skip to main content
10.1145/3301879.3301899acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbbeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Saccular Brain Aneurysm Detection and Multiclassifier Rupture Prediction using Digital Subtraction and Magnetic Resonance Angiograms

Published:12 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Saccular intracranial aneurysms corresponding to their berry or sac-like shape are characterized as most vulnerable to grow and rupture relatively quicker than other known types, such as, fusiform, distal and dissection. Approximately 80% of aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH) are reckoned due to burst of saccular aneurysms only. Therefore, timely detection of unruptured saccular brain aneurysms can greatly help neurosurgeons to treat them well before an aSAH occurs, and thus saves precious lives. Most of the research efforts in this respect involve statistical analysis of manually collected retrospective data to predict the risk of aneurysmal rupture. Whereas, geometrical, anatomical and textural characteristics of medical imaging, such as digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), is not investigated for accurate detection of unruptured saccular aneurysms and their individualized prediction of rupture likelihood. The main contribution of this work is a) 98% accurate identification of aneurysms from both DSA and MRA using Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network trained upon robust Haralick textural features of individual regions of interest (ROIs) segmented through Watershed Segmentation and Distance Transformation; b) prediction of aneurysms rupture probability, by categorizing aneurysmal ROIs into 5 classes, using geometrical, anatomical and textural features, with 76.67% accuracy using Decision Support Trees, ensembled with Bagging classifier. Our evaluation is based upon de-identified dataset of 180 images (54 MRA, and 126 DSA), obtained from Henry Ford Hospital, Bloomfield Hills, MI, USA, after IRB approval (No. 11254).

References

  1. Yoon N. K. et al. 2016. Imaging of cerebral aneurysms: a clinical perspective. Neurovascular Imaging 2:6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Greving et al. 2014. Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. The Lancet Neurology 13.1: 59--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Siuly S. and Zhang, Y. 2016. Medical Big Data: Neurological Diseases Diagnosis through Medical Data Analysis. Data Sci. Eng. 1(2):54--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kassner and Thornhill R.E. 2010. Texture Analysis: A Review of Neurologic MR Imaging Applications. Published April 15 asGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Moghaddam M. J. and Soltanian-Zadeh H. 2010. Medical Image Segmentation Using Artificial Neural Networks, Artificial Neural Networks - Methodological Advances and Biomedical Applications. Prof. Kenji Suzuki (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-243-2, InTech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kostopoulos S. et al. 2007. A Hybrid pixel-based classification method for blood vessel segmentation and aneurysm detection on CTA. Elsevier, Computers & Graphics 31 (2007) 493--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yohichi I. et al. 2018. Detection rates and sites of unruptured intracranial aneurysms according to sex and age: an analysis of MR angiography -- based brain examinations of 4070 healthy Japanese adults. J Neurosurg (April 06, 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Park S. and Lee D. H. et al. 2018. Incidental Saccular Aneurysms on Head MR Angiography: 5 Years' Experience at a Single Large-Volume Center (Mar 13, 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Millán R. D. et al. 2007. Morphological Characterization of Intracranial Aneurysms Using 3-D Moment Invariants. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, VOL. 26, NO. 9 (September 2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kostopoulos S. et al. 2007. A Hybrid pixel-based classification method for blood vessel segmentation and aneurysm detection on CTA. Elsevier, Computers & Graphics 31 (2007) 493--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jerman T. et al. 2016. Blob Enhancement and Visualization for Improved Intracranial Aneurysm Detection. IEEE Transaction on Visualization and Computer Graphics, VOL. 22, No. 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yang X. et al. 2011. Computer-Aided Detection of Intracranial Aneurysm in MR Angiography. Journal of Imaging, Vol 24--1: pp86--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hentschke C. M. et al. 2011. Automatic Cerebral Aneurysm Detection in Multimodal Angiographic Images. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, MIC12.M-193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Khalid M. and Shakeel M. Anjum, et al. 2018. ISADAQ--A Framework for Intracranial Saccular Aneurysm Detection and Quantification using Morphological Analysis of Cerebral Angiograms. IEEE Access, PP(99):1--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rahmany et al. 2014. Detection of Intracranial Aneurysm in Angiographic Images Using Fuzzy Approaches. IEEE IPAS'14: International Image Processing Applications and Systems Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nomura Y. and Masutani Y. et al. 2014. Performance improvement in computerized detection of cerebral aneurysms by retraining classifier using feedback data collected in routine reading environment. SEIDU, Journal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing. VOL. 4, NO. 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Farhan S. and Fahim M. A. et al. 2014. An Ensemble-of-Classifiers Based Approach for Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease: Classification Using Structural Features of Brain Images. Computational and Mathematical Models in Medicine. Vol 2014, Article ID 862307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Haralick R. M. 1979. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. In proceeding of IEEE (Volume: 67, Issue: 5, May 1979).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Breiman L. 1996. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24(2):123--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Freund Y., and Schapire R.E. 1996. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. Proceedings 13th International Conference on Machine Learning:148--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1):5--32 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Gama J., and Brazdil P. 2000. Cascade Generalization. Mach. Learn. 41(3):315--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wolpert D., and Stacked, H. 1992. Generalization. Neural Netw. 5:241--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Saccular Brain Aneurysm Detection and Multiclassifier Rupture Prediction using Digital Subtraction and Magnetic Resonance Angiograms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBBE '18: Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Biomedical and Bioinformatics Engineering
      November 2018
      156 pages
      ISBN:9781450365611
      DOI:10.1145/3301879

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 November 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader