skip to main content
10.1145/3291078.3291083acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation of the Smart Campus Information Portal

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

As the internet wave swept the world, "Internet plus education" came into being. Smart campus design and construction has since become a research hotspot. The Campus Information Portal (CIP) plays an increasingly important role in the management of smart campuses. That is why, conducting a comprehensive evaluation study on the construction level of campus information portals is necessary. By combining CIP's own characteristics and incorporating intelligent needs, a comprehensive evaluation index system for CIP was developed. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to determine index weights, while a Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE) was used to calculate the quantitative scores of the evaluation objects. We selected 10 representative Chinese universities for a comprehensive CIP evaluation and experimental analysis. We analyze the final results of the study, evaluate the validity of our process and methods and finally provide guidance for the construction of a smart campus information portal.

References

  1. Jiang, Dongxing, et al. Design of the Technical Reference Model of Wisdom Campus in Universities. China Educational Technology 9(2016):108--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dias, Cláudia. Corporate portals: a literature review of a new concept in Information Management. International Journal of Information Management 21.4(2001):269--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Neill, William D., and J. E. Richard. Intranet portals: Marketing and managing individuals' acceptance and use. Australasian Marketing Journal 20.2(2012):147--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Zhang, Shengping, and X. Chen. Research and practice of information portal system for digital campus. International Conference on Information Science and Technology IEEE, 2011:409--412.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Saghapour, Mohsen, et al. An empirical investigation of campus portal usage. Education & Information Technologies 23.3(2018):1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Townsend, James J., D. Riz, and D. Schaffer. Building portals, intranets, and corporate Web sites using Microsoft servers. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yong, Jin Kim, A. Chaudhury, and H. R. Rao. A knowledge management perspective to evaluation of enterprise information portals. Knowledge & Process Management 9.2(2002):57--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Azar, S. N, A. H. Jalali, and S. Falsafi. Commercial Portals Evaluation. International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology IEEE, 2008:2035--2039.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo, Mingjing, and Y. Zhao. AHP-Based Evaluation of Information Service Quality of Information Center Web Portals in High-Tech Industry. International Conference on Management and Service Science IEEE, 2009:1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Jian, and C. Mingins. A Benchmark-Based Approach for Evaluating Capability of Enterprise Web Portals. Fifth International Conference on Management of E-Commerce and E-Government IEEE, 2011:164--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tian, Jianwei, et al. Quality Model of Enterprise Information Portal Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology 4.23(2012):161--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang, Xiwei, et al. Evaluation of the Ecology of the Enterprise Information Portal: Analysis Based on the Perspective of Customer Experience. Library & Information Service 58.4(2014):46--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Pang, Qinghua, and Y. Jiang. A Comprehensive Evaluation Model of the Maturity of Enterprise Information Portal. Journal of Intelligence 31.2(2012):93--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tripathi, Rajeev, and R. Tripathi. Design of a AHP Based User Centric Decision Making Algorithm for Network Selection. International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology ACM, 2015:142--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yang, Da, and C. M. Mak. An assessment model of classroom acoustical environment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Applied Acoustics 127(2017):292--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Sun, Fudong, and F. Wei. Apply Excel Ingenious Solution Analytic Hierarchy Process. Statistics & Decision 22(2011):173--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of the Smart Campus Information Portal

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEEL '18: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Education and E-Learning
      November 2018
      224 pages
      ISBN:9781450365772
      DOI:10.1145/3291078

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 November 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader