Colin M. Gray
Shruthi Sai Chivukula
ABSTRACT
HCI scholars have become increasingly interested in describing the complex nature of UX practice. In parallel, HCI and STS scholars have sought to describe the ethical and value-laden relationship between designers and design outcomes. However, little research describes the ethical engagement of UX practitioners as a form of design complexity, including the multiple mediating factors that impact ethical awareness and decision-making. In this paper, we use a practice-led approach to describe ethical complexity, presenting three varied cases of UX practitioners based onin situ observations and interviews. In each case, we describe salient factors relating to ethical mediation, including organizational practices, self-driven ethical principles, and unique characteristics of specific projects the practitioner is engaged in. Using the concept of mediation from activity theory, we provide a rich account of practitioners' ethical decision making. We propose future work on ethical awareness and design education based on the concept of ethical mediation.
Supplemental Material
- Anders Albrechtslund. 2007. Ethics and technology design. Ethics and information technology 9, 1 (March 2007), 63--72. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Julian Baggini and Peter S Fosl. 2007. The ethics toolkit: a compendium of ethical concepts and methods. Blackwell Pub. https://market.android.com/details?id=book-ikvXAAAAMAAJGoogle Scholar
- Olav W Bertelsen and Susanne Bødker. 2003. Activity Theory. In HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks. Elsevier, 291--324.Google Scholar
- Alan Borning and Michael Muller. 2012. Next steps for value sensitive design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1125--1134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77--101.Google Scholar
- Harry Brignull. 2011. Dark Patterns: Deception vs. Honesty in UI Design. Interaction Design, Usability 338 (Nov. 2011), 338. https://alistapart.com/article/dark-patterns-deception-vs.-honesty-in-ui-designGoogle Scholar
- Amy Bruckman. 2014. Research Ethics and HCI. In Ways of Knowing in HCI, Judith S Olson and Wendy A Kellogg (Eds.). Springer New York, New York, NY, 449--468.Google Scholar
- Ryan C Campbell, Ken Yasuhara, and Denise Wilson. 2012. Care ethics in engineering education: Undergraduate student perceptions of responsibility. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Phil F Carspecken. 1996. Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
- Anthony Faiola. 2007. The Design Enterprise: Rethinking the HCI Education Paradigm. Design Issues 23, 3 (July 2007), 30--45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Fallman. 2003. Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 225--232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Madison Fansher, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, and Colin M Gray. 2018. #darkpatterns: UX Practitioner Conversations About Ethical Design. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, New York, USA, LBW082. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alain Findeli. 2001. Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion. Design Issues 17, 1 (Jan. 2001), 5--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mary Flanagan and Helen Nissenbaum. 2014. Values at Play in Digital Games. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. https://market.android.com/ details?id=book-iIYRBAAAQBAJ Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bent Flyvbjerg. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry 12, 2 (2006), 219--245.Google Scholar
- Batya Friedman, Peter Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2002. Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. University of Washington technical report (2002), 02--12.Google Scholar
- Batya Friedman and Peter H Kahn Jr. 2003. Human values, ethics, and design. In The human-computer interaction handbook, Julie A Jacko and Andrew Sears (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1177--1201. Google Scholar
- Ken Friedman. 2012. Models of Design: Envisioning a Future Design Education. Visible Language 46, 1/2 (2012), 132--153.Google Scholar
- Elizabeth Goodman, Erik Stolterman, and Ron Wakkary. 2011. Understanding Interaction Design Practices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1061--1070. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colin M Gray and Elizabeth Boling. 2016. Inscribing ethics and values in designs for learning: a problematic. Educational technology research and development 64, 5 (Oct. 2016), 969--1001.Google Scholar
- Colin M Gray, Cesur Dagli, Muruvvet Demiral-Uzan, Funda Ergulec, Verily Tan, Abdullah A Altuwaijri, Khendum Gyabak, Megan Hilligoss, Remzi Kizilboga, Kei Tomita, and Elizabeth Boling. 2015. Judgment and Instructional Design: How ID Practitioners Work In Practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly 28, 3 (Oct. 2015), 25--49.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Colin M Gray, Erik Stolterman, and Martin A Siegel. 2014. Reprioritizing the relationship between HCI research and practice: bubble-up and trickle-down effects. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, New York, USA, 725--734. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colin M Gray, Austin L Toombs, and Shad Gross. 2015. Flow of Competence in UX Design Practice. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3285--3294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve Harrison, Phoebe Sengers, and Deborah Tatar. 2011. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 385--392. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie A Nardi. 2012. Activity Theory in HCI - Fundamentals and Reflections. Activity Theory in HCI 5, 1 (2012), 1--105.Google Scholar
- Jes A Koepfler, Luke Stark, Paul Dourish, Phoebe Sengers, and Katie Shilton. 2014. Values & design in HCI education. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 127--130. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yubo Kou and Bonnie A Nardi. 2018. Complex Mediation in the Formation of Political Opinions. CHI (2018), 1--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kari Kuutti. 2009. HCI and design: uncomfortable bedfellows? In (Re)searching the Digital Bauhaus, Binder, Löwgren, and Malmborg (Eds.). Springer, London, 43--60.Google Scholar
- Kari Kuutti and Liam J Bannon. 2014. The turn to practice in HCI: Towards a research agenda. In CHI. Oulun Yliopisto, Oulu, Finland, Ethical Mediation in UX Practice CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland UK ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 3543--3552. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher A Le Dantec, Erika Shehan Poole, and Susan P Wyche. 2009. Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1141--1150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hong Lin. 2007. The ethics of instructional technology: issues and coping strategies experienced by professional technologists in design and training situations in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development 55, 5 (Feb. 2007), 411--437.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter Lloyd. 2009. Ethical Imagination and Design. In About: Designing: Analysing Design Meetings, Janet McDonnell and Peter Lloyd (Eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 85--99.Google Scholar
- Victor Margolin. 1991. Design studies and the education of designers. Pedagogia Del Disseny 6 (1991).Google Scholar
- Cosmin Munteanu, Heather Molyneaux, Wendy Moncur, Mario Romero, Susan O'Donnell, and John Vines. 2015. Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for HumanComputer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 105--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daisy Mwanza and Olav W Bertelsen. 2003. Methods for Applying Activity Theory to HCI Design. INTERACT (2003).Google Scholar
- Bonnie A Nardi. 1996. Context and Consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harold G Nelson and Erik Stolterman. 2012. The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marina Pantazidou and Indira Nair. 1999. Ethic of care: guiding principles for engineering teaching & practice. 88, 2 (1999), 205--212.Google Scholar
- Victor J Papanek. 1972. Design for the real world; human ecology and social change. Pantheon Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Michael Quinn Patton. 2014. Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). London, UK, Sage.Google Scholar
- Katie Shilton. 2013. Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design. Science, technology & human values 38, 3 (May 2013), 374--397.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katie Shilton. 2018. Engaging Values Despite Neutrality: Challenges and Approaches to Values Reflection during the Design of Internet Infrastructure. Science, technology & human values 43, 2 (March 2018), 247--269.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katie Shilton. 2018. Values and Ethics in Human-Computer Interaction. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 12, 2 (2018), 107--171. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert E Stake. 2008. Qualitative case studies. (2008).Google Scholar
- Marc Steen. 2015. Upon opening the black box and finding it full: Exploring the ethics in design practices. Science, Technology, & Human Values 40, 3 (2015), 389--420.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erik Stolterman. 2008. The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design 2, 1 (2008), 55--65.Google Scholar
- Mary E Sunderland, J Ahn, C Carson, and W Kastenberg. 2013. Making Ethics Explicit: Relocating Ethics to the Core of Engineering Education. In American society for engineering education annual conference proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia, June. 23--26.Google Scholar
- Austin L Toombs, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2015. The Proper Care and Feeding of Hackerspaces: Care Ethics and Cultures of Making. In CHI '15. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2093--2102. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aimee van Wynsberghe and Scott Robbins. 2014. Ethicist as designer: a pragmatic approach to ethics in the lab. Sci Eng Ethics 20, 4 (Dec. 2014), 947--961.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2006. Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation. In Science, Technology & Human Values. Vol. 31. 361--380.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jenny Waycott, Cosmin Munteanu, Hilary Davis, Anja Thieme, Wendy Moncur, Roisin McNaney, John Vines, and Stacy Branham. 2016. Ethical Encounters in Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 3387--3394. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert K Yin. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). London and Singapore: Sage (2009).Google Scholar
- Xiao Zhang and Ron Wakkary. 2014. Understanding the role of designers' personal experiences in interaction design practice. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems - DIS '14. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 895--904. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Ethical Mediation in UX Practice
Recommendations
A Practice-Led Account of the Conceptual Evolution of UX Knowledge
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe contours of user experience (UX) design practice have been shaped by a diverse array of practitioners and disciplines, resulting in a diffuse and decentralized body of UX-specific disciplinary knowledge. The rapidly shifting space that UX knowledge ...
Dimensions of UX Practice that Shape Ethical Awareness
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHCI researchers are increasingly interested in describing the complexity of design practice, including ethical, organizational, and societal concerns. Recent studies have identified individual practitioners as key actors in driving the design process and ...
Design Ethics in Practice - Points of Departure
CSCWRecent years have seen an increased interest in ethically responsible design of technology in society at large as well as among design practitioners. While design ethics is a well-established research area, less research has enquired into how design ...
Comments