skip to main content
research-article

Do Game Designers’ Decisions Related to Visual Activities Affect Knowledge Acquisition in Cultural Heritage Games? An Evaluation From a Human Cognitive Processing Perspective

Published:20 February 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In the cultural heritage domain, games have been used to engage users into an active state of learning through immersive and playful interactions that include visually enriched interaction contexts. There is evidence that individual differences in the inherent way people search, process, analyze, comprehend, store, and retrieve visual information in their surrounding environment are reflected in their performance, experience, effectiveness, and efficiency in such environments. Despite the fact that cultural heritage game designers favor learning experiences in such contexts, current design and evaluation practices of cultural heritage games barely consider the gamers’ individual differences in visual information processing. This can be attributed to a deficiency in understanding and modeling the effects among users’ visual behavior, gameplay behavior, and cognitive styles in cultural heritage games toward knowledge acquisition, resulting in insufficient methods of creating cognition-centered user models and considering such human cognitive factors practically, within current state-of-the-art design and evaluation approaches. To address this gap, we selected three known cultural heritage games, adopted a credible cognitive style theory, and performed, over a 6-month period, three separate evaluation user studies (N=127) following a between-subject, eye-tracking based, experimental design. The results of the evaluation studies revealed that game designers’ decisions, related to visual search, unintentionally favored users with specific cognitive characteristics by influencing their visual and consequently gameplay behavior, resulting in differences in knowledge acquisition. The results of the evaluation studies also revealed correlation effects during gameplay among individual differences in visual information processing, users’ visual behavior strategies, and gameplay behavior. The findings necessitate the consideration of cognitive characteristics as evaluation and design factors when delivering cultural heritage activities that are based on visual search tasks. Their consideration will help us better understand and explain the different information processing approaches in cultural heritage contexts and will drive the design of adaptive mechanisms for delivering personalized cultural heritage activities, tailored to the users’ unique cognitive characteristics.

References

  1. Sultan A. Alharthi, George E. Raptis, Christina Katsini, Igor Dolgov, Lennart E. Nacke, and Zachary O. Toups. 2018. Toward understanding the effects of cognitive styles on collaboration in multiplayer games. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’18). ACM, New York, NY, 169--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Panagiota Altanopoulou, Nikolaos Tselios, Christos Katsanos, Maria Georgoutsou, and Maria-Antonia Panagiotaki. 2015. Wiki-mediated activities in higher education: Evidence-based analysis of learning effectiveness across three studies. Journal of Educational Technology and Society 18, 4 (Oct. 2015), 511--522.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arif Altun and Mehtap Cakan. 2006. Undergraduate students’ academic achievement, field dependent/independent cognitive styles and attitude toward computers. Educational Technology and Society 9, 1 (2006), 289--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Eike Falk Anderson, Leigh McLoughlin, Fotis Liarokapis, Christopher Peters, Panagiotis Petridis, and Sara de Freitas. 2010. Developing serious games for cultural heritage: A state-of-the-art review. Virtual Reality 14, 4 (Dec. 2010), 255--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Charoula Angeli. 2013. Examining the effects of field dependence-independence on learners’ problem-solving performance and interaction with a computer modeling tool: Implications for the design of joint cognitive systems. Computers and Education 62 (Mar. 2013), 221--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Charoula Angeli, Nicos Valanides, and Paul Kirschner. 2009. Field dependence-independence and instructional-design effects on learners’ performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 6 (Nov. 2009), 1355--1366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Charoula Angeli, Nicos Valanides, Eirini Polemitou, and Elena Fraggoulidou. 2016. An interaction effect between young children’s field dependence-independence and order of learning with glass-box and black-box simulations: Evidence for the malleability of cognitive style in computer-supported learning. Computers in Human Behavior 61 (Aug. 2016), 569--583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Angeliki Antoniou, Dimitris Diakakis, George Lepouras, and Costas Vassilakis. 2011. Towards a methodological framework for the cognitive-behavioural evaluation of educational E-Games. International Journal of Learning Technology 6, 3 (Nov. 2011), 263--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Angeliki Antoniou and George Lepouras. 2010. Modeling visitors’ profiles: A study to investigate adaptation aspects for museum learning technologies. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 3, 2 (Sep. 2010), 1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Angeliki Antoniou, George Lepouras, Stavroula Bampatzia, and Hera Almpanoudi. 2013. An approach for serious game development for cultural heritage: Case study for an archaeological site and museum. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 6, 4 (Nov. 2013), 1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Carmelo Ardito and Rosa Lanzilotti. 2008. ”Isn’t this archaeological site exciting!”: A mobile system enhancing school trips. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 488--489. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sylvester Arnab, Panagiotis Petridis, Ian Dunwell, and Sara de Freitas. 2011. Enhancing learning in distributed virtual worlds through touch: A browser-based architecture for haptic interaction. In Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, M. Ma, A. Oikonomou, and L. C. Jain (Eds.). Springer London, London, UK, 149--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sylvester Arnab, Panagiotis Petridis, Ian Dunwell, and Sara De Freitas. 2011. Tactile interaction in an ancient world on a web browser. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications 3, 2011, 687--695.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mehmet Bahar and Mike H. Hansell. 2000. The relationship between some psychological factors and their effect on the performance of grid questions and word association tests. Educational Psychology 20, 3 (Sep. 2000), 349--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Rafael Ballagas, André Kuntze, and Steffen P. Walz. 2008. Gaming tourism: Lessons from evaluating REXplorer, a pervasive game for tourists. In Pervasive Computing, J. Indulska, D. J. Patterson, T. Rodden, and M. Ott (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, 244--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Stavroula Bampatzia, Ioannis Bourlakos, Angeliki Antoniou, Costas Vassilakis, George Lepouras, and Manolis Wallace. 2016. Serious games: Valuable tools for cultural heritage. In Games and Learning Alliance, R. Bottino, J. Jeuring, and R. C. Veltkamp (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 331--341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Marios Belk, Christos Fidas, Panagiotis Germanakos, and George Samaras. 2017. The interplay between humans, technology and user authentication: A cognitive processing perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 76, C (Nov. 2017), 184--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Francesco Bellotti, Riccardo Berta, Alessandro De Gloria, Annamaria D’ursi, and Valentina Fiore. 2012. A serious game model for cultural heritage. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 5, 4 (Oct. 2012), 1--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Francesco Bellotti, Riccardo Berta, Alessandro De Gloria, and Victor Zappi. 2008. Exploring gaming mechanisms to enhance knowledge acquisition in virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts (DIMEA’08). ACM, New York, NY, 77--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jorge Simarro Cabrera, Henar Muñoz Frutos, Adrian G. Stoica, Nikolaos Avouris, Yannis Dimitriadis, Georgios Fiotakis, et al. 2005. Mystery in the museum: Collaborative learning activities using handheld devices. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’05). ACM, New York, NY, 315--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Brian Cameron and Francis Dwyer. 2005. The effect of online gaming, cognition and feedback type in facilitating delayed achievement of different learning objectives. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 16, 3 (2005), 243--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. James J. Canelos, William D. Taylor, and Robin B. Gates. 1980. The effects of three levels of visual stimulus complexity on the information processing of field-dependents and field-independents when acquiring information for performance on three types of instructional objectives. Journal of Instructional Psychology 7, 2 (1980), 65--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ben Chang, Sherry Y. Chen, and Sin-Ni Jhan. 2015. The influences of an interactive group-based videogame: Cognitive styles vs. prior ability. Computers and Education 88, C (Oct. 2015), 399--407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kuo-En Chang, Chia-Tzu Chang, Huei-Tse Hou, Yao-Ting Sung, Huei-Lin Chao, and Cheng-Ming Lee. 2014. Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Computers and Education 71 (Feb. 2014), 185--197. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Sherry Y. Chen and Xiaohui Liu. 2008. An integrated approach for modeling learning patterns of students in web-based instruction: A cognitive style perspective. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15, 1 (May 2008), Article 1, 28 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Susan Coates, Mae Lord, and Evelyn Jakabovics. 1975. Field dependence-independence, social-non-social play and sex differences in preschool children. Perceptual and Motor Skills 40, 1 (Feb. 1975), 195--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Tanguy Coenen, Lien Mostmans, and Kris Naessens. 2013. MuseUs: Case study of a pervasive cultural heritage serious game. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 6, 2 (May 2013), Article 8, 19 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Guillaume Denis and Pierre Jouvelot. 2005. Motivation-driven educational game design: Applying best practices to music education. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE’05). ACM, New York, NY, 462--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Eyal Dim and Tsvi Kuflik. 2014. Automatic detection of social behavior of museum visitor pairs. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 4, 4 (Nov. 2014), 1--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Antoaneta L. Dimitrova and Bernard Steunenberg. 2017. The power of implementers: A three-level game model of compliance with EU policy and its application to cultural heritage. Journal of European Public Policy 24, 8 (2017), 1211--1232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Anne L. Dunnewold. 2014. Thought field therapy efficacy following large scale traumatic events. Current Research in Psychology 5, 1 (Jan. 2014), 34--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Francis M. Dwyer and David M. Moore. 1992. Effect of color coding on visually and verbally oriented tests with students of different field dependence levels. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 20, 4 (June 1992), 311--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Maria Economou and Laia Pujol-Tost. 2011. Evaluating the use of virtual reality and multimedia applications for presenting the past. In Handbook of Research on Technologies and Cultural Heritage. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 223--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Warwick B. Elley. 1989. Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories. Reading Research Quarterly 24, 2 (1989), 174--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Carol Evans, John T. E. Richardson, and Michael Waring. 2013. Field independence: Reviewing the evidence. British Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 2 (June 2013), 210--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Joseph R. Fanfarelli and Rudy McDaniel. 2015. Individual differences in digital badging: Do learner characteristics matter?Journal of Educational Technology Systems 43, 4 (June 2015), 403--428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Josef Froschauer, Dieter Merkl, Max Arends, and Doron Goldfarb. 2013. Art history concepts at play with ThIATRO. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 6, 2 (May 2013), Article 7, 15 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Josef Froschauer, Ingo Seidel, Markus Gartner, Helmut Berger, and Dieter Merkl. 2010. Design and evaluation of a serious game for immersive cultural training. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM’10). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 253--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Dina Goren-Bar, Ilenia Graziola, Fabio Pianesi, and Massimo Zancanaro. 2006. The influence of personality factors on visitor attitudes towards adaptivity dimensions for mobile museum guides. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 16, 1 (Mar. 2006), 31--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. David Hecht and Miriam Reiner. 2007. Field dependency and the sense of object-presence in haptic virtual environments. CyberPsychology and Behavior 10, 2 (Apr. 2007), 243--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Kenneth Holmqvist, Marcus Nyström, and Fiona Mulvey. 2012. Eye tracker data quality: What it is and how to measure it. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA’12). ACM, New York, NY, 45--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Jon-Chao Hong, Ming-Yueh Hwang, Ker-Ping Tam, Yi-Hsuan Lai, and Li-Chun Liu. 2012. Effects of cognitive style on digital jigsaw puzzle performance: A gridware analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 3 (2012), 920--928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ming-Shiunn Huang and Brian Byrne. 1978. Cognitive style and lateral eye movements. British Journal of Psychology 69, 1 (Feb. 1978), 85--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Jeffrey Jacobson. 2011. Digital dome versus desktop display in an educational game: Gates of Horus. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations 3, 1 (2011), 13--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Christina Katsini, Christos Fidas, Marios Belk, Nikolaos Avouris, and George Samaras. 2017. Influences of users’ cognitive strategies on graphical password composition. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’17). ACM, New York, NY, 2698--2705. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Christina Katsini, Christos Fidas, George E. Raptis, Marios Belk, George Samaras, and Nikolaos Avouris. 2018. Influences of human cognition and visual behavior on password strength during picture password composition. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 87, 14 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Mohammad Khatib and Rasoul Mohammad Hosseinpur. 2011. On the validity of the group embedded figure test (GEFT). Journal of Language Teaching and Research 2, 3 (May 2011), 640--648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Hayun Kim, Sungeun An, Sangeun Keum, and Wontack Woo. 2015. H-treasure hunt: A location and object-based serious game for cultural heritage learning at a historic site. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies, P. Zaphiris and A. Ioannou (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 561--572.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Kyung-Sun Kim. 2001. Implications of user characteristics in information seeking on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13, 3 (Sep. 2001), 323--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Eric Klopfer, Judy Perry, Kurt Squire, Ming-Fong Jan, and Constance Steinkuehler. 2005. Mystery at the museum: A collaborative game for museum education. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! (CSCL’05). 316--320. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1149293.1149334 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Chih-Hung Ko, Gin-Chung Liu, Sigmund Hsiao, Ju-Yu Yen, Ming-Jen Yang, Wei-Chen Lin, et al. 2009. Brain activities associated with gaming urge of online gaming addiction. Journal of Psychiatric Research 43, 7 (Apr. 2009), 739--747.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Maria Kozhevnikov. 2007. Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin 133, 3 (May 2007), 464--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Tsvi Kuflik, Oliviero Stock, Massimo Zancanaro, Ariel Gorfinkel, Sadek Jbara, Shahar Kats, et al. 2011. A visitor’s guide in an active museum: Presentations, communications, and reflection. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 3, 3 (Mar. 2011), 1--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Joel Lanir, Peter Bak, and Tsvi Kuflik. 2014. Visualizing proximity-based spatiotemporal behavior of museum visitors using tangram diagrams. Computer Graphics Forum 33, 3 (June 2014), 261--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Joel Lanir, Tsvi Kuflik, Julia Sheidin, Nisan Yavin, Kate Leiderman, and Michael Segal. 2017. Visualizing museum visitors’ behavior: Where do they go and what do they do there?Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 21, 2 (Apr. 2017), 313--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Joel Lanir, Alan J. Wecker, Tsvi Kuflik, and Yasmin Felberbaum. 2016. Shared mobile displays: An exploratory study of their use in a museum setting. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 20, 4 (Aug. 2016), 635--651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Nicola Lercari, Michela Mortara, and Maurizio Forte. 2014. Unveiling California history through serious games: Fort Ross virtual warehouse. In Games and Learning Alliance, A. De Gloria (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 236--251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Fotis Liarokapis, Panagiotis Petridis, Daniel Andrews, and Sara de Freitas. 2017. Multimodal serious games technologies for cultural heritage. In Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage, M. Ioannides, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, and G. Papagiannakis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 371--392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Tze Wei Liew and Sazilah Salam. 2012. The effects of visual cues and learners’ field dependence in multiple external representations environment for novice program comprehension. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 23, 2 (2012), 165--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Tze Wei Liew, Su-Mae Tan, and Rouzbeh Seydali. 2014. Learners’ field dependence and the effects of personalized narration on learners’ computer perceptions and task-related attitudes in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 42, 3 (Mar. 2014), 255--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. María Teresa Linaza, David Marimón, Paula Carrasco, Roberto Álvarez, Javier Montesa, Salvador Ramón Aguilar, et al. 2012. Evaluation of mobile augmented reality applications for tourism destinations. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2012, M. Fuchs, F. Ricci, and L. Cantoni (Eds.). Springer Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 260--271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Geoffrey R. Loftus. 1972. Eye fixations and recognition memory for pictures. Cognitive Psychology 3, 4 (Oct. 1972), 525--551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Chin-Hsieh Lu, Jon-Chou Hong, and Pei-Hsiu Huang. 2007. The effects of individual characteristics on children’s problem solving performances in the context of game-based learning. In Proceedings of Redesigning Pedagogy: Culture, Knowledge and Understanding Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Fei Lu, Feng Tian, Yingying Jiang, Xiang Cao, Wencan Luo, Guang Li, et al. 2011. ShadowStory: Creative and collaborative digital storytelling inspired by cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 1919--1928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Dane M. Chapman and Judith G. Calhoun2006. Validation of learning style measures: Implications for medical education practice. Medical Education 40, 6 (May 2006), 576--583.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Irini Malegiannaki and Thanasis Daradoumis. 2017. Analyzing the educational design, use and effect of spatial games for cultural heritage: A literature review. Computers and Education 108 (May 2017), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Stefano Mastandrea, Gabriella Bartoli, and Giuseppe Bove. 2009. Preferences for ancient and modern art museums: Visitor experiences and personality characteristics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3, 3 (Aug. 2009), 164--173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Franco Mawad, Marcela Trías, Ana Giménez, Alejandro Maiche, and Gastón Ares. 2015. Influence of cognitive style on information processing and selection of yogurt labels: Insights from an eye-tracking study. Food Research International 74 (Aug. 2015), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Richard E. Mayer and Laura J. Massa. 2003. Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 4 (Dec. 2003), 833--846.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Rudy McDaniel and Robert Kenny. 2013. Evaluating the relationship between cognitive style and pre-service teachers’ preconceived notions about adopting console video games for use in future classrooms. International Journal of Game-Based Learning 3, 2 (2013), 55--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Zdenek Mikovec, Pavel Slavik, and Jiri Zara. 2009. Cultural heritage, user interfaces and serious games at CTU Prague. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM’15). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 211--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Michela Mortara, Chiara Eva Catalano, Francesco Bellotti, Giusy Fiucci, Minica Houry-Panchetti, and Panagiotis Petridis. 2014. Learning cultural heritage by serious games. Journal of Cultural Heritage 15, 3 (2014), 318--325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Yannick Naudet, Angeliki Antoniou, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Eric Tobias, Jenny Rompa, and George Lepouras. 2015. Museum personalization based on gaming and cognitive styles. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking 7, 2 (Apr. 2015), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. João N. Neto, Ricardo Silva, João P. Neto, João Madeiras Pereira, and João Fernandes. 2011. Solis’curse—A cultural heritage game using voice interaction with a virtual agent. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-Games’11). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 164--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Newzoo. 2017. Gamer Consumer Insights. Technical Report. Newzoo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Efi Nisiforou and Andrew Laghos. 2016. Field dependence-independence and eye movement patterns: Investigating users’ differences through an eye tracking study. Interacting with Computers 28, 4 (June 2016), 407--420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Mania Nosratinia and Shirin Adibifar. 2014. The effect of teaching metacognitive strategies on field-dependent and independent learners’ writing. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (May 2014), 1390--1399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Jeni Paay, Jesper Kjeldskov, Anders Christensen, Andreas Ibsen, Dan Jensen, Glen Nielsen, et al. 2008. Location-based storytelling in the urban environment. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Designing for Habitus and Habitat (OZCHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 122--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Allan Paivio. 1990. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Ruth A. Palmquist and Kyung-Sun Kim. 2000. Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of web search performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 51, 6 (Mar. 2000), 558--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Konstantinos Papangelis, Melvin Metzger, Yiyang Sheng, Hai-Ning Liang, Alan Chamberlain, and Vassilis-Javed Khan. 2017. “Get off my lawn!”: Starting to understand territoriality in location based mobile games. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’17). ACM, New York, NY, 1955--1961. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Isabel Pedersen, Nathan Gale, Pejman Mirza-Babaei, and Samantha Reid. 2017. More than meets the eye: The benefits of augmented reality and holographic displays for digital cultural heritage. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10, 2 (Mar. 2017), 1--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Sara Elizabeth Perry, Maria Roussou, Maria Economou, Hilary Young, and Laia Pujol. 2017. Moving beyond the virtual museum: Engaging visitors emotionally. In Proceedings of the 2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System Multimedia (VSMM’17). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Daniela Petrelli and Sinead O’Brien. 2018. Phone vs. Tangible in museums: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 112, 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Panagiotis Petridis, Ian Dunwell, Fotis Liarokapis, George Constantinou, Sylvester Arnab, Sara de Freitas, et al. 2013. The Herbert Virtual Museum. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 2013 (2013), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Robert T. Pithers. 2002. Cognitive learning style: A review of the field dependent-field independent approach. Journal of Vocational Education and Training 54, 1 (Mar. 2002), 117--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Christina Pollalis, Whitney Fahnbulleh, Jordan Tynes, and Orit Shaer. 2017. HoloMuse: Enhancing engagement with archaeological artifacts through gesture-based interaction with holograms. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 565--570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Laia Pujol-Tost. 2018. Cultural presence in virtual archaeology: An exploratory analysis of factors. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 26, 3 (2018), 247--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. George E. Raptis, Christos A. Fidas, and Nikolaos M. Avouris. 2016. Differences of field dependent/independent gamers on cultural heritage playing: Preliminary findings of an eye--tracking study. In Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection, M. Ioannides, E. Fink, A. Moropoulou, M. Hagedorn-Saupe, A. Fresa, G. Liestøl, et al. (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 199--206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. George E. Raptis, Christos A. Fidas, and Nikolaos M. Avouris. 2016. Do field dependence-independence differences of game players affect performance and behaviour in cultural heritage games? In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY’16). ACM, New York, NY, 38--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. George E. Raptis, Christos A. Fidas, and Nikolaos M. Avouris. 2016. Using eye tracking to identify cognitive differences: A brief literature review. In Proceedings of the 20th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics (PCI’16). ACM, New York, NY, Article 21, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. George E. Raptis, Christos A. Fidas, and Nikolaos M. Avouris. 2017. Cultural heritage gaming: Effects of human cognitive styles on players’ performance and visual behavior. In the Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP’17). ACM, New York, NY, 343--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. George E. Raptis, Christos A. Fidas, and Nikolaos M. Avouris. 2017. On implicit elicitation of cognitive strategies using gaze transition entropies in pattern recognition tasks. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’17). ACM, New York, NY, 1993--2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. George E. Raptis, Christos A. Fidas, and Nikolaos M. Avouris. 2018. Effects of mixed-reality on players’ behaviour and immersion in a cultural tourism game: A cognitive processing perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 114 (June 2018), 69--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. George E. Raptis, Christos A. Fidas, Christina Katsini, and Nikolaos M. Avouris. 2018. Towards a cognition-centered personalization framework for cultural-heritage content. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article LBW011, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. George E. Raptis, Christina Katsini, Marios Belk, Christos A. Fidas, George Samaras, and Nikolaos Avouris. 2017. Using eye gaze data and visual activities to infer human cognitive styles: Method and feasibility studies. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP’17). ACM, New York, NY, 164--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. George E. Raptis, Christina Katsini, Christos A. Fidas, and Nikolaos Avouris. 2018. Visualization of cultural-heritage content based on individual cognitive differences. In Proceedings of the 2018 AVI-CH Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces for Cultural Heritage (AVI-CH’18). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2091/paper9.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Keith Rayner. 1977. Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes. Memory and Cognition 5, 4 (July 1977), 443--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Richard Riding and Indra Cheema. 1991. Cognitive styles—An overview and integration. Educational Psychology 11, 3--4 (1991), 193--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Kent A. Rittschof. 2010. Field dependence-independence as visuospatial and executive functioning in working memory: Implications for instructional systems design and research. Educational Technology Research and Development 58, 1 (Feb. 2010), 99--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Richard J. Robertson and Patricia Alfano. 1985. Field dependence as a limiting factor in solving a complex learning problem. Perceptual and Motor Skills 61, 1 (Aug. 1985), 276--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Cesare Rocchi, Oliviero Stock, Massimo Zancanaro, Michael Kruppa, and Antonio Krüger. 2004. The museum visit: Generating seamless personalized presentations on multiple devices. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interface (IUI’04). ACM, New York, NY, 316--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Irene Rubino, Claudia Barberis, Jetmir Xhembulla, and Giovanni Malnati. 2015. Integrating a location-based mobile game in the museum visit: Evaluating visitors’ behaviour and learning. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 8, 3 (May 2015), Article 15, 18 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Kaapo Seppälä, Olli I. Heimo, Timo Korkalainen, Juho Pääkylä, Jussi Latvala, Seppo Helle, et al. 2016. Examining user experience in an augmented reality adventure game: Case Luostarinmäki Handicrafts Museum. In Technology and Intimacy: Choice or Coercion, D. Kreps, G. Fletcher, and M. Griffiths (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 257--276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Kennon M. Sheldon and Vincent Filak. 2010. Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness support in a game-learning context: New evidence that all three needs matter. British Journal of Social Psychology 47, 2 (Dec. 2010), 267--283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Licheng Shi, Yuling Hu, and Jiali Wang. 2016. Effects of cognitive styles on eye fixations: Evidence from drivers’ eye movements. International Journal of Psychology 51, S1 (July 2016), 1153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Vandana Singh. 2017. Exploring the relationship between cognitive style and learning style with academic achievement of elementary school learners. Educational Quest 8 (Aug. 2017), 413--419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Christos Sintoris, Adrian Stoica, Ioanna Papadimitriou, Nikoleta Yiannoutsou, Vassilis Komis, and Nikolaos Avouris. 2010. MuseumScrabble: Design of a mobile game for children’s interaction with a digitally augmented cultural space. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction 2, 2 (2010), 53--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Maria Solé Puig, Laura Puigcerver, J. Antonio Aznar-Casanova, and Hans Supèr. 2013. Difference in visual processing assessed by eye vergence movements. PLoS One 8, 9 (Sep. 2013), 372041.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Oliviero Stock, Massimo Zancanaro, Paolo Busetta, Charles Callaway, Antonio Krüger, Michael Kruppa, et al. 2007. Adaptive, intelligent presentation of information for the museum visitor in PEACH. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 17, 3 (July 2007), 257--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. Yasuyuki Sumi and Kenji Mase. 2002. Supporting the awareness of shared interests and experiences in communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 56, 1 (Jan. 2002), 127--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. Han-Yu Sung and Gwo-Jen Hwang. 2013. A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Computers and Education 63 (Apr. 2013), 43--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Rhoada K. Tannenbaum. 1982. An Investigation of the Relationship(s) Between Selected Instructional Techniques and Identified Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Styles as Evidenced Among High School Students Enrolled in Studies of Nutrition. Ph.D. Dissertation. St. John’s University, Queens, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Gary F. Templeton. 2011. A two-step approach for transforming continuous variables to normal: Implications and recommendations for is research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 28, 1 (2011), 41--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  115. Marinos Theodorakopoulos, Nikos Papageorgopoulos, Andriana Mourti, Angeliki Antoniou, Manolis Wallace, George Lepouras, et al. 2017. Personalized augmented reality experiences in museums using Google Cardboards. In Proceeding of the 12th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP’17). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 95--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. Anastasios Theodoropoulos, Angeliki Antoniou, and George Lepouras. 2016. How do different cognitive styles affect learning programming? Insights from a game-based approach in Greek schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 17, 1 (Jan. 2016), Article 3, 25 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. Tobii AB. 2017. Tobii Pro Glasses 2: User Manual. Tobii AB.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Dereck Toker, Cristina Conati, Ben Steichen, and Giuseppe Carenini. 2013. Individual user characteristics and information visualization: Connecting the dots through eye tracking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. Tomas Trescak and Anton Bogdanovych. 2017. Case-based planning for large virtual agent societies. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST’17). ACM, New York, NY, Article 33, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. Evangelos Triantafillou, Andreas Pomportsis, and Stavros Demetriadis. 2003. The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles. Computers and Education 41, 1 (Aug. 2003), 87--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  121. Sheila Vaidya and Norman M. Chansky. 1980. Cognitive development and cognitive style as factors in mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 72, 3 (1980), 326--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  122. William R. Watson, Christopher J. Mong, and Constance A. Harris. 2011. A case study of the in-class use of a video game for teaching high school history. Computers and Education 56, 2 (Feb. 2011), 466--474. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. Michel Wedel and Rik Pieters. 2000. Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings. Marketing Science 19, 4 (Nov. 2000), 297--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Wen Wen, Toru Ishikawa, and Takao Sato. 2010. Working memory in spatial knowledge acquisition: Differences in encoding processes and sense of direction. Applied Cognitive Psychology 25, 4 (Aug. 2010), 654--662.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. James L. C. Wijnen and Cees J. Groot. 1984. An eye movement analysis system (EMAS) for the identification of cognitive processes on figural tasks. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 16, 3 (May 1984), 277--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  126. Mathias Wilde and Detlef Urhahne. 2008. Museum learning: A study of motivation and learning achievement. Journal of Biological Education 42, 2 (Mar. 2008), 78--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  127. Herman A. Witkin, Carol Ann Moore, Donald R. Goodenough, and Patricia W. Cox. 1977. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research 47, 1 (Mar. 1977), 1--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  128. Isil Yildirm and Rengin Zengel. 2014. The impact of cognitive styles on design students’ spatial knowledge from virtual environments. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 13, 3 (July 2014), 210--215.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. Yuji Yoshimura, Stanislav Sobolevsky, Carlo Ratti, Fabien Girardin, Juan Pablo Carrascal, Josep Blat, et al. 2014. An analysis of visitors’ behavior in the Louvre Museum: A study using Bluetooth data. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 41, 6 (Dec. 2014), 1113--1131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. Daniel Yule, Bonnie MacKay, and Derek Reilly. 2015. Operation Citadell: Exploring the role of docents in mixed reality. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY’15). ACM, New York, NY, 285--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. Robert Zheng. 2010. Effects of situated learning on students’ knowledge acquisition: An individual differences perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research 43, 4 (Dec. 2010), 467--487.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  132. Shi Zhuomin and Zheng Wanyi. 2014. An eye-tracking study on the differences between two cognitive styles of individuals in reading advertising. Journal of Marketing Science 10, 3 (2014), 128--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. Barry J. Zimmerman. 2000. Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 1 (Jan. 2000), 82--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Do Game Designers’ Decisions Related to Visual Activities Affect Knowledge Acquisition in Cultural Heritage Games? An Evaluation From a Human Cognitive Processing Perspective

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
        Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 12, Issue 1
        Special Issue on the Evaluation of Digital Cultural Resources
        February 2019
        151 pages
        ISSN:1556-4673
        EISSN:1556-4711
        DOI:10.1145/3313804
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 February 2019
        • Revised: 1 November 2018
        • Accepted: 1 November 2018
        • Received: 1 January 2018
        Published in jocch Volume 12, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format