skip to main content
10.1145/3306500.3306528acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Asynchronous discussion forum: fostering reflection among preservice math teachers

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 January 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Web-based learning tools have been burgeoning over the past years and continuously shape instructional strategies that will stimulate students' learning. Among these tools, asynchronous discussion forum (ADF) has been a powerful tool to invite reflection among students. However, there are substantial considerations in integrating ADF, specifically in mathematics courses, which will support desired learning outcomes. This study was designed under the paradigm of action research to investigate the learning experiences and challenges of preservice math teachers in answering open-ended questions via ADF. Thirty-four preservice math teachers were divided into four sub-groups, were given a problem to discuss with, and were asked to assess their experience in the conduct of ADF. Based on the structured interview, ADF supports reflection among students while challenging their minds to think critically and be understanding of others' perspectives. It also revealed that the availability of computers and the internet connection remained to be a main challenge among the participants. Further, results showed that the type of questions given to the students served as their foundation in reflecting and thinking critically while the role and the level of participation of the instructor in ADF as well as students' motivation influence the quality of the discussion.

References

  1. Andresen, M. A. (2009). Asynchronous discussion forums: success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 249--257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student Interactions in Online Discussion Forum: Empirical Research from "Media Richness Theory" Perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barseghian, T. (2013). How Technology Wires the Learning Brain, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodzin, A. M., & Park, J. C. (2002). Using a nonrestrictive web-based forum to promote reflective discourse with preservice science teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(3), 267--289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Demirel, M., Derman, I., & Karagedik, E. (2015). A study on the relationship between reflective thinking skills towards problem solving and attitudes towards mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 2086--2096.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Demissie, F. (2015). Promoting student reachers â€TM reflective thinking through a philosophical community of enquiry approach. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(12).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim, Y. (2006). Cultivating refelctive thinking: The effects of reflective thinking tool on learners' learning performance and metacognitive awareness in the context of on-line learning. ProQuest Information and Learning Company, (August).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Prensky, M. (2012). Before Bringing in New Tools, You Must First Bring in New Thinking. Amplify, (June), 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Seo, D. (2014). A qualitative study of paticipation of students in online discussion in Mathematics, (May).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wielgus, M. D. (2015). Critical-Reflective Thinking: A Phenomenology. Theses and Dissertations-Philosophy, Paper 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Asynchronous discussion forum: fostering reflection among preservice math teachers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IC4E '19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning
      January 2019
      469 pages
      ISBN:9781450366021
      DOI:10.1145/3306500

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 January 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader