 (3 2011), e17697.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Eric Whitmire, Hrvoje Benko, Christian Holz, Eyal Ofek, and Mike Sinclair. 2018. Haptic Revolver: Touch, Shear, Texture, and Shape Rendering on a Reconfigurable Virtual Reality Controller. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, 86:1--86:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Vibol Yem, Ryuta Okazaki, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2016. FinGAR. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Emerging Technologies on - SIGGRAPH '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Vibol Yem, Kevin Vu, Yuki Kon, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2018. Effect of Electrical Stimulation Haptic Feedback on Perceptions of SoftnessHardness and Stickiness While Touching a Virtual Object. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 89--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. T. Yoshioka, S. J. Bensmaïa, J. C. Craig, and S. S. Hsiao. 2007. Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: An analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration. Somatosensory & Motor Research 24, 1--2 (1 2007), 53--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Sung-Sik Yun, Brian Byunghyun Kang, and Kyu-Jin Cho. 2017. ExoGlove PM: An Easily Customizable Modularized Pneumatic Assistive Glove. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2, 3 (7 2017), 1725--1732.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Andre Zenner and Antonio Kruger. 2017. Shifty: A Weight-Shifting Dynamic Passive Haptic Proxy to Enhance Object Perception in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 4 (4 2017), 1285--1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. TORC: A Virtual Reality Controller for In-Hand High-Dexterity Finger Interaction

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 2019
          9077 pages
          ISBN:9781450359702
          DOI:10.1145/3290605

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 May 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format