skip to main content
10.1145/3294109.3295635acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Shiva's Rangoli: Tangible Storytelling through Diegetic Interfaces in Ambient Environments

Published:17 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the underlying motivation, creation process, and evaluation outcomes of Shiva's Rangoli, a tangible storytelling installation that allows readers to impact the emotional tone of a narrative by sculpting the ambience of their space. Readers interact with a tangible interface that acts as a boundary object between the reader and the fictional world. We discuss how these kinds of interfaces can engage readers to feel like they are a part of the story, endow them with responsibility, and blur the line between real and fictional worlds.

References

  1. 2018. Ranjit Makkuni. Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ranjit_Makkuni&oldid=823101557Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aaron F. Bobick, Stephen S. Intille, James W. Davis, Freedom Baird, Claudio S. Pinhanez, Lee W. Capmbell, Yuri A. Ivanov, Arjan Schutte, and Andrew Wilson. 1999. The KidsRoom: A Perceptually-Based Interactive and Immersive Story Environment. Presence 8, 4: 369--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alexandra Mazalek. 2001. Tangible interfaces for interactive point-of-view narratives. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved September 21, 2018 from http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/61854Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali Mazalek, Ali Wood, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2001. genieBottles: An Interactive Narrative in Bottles. In SIGGRAPH. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.16.3093&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ana Paiva. 2005. The Role of Tangibles in Interactive Storytelling. In Virtual Storytelling. Using Virtual Reality Technologies for Storytelling (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 225--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Anna St\a ahl, Petra Sundström, and Kristina Höök. 2005. A Foundation for Emotional Expressivity. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Designing for User eXperience (DUX '05). Retrieved September 21, 2018 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1138235.1138274Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayoka Chenzira, Yanfeng Chen, and Ali Mazalek. 2008. RENATI: Recontextualizing Narratives for Tangible Interfaces. ACM Press. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1347423 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Brygg Ullmer and Hiroshi Ishii. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits, and Atoms. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Celia Pearce. 2004. Towards a Game Theory of Game. In First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game, Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Pat Harrigan (eds.). The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, 143--153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Daniel Harley, Jean Ho Chu, Jamie Kwan, and Ali Mazalek. 2016. Towards a Framework for Tangible Narratives. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16), 62--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. David Bordwell and Kristin Thompson. 1997. Film Art: An Introduction. The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. David Bordwell. 2008. The Poetics of Cinema. Routledge, New York, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. David Thue, Vadam Bulitko, and Marcia Spetch. 2008. Making Stories Player-Specific: Delayed Authoring in Interactive Storytelling. In Interactive Storytelling, Ulrike Spierling and Nicolas Szilas (eds.). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Berlin, 230--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Edward Branigan. 1992. Narrative Comprehension and Film. Routledge, New York, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fei Lu, Feng Tian, Yingying Jiang, Xiang Cao, Wencan Luo, Guang Li, Xiaolong Zhang, Guozhong Dai, and Hongan Wang. 2011. ShadowStory: Creative and Collaborative Digital Storytelling Inspired by Cultural Heritage. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 1919--1928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Henry Jenkins. 2004. Game Design as Narrative Architecture. In First Person: New Media As Story, Performance, and Game, Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Pat Harrigan (eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, 118--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. James A. Russell. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 6: 1161--1178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Janet Horowitz Murray. 1998. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jay Silver and Eric Rosenbaum. 2012. MaKey MaKey. MaKey MaKey. Retrieved February 15, 2015 from http://makeymakey.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jean Ho Chu, Paul Clifton, Daniel Harley, Jordanne Pavao, and Ali Mazalek. 2015. Mapping Place: Supporting Cultural Learning Through a Lukasa-inspired Tangible Tabletop Museum Exhibit. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15), 261--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jeff L. Nay and José P. Zagal. 2017. Meaning Without Consequence: Virtue Ethics and Inconsequential Choices in Games. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG '17), 14:1--14:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jim Bizzocchi and Theresa Jean Tanenbaum. 2012. Mass Effect 2: A Case Study in the Design of Game Narrative. Bulletin of Science Technology Society 32, 5: 393--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jim Bizzocchi, Ben Lin, and Theresa Jean Tanenbaum. 2011. Games, Narrative, and the Design of Interface. International Journal of Art and Technology (IJART) 4, 4: 460--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jim Bizzocchi. 2007. Games and Narrative: An Analytical Framework. Loading - The Journal of the Canadian Games Studies Association 1, 1: 5--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. John W Creswell. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Theresa Jean Tanenbaum and Angela Tomizu. 2007. Affective Interaction Design and Narrative Presentation. 150--157. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Fall/2007/FS-07-05/FS07-05-025.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, Karen Tanenbaum, and Alissa Antle. 2010. The Reading Glove: Designing Interactions for Object-based Tangible Storytelling. In Proceedings of the 1st Augmented Human International Conference (AH '10), 19:1--19:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Theresa Jean Tanenbaum. 2011. Being in the Story: Readerly Pleasure, Acting Theory, and Performing a Role. In Interactive Storytelling, Mei Si, David Thue, Elisabeth André, James C. Lester, Theresa Jean Tanenbaum and Veronica Zammitto (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 55--66. Retrieved May 22, 2014 from http://link.springer.com.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/chapter/10.1007/978--3--642--25289--1_7 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Theresa Jean Tanenbaum. 2015. Identity Transformation and Agency in Digital Narratives and Story Based Games. Simon Fraser University, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada. Retrieved from http://summit.sfu.ca/item/15285Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2014. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. K.C. Wassermann, Kynan Eng, P.F.M.J. Verschure, and J. Manzolli. 2003. Live soundscape composition based on synthetic emotions. IEEE Multimedia 10, 4: 82--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Karen Tanenbaum and Theresa Jean Tanenbaum. 2009. Commitment to Meaning: A Reframing of Agency in Games. In Digital Arts and Culture Conference, 2009: after media: embodiment and context. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6f49r74nGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Karen Tanenbaum, Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, Alissa N. Antle, Jim Bizzocchi, Magy Seif el-Nasr, and Marek Hatala. 2011. Experiencing the Reading Glove. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '11), 137--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. L. Reitsma, A. Smith, and E. van den Hoven. 2013. StoryBeads: Preserving Indigenous Knowledge through Tangible Interaction Design. In 2013 International Conference on Culture and Computing (Culture Computing), 79--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Margaret Mackey. 2008. Stepping into the Subjunctive World of the Fiction in Game, Film and Novel. Loading - The Journal of the Canadian Games Studies Association 2, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Marie-Laure Ryan. 2001. Narrative as Virtual Reality. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Mariland, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Marie-Laure Ryan. 2006. Avatars of Story. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Mark O. Riedl and R. Michael Young. 2006. From Linear Story Generation to Branching Story Graphs. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 3: 23--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Mark Owen Riedl. 2004. Narrative Generation: Balancing Plot and Character. North Carolina State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Michelle Li and He Jianting. 2009. Ambient Environments for Emotional Physical Communication. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference NZ Chapter of the ACM's Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction (CHINZ '09), 81--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Nicolas Szilas. 2003. IDtension: A narrative engine for Interactive Drama.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Petra Fagerberg, Anna Ståhl, and Kristina Höök. 2004. eMoto: Emotionally Engaging Interaction. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8, 5: 377--381. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Philip Ross and David V. Keyson. 2007. The Case of Sculpting Atmospheres: Towards Design Principles for Expressive Tangible Interaction in Control of Ambient Systems. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 11, 2: 69--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Ronan Champagnat, Pascal Estraillier, and Armelle Prigent. 2006. Adaptative Execution of Game: Unfolding a Correct Story. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '06). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Susan Leigh Star and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology,translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social studies of science 19, 3: 387--420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Tom Gunning. 1990. The Cinema of Attractions: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde. In Early Cinema: Space--Frame--Narrative, Thomas Elaesser and Adam Barker (eds.). BFI Publishing, London, 56--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Shiva's Rangoli: Tangible Storytelling through Diegetic Interfaces in Ambient Environments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '19: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      March 2019
      785 pages
      ISBN:9781450361965
      DOI:10.1145/3294109

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 March 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate36of110submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader