skip to main content
10.1145/3308561.3354614acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Design and Analysis of Interoperable Data Logs for Augmentative Communication Practice

Published:24 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

mHealth is becoming increasingly data-driven in healthcare professions. Clinicians use a variety of data collection methods to capture the language use and communication performance of clients with complex communication needs. One solution for collecting and analyzing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) data is through automatic data logging from high-tech AAC devices, also known as speech generating devices (SGDs). However, there is no interoperable method to analyze data logs across various SGDs. To address this, our work presents an interoperable data log format and a parser as a prototype solution. The prototype was used successfully to analyze two common AAC data log formats, and can easily be extended to other formats. This approach has significant potential to improve AAC outcome measurement for individual users, as well as comparison of outcomes across multiple users and devices.

References

  1. David R. Beukelman and Pat Mirenda. 2013. Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needs. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Szu-Han Kay Chen, Eric Nyberg, and Katya Hill. 2017. Survey on AAC data logging: the industry perspective. In ASHA Convention.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Jeffery Higginbotham, Gregory W. Lesher, and Bryan J. Moulton. 1999. Development of a voluntary standard format for augmentative communication device logfiles. In Proceedings of the RESNA '99 Annual Conference, 25--27. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.15.9216Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Katya Hill, Thomas Kovacs, and Sangeun Shin. 2014. Reliability of brain computer interface language sample transcription procedures. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 51, 4 (2014), 579--590. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2013.05.0102Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Katya Hill and Barry Romich. 1999. AAC language activity monitoring and analysis for clinical intervention and research outcomes. In CSUN 99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Coughdrop INC. 2016. Coughdrop. Retrieved from www.mycoughdrop.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gregory W. Lesher, Gerard J. Rinkus, Bryan J. Moulton, and D. Jeffery Higginbotham. 2000. Logging and Analysis of Augmentive Communication. In Proceedings of the RESNA 2000 annual conference, 82--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregory W Lesher, Bryan J Moulton, Gerard Rinkus, and D Jeffery Higginbotham. 2000. A universal logging format for augmentative communication. In 2000 CSUN Conference. Retrieved January 1, 2017 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED447629Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lingraphica. 2016. Lingraphica. Retrieved from www.aphasia.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Howard P. Parette and Diane Dempsey Marr. 1997. Assisting children and families who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices: Best practices for school psychologists. Psychol. Sch. 34, 4 (1997), 337--346. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520--6807(199710)34:4<337::AID-PITS5>3.0.CO;2-IGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Prentke Romich Company. 2016. Unity. Retrieved from https://www.prentrom.com/prc_advantage/unity-language-systemGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Barry A. Romich and Katya J. Hill. 1999. A language activity monitor for AAC and writing systems: Clinical intervention, outcomes measurement, and research. In The RESNA'99 Annual Conference, 22--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Barry Romich and Katya Hill. 1999. A proposed standard for aac and writing system data logging for clinical intervention, outcomes measurement, and research. In RESNA '99, 22--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Barry Romich, Katya Hill, Amoin Seagull, Naveed Ahmad, Jaymie Strecker, and Kaizad Gotla. 2003. AAC performance report tool: PERT. In Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America (RESNA). Retrieved from https://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/legacy/conference/proceedings/2003/Papers/AAC/Romich_AAC.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Laura E. Smith, D. Jeffery Higginbotham, Gregory W. Lesher, Bryan Moulton, and Pamela Mathy. 2006. The development of an automated method for analyzing communication rate in augmentative and alternative communication. Assist. Technol. 18, 1 (2006), 107--121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2006.10131910Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Speak for yourself LLC. 2016. Speak for yourself. Retrieved from https://www.speakforyourself.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nava Tintarev, Ehud Reiter, Rolf Black, Annalu Waller, and Joe Reddington. 2016. Personal storytelling: Using Natural Language Generation for children with complex communication needs, in the wild... Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 92--93, (2016), 1--16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.04.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Erh-Hsuan Wang, Leming Zhou, Szu-Han Kay Chen, Katya Hill, and Bambang Parmanto. 2018. An mHealth platform for supporting clinical data integration into augmentative and alternative communication service delivery:?: User-centered design and usability evaluation. JMIR Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 5, 2 (2018), e14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2196/rehab.9009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ASSETS '19: Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
    October 2019
    730 pages
    ISBN:9781450366762
    DOI:10.1145/3308561

    Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 24 October 2019

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster

    Acceptance Rates

    ASSETS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate41of158submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader