ABSTRACT
Machine Learning (ML) is a useful tool for modern game designers but often requires a technical background to understand. This gap of knowledge can intimidate less technical game designers from employing ML techniques to evaluate designs or incorporate ML into game mechanics. Our research aims to bridge this gap by exploring interactive visualizations as a way to introduce ML principles to game designers. We have developed QUBE, an interactive level designer that shifts ML education into the context of game design. We present QUBE's interactive visualization techniques and evaluation through two expert panels (n=4, n=6) with game design, ML, and user experience experts.
- Martín Abadi, Ashish Agarwal, Paul Barham, Eugene Brevdo, Zhifeng Chen, Craig Citro, Greg S Corrado, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, et al. 2016. Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04467 (2016).Google Scholar
- Fernando de Mesentier Silva, Scott Lee, Julian Togelius, and Andy Nealen. 2017. AI-based playtesting of contemporary board games. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. ACM, 13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennifer L Faust and Donald R Paulson. 1998. Active learning in the college classroom. Journal on excellence in college teaching 9, 2 (1998), 3--24.Google Scholar
- Geoffrey Holmes, Andrew Donkin, and Ian H Witten. 1994. Weka: A machine learning workbench. In Intelligent Information Systems, 1994. Proceedings of the 1994 Second Australian and New Zealand Conference on. IEEE, 357--361.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Minsuk Kahng, Nikhil Thorat, Duen Horng, Polo Chau, Fernanda B Vi, and H C Sep. 2019. GAN Lab : Understanding Complex Deep Generative Models using Interactive Visual Experimentation. 25, 1 (2019). arXiv:arXiv:1809.01587v1Google Scholar
- Kirsi Kuosa, Damiano Distante, Anne Tervakari, Luigi Cerulo, Alejandro Fernández, Juho Koro, and Meri Kailanto. 2016. Interactive visualization tools to improve learning and teaching in online learning environments. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET) 14, 1 (2016), 1--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lars Lidén. 2003. Artificial stupidity: The art of intentional mistakes. AI game programming wisdom 2 (2003), 41--48.Google Scholar
- Jialin Liu, Julian Togelius, Diego Pérez-Liébana, and Simon M Lucas. 2017. Evolving game skill-depth using general video game ai agents. In Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2017 IEEE Congress on. IEEE, 2299--2307.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jorge Maturana, Álvaro Fialho, Frédéric Saubion, Marc Schoenauer, and Michèle Sebag. 2009. Extreme compass and dynamic multi-armed bandits for adaptive operator selection. In Evolutionary Computation, 2009. CEC'09. IEEE Congress on. IEEE, 365--372. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dino Schweitzer and Wayne Brown. 2007. Interactive visualization for the active learning classroom. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39, 1 (2007), 208--212. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adam M Smith, Mark J Nelson, and Michael Mateas. 2009. Computational Support for Play Testing Game Sketches. In AIIDE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Justin Talbot, Bongshin Lee, Ashish Kapoor, and Desney S Tan. 2009. EnsembleMatrix: interactive visualization to support machine learning with multiple classifiers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1283--1292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julian Togelius, Noor Shaker, and Mark J Nelson. 2014. Procedural Content Generation in Games: A Textbook and an Overview of Current Research/J. Togelius, N. Shaker, M. Nelson-Berlin: Springer (2014).Google Scholar
- Malcolm Ware, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes, Mark Hall, and Ian H Witten. 2001. Interactive machine learning: letting users build classifiers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55, 3 (2001), 281--292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xueqiao Xu. {n. d.}. A comprehensive path-finding library in javascript. http://qiao.github.io/PathFinding.js/visual/.Google Scholar
- Qian Yang, Jina Suh, Nan-Chen Chen, and Gonzalo Ramos. {n. d.}. ({n. d.}).Google Scholar
- Georgios N Yannakakis and Julian Togelius. 2017. Artificial Intelligence and Games. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jichen Zhu, Antonios Liapis, Sebastian Risi, Rafael Bidarra, and G Michael Youngblood. 2018. Explainable AI for designers: A human-centered perspective on mixed-initiative co-creation. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Interactive Visualizer to Facilitate Game Designers in Understanding Machine Learning
Recommendations
Investigating How Experienced UX Designers Effectively Work with Machine Learning
DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceMachine learning (ML) plays an increasingly important role in improving a user's experience. However, most UX practitioners face challenges in understanding ML's capabilities or envisioning what it might be. We interviewed 13 designers who had many ...
Machine Learning in Adversarial Game Using Flight Chess
MINES '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Third International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and SecurityGame playing is a perfect domain of the study of machine learning for its simplicity that allows the researchers to focus on the learning problems themselves and ignore marginal factors. Many learning techniques derived from games have been applied ...
“The game doesn't judge you”: game designers’ perspectives on implementing failure in video games
FDG '22: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital GamesFailure constitutes a key mechanic in video games, playing into player experience jointly with questions of challenge and difficulty. While research has started to investigate the effect of failure on the player's experience, it has so far overlooked ...
Comments