Eun Jee Sung
ABSTRACT
Driving is a social task where drivers should con-stantly communicate with one another. However, existing driver-to-driver communication methods have mainly focused on safety-related issues, thereby overlooking the social aspect of drivers' communication needs. We aim to shed light on drivers' needs for richer driver-to-driver (D2D) communication and design future D2D communi-cation methods. Through scenario-based semi-structured interviews, we discovered that drivers wanted to utilize more social cues, deliver more information and vary the scope of their communi-cation. Based on these findings, we derived de-sign ideas for future D2D communication meth-ods and are working on design prototypes.
- Chang, Jackie C., et al. Usability Evaluation of a Volkswagen Group In-Vehicle Speech Sys-tem. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automo-tiveUI 2009), Essen, Germany. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Elliott, Barry. 1999. Road rage: Media hype or serious road safety issue?. 59--62.Google Scholar
- Haglund, Mats, and Lars Åberg. 2000. Speed choice in relation to speed limit and influ-ences from other drivers. Transportation Re-search Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 3.1: 39--51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeon, Myounghoon, et al. 2012. Cross-cultural differences in the use of in-vehicle technologies and vehicle area network ser-vices: Austria, USA, and South Korea. Pro-ceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lamas, Raphael, et al. 2014. Driver link-up: exploring user requirements for a driver-to-driver communication device. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automo-tive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lamas, Raphael, et al. 2015. Please let me in: a participatory workshop approach to the de-sign of a driver-to-driver communication de-vice. Procedia Manufacturing 3: 3309--3316.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liu, Na, et al. 2015. Investigation of a Driver-to-Driver Communication Method Through Rear Window Display for Chinese. Interna-tional Conference on Cross-Cultural Design. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Müller, Lars, Malte Risto, and Colleen Em-menegger. 2016. The social behavior of au-tonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Perva-sive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ng, Alexander, et al. 2017. An Evaluation of Input Controls for In-Car Interactions. Pro-ceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Hu-man Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.Google Scholar
- Pillai, Sajan S., and Gaur G. Ray. 2014. Ergo-nomics intervention in automobile driver communication in a developing country. Pro-ceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. ACM.Google Scholar
- Schroeter, Ronald, Andry Rakotonirainy, and Marcus Foth. 2012. The social car: new inter-active vehicular applications derived from social media and urban informatics. Proceed-ings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schulz von Thun, F. 2008. Six Tools for Clear Communication. The Hamburg Approach in English Language. Hamburg, Germany: Schulz von Thun-Institut Fu?r Kommunikation.Google Scholar
- Wang, Chao, et al. 2014. Driver-to-Driver Communication on the Highway: What Driv-ers Want. European Conference on Ambient Intelligence. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
- Wang, Chao, et al. 2015. Reducing driving violations by receiving feedback from other drivers. Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th Inter-national Conference on Automotive User Inter-faces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, Chao, et al. 2016. Improving connect-edness between drivers by digital augmenta-tion. Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th Interna-tional Conference on Automotive User Inter-faces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM.Google Scholar
- Wang, Chao, et al. 2016. Likes and Dislikes on the Road: A Social Feedback System for Improving Driving Behavior.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Honk? Talk!: Designing Driver-to-Driver Communication Methods for Social Driving
Recommendations
"Likes" and "Dislikes" on the Road: A Social Feedback System for Improving Driving Behavior
Automotive'UI 16: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsDriving is a social activity, and therefore driving is not only a matter of skills but also of emotion. Numerous studies show that aggressive driving makes a significant contribution to traffic accident involvement. In previous research, a concept based ...
Verification of the Appropriate Number of Communications Between Drivers of Bicycles and Vehicles
Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience Case StudiesAbstractBecause vehicles and bicycles run on the same roads at different speeds, there are many cases in which vehicles overtake bicycles. In such cases, communication between drivers and bicyclists is crucial for sharing intentions and facilitating ...
Development of a methodology to demonstrate the environmental impact of connected vehicles under lane-changing conditions
This paper describes a lane-change model for connected vehicles, and evaluates the environmental impact per road level of service (LOS) when a host vehicle makes a lane change. During manual driving, the host vehicle accelerates or decelerates to create ...
Comments