skip to main content
10.1145/3308558.3313704acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning Task-Specific City Region Partition

Published:13 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of publicly accessible urban data provide new insights on various urban tasks. A frequently used approach is to treat each region as a data sample and build a model over all the regions to observe the correlations between urban features (e.g., demographics) and the target variable (e.g., crime count). To define regions, most existing studies use fixed grids or pre-defined administrative boundaries (e.g., census tracts or community areas). In reality, however, definitions of regions should be different depending on tasks (e.g., regional crime count prediction vs. real estate prices estimation). In this paper, we propose a new problem of task-specific city region partitioning, aiming to find the best partition in a city w.r.t. a given task. We prove this is an NP-hard search problem with no trivial solution. To learn the partition, we first study two variants of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). We further propose a reinforcement learning scheme for effective sampling the search space. We conduct experiments on two real datasets in Chicago (i.e., crime count and real estate price) to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.

References

  1. 2010. United States Census Bureau. Demographics Survey. http://www.census.govGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Konstantin Andreev and Harald Racke. 2006. Balanced graph partitioning. Theory of Computing Systems 39, 6 (2006), 929-939. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Christophe Andrieu, Nando De Freitas, Arnaud Doucet, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. An introduction to MCMC for machine learning. Machine learning 50, 1-2 (2003), 5-43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Richard Bellman and Robert Roth. 1969. Curve fitting by segmented straight lines. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 64, 327 (1969), 1079-1084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Santo Fortunato. 2010. Community detection in graphs. Physics reports 486, 3-5 (2010), 75-174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Santo Fortunato and Marc Barthelemy. 2007. Resolution limit in community detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 1 (2007), 36-41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Yanjie Fu, Yong Ge, Yu Zheng, Zijun Yao, Yanchi Liu, Hui Xiong, and Jing Yuan. 2014. Sparse real estate ranking with online user reviews and offline moving behaviors. In Data Mining (ICDM), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 120-129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Corina Graif, Andrew S Gladfelter, and Stephen A Matthews. 2014. Urban poverty and neighborhood effects on crime: Incorporating spatial and network perspectives. Sociology compass 8, 9 (2014), 1140-1155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ke Li and Jitendra Malik. 2016. Learning to optimize. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01885(2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yexin Li, Yu Zheng, Huichu Zhang, and Lei Chen. 2015. Traffic prediction in a bike-sharing system. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kevin P. Murphy. 2012. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Giulio Rossetti, Luca Pappalardo, Riivo Kikas, Dino Pedreschi, Fosca Giannotti, and Marlon Dumas. 2016. Homophilic network decomposition: a community-centric analysis of online social services. Social Network Analysis and Mining 6, 1 (2016), 103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Malcolm Strens. 2003. Evolutionary MCMC sampling and optimization in discrete spaces. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-03). 736-743. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. 1998. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Vol. 1. MIT press Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hado Van Hasselt, Arthur Guez, and David Silver. 2016. Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-Learning.. In AAAI, Vol. 16. 2094-2100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hongjian Wang, Daniel Kifer, Corina Graif, and Zhenhui Li. 2016. Crime rate inference with big data. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 635-644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hongjian Wang, Yu-Hsuan Kuo, Daniel Kifer, and Zhenhui Li. 2016. A simple baseline for travel time estimation using large-scale trip data. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hongjian Wang and Zhenhui Li. 2017. Region Representation Learningvia Mobility Flow. In In Proceedings of CIKM'17. CIKM'17, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hongjian Wang, Xianfeng Tang, Yu-Hsuan Kuo, Daniel Kifer, and Zhenhui Li. 2019. A Simple Baseline for Travel Time Estimation Using Large-scale Trip Data. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 10, 2, Article 19 (Jan. 2019), 22 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hongjian Wang, Huaxiu Yao, Daniel Kifer, Corina Graif, and Zhenhui Li. 2017. Non-Stationary Model for Crime Rate Inference Using Modern Urban Data. IEEE Transactions on Big Data(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Fei Wu, Hongjian Wang, and Zhenhui Li. 2016. Interpreting traffic dynamics using ubiquitous urban data. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Fengli Xu, Yong Li, Huandong Wang, Pengyu Zhang, and Depeng Jin. 2017. Understanding mobile traffic patterns of large scale cellular towers in urban environment. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 25, 2 (2017), 1147-1161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jing Yuan, Yu Zheng, and Xing Xie. 2012. Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and POIs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 186-194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Bin Zhang. 2003. Regression clustering. In Data Mining, 2003. ICDM 2003. Third IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 451-458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yu Zheng, Furui Liu, and Hsun-Ping Hsieh. 2013. U-air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1436-1444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yu Zheng, Tong Liu, Yilun Wang, Yanmin Zhu, Yanchi Liu, and Eric Chang. 2014. Diagnosing New York city's noises with ubiquitous data. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 715-725. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Yu Zheng, Xiuwen Yi, Ming Li, Ruiyuan Li, Zhangqing Shan, Eric Chang, and Tianrui Li. 2015. Forecasting fine-grained air quality based on big data. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2267-2276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zillow.com. 2017. Real Estate Value in Chicago. https://www.zillow.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference
    May 2019
    3620 pages
    ISBN:9781450366748
    DOI:10.1145/3308558

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format