skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300558acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Effects of Interruption Timings on Autonomous Height-Adjustable Desks that Respond to Task Changes

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Actuated furniture, such as electric adjustable sit-stand desks, helps users vary their posture and contributes to comfort and health. However, studies found that users rarely initiate height changes. Therefore, in this paper, we look into furniture that adjusts itself to the user's needs. A situated interview study indicated task-changing as an opportune moment for automatic height adjustment. We then performed a Wizard of Oz study to find the best timing for changing desk height to minimize interruption and discomfort. The results are in line with prior work on task interruption in graphical user interfaces and show that the table should change height during a task change. However, results also indicate that until users build trust in the system, they prefer actuation after a task change to experience the impact of the adjustment. Based on the results, we discuss design guidelines for interactive desks with agency.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn2771.mp4

mp4

11.4 MB

References

  1. Piotr D. Adamczyk and Brian P. Bailey. 2004. If Not Now, when?: The Effects of Interruption at Different Moments Within Task Execution. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 271--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gilles Bailly, Sidharth Sahdev, Sylvain Malacria, and Thomas Pietrzak. 2016. LivingDesktop: Augmenting Desktop Workstation with Actuated Devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5298--5310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Uta Brandes and Michael Erlhoff. 2012. My desk is my castle: exploring personalization cultures. Walter de Gruyter. Interruption Timings on Autonomous Height-Adjustable Desks CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland UKGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cynthia Breazeal, Andrew Wang, and Rosalind Picard. 2007. Experiments with a Robotic Computer: Body, Affect and Cognition Interactions. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 153--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nico J Delleman, Christine M Haslegrave, and Don B Chaffin. 2004. Working postures and movements. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stir Desk. 2019. Stir Desk. (jan 2019). Retrieved 2019-01-05 from https://www.stirworks.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E Grandjean, W. Hünting, and M. Pidermann. 1983. VDT Workstation Design: Preferred Settings and Their Effects. Human Factors 25, 2 (1983), 161--175. PMID: 6862447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Michael Haller, Christoph Richter, Peter Brandl, Sabine Gross, Gerold Schossleitner, Andreas Schrempf, Hideaki Nii, Maki Sugimoto, and Masahiko Inami. 2011. Finding the Right Way for Interrupting People Improving Their Sitting Posture. In Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-computer Interaction - Volume Part II (INTERACT'11). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1--17. http: //dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2042118.2042120 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Chris Harrison and Anind K. Dey. 2008. Lean and Zoom: Proximityaware User Interface and Content Magnification. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 507--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Alan Hedge. 2004. Effects of an Electric Height-adjustable Worksurface on self-assessed Musculokeletal discomfort and Productivity in Computer Workers. Technical Report. Cornell University Human Factors and Ergonomics Research Laboratory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ken Hinckley, Ken Hinckley, Jeff Pierce, Eric Horvitz, and Mike Sinclair. 2005. Foreground and Background Interaction with Sensor-enhanced Mobile Devices. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 1 (March 2005), 31--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Shamsi T. Iqbal and Brian P. Bailey. 2005. Investigating the Effectiveness of Mental Workload As a Predictor of Opportune Moments for Interruption. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1489--1492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Thomas Karakolis and Jack P. Callaghan. 2014. The impact of sit-stand office workstations on worker discomfort and productivity: A review. Applied Ergonomics 45, 3 (2014), 799 -- 806.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lena Karlqvist. 1998. A process for the development, specification and evaluation of VDU work tables. Applied Ergonomics 29, 6 (1998), 423 -- 432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lena K. Karlqvist, Mats Hagberg, Max Köster, Marika Wenemark, and Rickard Anell. 1996. Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Computer assisted Design (CAD) Operators and Evaluation of a Self-assessment Questionnaire. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 2, 3 (1996), 185--194. PMID: 9933873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Karl HE Kroemer, Henrike B Kroemer, and Katrin E Kroemer-Elbert. 2001. Ergonomics: how to design for ease and efficiency. Pearson College Division.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yoshiki Kudo, Kazuki Takashima, Morten Fjeld, and Yoshifumi Kitamura. 2018. AdapTable: Extending Reach over Large Tabletops Through Flexible Multi-Display Configuration. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 213--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Bokyung Lee, Minjoo Cho, Joonhee Min, and Daniel Saakes. 2016. Posing and Acting As Input for Personalizing Furniture. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 44, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Bokyung Lee, Joongi Shin, Hyoshin Bae, and Daniel Saakes. 2018. Interactive and Situated Guidelines to Help Users Design a Personal Desk That Fits Their Bodies. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 637--650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S.M. McGill, N.S. Kavcic, and E. Harvey. 2006. Sitting on a chair or an exercise ball: Various perspectives to guide decision making. Clinical Biomechanics 21, 4 (2006), 353 -- 360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Christophe Mignot, Claude Valot, and Noëlle Carbonell. 1993. An Experimental Study of Future "Natural" Multimodal Human-computer Interaction. In INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '93). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 67--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Heather L. Nerhood and Steven W. Thompson. 1994. Adjustable SitStand Workstations in the Office. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 38, 10 (1994), 668--672.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Takeshi Oozu, Aki Yamada, Yuki Enzaki, and Hiroo Iwata. 2016. Escaping Chair: Furniture-shaped Device Art. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Posters (SIGGRAPH '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 2 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Julius Panero and Martin Zelnik. 2014. Human dimension and interior space: a source book of design reference standards. Watson-Guptill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Casey Reas and Benjamin Fry. 2003. Processing: A Learning Environment for Creating Interactive Web Graphics. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Web Graphics (SIGGRAPH '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Thomas B. Sheridan. 1992. Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Joongi Shin, Woohyeok Choi, Uichin Lee, and Daniel Saakes. 2018. Actuating a Monitor for Posture Changes. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article LBW616, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. David Sirkin, Brian Mok, Stephen Yang, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Mechanical Ottoman: How Robotic Furniture Offers and Withdraws Support. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Salli Auto Smart. 2019. Salli. (jan 2019). Retrieved 2019-01-05 from https://salli.com/en/salli-autosmartGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Marco Spadafora, Victor Chahuneau, Nikolas Martelaro, David Sirkin, and Wendy Ju. 2016. Designing the Behavior of Interactive Objects. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 70--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kazuki Takashima, Naohiro Aida, Hitomi Yokoyama, and Yoshifumi Kitamura. 2013. TransformTable: A Self-actuated Shape-changing Digital Table. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 179--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Kazuki Takashima, Yusuke Asari, Hitomi Yokoyama, Ehud Sharlin, and Yoshifumi Kitamura. 2015. MovemenTable: The Design of Moving Interactive Tabletops. In 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2015 - Volume 9298. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 296--314. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland UK Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kazuki Takashima, Yusuke Asari, Hitomi Yokoyama, Ehud Sharlin, and Yoshifumi Kitamura. 2015. MovemenTable: The Design of Moving Interactive Tabletops. In Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2015, Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Mirko Fetter, Tom Gross, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 296--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Meng-Ru Tsai and Tze-Wen Lin. 2017. Desk Adjusting Method and Desk. (23 02 2017). https://patents.google.com/patent/ US20170052517A1/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. C Tudor-Locke, J M Schuna Jr, L J Frensham, and M Proenca. 2013. Changing the way we work: elevating energy expenditure with workstation alternatives. International Journal Of Obesity 38 (28 11 2013), 755 EP --.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. J. Verbeek. 1991. The use of adjustable furniture: Evaluation of an instruction programme for office workers. Applied Ergonomics 22, 3 (1991), 179 -- 184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Luke Vink, Viirj Kan, Ken Nakagaki, Daniel Leithinger, Sean Follmer, Philipp Schoessler, Amit Zoran, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2015. TRANSFORM As Adaptive and Dynamic Furniture. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. P. Vink, R. Porcar-Seder, ÃÂlvaro Page de Pozo, and F. Krause. 2007. Office chairs are often not adjusted by end-users. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 51, 17 (2007), 1015--1019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Qi Wang, Marina Toeters, Wei Chen, Annick Timmermans, and Panos Markopoulos. 2016. Zishi: A Smart Garment for Posture Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3792--3795. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Stephen Wilks, Monica Mortimer, and Per Nylén. 2006. The introduction of sit-stand worktables; aspects of attitudes, compliance and satisfaction. Applied Ergonomics 37, 3 (2006), 359 -- 365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Yu-Chian Wu, Te-Yen Wu, Paul Taele, Bryan Wang, Jun-You Liu, Pinsung Ku, Po-En Lai, and Mike Y. Chen. 2018. ActiveErgo: Automatic and Personalized Ergonomics Using Self-actuating Furniture. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 558, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. S. Yang, B. K. J. Mok, D. Sirkin, H. P. Ive, R. Maheshwari, K. Fischer, and W. Ju. 2015. Experiences developing socially acceptable interactions for a robotic trash barrel. In 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 277--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Nan Zhao, Asaph Azaria, and Joseph A. Paradiso. 2017. Mediated Atmospheres: A Multimodal Mediated Work Environment. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 2, Article 31 (June 2017), 23 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Ying Zheng and John B. Morrell. 2010. A vibrotactile feedback approach to posture guidance. In 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium. 351--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Effects of Interruption Timings on Autonomous Height-Adjustable Desks that Respond to Task Changes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2019
        9077 pages
        ISBN:9781450359702
        DOI:10.1145/3290605

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format