skip to main content
10.1145/3292147.3292218acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A framework for designing interactions between pedestrians and driverless cars: insights from a ride-sharing design study

Published: 04 December 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Previous work has highlighted the need for human factors research to not only focus on the passengers inside driverless cars but also consider others who will interact with the car in an urban environment such as pedestrians. In this paper, we position this area of research as a new opportunity for HCI and propose a framework to guide the design of the interactions between driverless cars and pedestrians. The framework draws on HCI literature and our findings from a design study, which focused on designing for the intent and awareness of driverless cars when picking up passengers in a ride-sharing scenario. We designed various interaction design proposals as mockups and tested their acceptance through three rounds of user evaluations. The framework was developed after the second evaluation round and was then applied to revise our design solutions and used in the final evaluation round. The framework offers guidance for breaking down use cases into stages of interactions, specifying the information channels and the interactions between driverless cars and pedestrians, as well as reflecting on how well each solution addresses the user needs.

References

[1]
Chia-Ming Chang, Koki Toda, Daisuke Sakamoto, and Takeo Igarashi. 2017. Eyes on a Car: an Interface Design for Communication between an Autonomous Car and a Pedestrian. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 65--73.
[2]
Michael Clamann, Miles Aubert, and Mary L Cummings. 2017. Evaluation of vehicle-to-pedestrian communication displays for autonomous vehicles. Technical Report.
[3]
Ashley Colley, Jonna Häkkilä, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2017. A Design Space for External Displays on Cars. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct. ACM, 146--151.
[4]
Scott Davidof, Min Kyung Lee, Anind K Dey, and John Zimmerman. 2007. Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 429--446.
[5]
Christopher Frayling. 1993. Research in art and design. (1993).
[6]
Nikhil Goel and John Badalamenti. 2016. Lighting the Way Toward Seamless Pickups with Uber Beacon. https://www.uber.com/newsroom/beacon/
[7]
Franz Keferböck and Andreas Riener. 2015. Strategies for negotiation between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians. Mensch und Computer 2015-Workshopband (2015).
[8]
T Lagstrom and Victor Malmsten Lundgren. 2015. AVIP-Autonomous vehicles interaction with pedestrians. Master of Science Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology (2015).
[9]
Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, and Ehud Sharlin. 2018. Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 429.
[10]
Milecia Matthews, Girish Chowdhary, and Emily Kieson. 2017. Intent Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07123 (2017).
[11]
Anantha Pillai et al. 2017. Virtual Reality based Study to Analyse Pedestrian Attitude towards Autonomous Vehicles. (2017).
[12]
Toni Robertson and Lian Loke. 2009. Designing situations. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7. ACM, 1--8.
[13]
Dirk Rothenbücher, Jamy Li, David Sirkin, Brian Mok, and Wendy Ju. 2016. Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 795--802.
[14]
Friederike Schneemann and Irene Gohl. 2016. Analyzing driver-pedestrian interaction at crosswalks: A contribution to autonomous driving in urban environments. In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2016 IEEE. IEEE, 38--43.
[15]
Azim Shariff, Jean-François Bonnefon, and Iyad Rahwan. 2017. Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles. Nature Human Behaviour 1, 10 (2017), 694.
[16]
Lucy A Suchman. 1987. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge university press.
[17]
Matthew Sweeney, Thomas Pilarski, William Payne Ross, and Chenggang Liu. 2018. LIGHT OUTPUT SYSTEM FOR A SELF-DRIVING VEHICLE. US Patent App. 15/803, 184.
[18]
Martin Tomitsch. 2018. Making Cities Smarter: Designing Interactive Urban Applications. Jovis Verlag GmbH, Berlin.
[19]
Christopher Paul Urmson, Ian James Mahon, Dmitri A Dolgov, and Jiajun Zhu. 2015. Pedestrian notifications. US Patent 8,954,252.
[20]
Stephan AG Wensveen, Johan Partomo Djajadiningrat, and CJ Overbeeke. 2004. Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. ACM, 177--184.
[21]
Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, Tamara von Sawitzky, and AnnaKatharina Frison. 2018. System Transparency: An Approach to Increase Trust in Automated Vehicles. In Position paper submitted to CHI 2018 workshop "Interacting with Autonomous Vehicles: Learning from other domains". Available at https://hci.sbg.ac.at/sites/autonomous-vehicles-chi2018/.
[22]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 493--502.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Human-Centred Technology Approach to Pedestrian Safety in Smart CitiesResilient and Responsible Smart Cities10.1007/978-3-031-20182-0_2(19-32)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Investigating the Need for Explicit Communication of Non-Yielding Intent through a Slow-Pulsing Light Band (SPLB) eHMI in AV-Pedestrian InteractionProceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3543174.3546086(307-318)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Evaluating the Use of Graphic Symbols in Autonomous Vehicle-To-Pedestrian Communication2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)10.1109/ITSC55140.2022.9922243(389-394)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A framework for designing interactions between pedestrians and driverless cars: insights from a ride-sharing design study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '18: Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction
      December 2018
      639 pages
      ISBN:9781450361880
      DOI:10.1145/3292147
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 04 December 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. autonomous vehicles
      2. designing interactions
      3. driverless cars
      4. pedestrians
      5. prototyping
      6. virtual reality

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Conference

      OzCHI '18

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)36
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)A Human-Centred Technology Approach to Pedestrian Safety in Smart CitiesResilient and Responsible Smart Cities10.1007/978-3-031-20182-0_2(19-32)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2023
      • (2022)Investigating the Need for Explicit Communication of Non-Yielding Intent through a Slow-Pulsing Light Band (SPLB) eHMI in AV-Pedestrian InteractionProceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3543174.3546086(307-318)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2022
      • (2022)Evaluating the Use of Graphic Symbols in Autonomous Vehicle-To-Pedestrian Communication2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)10.1109/ITSC55140.2022.9922243(389-394)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
      • (2021)Understanding the Headless Rider: Display-Based Awareness and Intent-Communication in Automated Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction in Mixed TrafficMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti50900515:9(51)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2021
      • (2021)Discovering the Design Challenges of Autonomous Vehicles through Exploring Scenarios via an Immersive Design WorkshopProceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3461778.3462119(322-338)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2021
      • (2021)Context-Based Interface Prototyping: Understanding the Effect of Prototype Representation on User FeedbackProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445159(1-14)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
      • (2021)Designing Human–Machine Interactions in the Automated City: Methodologies, Considerations, PrinciplesAutomating Cities10.1007/978-981-15-8670-5_2(25-49)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2021
      • (2021)Simulation Frameworks and Potential Research Challenges for Internet‐of‐Vehicles NetworksSpectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks10.1002/9781119665458.ch12(281-310)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2021
      • (2020)Augmenting Remote Interviews through Virtual Experience PrototypesProceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3441000.3441057(78-86)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2020
      • (2020)A Tangible Multi-Display Toolkit to Support the Collaborative Design Exploration of AV-Pedestrian InterfacesProceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3441000.3441031(25-35)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2020
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media