skip to main content
10.1145/3292147.3292203acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

The effect of video placement in AR conferencing applications

Published:04 December 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We ran a pilot study to investigate the impact of video placement in augmented reality conferencing on communication, social presence and user preference. In addition, we explored the influence of different tasks, assembly and negotiation. We discovered a correlation between video placement and the type of the tasks, with some significant results in social presence indicators.

References

  1. Billinghurst, M., & Kato, H. (2002). Collaborative augmented reality. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 64--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Lee, G. Teo, T. H. L, Kim, S. & Billinghurst, M (2018). A suer study on MR remote collaboration using live 360 video. In Proceedings of the IEEE and ACM International Symposium for Mixed and Augmented Reality 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, H., Lee, A. S., Swift, M., & Tang, J. C. (2015, October). 3D collaboration method over HoloLens™ and Skype™ end points. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Immersive Media Experiences (pp. 27--30). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dey, A., Billinghurst, M., Lindeman, R.W. and Swan, J. E., 2018. A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, p.37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fussell, S.R., Setlock, L.D. and Kraut, R.E., 2003, April. Effects of head-mounted and scene oriented video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 513--520). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Fussell, S.R., Kraut, R.E. and Siegel, J., 2000, December. Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 21--30). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hauber, J., Regenbrecht, H., Billinghurst, M. and Cockburn, A., 2006, November. Spatiality in videoconferencing: trade-offs between efficiency and social presence. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 413--422). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Whittaker, S. and O'Conaill, B., 1997. The role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Skype for HoloLens demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QiGYtd3qNIGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Harms, C., & A. Biocca, F. (2004). Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds social presence measure. In M. ALcaniz & B. Reys (Eds), Seventh Annual International Workshop: Presence 2004. Valencia: Universidad Politecnica de Valencia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, H. and Brennan, S. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on Social Shared Cognition, L. Resnick, J. Levine, and S. Teasley, eds. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 127--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Whittaker, S. (2003). Theories and methods in mediated communication. The handbook of discourse processes, 243--286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lost at Sea: http://insight.typepad.co.uk/lost_at_sea.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Winter Wilderness: https://ed.fnal.gov/arise/guides/bio/1-Scientific%20Method/1b-WinterSurvivalExercise.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Moon Landing: http://insight.typepad.co.uk/moon_landing.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Billinghurst, M., & Kato, H. (2000). Out and about---real world teleconferencing. BT technology journal, 18(1), 80--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Daly-Jones, O., Monk, A., & Watts, L. (1998). Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: fluency and awareness of attentional focus. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49(1), 21--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Velamkayala, E. R., Zambrano, M. V., & Li, H. (2017, September). Effects of HoloLens in Collaboration: A Case in Navigation Tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 2110--2114). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang, W., & Alem, L. (2013, February). HandsinAir: a wearable system for remote collaboration on physical tasks. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion (pp. 153--156). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 18(1--2), 13--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kato, H., & Billinghurst, M. (1999). Marker tracking and hmd calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. In Augmented Reality, 1999.(IWAR'99) Proceedings. 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on (pp. 85--94). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Isaacs, E. A., & Tang, J. C. (1994). What video can and cannot do for collaboration: a case study. Multimedia systems, 2(2), 63--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The effect of video placement in AR conferencing applications

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          OzCHI '18: Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction
          December 2018
          639 pages
          ISBN:9781450361880
          DOI:10.1145/3292147

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 December 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader