ABSTRACT
Gentrification-the spatial expression of economic inequality-is fundamentally a matter of social justice. Yet, even as work outside of HCI has begun to discuss how computing can enable or challenge gentrification, HCI's growing social justice agenda has not engaged with this issue. This omission creates an opportunity for HCI to develop a research and design agenda at the intersection of computing, social justice, and gentrification. We begin this work by outlining existing scholarship describing how the consumption side dynamics of gentrification are mediated by contemporary socio-technical systems. Subsequently, we build on the social justice framework introduced by Dombrowski, Harmon, and Fox to discuss how HCI may resist or counter such forces. We offer six modes of research that HCI scholars can pursue to engage gentrification.
Supplemental Material
- A BeltLine for All? -- Yanni Alexander Loukissas: 2018. http://loukissas.lmc.gatech.edu/uncategorized/a-beltline-for-all/. Accessed: 2019-01-04.Google Scholar
- A Glorified Sidewalk, and the Path to Transform Atlanta - The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/12/us/atlantabeltline.html. Accessed: 2019-01-05.Google Scholar
- About | Counter Map Collection: http://countermapcollection.org/about/. Accessed: 2018-08--30.Google Scholar
- Ames, M.G. et al. 2011. Understanding technology choices and values through social class. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '11 (New York, New York, USA, 2011), 55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Asad, M. and Le Dantec, C. a. 2015. Illegitimate civic participation: supporting community activists on the ground. Cscw 2015. (2015), 1694--1703. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Asad, M. and Le Dantec, C.A. 2015. Illegitimate Civic Participation: Supporting Community Activists on the Ground. CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (New York, New York, USA, Feb. 2015), 1694--1703. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Atkinson, R. 2002. Does gentrification help or harm urban neighbourhoods: An assessment of the evidence-base in the context of the new urban agenda (CNR paper 5). ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research. June (2002), 27.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, R. 2000. Measuring gentrification and displacement in Greater London. Urban studies. 37, 1 (2000), 149--165.Google Scholar
- Atlanta Beltline CEO Paul Morris steps down from post: https://www.ajc.com/news/local-govt--politics/beltline-ceo-stepsdown-new-head-focus-affordablehousing/RoWS3022b1qYl8eWAoBa6M/. Accessed: 2019-01-04.Google Scholar
- Atlanta Beltline fails to deliver on promise for affordable housing: https://www.ajc.com/news/local/how-the-atlanta-beltline-broke-itspromise-affordable-housing/0VXnu1BlYC0IbA9U4u2CEM/. Accessed: 2019-01-04.Google Scholar
- Atlanta Map Room | Digital Integrative Liberal Arts Center: https://dilac.iac.gatech.edu/node/55. Accessed: 2018-09-07.Google Scholar
- Bardzell and Shaowen 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2010), 1301-- 1310. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beauregard, R.A. 2013. The chaos and complexity of gentrification. Gentrification of the City. Routledge. 51--71.Google Scholar
- BeltLining: Gentrification, Broken Promises, and Hope on Atlanta's Southside: 2017. https://www.housingjusticeleague.org/b4all-report/. Accessed: 2019-01-04.Google Scholar
- Bolter, J.D. et al. 2000. Remediation: Understanding new media. mit Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bonam, C.M. et al. 2016. Polluting Black Space. Journal of experimental psychology. General. 145, 11 (2016), 1561--1582.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brown-Saracino, J. 2013. The gentrification debates: a reader. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Byrne, J. 2003. Two Cheers for Gentrification. Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. (Jan. 2003).Google Scholar
- Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture Volume I (Information Age Series). London: Blackwell. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Certeau, M. de 1984. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley. CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Clarke, R. et al. 2013. Digital portraits: Photo-sharing after domestic violence. Proc. CHI '13. (2013), 2517--2526. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Community Historians & Westside Soul | Christopher A. Le Dantec: https://ledantec.net/research/community-historianswestside-soul/. Accessed: 2018-09-07.Google Scholar
- Cresswell, T. 2004. Place: A Short Introduction. The Professional Geographer. 58, February (2004), 153.Google Scholar
- Crivellaro, C. et al. 2015. Contesting the city: enacting the pollitical through digitally supported urban walks. CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2015), 2853--2862. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crivellaro, C. et al. 2016. Re-Making Places: HCI,'Community Building'and Change. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 2958--2969. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Le Dantec, C.A. et al. 2011. Publics in practice: Ubiquitous computing at a shelter for homeless mothers. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011), 1687--1696. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Delaney, D. 2002. The space that race makes. The professional geographer. 54, 1 (2002), 6--14.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. and Rogers, M.L. 2012. The public and its problems: An essay in political inquiry. Penn State Press.Google Scholar
- Diedrick, K. and Dantec, C.A. Le 2017. Atlanta's Westside residents challenge the rules of sport mega-development. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal. 2, 1 (2017), 54--68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DILLAHUNT, T. 2017. Everyday Resilience: Supporting Resilient Strategies among Low-socioeconomic-status Communities DHAVAL VYAS, Queensland University of Technology (QUT). (2017).Google Scholar
