Anna-Katharina Frison
Andreas Riener
ABSTRACT
Technology acceptance is a critical factor influencing the adoption of automated vehicles. Consequently, manufacturers feel obliged to design automated driving systems in a way to account for negative effects of automation on user experience. Recent publications confirm that full automation will potentially lack in the satisfaction of important user needs. To counteract, the adoption of Intelligent User Interfaces (IUIs) could play an important role. In this work, we focus on the evaluation of the impact of scenario type (represented by variations of road type and traffic volume) on the fulfillment of psychological needs. Results of a qualitative study (N=30) show that the scenario has a high impact on how users perceive the automation. Based on this, we discuss the potential of adaptive IUIs in the context of automated driving. In detail, we look at the aspects trust, acceptance, and user experience and its impact on IUIs in different driving situations.
Supplemental Material
- Caroline Arien, Ellen M.M. Jongen, Kris Brijs, Tom Brijs, Stijn Daniels, and Geert Wets. 2013. A simulator study on the impact of traffic calming measures in urban areas on driving behavior and workload. Accident Analysis & Prevention 61 (2013), 43 -- 53. Emerging Research Methods and Their Application to Road Safety Emerging Issues in Safe and Sustainable Mobility for Older Persons The Candrive/Ozcandrive Prospective Older Driver Study: Methodology and Early Study Findings.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Prateek Bansal, Kara M. Kockelman, and Amit Singh. 2016. Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 67 (2016), 1 -- 14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hanna Bellem, Barbara Thiel, Michael Schrauf, and Josef F. Krems. 2018. Comfort in automated driving: An analysis of preferences for different automated driving styles and their dependence on personality traits. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 55 (2018), 90 -- 100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Burmester, Marcus Mast, Kilian Jäger, and Hendrik Homans. 2010. Valence Method for Formative Evaluation of User Experience. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 364--367. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jong Kyu Choi and Yong Gu Ji. 2015. Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31, 10 (2015), 692--702.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee et al. 2014. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE International (2014).Google Scholar
- Rita Cyganski, Eva Fraedrich, and Barbara Lenz. 2015. Travel-time valuation for automated driving: A use-case-driven study. In Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 15. 11--15.Google Scholar
- Fred D. Davis. 1993. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38, 3 (1993), 475 -- 487. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pieter MA Desmet and Paul Hekkert. 2007. Framework of product experience. International journal of design 1, 1 (2007), 57--66.Google Scholar
- Anind K. Dey. 2001. Understanding and Using Context. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 5, 1 (Jan. 2001), 4--7. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cyriel Diels and Jelte E. Bos. 2016. Self-driving carsickness. Applied Ergonomics 53 (2016), 374 -- 382. htttps:// Transport in the 21st Century: The Application of Human Factors to Future User Needs.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Verena Distler, Carine Lallemand, and Thierry Bellet. 2018. Acceptability and Acceptance of Autonomous Mobility on Demand: The Impact of an Immersive Experience. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 612, 10 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kai Eckoldt, Martin Knobel, Marc Hassenzahl, and Josef Schumann. 2012. An experiential perspective on advanced driver assistance systems. it-Information Technology Methoden und innovative Anwendungen der Informatik und Informationstechnik 54, 4 (2012), 165--171.Google Scholar
- Anna-Katharina Frison, Laura Aigner, Philipp Wintersberger, and Andreas Riener. 2018. Who is Generation A?: Investigating the Experience of Automated Driving for Different Age Groups. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI 18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 94--104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anna-Katharina Frison, Bastian Pfleging, Andreas Riener, Myounghoon Philart Jeon, Ignacio Alvarez, and Wendy Ju. 2017. Workshop on User-Centered Design for Automated Driving Systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct (AutomotiveUI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 22--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anna-Katharina Frison, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Schartmüller. 2017. Driving Hotzenplotz: A Hybrid Interface for Vehicle Control Aiming to Maximize Pleasure in Highway Driving. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 236--244. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Gutman. 1982. A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes. Journal of Marketing 46, 2 (1982), 60--72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3203341Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Hasenjäger and H. Wersing. 2017. Personalization in advanced driver assistance systems and autonomous vehicles: A review. In 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). 1--7.Google Scholar
- Marc Hassenzahl. 2008. User Experience (UX): Towards an Experiential Perspective on Product Quality. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on L'Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl, Sarah Diefenbach, and Anja Göritz. 2010. Needs, affect, and interactive products-Facets of user experience. Interacting with computers 22, 5 (2010), 353--362. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl and Holger Klapperich. 2014. Convenient, Clean, and Efficient?: The Experiential Costs of Everyday Automation. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl, Annika Wiklund-Engblom, Anette Bengs, Susanne Hägglund, and Sarah Diefenbach. 2015. Experience-oriented and product-oriented evaluation: psychological need fulfillment, positive affect, and product perception. International journal of human-computer interaction 31, 8 (2015), 530--544.Google Scholar
- Renate Häuslschmid, Max von Bülow, Bastian Pfleging, and Andreas Butz. 2017. SupportingTrust in Autonomous Driving. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 319--329. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Howard and Danielle Dai. {n. d.}. Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California. In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting (Vol. 14, No. 4502).Google Scholar
- ISO 9241--11:1998(en) 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) --- Part 11: Guidance on usability. Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH.Google Scholar
- ISO 9241--210:2010(en) 2010. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH.Google Scholar
- Holger Klapperich and Marc Hassenzahl. 2016. Hotzenplotz: Reconciling Automation with Experience. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 39, 10 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. L. Kun, S. Boll, and A. Schmidt. 2016. Shifting Gears: User Interfaces in the Age of Autonomous Driving. IEEE Pervasive Computing 15, 1 (Jan.-Mar. 2016), 32--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carine Lallemand. 2015. Towards consolidated methods for the design and evaluation of user experience. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- Jae-Gil Lee, Ki Joon Kim, Sangwon Lee, and Dong-Hee Shin. 2015. Can Autonomous Vehicles Be Safe and Trustworthy? Effects of Appearance and Autonomy of Unmanned Driving Systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31, 10 (2015), 682--691.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yannis Lilis, Emmanouil Zidianakis, Nikolaos Partarakis, Margherita Antona, and Constantine Stephanidis. 2017. Personalizing HMI Elements in ADAS Using Ontology Meta-Models and Rule Based Reasoning. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches and Methods, Margherita Antona and Constantine Stephanidis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 383--401.Google Scholar
- Todd Litman. 2014. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions. Victoria Transport Policy Institute Victoria, Canada.Google Scholar
- Todd Litman. 2017. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions. Victoria Transport Policy Institute Victoria, Canada.Google Scholar
- Steffen Maurer, Rainer Erbach, IssamKraiem, Susanne Kuhnert, Petra Grimm, and Enrico Rukzio. 2018. Designing a Guardian Angel: Giving an Automated Vehicle the Possibility to Override Its Driver. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 341--350. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elisa D. Mekler and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Momentary Pleasure or Lasting Meaning?: Distinguishing Eudaimonic and Hedonic User Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4509--4520. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Manfred Tscheligi, Bastian Pfleging, Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Wendy Ju, Philippe Palanque, Andreas Riener, Bilge Mutlu, and Andrew L. Kun. 2018. Interacting with Autonomous Vehicles: Learning from Other Domains. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article W30, 8 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Manfred Tscheligi, Dalila Szostak, Sven Krome, Bastian Pfleging, Rabindra Ratan, Ioannis Politis, Sonia Baltodano, Dave Miller, and Wendy Ju. 2016. HCI and Autonomous Vehicles: Contextual Experience Informs Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3542--3549. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Manfred Tscheligi, Dalila Szostak, Rabindra Ratan, Roderick McCall, Ioannis Politis, and Sven Krome. 2015. Experiencing Autonomous Vehicles: Crossing the Boundaries Between a Drive and a Ride. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2413--2416. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abhijai Miglani, Cyriel Diels, and Jacques Terken. 2016. Compatibility Between Trust and Non-Driving Related Tasks in UI Design for Highly and Fully Automated Driving. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '16 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ingrid Pettersson and Wendy Ju. 2017. Design Techniques for Exploring Automotive Interaction in the Drive Towards Automation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 147--160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Pettersson and I. C. M. Karlsson. 2015. Setting the stage for autonomous cars: a pilot study of future autonomous driving experiences. IET Intelligent Transport Systems 9, 7 (2015), 694--701.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ingrid Pettersson, Florian Lachner, Anna-Katharina Frison, Andreas Riener, and Andreas Butz. 2018. A Bermuda Triangle?: A Review of Method Application and Triangulation in User Experience Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 461, 16 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bastian Pfleging, Maurice Rang, and Nora Broy. 2016. Investigating User Needs for Non-driving-related Activities During Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91--99. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wintersberger Philipp, Frison Anna-Katharina, Andreas Riener, and Tamara von Sawitzky. 2019. Fostering User Acceptance and Trust in Fully Automated Vehicles: Evaluating the Potential of Augmented Reality. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 27--1 (2019).Google Scholar
- Hamidur Rahman, Shahina Begum, and Mobyen Uddin Ahmed. 2015. Driver Monitoring in the Context of Autonomous Vehicle.. In SCAI. 108--117.Google Scholar
- Karen Renaud and Judy van Biljon. 2008. Predicting Technology Acceptance and Adoption by the Elderly: A Qualitative Study. In Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries: Riding the Wave of Technology (SAICSIT '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 210--219. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas J Reynolds and Jonathan Gutman. 1988. Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. Journal of advertising research 28, 1 (1988), 11--31.Google Scholar
- Christina Rödel, Susanne Stadler, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 8 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clemens Schartmüller, Andreas Riener, Philipp Wintersberger, and Anna-Katharina Frison. 2018. Workaholistic: On Balancing Typing- and Handover-performance in Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 12 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brandon Schoettle and Michael Sivak. 2014. A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia. (2014).Google Scholar
- Kennon M Sheldon, Andrew J Elliot, Youngmee Kim, and Tim Kasser. 2001. What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of personality and social psychology 80, 2 (2001), 325.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexandre N. Tuch and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Does Herzberg's Notion of Hygienes and Motivators Apply to User Experience? ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 4, Article 16 (June 2015), 24 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexandre N. Tuch, Rune Trusell, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2013. Analyzing Users' Narratives to Understand Experience with Interactive Products. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2079--2088. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Anna-Katharina Frison. 2016. Automated Driving System, Male, or Female Driver: Who'D You Prefer? Comparative Analysis of Passengers' Mental Conditions, Emotional States & Qualitative Feedback. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automotive'UI 16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51--58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, Clemens Schartmüller, Anna-Katharina Frison, and Klemens Weigl. 2018. Let Me Finish Before I Take Over: Towards Attention Aware Device Integration in Highly Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 53--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philipp Wintersberger, Tamara von Sawitzky, Anna-Katharina Frison, and Andreas Riener. 2017. Traffic Augmentation As a Means to Increase Trust in Automated Driving Systems. In Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter (CHItaly '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 7 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Why do you like to drive automated?: a context-dependent analysis of highly automated driving to elaborate requirements for intelligent user interfaces
Recommendations
In UX We Trust: Investigation of Aesthetics and Usability of Driver-Vehicle Interfaces and Their Impact on the Perception of Automated Driving
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn the evolution of technical systems, freedom from error and early adoption plays a major role for market success and to maintain competitiveness. In the case of automated driving, we see that faulty systems are put into operation and users trust these ...
Automated Driving System, Male, or Female Driver: Who'd You Prefer? Comparative Analysis of Passengers' Mental Conditions, Emotional States & Qualitative Feedback
Automotive'UI 16: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsIt is expected that automated vehicles (AVs) will only be used when customers believe them to be safe, trustworthy, and match their personal driving style. As AVs are not very common today, most previous studies on trust, user experience, or acceptance ...
Man vs. Machine: Comparing a Fully Automated Bus Shuttle with a Manually Driven Group Taxi in a Field Study
AutomotiveUI '18: Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsAutomated driving functions are traditionally tested in on-road studies, however, mainly focusing on technological aspects (sensor accuracy, etc.). Field studies addressing users' individual needs and expectations are still rare. As a consequence, it is ...
Comments