skip to main content
10.1145/3308560.3316475acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lightning Talk - Looking for the Movie Seven or Sven from the Movie Frozen?

Published:13 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

As one of the largest communities that search for online resources, children are introduced to the Web at increasingly young ages [1]. However, popular search tools are not explicitly designed with children in mind nor do their retrieved results explicitly target children. Consequently, many young users struggle in completing successful searches, especially since most search engines (SE) do not directly support, or offer weak support, for children’s inquiry approaches [2]. Even though children, as inexperienced users, struggle with describing their information needs in a concise query, they still expect SEs to retrieve relevant information in response to their requirements. As part of their capabilities, SEs often suggest queries to aid users in better defining their information needs. In fact, a recent study conducted by Gossen et al. [3] shows that children pay more attention to suggested queries than adults. Unfortunately, these suggestions are not specifically tailored towards children and thus need improvement [5]. While there exist multiple query suggestion modules, only few specifically target children. To address this problem, along with a need for more children-related tools, we rely on ReQuIK (Recommendations based on Query Intention for Kids), a query suggestion module tailored towards 6-to-13 year old children (introduced in [4]). ReQuIK informs its suggestion process by applying (i) a strategy based on search intent to capture the purpose of a query [1], (ii) a ranking strategy based on a wide and deep neural network that considers both raw text and traits commonly associated with kid-related queries, (iii) a filtering strategy based on the readability levels of documents potentially retrieved by a query to favor suggestions that trigger the retrieval of documents matching children’s reading skills, and (iv) a content-similarity strategy to ensure diversity among suggestions.

For assessing the quality of the system, we conducted initial offline and online experiments based on 591 queries written by 97 children, ages 6 to 13. The results of this assessment verified the correctness of ReQuIK’s recommendation strategy, the fact that it provides suggestions that appeal to children and ReQuIK’s ability to recommend queries that lead to the retrieval of materials with readability levels that correlate with children’s reading skills

To the best of our knowledge, ReQuIK is the only available system that can be coupled with SEs to generate query recommendations for children, favoring those that lead to easier-to-read, child-related resources, which can improve SEs’ performance. The design of the proposed tool explicitly considers different patterns children use while searching the Web to adequately capture the intended meaning of their original queries. For example, if a child submits the query “elsa”, ReQuIK aims to prioritize query suggestions such as “elsa coloring papers” or “elsa dress up games” that correlate better with topics of interest to children rather than “elsa pataky”, as suggested by Google, which is more appealing to mature users. Other contributions of our work include a novel ranking model inspired by a deep-and-wide architecture that, while successfully applied for ranking purposes [6], has never been used in the query suggestions domain; a strategy to overcome the lack of queries written by children by taking advantage of general purpose children-oriented phrases; and a newly-created dataset [4].

References

  1. Nevena Dragovic, Ion Madrazo Azpiazu, and Maria Soledad Pera. 2016. Is Sven Seven?: A Search Intent Module for Children. In ACM SIGIR. 885–888. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Elizabeth Foss, Allison Druin, Robin Brewer, Phillip Lo, Luis Sanchez, Evan Golub, and Hilary Hutchinson. 2012. Children’s search roles at home: Implications for designers, researchers, educators, and parents. JASIST 63, 3 (2012), 558–573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Tatiana Gossen, Juliane Höbel, and Andreas Nürnberger. 2014. A comparative study about children’s and adults’ perception of targeted web search engines. In SIGCHI. 1821–1824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ion Madrazo Azpiazu, Nevena Dragovic, Oghenemaro Anuyah, and Maria Soledad Pera. 2018. Looking for the Movie Seven or Sven from the Movie Frozen?: A Multi-perspective Strategy for Recommending Queries for Children. In ACM CHIIR. ACM, 92–101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Arif Usta, Ismail Sengor Altingovde, Ibrahim Bahattin Vidinli, Rifat Ozcan, and Özgür Ulusoy. 2014. How k-12 students search for learning?: analysis of an educational search engine log. In ACM SIGIR. 1151–1154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hamed Zamani, Michael Bendersky, Xuanhui Wang, and Mingyang Zhang. 2017. Situational Context for Ranking in Personal Search. In WWW. 1531–1540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Lightning Talk - Looking for the Movie Seven or Sven from the Movie Frozen?
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '19: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference
        May 2019
        1331 pages
        ISBN:9781450366755
        DOI:10.1145/3308560

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format