- Dillahunt, T.R. 2014. Fostering Social Capital in Economically Distressed Communities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014), 531--540. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dillahunt, T.R. et al. 2017. Reflections on Design Methods for Underserved Communities. Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17 Companion (New York, New York, USA, 2017), 409--413. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dillahunt, T.R. and Malone, A.R. 2015. The Promise of the Sharing Economy among Disadvantaged Communities. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. (2015), 2285--2294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dombrowski, L. et al. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16. (2016), 656--671. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM. (2010), 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. 2006. Re-Space-ing Place: "Place" and "Space" Ten Years On. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '06. (2006), 299. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erete, S. and Burrell, J.O. 2017. Empowered Participation: How Citizens Use Technology in Local Governance. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. (2017), 2307--2319. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Foucault, M. 1972. The discourse on language. Truth: Engagements across philosophical traditions. (1972), 315--335.Google Scholar
- Fox, S. et al. 2016. Exploring Social Justice, Design, and HCI. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '16 (New York, New York, USA, 2016), 3293--3300. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fox, S. 2015. Feminist Hackerspaces as Sites for Feminist Design. C&C '15. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. (2015), 341--342. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fox, S. and Le Dantec, C. 2014. Community historians: scaffolding community engagement through culture and heritage. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (2014), 785-- 794. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gates, H.L. et al. 1999. The souls of Black folk. By WEB Du Bois. New York: VV VV Norton. (1999).Google Scholar
- Gay, G. 2009. Context-Aware Mobile Computing: Affordances of Space, Social Awareness, and Social Influence. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gieryn, T.F. 2000. A Space for Place in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology. 26, 1 (2000), 463--496.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Glass, R.L. 1964. London: aspects of change. MacGibbon & Kee.Google Scholar
- Goodie Nation | A Tribe of Changemakers & Entrepreneurs Using Innovation to Help Under-Served Communities: http://goodienation.org/. Accessed: 2017-01-07.Google Scholar
- Gravel, R.A. 1999. Belt line-Atlanta: design of infrastructure as a reflection of public policy. Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Hanan, J.S. 2010. Home is Where the Capital is: The Culture of Real Estate in an Era of Control Societies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies. 7, 2 (2010), 176--201.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haraway, D.J. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies. 14, 3 (1988), 575--599.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harrison, S. and Dourish, P. 1996. Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (1996), 67--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hayes, G.R. 2011. The relationship of action research to humancomputer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 18, 3 (2011), 1--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Housing Justice League: https://www.housingjusticeleague.org/. Accessed: 2018-08--30.Google Scholar
- Hutton, T.A. 2004. The new economy of the inner city. Cities. 21, 2 (2004), 89--108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ignazio, C.D. and Klein, L.F. 2016. Feminist Data Visualization. IEEE Vis conference. (2016).Google Scholar
- Imbroscio, D. 2004. Can We Grant a Right to Place? Politics & Society. 32, 4 (2004), 575--609.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Immergluck, D. 2009. Large redevelopment initiatives, housing values and gentrification: the case of the Atlanta Beltline. Urban Studies. 46, 8 (2009), 1723--1745.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Immergluck, D. and Tech, G. 2016. Affordability First: Concerns about Preserving Housing Options for Existing and New Residents on Atlanta's Westside. (2016), 1--5.Google Scholar
- Irani, L. et al. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (2010), 1311--1320. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Irani, L.C. and Silberman, M.S. 2013. Turkopticon. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '13. (2013), 611. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jackson, S.J. et al. 2014. The policy knot. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14 (2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jenkins, T. et al. 2016. Object-Oriented Publics. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 827--839. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jönsson, L. et al. 2010. Watt-Lite. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '10 (New York, New York, USA, 2010), 240.Google Scholar
- Keating, L. 2010. Atlanta: Race, class and urban expansion. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Kirkland, E. 2008. What's Race Got to Do With it? Looking for the Racial Dimensions of Gentrification. Western Journal of Black Studies. 32, 2 (2008).Google Scholar
- Korn, M. and Back, J. 2012. Talking it further: from feelings and memories to civic discussions in and about places. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design. (2012), 189--198. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kruse, K.M. 2013. White flight: Atlanta and the making of modern conservatism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Kurgan, L. 2013. Close Up At a Distance.Google Scholar
- Lees, L. et al. 2013. Gentrification. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lees, L. 2003. Super-gentrification: The case of Brooklyn heights, New York city. Urban studies. 40, 12 (2003), 2487--2509.Google Scholar
- Lees, L. et al. 2010. The gentrification reader. Routledge London.Google Scholar
- Loukissas, Y. 2018. All the Homes: Zillow and the Operational Context of Data. International Conference on Information (2018), 272--281.Google Scholar
- Loukissas, Y.A. 2017. Taking Big Data apart: local readings of composite media collections. Information, Communication & Society. 20, 5 (2017), 651--664.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lury, C. and Wakeford, N. 2012. Inventive methods: The happening of the social. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Maharawal, M.M. and McElroy, E. 2018. The Anti-Eviction Mapping Project: Counter Mapping and Oral History toward Bay Area Housing Justice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 108, 2 (Mar. 2018), 380--389.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marcuse, P. 1984. To control gentrification: anti-displacement zoning and planning for stable residential districts. NYU Rev. L. & Soc. Change. 13, (1984), 931.Google Scholar
- Masden, C.A. et al. 2014. Tensions in scaling-up community social media: a multi-neighborhood study of nextdoor. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (2014), 3239--3248. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Massey, D.S. and Denton, N.A. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- McNeill, D. 2016. Governing a city of unicorns: technology capital and the urban politics of San Francisco. Urban geography. 37, 4 (2016), 494--513.Google Scholar
- Newman, K. and Wyly, E.K. 2006. The right to stay put, revisited: gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Studies. 43, 1 (2006), 23--57.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Noble, S.U. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.Google Scholar
- O'Mara, M. 2017. Silicon Dreams: States, Markets, and the Transnational High-Tech Suburb. Making Cities Global: The Transnational Turn in Urban History. University of Pennsylvania Press. 17--47.Google Scholar
- O'Mara, M. 2014. The environmental contradictions of high-tech urbanism. Now Urbanism. Routledge. 40--56.Google Scholar
- Oliver, M. and Shapiro, T. 2013. Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Parker, A. et al. 2012. Health promotion as activism. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12 (New York, New York, USA, 2012), 99. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Payne, W. 2017. Welcome to the Polygon?: Contested Digital Neighborhoods and Spatialized Segregation on Nextdoor. Computational Culture. (2017).Google Scholar
- Rascoff, S. and Humphries, and S. 2015. Zillow Talk: Rewriting the Rules of Real Estate. Grand Central Publishing.Google Scholar
- Rundstrom, R. 2009. Counter-Mapping. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier. 314--318.Google Scholar
- Sandvig, C. et al. Can an Algorithm be Unethical?Google Scholar
- Slater, T. 2006. The Eviction of Criticial Perspectives from Gentrification Research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 30, 4 (2006), 737--757.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smith, N. 1987. Gentrification and the rent gap. Annals of the Association of American geographers. 77, 3 (1987), 462--465.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smith, N. and Williams, P. 2013. Gentrification of the City. Routledge.Google Scholar
- St. Louis MapRoom: http://stlmaproom.org/. Accessed: 2018-09-07.Google Scholar
- Taylor, N. et al. 2013. Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2013), 1549--1558. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Using Mapping to Understand Gentrification, Prevent Displacement: 2017. http://www.govtech.com/data/Using-Mappingto-Understand-Gentrification-Prevent-Displacement.html?r. Accessed: 2018-08--28.Google Scholar
- Wachsmuth, D. and Weisler, A. 2018. Airbnb and the Rent Gap: Gentrification Through the Sharing Economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. (2018).Google Scholar
- Woodward, C.V. 2002. The strange career of Jim Crow. Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
- Zukin, S. 1993. Landscapes of power: from Detroit to Disney World. Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
- Zukin, S. 1989. Loft living: culture and capital in urban change. Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Zukin, S. et al. 2015. The omnivore's neighborhood? Online restaurant reviews, race, and gentrification. Journal of Consumer Culture. (2015), 1--21.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Engaging Gentrification as a Social Justice Issue in HCI
Recommendations
Exploring Social Justice, Design, and HCI
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe aim of this one-day workshop is to share existing research, discuss common practices, and to develop new strategies and tools for designing for social justice in HCI. This workshop will bring together a set of HCI scholars, designers, and community ...
Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments
DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive SystemsIn recent years, many HCI designers have begun pursuing research agendas that address large scale social issues. These systemic or "wicked" problems present challenges for design practice due to their scope, scale, complexity, and political nature. In ...
Social Justice and Design: Power and oppression in collaborative systems
CSCW '17 Companion: Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingThe study of power and oppression is and has always been integral to CSCW research. From studies of less visible forms of maintenance practice to understanding the effects of categorization on users of social media, scholars highlight the ways in which ...
Comments