skip to main content
10.1145/3308558.3313467acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Large-scale Study of Wikipedia Users' Quality of Experience

Published:13 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Web is one of the most successful Internet application. Yet, the quality of Web users' experience is still largely impenetrable. Whereas Web performances are typically gathered with controlled experiments, in this work we perform a large-scale study of one of the most popular websites,namely Wikipedia, explicitly asking (a small fraction of its) users for feedback on the browsing experience. We leverage user survey responses to build a data-driven model of user satisfaction which, despite including state-of-the art quality of experience metrics, is still far from achieving accurate results, and discuss directions to move forward. Finally, we aim at making our dataset publicly available, which hopefully contributes in enriching and refining the scientific community knowledge on Web users' quality of experience (QoE).

References

  1. 2010. World Wide Wait. https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2010/02/12/world-wide-wait.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Eytan Bakshy, Dean Eckles, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Designing and Deploying Online Field Experiments. In Proc. of the 23rd International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Athula Balachandran, Vaneet Aggarwal, Shobha, He Yan, 2014. Modeling Web Quality-of-experience on Cellular Networks. In Proc. ACM MOBICOM. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Enrico Bocchi, Luca De Cicco, and Dario Rossi. 2016. Measuring the Quality of Experience of Web Users. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Internet-QoE Workshop(2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45, 1 (oct 2001), 5-32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jake Brutlag, Zoe Abrams, and Pat Meenan. {n. d.}. Above the fold time: Measuring Web page performance visually. http://conferences.oreilly.com/velocity/velocity-mar2011/public/schedule/detail/18692.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael Butkiewicz, Daimeng Wang, Zhe Wu, Harsha V. Madhyastha, and Vyas Sekar. 2015. Klotski: Reprioritizing Web Content to Improve User Experience on Mobile Devices. In Proc. of the USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Vint Cerf, Van Jacobson, Nick Weaver, and Jim Gettys. 2012. BufferBloat: what's wrong with the internet?Commun. ACM 55, 2 (2012), 40-47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proc. of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 785-794. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Diego Da Hora, Alemnew Asrese, Vassilis Christophides, Renata Teixeira, and Dario Rossi. 2018. Narrowing the gap between QoS metrics and Web QoE using Above-the-fold metrics. In Proc. Passive and Active Measurement Conference (PAM).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mallesham Dasari, Santiago Vargas, Arani Bhattacharya, Aruna Balasubramanian, Samir R. Das, and Michael Ferdman. 2018. Impact of Device Performance on Mobile Internet QoE. In Proc. ACM Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zhiheng Wang (Ed.). 2012. Navigation Timing. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-navigation-timing-20121217/. In ”W3C Recommendation”.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sebastian Egger, Peter Reichl, Tobias Hoβfeld, and Raimund Schatz. 2012. “Time is bandwidth”? Narrowing the gap between subjective time perception and Quality of Experience. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jeffrey Erman, Vijay Gopalakrishnan, Rittwik Jana, and K. K. Ramakrishnan. 2013. Towards a SPDY'Ier Mobile Web?. In ACM CoNEXT. 303-314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Markus Fiedler, Tobias Hoβfeld, and Phuoc Tran-Gia. 2010. A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. IEEE Network 24, 2 (2010), 36-41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Qingzhu Gao, Prasenjit Dey, and Parvez Ahammad. 2017. Perceived Performance of Top Retail Webpages In the Wild: Insights from Large-scale Crowdsourcing of Above-the-Fold QoE. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Internet-QoE Workshop. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tobias Hoβfeld, Poul E Heegaard, Martín Varela, and Sebastian Möller. 2016. QoE beyond the MOS: an in-depth look at QoE via better metrics and their relation to MOS. Quality and User Experience 1, 1 (2016), 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. ITU-T. 2014. Estimating end-to-end performance in IP networks for data application.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ITU-T. 2014. QoE factors in web-browsing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Conor Kelton, Jihoon Ryoo, Aruna Balasubramanian, and Samir R Das. 2017. Improving User Perceived Page Load Time Using Gaze. In Proc. of the USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yun Ma, Xuanzhe Liu, Shuhui Zhang, Ruirui Xiang, Yunxin Liu, and Tao Xie. 2015. Measurement and Analysis of Mobile Web Cache Performance. In Proc. of the 24th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Robert B Miller. 1968. Response time in man-computer conversational transactions. In Proc. AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ben Miroglio, David Zeber, Jofish Kaye, and Rebecca Weiss. 2018. The Effect of Ad Blocking on User Engagement with the Web. In Proc. of the 27th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yashar Moshfeghi and Joemon M. Jose. 2013. On Cognition, Emotion, and Interaction Aspects of Search Tasks with Different Search Intentions. In Proc. of the 22nd International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah. 2004. A study on tolerable waiting time: how long are web users willing to wait?Behaviour & Information Technology 23, 3 (2004), 153-163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Javad Nejati and Aruna Balasubramanian. 2016. An In-depth Study of Mobile Browser Performance. In Proc. of the 25th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ravi Netravali, Anirudh Sivaraman, Keith Winstein, Somak Das, Ameesh Goyal, and Hari Balakrishnan. 2014. Mahimahi: a lightweight toolkit for reproducible web measurement. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 44. ACM, 129-130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jakob Nielsen. {n. d.}. Response Times: The 3 Important Limits. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/response-times-3-important-limits/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ashkan Nikravesh, Hongyi Yao, Shichang Xu, David Choffnes, and Z. Morley Mao. 2015. Mobilyzer: An Open Platform for Controllable Mobile Network Measurements. In Proc. ACM MobiSys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Ingmar Poese, Steve Uhlig, Mohamed Ali Kaafar, Benoit Donnet, and Bamba Gueye. 2011. IP Geolocation Databases: Unreliable?ACM SIGCOMM CCR 41, 2 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Peter Reichl, Sebastian Egger, Raimund Schatz, and Alessandro D'Alconzo. 2010. The logarithmic nature of QoE and the role of the Weber-Fechner law in QoE assessment. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sanae Rosen, Bo Han, Shuai Hao, Z. Morley Mao, and Feng Qian. 2017. Push or Request: An Investigation of HTTP/2 Server Push for Improving Mobile Performance. In Proc. of the 26th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Philipp Singer, Florian Lemmerich, Robert West, Leila Zia, Ellery Wulczyn, Markus Strohmaier, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Why We Read Wikipedia. In Proc. of the 26th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Chris Smith-Clarke and Licia Capra. 2016. Beyond the Baseline: Establishing the Value in Mobile Phone Based Poverty Estimates. In Proc. of the 25th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Srikanth Sundaresan, Walter de Donato, Nick Feamster, Renata Teixeira, Sam Crawford, and Antonio Pescapè. 2011. Broadband Internet Performance: A View from the Gateway. In ACM SIGCOMM. 134-145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Matteo Varvello, Jeremy Blackburn, David Naylor, and Konstantina Papagiannaki. 2016. EYEORG: A Platform For Crowdsourcing Web Quality Of Experience Measurements. In Proc. ACM CoNEXT. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Xiao Sophia Wang, Aruna Balasubramanian, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and David Wetherall. 2014. How Speedy is SPDY?. In Proc. of the USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Xiao Sophia Wang, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and David Wetherall. 2016. Speeding up Web Page Loads with Shandian. In Proc. of the USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Torsten Zimmermann, Jan Ruth, Benedikt Wolters, and Oliver Hohlfeld. 2017. How HTTP/2 Pushes the Web: An Empirical Study of HTTP/2 Server Push. In Proc. IFIP Networking.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Torsten Zimmermann, Benedikt Wolters, and Oliver Hohlfeld. 2017. A QoE Perspective on HTTP/2 Server Push. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Internet-QoE Workshop. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference
    May 2019
    3620 pages
    ISBN:9781450366748
    DOI:10.1145/3308558

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format