skip to main content
10.1145/3299852.3299854acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdmipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Momentous Innovations in the Prospective Method of Drug Development

Published:12 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The innovative work (Research and development) pipeline is a huge cost for pharmaceutical Organizations. In spite of the requirement for more advancement, Research and development profitability has vegetated or decayed over various years.1-3 More present, the industry has not exhaustively evaluated the effect of new developments in pharmaceutical improvement and market get to particularly as far as basic achievement measurements, for example, clinical preliminary productivity, the probability of medication dispatch and patient access. To invigorate activity on this diagnostic issue, we accumulated and translated hard confirmation on the effect of chosen developments estimated against particular achievement measurements. The general objective of the investigation is to invigorate expansive dialog on how the business can utilize inventive methodologies in medicate advancement and market access to enhance proficiency, revive profitability and revitalize supportability.

It is unmistakable in openly evaluating the effect of the most encouraging advancements in sedate improvement on preliminary productivity and accomplishment in dispatch and getting model endorsement around the world. We recommend that it makes convincing, information-driven case for expediting the selection of new market get to forms for drugs. In particular, it demonstrates that the four developments assessed---adaptive trial designs, patient-centric trials, precision medicine trials and real-world data trials reliably convey in contrast to industry achievement touchstone.

References

  1. ASCO. Clinical trial design and methodology {Internet}. Alexandria (VA): American Society of Clinical Oncology. Available from: https://www.asco.org/research-progress/clinical-trials/clinicaltrial-resources/clinical-trial-design-and-methodology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. FDA. Adaptive design clinical trials for drugs and biologics: draft guidance. Silver Spring (MD): US Food and Drug Administration, 2010. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM201790.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. CFDA. {Biostatistics guidelines for drug clinical trials}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. FDA. FDA approves first cancer treatment for any solid tumor with a specific genetic feature {Internet}. Silver Spring (MD): US Food & Drug Administration. Available from:https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm560167.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors (MK-3475-158/ KEYNOTE-158) {Internet}. Bethesda (MD): ClinicalTrials.gov. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02628067.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Investigational immunotherapy trials for solid tumors {Internet}. Kenilworth (NJ): Merck & Co, Inc. Available from: https://keynoteclinicaltrials.com/trials/solid-tumors.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ray, T. Basket study supported keytruda pan-cancer indication but challenges remain {Internet}. New York (NY): Genomewide. Available from: https://www.genomeweb.com/cancer/basket-studysupported-keytruda-pan- cancer-indication-challenges-remain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A study of vemurafenib in participants with BRAF V600 mutation-positive cancers {Internet}.Bethesda (MD): ClinicalTrials.gov. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01524978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hyman, M., Blay, J. Y., Chau, I., et al. VE-BASKET, a first-in-kind, phase II, histology-independent "basket" study of vemurafenib (VEM) in nonmelanoma solid tumors harboring BRAF V600 mutations (V600m). Journal of Clinical Oncology 32, No 15_suppl (May 2014) 2533--2533. 2014;32 ((suppl.)):2533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. FDA announces first approval of targeted therapy based on basket study {Internet}. New York (NY): Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Available from: https://www.mskcc.org/trending-topics/fda-announces-first-approval-targeted-therapy-based-basket-study.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ando, Y. Biostatistical review of new drug applications in Japan - current and future activity. Tokyo: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, 2015. Available from: https://www.pmda.go.jp/ files/000207303.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ADDPLAN® {Internet}. Dublin: ICON. Available from: http://www.iconplc.com/innovation/addplan/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Treweek, S., Lockhart, P., Pitkethly, M., et al. Methods to improve recruitment to randomized controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoos, A., Anderson, J., Boutin, M., et al. Partnering with patients in the development and lifecycle of medicines: a call for action. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science.49(6):929--39, 2015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. JPRN. Japan primary registries network {Internet}. Available from: http://rctportal.niph.go.jp/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. PCORI. About our research {Internet}. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Available from: https://www.pcori.org/research-results/about-our-research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. PCORI. PCORI methodology standards {Internet}. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Available from: https://www.pcori.org/research-results/about-our-research/research-methodology/pcori-methodology-standards.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. CTTI. Project: patient groups & clinical trials {Internet}. Durham (NC): Clinical Trials Transofrmation Initiative. Available from: https://www.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/projects/patient-groups-clinical-trials.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Burrows, A. The future of clinical trials: industry voices {Internet}. London: Knect365. Available from:https://knect365.com/clinical-trials-innovation/article/0e134709--42bc-4c70-a271-dead8fd43612/industry-voices-future-clinical-trials-673533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. FDA. Biomarker qualification program {Internet}. Silver Spring (MD): US Food and Drug Administration. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/ DrugDevelopmentToolsQualificationProgram/BiomarkerQualificationProgram/default.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. The precision medicine initiative {Internet}. Bethesda (MD): Precision Medicine Initiative. Available from: https://syndication.nih.gov/multimedia/pmi/infographics/pmi-infographic.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, P. China initiative would pour billions into precision medicine {Internet}. Available from: http://www.bioworld.com/content/china-initiative-would-pour-billions-precision-medicine-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Cyranoski, D. China embraces precision medicine on a massive scale {Internet}. Available from: https://www.nature.com/news/china-embraces-precision-medicine-on-a-massive-scale-1.19108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sherman, R. E., Anderson, S. A., Dal Pan G. J., et al. Real-world evidence: what is it and what can it tell us? New England Journal of Medicine. 375(23):2293--7, 2016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Sun, X. F., Tan, J., Tang, L., et al. Real-world evidence: experience and lessons from China. BMJ. (360):j5262; 2018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. PMDA. "Rational Medicine" Initiative. Tokyo: Pharmaceuticals and Medicines Devices Agency, 2017.Available from: https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000216304.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. FDA. Use of real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making for medical devices. Silver Spring (MD): US Food and Drug Administration. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm513027.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. CDER SBIA Chronicles. Real-world data and evidence in drug development. Silver Spring (MD): US Food and Drug Administration, 2017. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/developmentapprovalprocess/smallbusinessassistance/ucm572939.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. EMA. Public summary of opinion on orphan designation: eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. London: European Medicines Agency, 2015. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Orphan_designation/2009/10/WC500006161.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Zimmermann, M. Soliris case: PNH indication update based on data from the global registry. London: European Medicines Agency, 2016. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Presentation/2016/12/WC500217727.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Woodcock, A. and Leather, D. The Salford lung study. London: European Medicines Agency, 2016. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Presentation/2016/12/WC500218600.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. New J. P., Diar, B. N., Leather, D., et al. Obtaining real-world evidence: the Salford lung study. BMJ Thorax, 69(12):1152--4: 2015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Lewis, J. R. R., Kerridge, I. and Lipworth, W. Use of Real-World Data for the Research, Development, and Evaluation of Oncology Precision Medicines. JCO Precision Oncology. 2017(1):1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Curran, G. M., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., et al. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact.Med Care. 2012;50(3):217--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Makady, A., Ham, R. T., de Boer, A., et al. Policies for Use of Real-World Data in Health technology assessment (HTA): A Comparative Study of Six HTA Agencies. The value in Health.20(4):520--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Momentous Innovations in the Prospective Method of Drug Development

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        DMIP '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Digital Medicine and Image Processing
        November 2018
        88 pages
        ISBN:9781450365789
        DOI:10.1145/3299852

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 November 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader