skip to main content
10.1145/3290607.3312859acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

ML-Process Canvas: A Design Tool to Support the UX Design of Machine Learning-Empowered Products

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Machine learning (ML) is now widely used to empower products and services, but there is a lack of research on the tools that involve designers in the entire ML process. Thus, designers who are new to ML technology may struggle to fully understand the capabilities of ML, users, and scenarios when designing ML-empowered products. This paper describes a design tool, ML-Process Canvas, which assists designers in considering the specific factors of the user, ML system, and scenario throughout the whole ML process. The Canvas was applied to a design project, and was observed to contribute in the conceptual phase of UX design practice. In the future, we hope that the ML-Process Canvas will become more practical through continued use in design practice.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

lbw1420p.mp4

mp4

4 MB

References

  1. Saleema Amershi, Maya Cakmak, William Bradley Knox, and Todd Kulesza. 2014. Power to the people: The role of humans in interactive machine learning. AI Magazine, 35(4), 105--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Haydee M Cuevas, Stephen M Fiore, Barrett S Caldwell, and Strater Laura. 2007. Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine, 78(5), B63-B70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Graham Dove, Kim Halskov, Jodi Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2017. UX Design Innovation: Challenges for Working with Machine Learning as a Design Material. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Denver, Colorado, USA, 278--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jodi Forlizzi, John Zimmerman, Vince Mancuso, and Sonya Kwak. 2007. How interface agents affect interaction between humans and computers. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces. ACM, 209--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Peter A. Hancock and Mark H. Chignell. 1988. Mental workload dynamics in adaptive interface design. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man & Cybernetics, 18(4), 647--658.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lars Erik Holmquist. 2017. Intelligence on tap: artificial intelligence as a new design material. Interactions, 24(4), 28--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tharon Howard. 2014. Journey mapping: a brief overview. Commun. Des. Q. Rev, 2(3), 10--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yung-Ming Li and Yung-Shao Yeh. 2010. Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design aesthetics. Comput. Hum. Behav., 26(4), 673--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Stephanie M Merritt, Heimbaugh Heather, La Chapell Jennifer, and Lee Deborah. 2013. I trust it, but I don't know why: effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system. Human Factors, 55(3), 520--534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kristin E Schaefer, Jessie YC Chen, James L Szalma, and Peter A Hancock. 2016. A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems. Human factors, 58(3), 377--400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Molly Wood. Hopes to Serve Up Music in a Novel Way. Retrieved December 27, 2018 from http://nyti.ms/1fr8LY5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Qian Yang, Nikola Banovic, and John Zimmerman. 2018. Mapping Machine Learning Advances from HCI Research to Reveal Starting Places for Design Innovation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC, Canada, Paper No. 130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Qian Yang, Alex Scuito, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Aaron Steinfeld. 2018. Investigating How Experienced UX Designers Effectively Work with Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Hong Kong, China, 585--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Qian Yang, John Zimmerman, Aaron Steinfeld, and Anthony Tomasic. 2016. Planning Adaptive Mobile Experiences When Wireframing. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 565--576. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ML-Process Canvas: A Design Tool to Support the UX Design of Machine Learning-Empowered Products

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 2019
          3673 pages
          ISBN:9781450359719
          DOI:10.1145/3290607

          Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 May 2019

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format