skip to main content
10.1145/3308558.3313751acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quality Effects on User Preferences and Behaviorsin Mobile News Streaming

Published: 13 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

User behaviors are widely used as implicit feedbacks of user preferences in personalized information systems. In previous works and online applications, the user's click signals are used as positive feedback for ranking, recommendation, evaluation, etc. However, when users click on a piece of low-quality news, they are more likely to have negative experiences and different reading behaviors. Hence, the ignorance of the quality effects of news may lead to the misinterpretation of user behaviors as well as consequence studies. To address these issues, we conducted an in-depth user study in mobile news streaming scenario to investigate whether and how the quality of news may affect user preferences and user behaviors. Firstly, we verify that quality does affect user preferences, and low-quality news results in a lower preference. We further find that this effect varies with both interaction phases and user's interest in the topic of the news. Secondly, we inspect how users interact with low-quality news. Surprisingly, we find that users are more likely to click on low-quality news because of its high title persuasion. Moreover, users will read less and slower with fewer revisits and examinations while reading the low-quality news.
Based on these quality effects we have discovered, we propose the Preference Behavior Quality (PBQ) probability model which incorporates the quality into traditional behavior-only implicit feedback. The significant improvement demonstrates that incorporating quality can help build implicit feedback. Since the importance and difficulty in collecting news quality, we further investigate how to identify it automatically. Based on point-wise and pair-wise distinguishing experiments, we show that user behaviors, especially reading ratio and dwell time, have high ability to identify news quality. Our research has comprehensively analyzed the effects of quality on user preferences and behaviors, and raised the awareness of item quality in interpreting user behaviors and estimating user preferences.

References

[1]
Eugene Agichtein, Eric Brill, and Susan Dumais. 2006. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 19-26.
[2]
Antti Ajanki, David R Hardoon, Samuel Kaski, Kai Puolamäki, and John Shawe-Taylor. 2009. Can eyes reveal interest? Implicit queries from gaze patterns. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 19, 4 (2009), 307-339.
[3]
Ioannis Arapakis, Mounia Lalmas, B Barla Cambazoglu, Mari-Carmen Marcos, and Joemon M Jose. 2014. User engagement in online N ews: Under the scope of sentiment, interest, affect, and gaze. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65, 10(2014), 1988-2005.
[4]
Nicholas J Belkin, Michael Cole, and Jingjing Liu. 2009. A model for evaluation of interactive information retrieval. In Proceedings of the SIGIR 2009 Workshop on the Future of IR Evaluation. 7-8.
[5]
Olivier Chapelle and Ya Zhang. 2009. A dynamic bayesian network click model for web search ranking. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 1-10.
[6]
Mark Claypool, Phong Le, Makoto Wased, and David Brown. 2001. Implicit interest indicators. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 33-40.
[7]
Janez Demšar. 2006. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine learning research 7, Jan (2006), 1-30.
[8]
Georges E Dupret and Benjamin Piwowarski. 2008. A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 331-338.
[9]
Steve Fox, Kuldeep Karnawat, Mark Mydland, Susan Dumais, and Thomas White. 2005. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 23, 2 (2005), 147-168.
[10]
Fan Guo, Chao Liu, and Yi Min Wang. 2009. Efficient multiple-click models in web search. In Proceedings of the second acm international conference on web search and data mining. ACM, 124-131.
[11]
Ahmed Hassan. 2012. A semi-supervised approach to modeling web search satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 275-284.
[12]
Ahmed Hassan and Ryen W White. 2013. Personalized models of search satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 2009-2018.
[13]
Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In Data Mining, 2008. ICDM'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on. Ieee, 263-272.
[14]
Jeff Huang and Abdigani Diriye. 2012. Web user interaction mining from touch-enabled mobile devices. In HCIR workshop.
[15]
Jiepu Jiang, Daqing He, and James Allan. 2017. Comparing In Situ and Multidimensional Relevance Judgments. (2017).
[16]
Thorsten Joachims, Laura Granka, Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, and Geri Gay. 2017. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In ACM SIGIR Forum, Vol. 51. Acm, 4-11.
[17]
Thorsten Joachims, Laura Granka, Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, Filip Radlinski, and Geri Gay. 2007. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 25, 2 (2007), 7.
[18]
Diane Kelly and Nicholas J Belkin. 2004. Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects. In Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 377-384.
[19]
Diane Kelly and Jaime Teevan. 2003. Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography. In Acm Sigir Forum, Vol. 37. ACM, 18-28.
[20]
Youngho Kim, Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W White, and Imed Zitouni. 2014. Comparing client and server dwell time estimates for click-level satisfaction prediction. In Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval. ACM, 895-898.
[21]
Youngho Kim, Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W White, and Imed Zitouni. 2014. Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 193-202.
[22]
Dmitry Lagun, Chih-Hung Hsieh, Dale Webster, and Vidhya Navalpakkam. 2014. Towards better measurement of attention and satisfaction in mobile search. In Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval. ACM, 113-122.
[23]
Dmitry Lagun, Donal McMahon, and Vidhya Navalpakkam. 2016. Understanding mobile searcher attention with rich ad formats. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 599-608.
[24]
Gael Lederrey and Robert West. 2018. When Sheep Shop: Measuring Herding Effects in Product Ratings with Natural Experiments. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 793-802.
[25]
Yixuan Li, Pingmei Xu, Dmitry Lagun, and Vidhya Navalpakkam. 2017. Towards Measuring and Inferring User Interest from Gaze. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 525-533.
[26]
Jimmy Lin, Salman Mohammed, Royal Sequiera, and Luchen Tan. 2018. Update Delivery Mechanisms for Prospective Information Needs: An Analysis of Attention in Mobile Users. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 785-794.
[27]
Zeyang Liu, Jiaxin Mao, Chao Wang, Qingyao Ai, Yiqun Liu, and Jian-Yun Nie. 2017. Enhancing click models with mouse movement information. Information Retrieval Journal 20, 1 (2017), 53-80.
[28]
Hongyu Lu, Min Zhang, and Ma Shaoping. 2018. Between Clicks and Satisfaction: Study on Multi-Phase User Preferences and Satisfaction for Online News Reading. In International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM.
[29]
Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Ke Zhou, Jian Yun Nie, Jingtao Song, Min Zhang, Hengliang Luo, Hengliang Luo, and Hengliang Luo. 2016. When does Relevance Mean Usefulness and User Satisfaction in Web Search?. In International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 463-472.
[30]
Benjamin M Marlin and Richard S Zemel. 2009. Collaborative prediction and ranking with non-random missing data. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 5-12.
[31]
Ben Miroglio, David Zeber, Jofish Kaye, and Rebecca Weiss. 2018. The Effect of Ad Blocking on User Engagement with the Web. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 813-821.
[32]
Rong Pan, Yunhong Zhou, Bin Cao, Nathan N Liu, Rajan Lukose, Martin Scholz, and Qiang Yang. 2008. One-class collaborative filtering. In Data Mining, 2008. ICDM'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 502-511.
[33]
Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1146-1151.
[34]
Chao Wang, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, Meihong Zheng, Jing Qian, and Kuo Zhang. 2013. Incorporating vertical results into search click models. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 503-512.
[35]
Ryen W White and Diane Kelly. 2006. A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 297-306.
[36]
Peifeng Yin, Ping Luo, Wang-Chien Lee, and Min Wang. 2013. Silence is also evidence: interpreting dwell time for recommendation from psychological perspective. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 989-997.
[37]
Yisong Yue, Rajan Patel, and Hein Roehrig. 2010. Beyond position bias: Examining result attractiveness as a source of presentation bias in clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 1011-1018.
[38]
Xiaoying Zhang, Junzhou Zhao, and John Lui. 2017. Modeling the assimilation-contrast effects in online product rating systems: Debiasing and recommendations. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 98-106.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)EEG-SVRec: An EEG Dataset with User Multidimensional Affective Engagement Labels in Short Video RecommendationProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657890(698-708)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Two-sided Calibration for Quality-aware Responsible RecommendationProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3604915.3608799(223-233)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Understanding User Immersion in Online Short Video InteractionProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3615099(731-740)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference
May 2019
3620 pages
ISBN:9781450366748
DOI:10.1145/3308558
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 May 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Implicit feedback
  2. Online news reading
  3. Quality effect
  4. User behavior analysis
  5. User item-level preference

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WWW '19
WWW '19: The Web Conference
May 13 - 17, 2019
CA, San Francisco, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)EEG-SVRec: An EEG Dataset with User Multidimensional Affective Engagement Labels in Short Video RecommendationProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657890(698-708)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Two-sided Calibration for Quality-aware Responsible RecommendationProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3604915.3608799(223-233)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Understanding User Immersion in Online Short Video InteractionProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3615099(731-740)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Federated User Modeling from Hierarchical InformationACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/356048541:2(1-33)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Positive, Negative and NeutralProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3532040(1185-1195)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
  • (2021)Using Interaction Data to Predict Engagement with Interactive MediaProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia10.1145/3474085.3475631(1258-1266)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2021
  • (2021)The Effect of News Article Quality on Ad ConsumptionProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3459637.3482201(3107-3111)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Effects of Incidental Brief Exposure to News on News Knowledge While Scrolling Through VideosIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.30634849(37772-37783)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Prediction of News Popularity via Keywords Extraction and Trends TrackingRecent Trends in Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts10.1007/978-3-030-71214-3_4(37-51)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2021
  • (2019)Effects of User Negative Experience in Mobile News StreamingProceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3331184.3331247(705-714)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2019

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media