skip to main content
research-article

Exploring and Understanding the Role of Workshop Environments in Personal Fabrication Processes

Published:27 March 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Growing interest in personal fabrication has resulted in many ways to ideate, design, and prototype, in addition to studies of who a maker is and the challenges they face. Less attention, however, has focused on the role of the environment in fabrication processes. By understanding how interactions with tools, fixtures, materials, and spaces shape workflows, we can better determine how to design the next generation of workshops, design tools, and fabrication equipment to support personal fabrication activities. To build this understanding, site visits and interviews at local makerspaces, fabrication studios, and workshops were conducted. These visits uncovered the rich practices and roadblocks generated by workshops today. The observations identified the importance of spatial layouts, territoriality and occupant agency, distributed knowledge, and organizational flux, among others, to design and fabrication processes. These observations were further synthesized into one possible direction for such spaces: hybrid workshops (i.e., environments that can leverage computation and responsive architecture to enhance a maker's ability to design and fabricate). This work identifies how such spaces could harness the rich practices and eliminate the challenges found with workshops today and discusses the technical innovations and philosophical questions that hybrid workshops will pose to the future of personal fabrication.

References

  1. Access Engineering. 2015. Making a Makerspace? Guidelines for Accessibility and Universal Design. Retrieved August 2017 from https://www.washington.edu/doit/sites/default/files/atoms/files/Making_a_Makerspace_8_03_15.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Harshit Agrawal, Udayan Umapathi, Robert Kovacs, Johannes Frohnhofen, Hsiang-Ting Chen, Stefanie Mueller, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Protopiper: Physically sketching room-sized objects at actual scale. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software 8 Technology. 427--436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kristina Andersen. 2014. The deliberate cargo cult. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 627--636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chris Anderson. 2012. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Crown Business Books, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Stavros Antifakos, Florian Michahelles, and Bernt Schiele. 2002. Proactive instructions for furniture assembly. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 351--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Till Ballendat, Nicolai Marquardt, and Saul Greenberg. 2010. Proxemic interaction: Designing for a proximity and orientation-aware environment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. 121--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Francois Barbier. 2017. 5 Trends for the future of manufacturing. Retrieved October 2017 from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/06/what-s-going-on-with-manufacturing-b013f435-1746-4bce-ac75-05c642652d42/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Austin Toombs. 2014. Now that's definitely a proper hack: Self-made tools in hackerspaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 473--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gilles Bailly, Sidharth Sahdev, Sylvain Malacria, and Thomas Pietrzak. 2016. Livingdesktop: Augmenting desktop workstation with actuated devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5298--5310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Black+Decker SMARTTECH Products. (n.d.). Retrieved August 2016 from http://www.blackanddecker.com/en-us/products/smartech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Henriette H. Bier. 2011. Robotic environments. In Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Matthew Blackshaw, Anthony devincenzi, David Lakatos, Daniel Leithinger, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2011. Recompose: Direct and gestural interaction with an actuated surface. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1237--1242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Paulo Blikstein. 2013. Digital fabrication and ‘Making’ in education: The democratization of invention. Fablabs: of Machines, Makers and Inventors 4 (2013), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Olha Bondarenko and R. Janssen. 2005. Documents at hand: Learning from paper to improve digital technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 121--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Adrien Bousseau, Theophanis Tsandilas, Lora Oehlberg, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2016. How novices sketch and prototype hand-fabricated objects. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 397--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lauren Britton. 2012. The makings of maker: Making space for creation, not just consumption. Library Journal 137, 16 (2012), 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Graham Brown. 2009. Claiming a corner at work: Measuring employee territoriality in their workspaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, 1 (2009), 44--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Graham Brown and Helena Zhu. 2016. My workspace, not yours: The pact of psychological ownership and territoriality in organizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 48 (2016), 54--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Bradley A. Camburn, Karen H. Sng, K. Blake Perez, Kevin Otto, Kristin L. Wood, Daniel Jensen, and Richard Crawford. 2015. The way makers prototype: Principles of DIY design. In Proceedings of the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. V007T06A004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Marcelo Coelho and Jamie Zigelbaum. 2011. Shape-changing interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 15, 2 (2011), 161--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Irene Cole. 1982. Human aspects of office filing: Implications for the electronic office. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meetings. 59--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Timothy Campbell, Jonathan Harper, Björn Hartmann, and Eric Paulos. 2015. Towards Digital Apprenticeship: Wearable Activity Recognition in the Workshop Setting. Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2015-172. University of California, Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Daqri. (n.d.). Retrieved July 2016 from http://daqri.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Ann Garrison Darrin and Jerry A. Krill. 2016. Infusing Innovation into Organizations: A Systems Engineering Approach. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Laura Devendorf and Kimiko Ryokai. 2014. Being the machine: Exploring new modes of making. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. 33--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Linda Di Geronimo, Maria Husmann, Abhimanyu Patel, Can Tuerk, and Moira C. Norrie. 2016. CTAT: Tilt-and-tap across devices. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Engineering. 96--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. George W. Fitzmaurice, Azam Khan, William Buxton, Gordon Kurtenback, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2003. Sentient data access via a diverse society of devices. ACM Queue 1, 8 (2003), 53--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Laura Fleming. 2015. Worlds of Making: Best Practices for Establishing a Makerspace for Your School. Corwin Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Murelle Florins and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2004. Graceful degradation of user interfaces as a design method for multiplatform systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 140--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sean Follmer, Sean, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. Inform: Dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 417--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sarah Fox, Rachel Rose Ulgado, and Daniela Rosner. 2015. Hacking culture, not devices: Access and recognition in feminist hackerspaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing. 56--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ailie Fraser, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2017. Webuild: Automatically distributing assembly tasks among collocated workers to improve coordination. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1817--1830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hans Gellersen, Carl Fischer, Dominique Guinard, Roswitha Gostner, Gerd Kortuem, Christian Kray, Enrico Rukzio, and Sara Streng. 2009. Supporting device discovery and spontaneous interaction with spatial references. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 13, 4 (2009), 255--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Georgi V. Georgiev, Iván Sánchez Milara, and Denzil Ferreira. 2017. A framework for capturing creativity in digital fabrication. Design Journal 20, 1 (2017), S3659--S3668. DOI:http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi-fe201710098936Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Neil Gershenfeld. 2012. How to make almost anything: The digital fabrication revolution. Foreign Affairs 91 (2012), 43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. David Philip Green, Verena Fuchsberger, David Kirk, Nick Taylor, David Chatting, Janis Lena Meissner, Martin Murer, Manfred Tscheligi, Silvia Lindtner, Pernille Bjorn, and Andreas Reiter. 2017. Open design at the intersection of making and manufacturing. In Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems. 542--549. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jens Emil Grønbæk, Henrik Korsgaard, Marianne Graves Petersen, Morten Henriksen Birk, and Peter Gall Krogh. 2017. Proxemic transitions: Designing shape-changing furniture for informal meetings. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 7029--7041. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Chris Harrison and Anind K. Dey. 2008. Lean and zoom: Proximity-aware user interface and content magnification. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 207--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Mohammad A. Hassanain. 2010. Analysis of factors influencing office workplace planning and design in corporate facilities. Journal of Building Appraisal 6, 4 (2010), 183--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Seongkook Heo, Michelle Annett, Benjamin Lafreniere, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2017. No need to stop what you're doing: Exploring no-handed smartwatch interaction. In Proceedings of the Graphics Interface Conference. 107--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Pamela J. Hinds, Teresa L. Roberts, and Hank Jones. 2004. Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Journal of Human Computer Interaction 19, 1 (2004), 151--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Matthew Hong, Anne Marie Piper, Nadir Weibel, Simon Olberding, and James Hollan. 2012. Microanalysis of active reading behavior to inform design of interactive desktop workspaces. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. 215--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Lara Houston, Steven J. Jackson, Daniela K. Rosner, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Meg Young, and Laewoo Kang. 2016. Values in Repair. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1403--1414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Nathanial Hudson, Celena Alcock, and Parmit K. Chilana. Understanding newcomers to 3D printing: Motivations, workflows, and barriers of casual makers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 384--396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Pradthana Jarusriboonchai, Thomas Olsson, Vikas Prabhu, and Kaisa Vaananen-Vainio-Mattila. 2015. Cuesense: A wearable proximity-aware display enhancing encounters. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2127--2132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Wendy G. Ju, Brian A. Lee, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2007. Range -- Exploring proxemics in collaborative whiteboard interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2483--2488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Adam Kemp. 2013. The Makerspace Workbench: Tools, Technologies, and Techniques for Making. Maker Media, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Alison Kidd. 1994. The marks are on the knowledge worker. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 186--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jeeeun Kim, Haruki Takahashi, Homei Miyashita, Michelle Annett, and Tom Yeh. 2017. Machines as co-designers: A fiction on the future of human-fabrication machine interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 790--805. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. David Kirsh. 1995. The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence 73, 1 (1995), 31--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Ulrike Kister, Patrick Reipschl, Fabrice Matulic, and Raimund Dachselt. 2015. Bodylenses -- Embodied magic lenses and personal territories for wall displays. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. 117--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Jarrod Knibbe, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2015. Smart makerspace: An immersive instructional space for physical tasks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Tabletops 8 Surfaces. 83--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Silika Rahman Kona and Saleh Uddin. 2006. Movement in architecture: An analytical approach towards organic characteristics. In Proceedings of Communicating Space(s): 24th eCAAde Conference. 714--719.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Gokul Krishnan. 2015. Designing a Mobile Makerspace for Children's Hospital Patients: Enhancing Patients' Agency and Identity in Learning. Vanderbilt University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Stacey Kuznetsov and Eric Paulos. 2010. Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. In Proceedings of the Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. David Lakatos. 2012. AMPHORM: Form Giving Through Gestural Interaction to Shape Changing Objects. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Matthew Lakier, Michelle Annett, Daniel Wigdor, 2018. Automatics: Dynamically generating fabrication tasks to adapt to varying contexts. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 4 (2018), 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Sophie Landwehr Sydow and Martin Jonsson. 2015. The organization of personal fabrication: Hackathons and makerspaces as semi-professional places for creative making. In Proceedings of Critical Alternatives.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. David Ledo, Saul Greenberg, Nicolai Marquardt, and Sebastian Boring. 2015. Proxemic-aware controls: Designing remote controls for ubiquitous computing ecologies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices 8 Services. 187--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. So Young Lee and Jay L. Brand. 2005. Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25, 3 (2005), 323--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Anke Lehmann, Heidrun Schumann, Oliver Staadt, and Christian Tominski. 2011. Physical navigation to support graph exploration on a large high-resolution display. In International Symposium on Visual Computing. Springer, 496--507. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Daniel Leithinger, David Lakatos, Anthony Devincenzi, Matthew Blackshaw, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2011. Direct and gestural interaction with relief: A 2.5 D shape display. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 541--548. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Steven Levy. 2010. Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution. O'Reilly Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Jessica Lingel. 2016. The poetics of socio-technical space: Evaluating the internet of things through craft. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 815--826. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Thomas Ludwig, Oliver Stickel, Alexander Boden, Volkmar Pipek, and Volker Wulf. 2015. Appropriating digital fabrication technologies - a comparative study of two 3D printing communities. In Proceedings of the iConference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Thomas Ludwig, Oliver Stickel, Alexander Boden, and Volkmar Pipek. 2014. Towards sociable technologies: An empirical study on designing appropriation infrastructures for 3D printing. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems. 835--844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Maker Market Study. 2013. Retrieved July 2016 from http://cdn.makezine.com/ make/sales /Maker-Market-Study.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Makerspace Playbook. 2013. Retrieved July 2016 from http://makered.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Makerspace-Playbook-Feb-2013.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas W. Malone. 1983. How do people organize their desks? Implications for the design of office information systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 1, 1 (1983), 99--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Nicolai Marquardt, Till Ballendat, Sebastian Boring, Saul Greenberg, and Ken Hinckley. 2012. Gradual engagement: Facilitating information exchange between digital devices as a function of proximity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Jackie Marsh, Kristiina Kumpulainen, Bobby Nisha, Anca Velicu, Alicia Blum-Ross, David Hyatt, Svanborg R. Jónsdóttir, Rachael Levy, Sabine Little, George Marusteru, Margrét Elísabet Ólafsdóttir, Kjetil Sandvik, Fiona Scott, Klaus Thestrup, Hans Christian Arnseth, Kristín Dýrfjörð, Alfredo Jornet, Skúlína Hlíf Kjartansdóttir, Kate Pahl, Svava Pétursdóttir, and Gísli Thorsteinsson. 2017. Makerspaces in the Early Years: A Literature Review. Makey Project, University of Sheffield.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Ron Martin and Agnis Stibe. 2016. Sensing-bot and persuasive systems for the new makerspace. In Proceedings of ECSW@ PERSUASIVE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Christian Mckay and Kylie Peppler. 2013. Makercart: A mobile fab lab for the classroom. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design for Children Conference. Position Paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Andrew Milne, Bernhard Riecke, and Alissa Antle. 2014. Exploring maker practice: Common attitudes, habits and skills from Vancouver's maker community. Studies 19, 21 (2014), 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Bakhtiar Mikhak, Christopher Lyon, Tim Gorton, Neil Gershenfeld, Caroline McEnnis, and Jason Taylor. 2002. Fab lab: An alternate model of ICT for development. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Open Collaborative Design for Sustainable Innovation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Diane Mizrachi. 2013. Individuality and diversity among undergraduates’ academic information behaviors: An exploratory study. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development 8 Technology 3, 2 (2013), 29--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Stefanie Mueller, Bastian Kruck, and Patrick Baudisch. 2013. Laserorigami: Laser-cutting 3D objects. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2585--2592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Ken Nakagaki, Luke Vink, Jared Counts, Daniel Windham, Daniel Leithinger, Sean Follmer, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2016. Materiable: Rendering dynamic material properties in response to direct physical touch with shape changing interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2764--2772. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Martin M. Nielsen. 2003. Representations at Work. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 5, 2 (2003), 69--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Nancy Nersessian, Wendy C. Newstetter, Elke Kurz-Milcke, and Jim Davies. 2002. A mixed-method approach to studying distributed cognition in evolving environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Sciences. 307--314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Lora Oehlberg, Wesley Willett, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2015. Patterns of physical design remixing in online maker communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing. 639--648. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Kas Oosterhuis and Nimish Biloria. 2008. Interactions with proactive architectural spaces: The muscle projects. Communications of the ACM 51, 6 (2008), 70--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Antti Oulasvirta and Lauri Sumari. 2007. Mobile kits and laptop trays: Managing multiple devices in mobile information work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1127--1136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Amanda Parkes, Ivan Poupyrev, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2008. Designing kinetic interactions for organic user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 51, 6 (2008), 58--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Irene Posch and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2012. First steps in the fablab: Experiences engaging children. In Proceedings of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. 497--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Irene Posch, Hideaki Ogawa, Christopher Lindinger, Roland Haring, and Horst Hörtner. 2010. Introducing the fablab as interactive exhibition space. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 254--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Steven Pryor. 2014. Implementing a 3D printing service in an academic library. Journal of Library Administration 54, 1 (2014), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. David Pye. 1968. The Nature and Art of Workmanship. A8C Black.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Roman Rädle, Hans-Christian Jetter, Nicolai Marquardt, Harald Reiterer, and Yvonne Rogers. 2014. Huddlelamp: Spatially-aware mobile displays for Ad-hoc around-the-table collaboration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Majken K. Rasmussen, Esben W. Pedersen, Marianne G. Petersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2012. Shape-changing interfaces: A review of the design space and open research questions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 735--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance). Retrieved August 2018 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2016:119:TOC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Daniela Rosner and Jonathan Bean. 2009. Learning from IKEA hacking: I'm not one to decoupage a tabletop and call it a day. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 419-422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Thijs Roumen, Bastian Kruck, Tobias Dürschmid, Tobias Nack, and Patrick Baudisch. 2016. Mobile fabrication. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 3--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Vincent F. Scalfani and Josh Sahib. 2013. A model for managing 3D printing services in academic libraries. Issues in Science 8 Technology Librarianship 72 (2013), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Holger Schnädelbach, Ainojie Irune, David Kirk, Kevin Glover, and Patrick Brundell. 2012. ExoBuilding: Physiologically driven adaptive architecture. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 4 (2012), 25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Eldon Schoop, Michelle Nguyen, Daniel Lim, Valkyrie Savage, Sean Follmer, and Björn Hartmann. 2016. Drill sergeant: Supporting physical construction projects through an ecosystem of augmented tools. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1607--1614. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Stacey D. Scott, Carpendale Sheelagh, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2004. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. 294--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Abigail J. Sellen and Richard H. R. Harper. 2003. The Myth of the Paperless Office. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Kimberly Sheridan, Erica Rosenfeld Halverson, Breanne Litts, Lisa Brahms, Lynette Jacobs-Priebe, and Trevor Owens. 2004. Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review 84, 4 (2004), 505--531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Jay Silver. 2009. Awakening to maker methodology: The metamorphosis of a curious caterpillar. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 242--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Diane Slatter and Zaana Howard. 2013. A place to make, hack, and learn: Makerspaces in Australian public libraries. Australian Library Journal 62, 4 (2013), 272--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Sowmya Somanath, Lora Oehlberg, Janette Hughes, Ehud Sharlin, and Mario Costa Sousa. 2017. `Maker' within Constraints: Exploratory study of young learners using Arduino at a high school in India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 96--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Daniel Southwick and Matt Ratto. 2015. The Discrete Practices of 3D Printing. DOI:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/71939Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Tristan d'Estree Sterk. 2006. Responsive architecture: User-centered interactions within the hybridized model of control. In Proceedings of the Game Set and Match II Conference. 494--501.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Vol. 15, Sage, Newberry Park.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Kentaro Takano, Hirohito Shibata, and Junko Ichino. 2014. Microscopic analysis of document handling while reading paper documents to improve digital reading device. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction. 559--567. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. Kentaro Takano, Hirohito Shibata, and Kengo Omura. 2015. Effects of paper on cross-reference reading for multiple documents: Comparison of reading performances and processes between paper and computer displays. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction. 497--505. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Yuichiro Takeuchi. 2014. Building a World of Habitable Bits. Interactions 21, 6 (2014), 52--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Nick Taylor, Ursula Hurley, and Philip Connolly. 2016. Making community: The wider role of makerspaces in public life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1415--1425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. The Maker's Manual. 2015. Retrieved July 2016 http://www.psfk.com/ report/makers-manual.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Katja Thoring, Roland M. Mueller, Petra Badke-Schaub, and Pieter Desmet. 2016. Design the campus: Introducing a toolkit for developing creative learning spaces. In Proceedings of Cumulus Association International Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Austin L. Toombs, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2014. Becoming makers: Hackerspace member habits, values, and identities. Journal of Peer Production 5 (2014), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Cristen Torrey, Elizabeth F. Churchill, and David W. Mcdonald. 2009. Learning how: The search for craft knowledge on the internet. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1371--1380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive public ambient displays: Transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Stephen Voida, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and W. Keith Edwards. 2008. Re-framing the desktop interface around the activities of knowledge work. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 211--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. Ron Wakkary and Karen Tanenbaum. 2009. A sustainable identity: The creativity of an everyday designer. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 365--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. Jennifer Wang and Alice M. Agogino. 2013. Cross-community design and implementation of engineering tinkering activities at a science center. In Proceedings of Fablearn. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Miaosen Wang, Sebastian Boring, and Saul Greenberg. 2012. Proxemic peddler: A public advertising display that captures and preserves the attention of a passerby. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. 3--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. Tricia Wang and Joseph Kaye. 2011. Inventive leisure practices: Understanding hacking communities as sites of sharing and innovation. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 263--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. Jiajie Zhang. 1997. The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science 21, 2 (1997), 179--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring and Understanding the Role of Workshop Environments in Personal Fabrication Processes

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
              ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 26, Issue 2
              Special Issue on Human-Building Interaction
              April 2019
              217 pages
              ISSN:1073-0516
              EISSN:1557-7325
              DOI:10.1145/3319806
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2019 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 27 March 2019
              • Accepted: 1 November 2018
              • Revised: 1 August 2018
              • Received: 1 January 2018
              Published in tochi Volume 26, Issue 2

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format