skip to main content
10.1145/3292500.3330878acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hidden Markov Contour Tree: A Spatial Structured Model for Hydrological Applications

Published: 25 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Spatial structured models are predictive models that capture dependency structure between samples based on their locations in the space. Learning such models plays an important role in many geoscience applications such as water surface mapping, but it also poses significant challenges due to implicit dependency structure in continuous space and high computational costs. Existing models often assume that the dependency structure is based on either spatial proximity or network topology, and thus cannot incorporate complex dependency structure such as contour and flow direction on a 3D potential surface. To fill the gap, this paper proposes a novel spatial structured model called hidden Markov contour tree (HMCT), which generalizes the traditional hidden Markov model from a total order sequence to a partial order polytree. HMCT also advances existing work on hidden Markov trees through capturing complex contour structures on a 3D surface. We propose efficient model construction and learning algorithms. Evaluations on real world hydrological datasets show that our HMCT outperforms multiple baseline methods in classification performance and that HMCT is scalable to large data sizes (e.g., classifying millions of samples in seconds).

References

[1]
Luc Anselin. 2013. Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Vol. 4. Springer Science & Business Media.
[2]
Sudipto Banerjee, Bradley P Carlin, and Alan E Gelfand. 2014. Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data .CRC Press.
[3]
PA Brivio, R Colombo, M Maggi, and R Tomasoni. 2002. Integration of remote sensing data and GIS for accurate mapping of flooded areas. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 23, 3 (2002), 429--441.
[4]
Hamish Carr, Jack Snoeyink, and Ulrike Axen. 2003. Computing contour trees in all dimensions. Computational Geometry, Vol. 24, 2 (2003), 75--94.
[5]
Don Cline. 2009. Integrated Water Resources Science and Services: an Integrated and Adaptive Roadmap for Operational Implementation. Technical Report. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[6]
Herbert Edelsbrunner and John Harer. 2010. Computational topology: an introduction .American Mathematical Soc.
[7]
David Günther, Roberto A Boto, Juila Contreras-Garcia, Jean-Philip Piquemal, and Julien Tierny. 2014. Characterizing molecular interactions in chemical systems. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, Vol. 20, 12 (2014), 2476--2485.
[8]
Zhe Jiang. 2018. A Survey on Spatial Prediction Methods. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2018).
[9]
T. Joachims. 1999. Making large-Scale SVM Learning Practical. In Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, B. Schölkopf, C. Burges, and A. Smola (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Chapter 11, 169--184.
[10]
Anuj Karpatne, Ankush Khandelwal, Shyam Boriah, and Vipin Kumar. 2014. Predictive Learning in the Presence of Heterogeneity and Limited Training Data. In Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, April 24--26, 2014. 253--261.
[11]
Frank R Kschischang, Brendan J Frey, and H-A Loeliger. 2001. Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm. IEEE Transactions on information theory, Vol. 47, 2 (2001), 498--519.
[12]
Alexander Kuhn, Wito Engelke, Markus Flatken, Hans-Christian Hege, and Ingrid Hotz. 2015. Topology-based analysis for multimodal atmospheric data of volcano eruptions. In Topological Methods in Data Analysis and Visualization. Springer, 35--50.
[13]
John Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, Fernando Pereira, et al. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference on machine learning (ICML), IEEE, Vol. 1. 282--289.
[14]
James R Munkres. 2000. Topology. Pearson.
[15]
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. {n.d.}. Data and Imagery from NOAA's National Geodetic Survey. https://www.ngs.noaa.gov.
[16]
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2018. National Water Model: Improving NOAA's Water Prediction Services. http://water.noaa.gov/documents/wrn-national-water-model.pdf.
[17]
NCSU Libraries. 2018. LIDAR Based Elevation Data for North Carolina. https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/gis/elevation.
[18]
Valerio Pascucci, Xavier Tricoche, Hans Hagen, and Julien Tierny. 2010. Topological Methods in Data Analysis and Visualization: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications .Springer Science & Business Media.
[19]
Lawrence R Rabiner. 1989. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE, Vol. 77, 2 (1989), 257--286.
[20]
O Ronen, JR Rohlicek, and M Ostendorf. 1995. Parameter estimation of dependence tree models using the EM algorithm. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 2, 8 (1995), 157--159.
[21]
Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, 234--241.
[22]
Jonathan Stoeckel and Glenn Fung. 2005. SVM Feature Selection for Classification of SPECT Images of Alzheimer's Disease Using Spatial Information. In ICDM. 410--417.
[23]
Karthik Subbian and Arindam Banerjee. 2013. Climate Multi-model Regression Using Spatial Smoothing. In SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM). 324--332.
[24]
Richard Szeliski, Ramin Zabih, Daniel Scharstein, Olga Veksler, Vladimir Kolmogorov, Aseem Agarwala, Marshall Tappen, and Carsten Rother. 2006. A comparative study of energy minimization methods for markov random fields. In European conference on computer vision. Springer, 16--29.
[25]
The Middlebury Computer Vision Pages. 2018. C+ Source Code of MRF. http://vision.middlebury.edu/MRF/code/.
[26]
Waldo R Tobler. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic geography, Vol. 46, sup1 (1970), 234--240.
[27]
Philip A Viton. 2010. Notes on spatial econometric models. City and regional planning, Vol. 870, 03 (2010), 9--10.
[28]
Hongjian Wang and Zhenhui Li. 2017. Region representation learning via mobility flow. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 237--246.
[29]
Miao Xie, Zhe Jiang, and Arpan Man Sainju. 2018. Geographical Hidden Markov Tree for Flood Extent Mapping. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD '18). ACM, 2545--2554.
[30]
Huaxiu Yao, Fei Wu, Jintao Ke, Xianfeng Tang, Yitian Jia, Siyu Lu, Pinghua Gong, Jieping Ye, and Zhenhui Li. 2018. Deep Multi-View Spatial-Temporal Network for Taxi Demand Prediction. In 2018 AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'18).
[31]
Zijun Yao, Yanjie Fu, Bin Liu, Wangsu Hu, and Hui Xiong. 2018. Representing Urban Functions through Zone Embedding with Human Mobility Patterns. In IJCAI. 3919--3925.
[32]
Xiaojin Zhu and Zoubin Ghahramani. 2002. Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation. (2002).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)EvaNetProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.24963/ijcai.2024/133(1200-1208)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Scaling Terrain-Aware Spatial Machine Learning for Flood Mapping on Large Scale Earth Imagery DataACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/3703157Online publication date: 5-Nov-2024
  • (2024)GeoAI for Natural Disaster AssessmentProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3627673.3680257(5431-5434)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
July 2019
3305 pages
ISBN:9781450362016
DOI:10.1145/3292500
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 July 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 3D surface
  2. flood mapping
  3. hidden Markov contour tree
  4. spatial structured model
  5. structured prediction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

KDD '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

KDD '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 110 of 1,200 submissions, 9%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

Upcoming Conference

KDD '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)EvaNetProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.24963/ijcai.2024/133(1200-1208)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Scaling Terrain-Aware Spatial Machine Learning for Flood Mapping on Large Scale Earth Imagery DataACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/3703157Online publication date: 5-Nov-2024
  • (2024)GeoAI for Natural Disaster AssessmentProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3627673.3680257(5431-5434)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2022)CrimeTensor: Fine-Scale Crime Prediction via Tensor Learning with Spatiotemporal ConsistencyACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/350180713:2(1-24)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2022
  • (2022)Make More Connections: Urban Traffic Flow Forecasting with Spatiotemporal Adaptive Gated Graph Convolution NetworkACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/348890213:2(1-25)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Earth Imagery Segmentation on Terrain Surface with Limited Training Labels: A Semi-supervised Approach based on Physics-Guided Graph Co-TrainingACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/348104313:2(1-22)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2022
  • (2022)DeepRoute+: Modeling Couriers’ Spatial-temporal Behaviors and Decision Preferences for Package Pick-up Route PredictionACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/348100613:2(1-23)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Weakly Supervised Spatial Deep Learning for Earth Image Segmentation Based on Imperfect Polyline LabelsACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/348097013:2(1-20)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Generative Adversarial Networks for Spatio-temporal Data: A SurveyACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/347483813:2(1-25)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Graph Sequence Neural Network with an Attention Mechanism for Traffic Speed PredictionACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/347088913:2(1-24)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media