skip to main content
10.1145/3306500.3306509acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Study on the influencing factors of online learning effect based on decision tree and recursive feature elimination

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 January 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the popularity of online learning, more and more researchers have attached great importance to the relationship between learning effect and influence factors in the online courses. In literature works, Logistic Stepwise Regression algorithm is the most used method. But this method has limitation in run time especially when the dimension of data is large. Besides that, it can't rank the importance of factors. Aiming at the above shortcomings, this paper proposes a novel approach to analyze the influencing factors of online learning, which is based on the combination of decision tree and recursive feature elimination. Firstly, the feature sorting algorithm is based on decision tree to conduct the preliminary screening, which is to form a candidate feature set. Then, recursive feature elimination is used to rank the candidate features by their importance. At this stage, Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT) models are used separately to obtain each collating sequence of importance. By averaging these collating sequences, the final importance ranking of candidate features is achieved. Finally, an experiment is carried out on the Open University Learning Analytics dataset, and the results show that learning behavior has an important impact on the learning effect. Positive learning behaviors can lead to better learning effect.

References

  1. S Nesterko, D Seaton, J Reich, I Chuang. Evaluating Geographic Data in MOOCs, Neural information processing systems workship on data driven education, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F Han, UO Reilly. Analyzing Millions of Submissions to Help MOOC Instructors Understand Problem Solving, Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop on Data Driven Education, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang Ping. Learning analysis of learners based on edX open data{J}. Modern Educational Technology, 2015, 25(4):86--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ding N, Bosker R J, Harskamp E G. Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning{J}. Computers & Education, 2011, 56(2):325--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Vaessen B E, Prins F J, Jeuring J. University students' achievement goals and help-seeking strategies in an intelligent tutoring system{J}. Computers & Education, 2014, 72(C):196--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shu Zhong-mei, Qu Qiong-fei. An analysis of university students' learning outcome based on educational data mining{J}. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), 2014, 16(3):309--314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chanchary F H, Haque I, Khalid M S. Web Usage Mining to Evaluate the Transfer of Learning in a Web-based Learning Environment{C}//International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2008:249--253 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Natek S, Zwilling M. Student data mining solution-knowledge management system related to higher education institutions{J}. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(14):6400--6407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. He W. Examining students' online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining{J}. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(1):90--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Huang C K, Huang C H, Chuang Y T. Change discovery of learning performance in dynamic educational environments {J}. Telematics & Informatics, 2015, 33(3):773--792. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wu Qing, Luo Ru-guo. Predicting the Students' Performances and Reflecting the Teaching Strategies Based on the E-Learning Behaviors, Modern Educational Technology, 2017, 27 (6) : 18--24Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mahmood A M, Imran M, Satuluri N, et al. An Improved CART Decision Tree for Datasets with Irrelevant Feature{J}. 2011, 7076:539--549. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tan Xing, Xiong Juan. Application of 3σ rule in LabVIEW data procession{J}. China measurement & test, 2009, 35(5):66--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Study on the influencing factors of online learning effect based on decision tree and recursive feature elimination

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IC4E '19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning
      January 2019
      469 pages
      ISBN:9781450366021
      DOI:10.1145/3306500

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 January 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader