skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300392acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Paragraph-based Faded Text Facilitates Reading Comprehension

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

We propose a new text layout that facilitates reading comprehension. By sequentially fading out characters sentence-by-sentence from the beginning of each paragraph, we highlight the paragraph structure of the entire text and the relative positions of the sentences. To evaluate the effectiveness of the paragraph-based faded text in a reading comprehension, we measure the comprehension, eye movements, and recognition for both the proposed method and a conventional standard method. In the proposed method, rates of correct answers to text comprehension questions are improved. Moreover, the proposed method leads to slower reading speeds and better recognition rates for the first sentences of paragraphs, which are displayed in a relatively thicker mode. With the paragraph-based faded text, the reader is naturally facilitated to pay attention to the first sentence of each paragraph, suggesting that this reading style could result in a more accurate text comprehension.

References

[1]
Jason E. Albrecht and Jerome L. Myers. 1995. Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, 6 (1995), 1459--1468.
[2]
David P Ausubel. 1963. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Grune & Stratton, Oxford, England.
[3]
Simone Benedetto, Andrea Carbone, Marco Pedrotti, Kevin Le Fevre, Linda Amel Yahia Bey, and Thierry Baccino. 2015. Rapid serial visual presentation in reading: The case of Spritz. Computers in Human Behavior 45 (2015), 352--358.
[4]
H. Bouma and A.H. De Voogd. 1974. On the control of eye saccades in reading. Vision Research 14, 4 (1974), 273--284.
[5]
Gordon H. Bower and Daniel G. Morrow. 1990. Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science 247, 4938 (1990), 44--48.
[6]
John D. Bransford, J. Richard Barclay, and Jeffery J. Franks. 1972. Sen­ tence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology 3, 2 (1972), 193--209.
[7]
Monica S. Castelhano and Paul Muter. 2001. Optimizing the reading of electronic text using rapid serial visual presentation. Behaviour and Information Technology 20, 4 (2001), 237--247.
[8]
Hsuan-Chih Chen. 1986. Effects of reading span and textual coherence on rapid-sequential reading. Memory & Cognition 14, 3 (1986), 202--208.
[9]
Charles Clifton. 2012. Comprehension of discourse. In Psychology of Reading, Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek, Jane Ashby, and Charles Clifton, Jr. (Eds.). Psychology Press, Chapter 9, 245--276.
[10]
Thomas G. Cocklin, Nicklas J. Ward, Hsuan-Chih Chen, and James F. Juola. 1984. Factors influencing readability of rapidly presented text segments. Memory & Cognition 12, 5 (1984), 431--442.
[11]
Craig Darch and Russell Gersten. 1986. Direction-setting activities in reading comprehension: A comparison of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly 9, 3 (1986), 235--243.
[12]
Connor Diemand-Yauman, Daniel M. Oppenheimer, and Erikka B. Vaughan. 2011. Fortune favors the Bold (and the Italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition 118, 1 (2011), 111--115.
[13]
John Dunlosky, Katherine A. Rawson, Elizabeth J. Marsh, Mitchell J. Nathan, and Daniel T. Willingham. 2013. Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14, 1 (2013), 4--58.
[14]
Kenneth I. Forster. 1970. Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics 8, 4 (jul 1970), 215--221.
[15]
Robert L. Fowler and Anne S. Barker. 1974. Effectiveness of highlight­ ing for retention of text material. Journal of Applied Psychology 59, 3 (1974), 358--364.
[16]
Darryl Francis. 2018. Introducing Sans Forgetica. Word Ways 51, 4 (2018), 1.
[17]
Morton A. Gernsbacher, Kathleen R. Varner, and Mark E. Faust. 1990. Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16, 3 (1990), 430--445.
[18]
Arthur M Glenberg, Marion Meyer, and Karen Lindem. 1987. Men­ tal models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 26, 1 (1987), 69--83.
[19]
Shawn M. Glynn, Bruce K. Britton, and K. Denise Muth. 1985. Textcomprehension strategies based on outlines. The Journal of Experi­ mental Education 53, 3 (1985), 129--135.
[20]
William Grabe and Fredricka L. Stoller. 2013. Teaching and researching: Reading (2 ed.). Taylor and Francis, New York, NY, USA.
[21]
Arthur C. Graesser, Murray Singer, and Tom Trabasso. 1994. Construct­ ing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review 101, 3 (1994), 371--395.
[22]
Sarah Guri-Rozenblit. 1989. Effects of a tree diagram on students' comprehension of main ideas in an expository text with multiple themes. Reading Research Quarterly 24, 2 (1989), 236--247.
[23]
Karl Haberlandt. 1980. Story grammar and reading time of story constituents. Poetics 9, 1--3 (1980), 99--118.
[24]
James Hartley and Ivor K. Davies. 1976. Preinstructional strategies: The role of pretests, behavioral objectives, overviews and advance organizers. Review of Educational Research 46, 2 (1976), 239--265.
[25]
Wayne A. Hershberger and Donald F. Terry. 1965. Typographical cuing in conventional and programed texts. Journal of Applied Psychology 49, 1 (1965), 55--60.
[26]
Jukka Hyönä. 1994. Processing of topic shifts by adults and children. Reading Research Quarterly 29, 1 (1994), 76.
[27]
Jukka Hyönä and Robert F Lorch. 2004. Effects of topic headings on text processing: evidence from adult readers' eye fixation patterns. Learning and Instruction 14, 2 (2004), 131--152.
[28]
Takashi Ichikawa. 1978. Introduction to writing theory for Japanese language education. Kyoiku-shuppan, Tokyo, Japan. (in Japanese).
[29]
Philip N Johnson-Laird. 1983. Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[30]
Toshio Kawashima, Takanori Terashima, Takeshi Nagasaki, Masashi Toda, Gunter Grieser, and Yuzuru Tanaka. 2005. Enhancing Visual Perception Using Dynamic Updating of Display. In Intuitive Hu­ man Interfaces for Organizing and Accessing Intellectual Assets, Gunter Grieser and Yuzuru Tanaka (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3359. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 127--141.
[31]
Walter Kintsch. 1988. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehen­ sion: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review 95, 2 (1988), 163--182.
[32]
Walter Kintsch. 1998. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cam­ bridge University Press, New York, NY, US.
[33]
Walter Kintsch and Teun A. van Dijk. 1978. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 85, 5 (1978), 363--394.
[34]
John R Kirby and Robert H Cantwell. 1985. Use of advance organizers to facilitate higher-level text comprehension. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications 4, 3 (1985), 159--168.
[35]
Jumpei Kobayashi, Takashi Sekiguchi, Eiji Shinbori, and Toshio Kawashima. 2015. Stepped-line text layout with phrased segmentation for readability improvement of Japanese electronic text. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM 2015). IEEE, 553--558.
[36]
Jumpei Kobayashi, Takashi Sekiguchi, Eiji Shinbori, and Toshio Kawashima. 2017. Readability of Japanese electronic text with bunsetsu-based layouts. Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 32, 2 (2017), A--AI30_1--24. (in Japanese).
[37]
Byungjoo Lee, Olli Savisaari, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2016. Spotlights: Attention-optimized highlights for skim reading. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). 5203--5214.
[38]
Kirsti Lonka, Sari Lindblom-Ylänne, and Sini Maury. 1994. The effect of study strategies on learning from text. Learning and Instruction 4, 3 (1994), 253--271.
[39]
Michael E. J. Masson. 1983. Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory & Cognition 11, 3 (1983), 262--274.
[40]
Richard E. Mayer. 1979. Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research 49, 2 (1979), 371--383.
[41]
Phillip J. Moore, Lorna K. S. Chan, and Wing K. Au. 1993. High school students' use of diagrams during reading. Journal of Research in Reading 16, 1 (1993), 57--71.
[42]
OECD. 2017. PISA for development assessment and analytical framework: Reading, mathematics and science. OECD Publishing, Paris.
[43]
Alice C. Omaggio. 1979. Pictures and second language comprehension: Do they help? Foreign Language Annals 12, 2 (1979), 107--116.
[44]
Naoyuki Osaka (Ed.). 1998. Reading. Asakura Publishing, Tokyo, Japan. (in Japanese).
[45]
Yuki Otsuka, Masanao Morishita, Hirohito Kondo, and Naoyuki Osaka. 2003. Relationship between reading comprehension and inhibitory mechanism in working memory. The Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science 21, 2 (2003), 131--136.
[46]
Charles Perfetti and Joseph Stafura. 2014. Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading 18, 1 (2014), 22--37.
[47]
Keith Rayner. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information pro­ cessing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124, 3 (1998), 372--422.
[48]
Gary S. Rubin and Kathleen Turano. 1992. Reading without saccadic eye movements. Vision Research 32, 5 (1992), 895--902.
[49]
Tomoyuki Uchida and Hidehiko Tanaka. 1997. An interactive docu­ ment coloring system for legible expression. The transactions of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers 80, 12 (1997), 3173--3180.
[50]
Paul van den Broek, Michael Young, Yuhtsuen Tzeng, and Tracy Lin­ derholm. 1999. The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the one-line construction of memory representation. In The construction of mental representations during reading, Herre van Oostendorp and Susan R. Goldman (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Chapter 3, 71--98.
[51]
Teun Adrianus van Dijk and Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of dis­ course comprehension. Academic Press, New York.
[52]
Rolf A Zwaan. 2016. Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23, 4 (2016), 1028--1034.
[53]
Rolf A Zwaan, Gabriel A Radvansky, Amy E Hilliard, and Jacqueline M Curiel. 1998. Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 2, 3 (1998), 199--220.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Predicting Behaviour Patterns in Online and PDF Magazines with AI Eye-TrackingBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1408067714:8(677)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2024
  • (2024)SummarFlex: Exploring Personalized News Filtering and Reading with Query-Focused Hierarchical SummarizationCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3681854(216-222)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
  • (2023)CASESProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36109107:3(1-31)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2019
9077 pages
ISBN:9781450359702
DOI:10.1145/3290605
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. eye movements
  2. reading
  3. text comprehension
  4. text layout

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CHI '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 703 of 2,958 submissions, 24%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)80
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Predicting Behaviour Patterns in Online and PDF Magazines with AI Eye-TrackingBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1408067714:8(677)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2024
  • (2024)SummarFlex: Exploring Personalized News Filtering and Reading with Query-Focused Hierarchical SummarizationCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3681854(216-222)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
  • (2023)CASESProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36109107:3(1-31)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Accessible Text Tools for People with Cognitive Impairments and Non-Native Readers: Challenges and OpportunitiesProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202310.1145/3603555.3603569(250-266)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Investigating the Design of Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) Messages Targeting Eating BehaviorsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Southeast Conference10.1145/3564746.3587028(144-148)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Soliloquy: Fostering Poetry Comprehension Using an Interactive Think-aloud VisualizationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581374(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)CReBotInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102898167:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2022
  • (2020)Automatic Text Simplification Tools for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Adults: Benefits of Lexical Simplification and Providing Users with AutonomyProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376563(1-13)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media