skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300510acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Engaging Gentrification as a Social Justice Issue in HCI

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Gentrification-the spatial expression of economic inequality-is fundamentally a matter of social justice. Yet, even as work outside of HCI has begun to discuss how computing can enable or challenge gentrification, HCI's growing social justice agenda has not engaged with this issue. This omission creates an opportunity for HCI to develop a research and design agenda at the intersection of computing, social justice, and gentrification. We begin this work by outlining existing scholarship describing how the consumption side dynamics of gentrification are mediated by contemporary socio-technical systems. Subsequently, we build on the social justice framework introduced by Dombrowski, Harmon, and Fox to discuss how HCI may resist or counter such forces. We offer six modes of research that HCI scholars can pursue to engage gentrification.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper280.mp4

mp4

251.9 MB

References

  1. A BeltLine for All? -- Yanni Alexander Loukissas: 2018. http://loukissas.lmc.gatech.edu/uncategorized/a-beltline-for-all/. Accessed: 2019-01-04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A Glorified Sidewalk, and the Path to Transform Atlanta - The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/12/us/atlantabeltline.html. Accessed: 2019-01-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. About | Counter Map Collection: http://countermapcollection.org/about/. Accessed: 2018-08--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ames, M.G. et al. 2011. Understanding technology choices and values through social class. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '11 (New York, New York, USA, 2011), 55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Asad, M. and Le Dantec, C. a. 2015. Illegitimate civic participation: supporting community activists on the ground. Cscw 2015. (2015), 1694--1703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Asad, M. and Le Dantec, C.A. 2015. Illegitimate Civic Participation: Supporting Community Activists on the Ground. CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (New York, New York, USA, Feb. 2015), 1694--1703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Atkinson, R. 2002. Does gentrification help or harm urban neighbourhoods: An assessment of the evidence-base in the context of the new urban agenda (CNR paper 5). ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research. June (2002), 27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Atkinson, R. 2000. Measuring gentrification and displacement in Greater London. Urban studies. 37, 1 (2000), 149--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Atlanta Beltline CEO Paul Morris steps down from post: https://www.ajc.com/news/local-govt--politics/beltline-ceo-stepsdown-new-head-focus-affordablehousing/RoWS3022b1qYl8eWAoBa6M/. Accessed: 2019-01-04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Atlanta Beltline fails to deliver on promise for affordable housing: https://www.ajc.com/news/local/how-the-atlanta-beltline-broke-itspromise-affordable-housing/0VXnu1BlYC0IbA9U4u2CEM/. Accessed: 2019-01-04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Atlanta Map Room | Digital Integrative Liberal Arts Center: https://dilac.iac.gatech.edu/node/55. Accessed: 2018-09-07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bardzell and Shaowen 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2010), 1301-- 1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Beauregard, R.A. 2013. The chaos and complexity of gentrification. Gentrification of the City. Routledge. 51--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. BeltLining: Gentrification, Broken Promises, and Hope on Atlanta's Southside: 2017. https://www.housingjusticeleague.org/b4all-report/. Accessed: 2019-01-04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bolter, J.D. et al. 2000. Remediation: Understanding new media. mit Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bonam, C.M. et al. 2016. Polluting Black Space. Journal of experimental psychology. General. 145, 11 (2016), 1561--1582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Brown-Saracino, J. 2013. The gentrification debates: a reader. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Byrne, J. 2003. Two Cheers for Gentrification. Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. (Jan. 2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture Volume I (Information Age Series). London: Blackwell. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Certeau, M. de 1984. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley. CA: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Clarke, R. et al. 2013. Digital portraits: Photo-sharing after domestic violence. Proc. CHI '13. (2013), 2517--2526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Community Historians & Westside Soul | Christopher A. Le Dantec: https://ledantec.net/research/community-historianswestside-soul/. Accessed: 2018-09-07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Cresswell, T. 2004. Place: A Short Introduction. The Professional Geographer. 58, February (2004), 153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Crivellaro, C. et al. 2015. Contesting the city: enacting the pollitical through digitally supported urban walks. CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2015), 2853--2862. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Crivellaro, C. et al. 2016. Re-Making Places: HCI,'Community Building'and Change. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 2958--2969. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Le Dantec, C.A. et al. 2011. Publics in practice: Ubiquitous computing at a shelter for homeless mothers. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011), 1687--1696. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Delaney, D. 2002. The space that race makes. The professional geographer. 54, 1 (2002), 6--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Dewey, J. and Rogers, M.L. 2012. The public and its problems: An essay in political inquiry. Penn State Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Diedrick, K. and Dantec, C.A. Le 2017. Atlanta's Westside residents challenge the rules of sport mega-development. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal. 2, 1 (2017), 54--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. DILLAHUNT, T. 2017. Everyday Resilience: Supporting Resilient Strategies among Low-socioeconomic-status Communities DHAVAL VYAS, Queensland University of Technology (QUT). (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Dillahunt, T.R. 2014. Fostering Social Capital in Economically Distressed Communities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014), 531--540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Dillahunt, T.R. et al. 2017. Reflections on Design Methods for Underserved Communities. Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17 Companion (New York, New York, USA, 2017), 409--413. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Dillahunt, T.R. and Malone, A.R. 2015. The Promise of the Sharing Economy among Disadvantaged Communities. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. (2015), 2285--2294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Dombrowski, L. et al. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16. (2016), 656--671. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Dourish, P. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM. (2010), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Dourish, P. 2006. Re-Space-ing Place: "Place" and "Space" Ten Years On. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '06. (2006), 299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Erete, S. and Burrell, J.O. 2017. Empowered Participation: How Citizens Use Technology in Local Governance. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. (2017), 2307--2319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Foucault, M. 1972. The discourse on language. Truth: Engagements across philosophical traditions. (1972), 315--335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Fox, S. et al. 2016. Exploring Social Justice, Design, and HCI. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '16 (New York, New York, USA, 2016), 3293--3300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Fox, S. 2015. Feminist Hackerspaces as Sites for Feminist Design. C&C '15. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. (2015), 341--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Fox, S. and Le Dantec, C. 2014. Community historians: scaffolding community engagement through culture and heritage. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (2014), 785-- 794. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Gates, H.L. et al. 1999. The souls of Black folk. By WEB Du Bois. New York: VV VV Norton. (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Gay, G. 2009. Context-Aware Mobile Computing: Affordances of Space, Social Awareness, and Social Influence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Gieryn, T.F. 2000. A Space for Place in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology. 26, 1 (2000), 463--496.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Glass, R.L. 1964. London: aspects of change. MacGibbon & Kee.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Goodie Nation | A Tribe of Changemakers & Entrepreneurs Using Innovation to Help Under-Served Communities: http://goodienation.org/. Accessed: 2017-01-07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Gravel, R.A. 1999. Belt line-Atlanta: design of infrastructure as a reflection of public policy. Georgia Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Hanan, J.S. 2010. Home is Where the Capital is: The Culture of Real Estate in an Era of Control Societies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies. 7, 2 (2010), 176--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Haraway, D.J. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies. 14, 3 (1988), 575--599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Harrison, S. and Dourish, P. 1996. Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (1996), 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Hayes, G.R. 2011. The relationship of action research to humancomputer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 18, 3 (2011), 1--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Housing Justice League: https://www.housingjusticeleague.org/. Accessed: 2018-08--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Hutton, T.A. 2004. The new economy of the inner city. Cities. 21, 2 (2004), 89--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Ignazio, C.D. and Klein, L.F. 2016. Feminist Data Visualization. IEEE Vis conference. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Imbroscio, D. 2004. Can We Grant a Right to Place? Politics & Society. 32, 4 (2004), 575--609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Immergluck, D. 2009. Large redevelopment initiatives, housing values and gentrification: the case of the Atlanta Beltline. Urban Studies. 46, 8 (2009), 1723--1745.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Immergluck, D. and Tech, G. 2016. Affordability First: Concerns about Preserving Housing Options for Existing and New Residents on Atlanta's Westside. (2016), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Irani, L. et al. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (2010), 1311--1320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Irani, L.C. and Silberman, M.S. 2013. Turkopticon. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '13. (2013), 611. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Jackson, S.J. et al. 2014. The policy knot. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14 (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Jenkins, T. et al. 2016. Object-Oriented Publics. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 827--839. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Jönsson, L. et al. 2010. Watt-Lite. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '10 (New York, New York, USA, 2010), 240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Keating, L. 2010. Atlanta: Race, class and urban expansion. Temple University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Kirkland, E. 2008. What's Race Got to Do With it? Looking for the Racial Dimensions of Gentrification. Western Journal of Black Studies. 32, 2 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Korn, M. and Back, J. 2012. Talking it further: from feelings and memories to civic discussions in and about places. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design. (2012), 189--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Kruse, K.M. 2013. White flight: Atlanta and the making of modern conservatism. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Kurgan, L. 2013. Close Up At a Distance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Lees, L. et al. 2013. Gentrification. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Lees, L. 2003. Super-gentrification: The case of Brooklyn heights, New York city. Urban studies. 40, 12 (2003), 2487--2509.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Lees, L. et al. 2010. The gentrification reader. Routledge London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Loukissas, Y. 2018. All the Homes: Zillow and the Operational Context of Data. International Conference on Information (2018), 272--281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Loukissas, Y.A. 2017. Taking Big Data apart: local readings of composite media collections. Information, Communication & Society. 20, 5 (2017), 651--664.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Lury, C. and Wakeford, N. 2012. Inventive methods: The happening of the social. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Maharawal, M.M. and McElroy, E. 2018. The Anti-Eviction Mapping Project: Counter Mapping and Oral History toward Bay Area Housing Justice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 108, 2 (Mar. 2018), 380--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Marcuse, P. 1984. To control gentrification: anti-displacement zoning and planning for stable residential districts. NYU Rev. L. & Soc. Change. 13, (1984), 931.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Masden, C.A. et al. 2014. Tensions in scaling-up community social media: a multi-neighborhood study of nextdoor. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (2014), 3239--3248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Massey, D.S. and Denton, N.A. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. McNeill, D. 2016. Governing a city of unicorns: technology capital and the urban politics of San Francisco. Urban geography. 37, 4 (2016), 494--513.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Newman, K. and Wyly, E.K. 2006. The right to stay put, revisited: gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Studies. 43, 1 (2006), 23--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Noble, S.U. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. O'Mara, M. 2017. Silicon Dreams: States, Markets, and the Transnational High-Tech Suburb. Making Cities Global: The Transnational Turn in Urban History. University of Pennsylvania Press. 17--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. O'Mara, M. 2014. The environmental contradictions of high-tech urbanism. Now Urbanism. Routledge. 40--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Oliver, M. and Shapiro, T. 2013. Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Parker, A. et al. 2012. Health promotion as activism. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12 (New York, New York, USA, 2012), 99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Payne, W. 2017. Welcome to the Polygon?: Contested Digital Neighborhoods and Spatialized Segregation on Nextdoor. Computational Culture. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Rascoff, S. and Humphries, and S. 2015. Zillow Talk: Rewriting the Rules of Real Estate. Grand Central Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Rundstrom, R. 2009. Counter-Mapping. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier. 314--318.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Sandvig, C. et al. Can an Algorithm be Unethical?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Slater, T. 2006. The Eviction of Criticial Perspectives from Gentrification Research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 30, 4 (2006), 737--757.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Smith, N. 1987. Gentrification and the rent gap. Annals of the Association of American geographers. 77, 3 (1987), 462--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Smith, N. and Williams, P. 2013. Gentrification of the City. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. St. Louis MapRoom: http://stlmaproom.org/. Accessed: 2018-09-07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Taylor, N. et al. 2013. Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2013), 1549--1558. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Using Mapping to Understand Gentrification, Prevent Displacement: 2017. http://www.govtech.com/data/Using-Mappingto-Understand-Gentrification-Prevent-Displacement.html?r. Accessed: 2018-08--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Wachsmuth, D. and Weisler, A. 2018. Airbnb and the Rent Gap: Gentrification Through the Sharing Economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Woodward, C.V. 2002. The strange career of Jim Crow. Oxford University Press, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Zukin, S. 1993. Landscapes of power: from Detroit to Disney World. Univ of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Zukin, S. 1989. Loft living: culture and capital in urban change. Rutgers University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Zukin, S. et al. 2015. The omnivore's neighborhood? Online restaurant reviews, race, and gentrification. Journal of Consumer Culture. (2015), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Engaging Gentrification as a Social Justice Issue in HCI

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      9077 pages
      ISBN:9781450359702
      DOI:10.1145/3290605

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format