skip to main content
10.1145/3306214.3338608acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Display methods of projection augmented reality based on deep learning pose estimation

Published:28 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose three display methods for projection-based augmented reality. In spatial augmented reality (SAR), determining where information, objects, or contents are to be displayed is a difficult and important issue. We use deep learning models to estimate user pose and suggest ways to solve the issue based on this data. Finally, each method can be appropriately applied according to various the applications and scenarios.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a55-ro.mp4

mp4

6.2 MB

References

  1. 2019. Runway. https://runwayapp.ai/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Oliver Bimber and Ramesh Raskar. 2005. Spatial augmented reality: merging real and virtual worlds. AK Peters/CRC Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Henry Chen, Austin S Lee, Mark Swift, and John C Tang. 2015. 3D collaboration method over HoloLensâĎć and SkypeâĎć end points. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Immersive Media Experiences. ACM, 27--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Andreas Fender, David Lindlbauer, Philipp Herholz, Marc Alexa, and Jörg Müller. 2017. HeatSpace: Automatic Placement of Displays by Empirical Analysis of User Behavior. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 611--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shafaq Mussadiq, Rehan Hafiz, and Muhammad Abdullah Jamal. 2017. Confined projection on selected sub-surface using a robust binary-coded pattern for pico-projectors. Multimedia Systems 23, 2 (2017), 207--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. George Papandreou, Tyler Zhu, Nori Kanazawa, Alexander Toshev, Jonathan Tompson, Chris Bregler, and Kevin Murphy. 2017. Towards accurate multi-person pose estimation in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4903--4911.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hyocheol Ro, Jung-Hyun Byun, Inhwan Kim, Yoon Jung Park, Kyuri Kim, and Tack-Don Han. 2019. Projection-Based Augmented Reality Robot Prototype with Human-Awareness. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 598--599.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyocheol Ro, Inhwan Kim, JungHyun Byun, Yoonsik Yang, Yoon Jung Park, Seungho Chae, and Tackdon Han. 2018. PAMI: Projection Augmented Meeting Interface for Video Conferencing. In 2018 ACM Multimedia Conference on Multimedia Conference. ACM, 1274--1277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Display methods of projection augmented reality based on deep learning pose estimation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGGRAPH '19: ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Posters
          July 2019
          148 pages
          ISBN:9781450363143
          DOI:10.1145/3306214

          Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 July 2019

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

          Upcoming Conference

          SIGGRAPH '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader