skip to main content
10.1145/3291279.3339435acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Computer Science Teacher Preparation in an International Context: A Comparative Study

Published:30 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Since computer science is implemented at all levels of curriculum from kindergarten to high school there is a growing interest in increasing the quality and number of computer science teachers in countries around the world. Innovation in university study programmes and different approaches in computer science teacher preparation can be one of the key elements for success with these problems. In the Czech Republic, as well as in other countries, there is also a problem with the number of qualified computer science teachers, and with how to recruit new teachers. Comparative education as a general cognitive tool can bring important knowledge of foreign development. The main aim of my dissertation thesis is to empirically describe the key elements in computer science teacher preparation in selected contexts. The results can serve as a valuable source of information and inspiration for universities preparing computer science teachers, but also for political representatives of the countries in the field of education who deal with the given issues.

References

  1. Iva Stuchlíková, Tomá Janík and Zden?k Bene, et al. 2015. Oborové didaktiky: vývoj, stav, perspektivy. Masarykova univerzita, Brno. ISBN 978-80-210-7769-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Computer Science For All. 2016. Computer Science For All | whitehouse.gov {online}. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Computer Science Teachers Association. 2013. Bugs in the System: Computer Science Teacher Certification in the U.S. {online}. ACM, New York. ISBN 978-1-4503-2310-9. https://csta.acm.org/ComputerScienceTeacherCertification/sub/CSTA_BugsInTheSystem.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Judith Gal-Ezer and Chris Stephenson. 2014. A Tale of Two Countries: Successes and Challenges in K-12 Computer Science Education in Israel and the United States. Trans. Comput. Educ. 14, 2, Article 8 (June 2014), 18 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gene Bottoms and Kirsten Sundell. 2016. The Future of K-12 Computer Science Instruction. State Education Standard, Vol. Volume 16, No. 3, 24--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Adams Nager and Robert Atkinson. 2016. The Case for Improving U.S. Computer Science Education. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, https://itif.org/publications/2016/05/31/case-improving-us-computer-science-education.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Muhsin Menekse. 2015. Computer science teacher professional development in the United States: a review of studies published between 2004 and 2014. Computer Science Education. 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. The Royal Society. 2012. Shut down or restart? The way forward for computing in UK schools. The Royal Society, London, U.K.; https://royalsociety.org/~/media/education/computing-in-schools/2012-01-12-computing-in-schools.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Katrina Falkner, Rebecca Vivian, Nickolas Falkner and Sally-Ann Williams. 2017. Reflecting on Three Offerings of a Community-Centric MOOC for K-6 Computer Science Teachers. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 195--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jan Průcha. 2017. Vzdělávací systémy v zahraničí: encyklopedický přehled kolství v 30 zemích Evropy, v Japonsku, Kanadě, USA. Wolters Kluwer, Praha. ISBN 978-80-7552-845-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. David Phillips and Michele Schweisfurth. 2008. Comparative and international education. An introduction to theory, method, and practice. Continuum, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mark Bray and Muray Thomas. 1995. Levels of comparison in educational studies: Different insights from different literatures and the value of multilevel analyses. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 472--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Edmund J. King. 1967. Other schools and ours. A comparative study for today. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Delwyn Goodrick. 2014. Comparative Case Studies: Methodological Briefs - Impact Evaluation No. 9, Methodological Briefs no. 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Peter Lor. 2011. International and comparative librarianship. De Gruyter Saur, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Leo A. Goodman. 1961. "Snowball sampling". Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 32 (1): 148--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computer Science Teacher Preparation in an International Context: A Comparative Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICER '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
      July 2019
      375 pages
      ISBN:9781450361859
      DOI:10.1145/3291279

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 July 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      ICER '19 Paper Acceptance Rate28of137submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICER 2024
      ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
      August 13 - 15, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader