skip to main content
research-article

BLITZ: Low Latency and Energy-Efficient Communication for Event-Triggered Wireless Sensing Systems

Published: 28 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Event-triggered wireless sensing systems are an important class of wireless sensor network, where the detection of non-deterministic events enables the monitoring and control of processes in industries such as manufacturing, healthcare, and agriculture. The system properties of low latency, energy efficiency, and adaptability make event-triggered wireless sensing systems a key technological enabler for the Industrial Internet of Things.
<?tight?>Wireless sensing systems based on periodic multi-hop communication exhibit a fundamental trade-off between latency and energy efficiency, which is unfavorable for event-triggered application scenarios. To address this technological gap, we present Blitz, the first communication architecture that combines asynchronous and synchronous flooding primitives to facilitate low latency and energy-efficient multi-hop communication of non-deterministic events. Blitz also incorporates a novel scheme for mitigating erroneous wake-ups, which is shown analytically and experimentally to further reduce energy consumption. We present a prototype implementation of Blitz and evaluate its performance in an indoor testbed deployment. Experiments show that BLITZ supports a mean latency as low as 108.9ms for an 8-bit event packet and its associated data packet of 32 bytes through a 4-hop network, and a power dissipation of 16μW during periods of inactivity.

References

[1]
Yasmin Ammar, Sadok Bdiri, and Faouzi Derbel. 2015. An ultra-low power wake up receiver with flip flops based address decoder. In Proceedings of the 12th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals, and Devices. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--5.
[2]
Fayçal Ait Aoudia, Matthieu Gautier, Michele Magno, Olivier Berder, and Luca Benini. 2016. SNW-MAC: An asynchronous protocol leveraging wake-up receivers for data gathering in star networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sensor Systems and Software. 3--14.
[3]
Fayçal Ait Aoudia, Matthieu Gautier, Michele Magno, Olivier Berder, and Luca Benini. 2017. A generic framework for modeling MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 25, 3 (2017), 1489--1500.
[4]
Jan Beutel, Bernhard Buchli, Federico Ferrari, Matthias Keller, and Marco Zimmerling. 2011. X-sense: Sensing in extreme environments. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation, and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--6.
[5]
Dinesh Bharadia, Kiran Raj Joshi, Manikanta Kotaru, and Sachin Katti. 2015. BackFi: High throughput WiFi backscatter. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 45, 4 (2015), 283--296.
[6]
Johannes Blanckenstein, Jirka Klaue, and Holger Karl. 2015. A survey of low-power transceivers and their applications. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine 15, 3 (2015), 6--17.
[7]
Carlo Alberto Boano, Thiemo Voigt, Nicolas Tsiftes, Luca Mottola, Kay Römer, and Marco Antonio Zúñiga. 2010. Making sensornet MAC protocols robust against interference. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks. 272--288.
[8]
Michael Buettner, Gary V. Yee, Eric Anderson, and Richard Han. 2006. X-MAC: A short preamble MAC protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 307--320.
[9]
Marco Cattani, Andreas Loukas, Marco Zimmerling, Marco Zuniga, and Koen Langendoen. 2016. Staffetta: Smart duty-cycling for opportunistic data collection. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 56--69.
[10]
Jeongki Choi, Kanghyuk Lee, Seok-Oh Yun, Sang-Gug Lee, and Jinho Ko. 2012. An interference-aware 5.8GHz wake-up radio for ETCS. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. 446--448.
[11]
Fabien Chraim, Yusuf Bugra Erol, and Kris Pister. 2016. Wireless gas leak detection and localization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 12, 2 (2016), 768--779.
[12]
Ruben de Francisco and Yan Zhang. 2011. An interference robust multi-carrier wake-up radio. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1265--1270.
[13]
Ilker Demirkol, Cem Ersoy, and Ertan Onur. 2009. Wake-up receivers for wireless sensor networks: Benefits and challenges. IEEE Wireless Communications 16, 4 (2009), 88--96.
[14]
Fatima Zahra Djiroun and Djamel Djenouri. 2017. MAC protocols with wake-up radio for wireless sensor networks: A review. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 19, 1 (2017), 587--618.
[15]
Richard O. Duda, Peter E. Hart, and David G. Stork. 2012. Pattern Classification. John Wiley 8 Sons.
[16]
Simon Duquennoy, Beshr Al Nahas, Olaf Landsiedel, and Thomas Watteyne. 2015. Orchestra: Robust mesh networks through autonomously scheduled TSCH. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 337--350.
[17]
Prabal Dutta, Stephen Dawson-Haggerty, Yin Chen, Chieh-Jan Mike Liang, and Andreas Terzis. 2012. A-MAC: A versatile and efficient receiver-initiated link layer for low-power wireless. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 8, 4 (2012), 30.
[18]
Prabal Dutta, Mike Grimmer, Anish Arora, Steven Bibyk, and David Culler. 2005. Design of a wireless sensor network platform for detecting rare, random, and ephemeral events. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[19]
Federico Ferrari, Marco Zimmerling, Luca Mottola, and Lothar Thiele. 2012. Low-power wireless bus. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1--14.
[20]
Federico Ferrari, Marco Zimmerling, Lothar Thiele, and Olga Saukh. 2011. Efficient network flooding and time synchronization with Glossy. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[21]
IEFT. 2012. RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks. IETF RFC 6550. Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6550.
[22]
G. U. Gamm, M. Kostic, M. Sippel, and L. M. Reindl. 2012. Low-power sensor node with addressable wake-up on-demand capability. International Journal of Sensor Networks 11, 1 (2012), 48--56.
[23]
L. Girard, J. Beutel, S. Gruber, J. Hunziker, R. Lim, and S. Weber. 2012. A custom acoustic emission monitoring system for harsh environments: Application to freezing-induced damage in alpine rock walls. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems 1, 2 (2012), 155--167.
[24]
Dawud Gordon, Matthias Berning, Rayan El Masri, Michael Beigl, Johannes Blanckenstein, and Jirka Klaue. 2012. WoR-MAC: Combining wake-on-radio with quality-of-service for intelligent environments. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--8.
[25]
Chunlong Guo, Lizhi Charlie Zhong, and Jan M. Rabaey. 2001. Low power distributed MAC for ad hoc sensor radio networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[26]
Daniel Halperin, Thomas Anderson, and David Wetherall. 2008. Taking the sting out of carrier sense: Interference cancellation for wireless LANs. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, New York, NY, 339--350.
[27]
Christian Hambeck, Stefan Mahlknecht, and Thomas Herndl. 2011. A 2.4W wake-up receiver for wireless sensor nodes with &minus;71dBm sensitivity. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 534--537.
[28]
David C. Harrison, Winston K. G. Seah, and Ramesh Rayudu. 2016. Rare event detection and propagation in wireless sensor networks. ACM Computing Surveys 48, 4 (2016), 58.
[29]
Anwar Hithnawi, Su Li, Hossein Shafagh, James Gross, and Simon Duquennoy. 2016. Crosszig: Combating cross-technology interference in low-power wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 10.
[30]
Anwar Hithnawi, Hossein Shafagh, and Simon Duquennoy. 2014. Understanding the impact of cross technology interference on IEEE 802.15. 4. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental Evaluation, and Characterization. ACM, New York, NY, 49--56.
[31]
Pei Huang, Li Xiao, Soroor Soltani, Matt W. Mutka, and Ning Xi. 2013. The evolution of MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 15, 1 (2013), 101--120.
[32]
Florin Hutu, Aissa Khoumeri, Guillaume Villemaud, and Jean-Marie Gorce. 2014. Wake-up radio architecture for home wireless networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Radio Wireless Symposium.
[33]
IEEE Standards Association. IEEE 802.15.4e Wireless Standard—Amendment 1: MAC sublayer. Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/802.15.4e-2012.html.
[34]
K. Jamieson, H. Balakrishnan, and Y. C. Tay. 2006. Sift: A MAC protocol for event-driven wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks. 260--275.
[35]
Heikki Karvonen, Juha Petäjäjärvi, Jari Iinatti, Matti Hämäläinen, and Carlos Pomalaza-Ráez. 2014. A generic wake-up radio based MAC protocol for energy efficient short range communication. In Proceedings of the IEEE 25th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communication. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 2173--2177.
[36]
Bryce Kellogg, Aaron Parks, Shyamnath Gollakota, Joshua R. Smith, and David Wetherall. 2015. Wi-Fi Backscatter: Internet connectivity for RF-powered devices. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 44, 4 (2015), 607--618.
[37]
Gyouho Kim, Yoonmyung Lee, Suyoung Bang, Inhee Lee, Yejoong Kim, Dennis Sylvester, and David Blaauw. 2012. A 695pW standby power optical wake-up receiver for wireless sensor nodes. In Proceedings of the Custom Integrated Circuits Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--4.
[38]
Michael König and Roger Wattenhofer. 2016. Maintaining constructive interference using well-synchronized sensor nodes. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 206--215.
[39]
Trong Nhan Le, Alain Pegatoquet, and Michele Magno. 2015. Asynchronous on demand MAC protocol using wake-up radio in wireless body area network. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Workshop on Advances in Sensors and Interfaces. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 228--233.
[40]
Edward A. Lee. 2008. Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 363--369.
[41]
Krijn Leentvaar and Jan Flint. 1976. The capture effect in FM receivers. IEEE Transactions on Communications 24, 5 (1976), 531--539.
[42]
Roman Lim, Federico Ferrari, Marco Zimmerling, Christoph Walser, Philipp Sommer, and Jan Beutel. 2013. FlockLab: A testbed for distributed, synchronized tracing and profiling of wireless embedded systems. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM, New York, NY.
[43]
Roman Lim, Reto Da Forno, Felix Sutton, and Lothar Thiele. 2017. Competition: Robust flooding using back-to-back synchronous transmissions with channel-hopping. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, Vol. 17. 270--271.
[44]
Roman Lim, Balz Maag, Benjamin Dissler, Jan Beutel, and Lothar Thiele. 2015. A testbed for fine-grained tracing of time sensitive behavior in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Local Computer Networks Workshops.
[45]
E.-Y. A. Lin, J. M. Rabaey, and A. Wolisz. 2004. Power-efficient rendez-vous schemes for dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[46]
Vincent Liu, Aaron Parks, Vamsi Talla, Shyamnath Gollakota, David Wetherall, and Joshua R. Smith. 2013. Ambient backscatter: Wireless communication out of thin air. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference. ACM, New York, NY.
[47]
Maarten Lont, Dusan Milosevic, Peter G. M. Baltus, Arthur H. M. Van Roermund, and Guido Dolmans. 2009. Analytical models for the wake-up receiver power budget for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--6.
[48]
Maarten Lont, Dusan Milosevic, and Arthur van Roermund. 2014. Wake-up Receiver Based Ultra-Low-Power WBAN. Springer.
[49]
LoRa Alliance. 2019. Home Page. Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.lora-alliance.org.
[50]
Michele Magno, Vana Jelicic, Bruno Srbinovski, Vedran Bilas, Emanuel Popovici, and Luca Benini. 2016. Design, implementation, and performance evaluation of a flexible low-latency Nanowatt wake-up radio receiver. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 12, 2 (2016), 633--644.
[51]
S. Mahlknecht and M. Spinola Durante. 2009. WUR-MAC: Energy efficient wakeup receiver based MAC protocol. In Proceedings of the 8th IFAC Conference on Fieldbuses and Networks in Industrial and Embedded Systems.
[52]
Stevan Marinkovic and Emanuel Popovici. 2012. Ultra low power signal oriented approach for wireless health monitoring. Sensors 12, 6 (2012), 7917--7937.
[53]
Nafiseh Seyed Mazloum and Ove Edfors. 2011. DCW-MAC: An energy efficient medium access scheme using duty-cycled low-power wake-up receivers. In Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--5.
[54]
Nafiseh Seyed Mazloum and Ove Edfors. 2017. Influence of duty-cycled wake-up receiver characteristics on energy consumption in single-hop networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 16, 6 (2017), 3870--3884.
[55]
D. K. McCormick. 2017. 802.11ba battery life improvement—Preview: IEEE technology report on wake-up radio. In IEEE Standards. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--11.
[56]
Doudou Messaoud, Djenouri Djamel, and Badache Nadjib. 2013. Survey on latency issues of asynchronous MAC protocols in delay-sensitive wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials 15, 2 (2013), 528--550.
[57]
Matthew J. Miller and Nitin H. Vaidya. 2005. A MAC protocol to reduce sensor network energy consumption using a wakeup radio. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 4, 3 (2005), 228--242.
[58]
R. Musaloiu-E, C.-J. M. Liang, and A. Terzis. 2008. Koala: Ultra-low power data retrieval in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[59]
Vinod Namboodiri and Abtin Keshavarzian. 2008. Alert: An adaptive low-latency event-driven MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 159--170.
[60]
J. Oetting. 1979. A comparison of modulation techniques for digital radio. IEEE Transactions on Communications 27, 12 (1979), 1752--1762.
[61]
Seunghyun Oh, Nathan E. Roberts, and David D. Wentzloff. 2013. A 116nW multi-band wake-up receiver with 31-bit correlator and interference rejection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--4.
[62]
Joaquim Oller, Ilker Demirkol, Jordi Casademont, Josep Paradells, Gerd Ulrich Gamm, and Leonhard Reindl. 2013. Wake-up radio as an energy-efficient alternative to conventional wireless sensor networks MAC protocols. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 173--180.
[63]
Joaquim Oller, Ilker Demirkol, Jordi Casademont, Josep Paradells, Gerd Ulrich Gamm, and Leonhard Reindl. 2016. Has time come to switch from duty-cycled MAC protocols to wake-up radio for wireless sensor networks? IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 24, 2 (2016), 674--687.
[64]
Joaquim Oller, Ilker Demirkol, Josep Paradells, Jordi Casademont, and Wendi Heinzelman. 2012. Time-knocking: A novel addressing mechanism for wake-up receivers. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking, and Communications. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 268--275.
[65]
Aishwarya Parasuram, David Culler, and Randy Katz. 2016. An Analysis of the RPL Routing Standard for Low Power and Lossy Networks. Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2016-106. University of California at Berkeley.
[66]
Aaron N. Parks, Angli Liu, Shyamnath Gollakota, and Joshua R. Smith. 2015. Turbocharging ambient backscatter communication. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 44, 4, 619--630.
[67]
Chiara Petrioli, Dora Spenza, Pasquale Tommasino, and Alessandro Trifiletti. 2014. A novel wake-up receiver with addressing capability for wireless sensor nodes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems. 18--25.
[68]
Rajeev Piyare, Timofei Istomin, and Amy L. Murphy. 2017. WaCo: A wake-up radio COOJA extension for simulating ultra low power radios. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks.
[69]
Rajeev Piyare, Amy L. Murphy, Csaba Kiraly, Pietro Tosato, and Davide Brunelli. 2017. Ultra low power wake-up radios: A hardware and networking survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 19, 4 (2017), 2117--2157.
[70]
Nathan Pletcher, Simone Gambini, and Jan Rabaey. 2007. A 65&mu;W, 1.9 GHz RF to digital baseband wakeup receiver for wireless sensor nodes. In Proceedings of the Custom Integrated Circuits Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 539--542.
[71]
Joseph Polastre, Jason Hill, and David Culler. 2004. Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 95--107.
[72]
(CoAP). IETF RFC 7252. Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252.
[73]
V. Rajendran, K. Obraczka, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. 2003. Energy-efficient collision-free medium access control for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 181--192.
[74]
Ragunathan Raj Rajkumar, Insup Lee, Lui Sha, and John Stankovic. 2010. Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution. In Proceedings of the 47th Design Automation Conference. ACM, New York, NY, 731--736.
[75]
Injong Rhee, Ajit Warrier, Mahesh Aia, Jeongki Min, and Mihail L. Sichitiu. 2008. Z-MAC: A hybrid MAC for wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 16, 3 (2008), 511--524.
[76]
Jorge Saez, Tolgay Ungan, Leonhard M. Reindl, and Timo Kumberg. 2017. Development and characterization of a robust differential wake-up receiver for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1209--1214.
[77]
Mo Sha, Gregory Hackmann, and Chenyang Lu. 2013. Energy-efficient low power listening for wireless sensor networks in noisy environments. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM, New York, NY, 277--288.
[78]
Rajeev K. Shakya, Yatindra Nath Singh, and Nishchal K. Verma. 2012. Optimizing channel access for event-driven wireless sensor networks: Analysis and enhancements. arXiv:1203.5874.
[79]
Sigfox. n.d. Home Page. Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.sigfox.com.
[80]
Lukas Sigrist, Andres Gomez, Roman Lim, Stefan Lippuner, Matthias Leubin, and Lothar Thiele. 2017. Measurement and validation of energy harvesting IoT devices. In Proceedings of the 2017 Design, Automation, and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1159--1164.
[81]
Dora Spenza, Michele Magno, Stefano Basagni, Luca Benini, Mario Paoli, and Chiara Petrioli. 2015. Beyond duty cycling: Wake-up radio with selective awakenings for long-lived wireless sensing systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 522--530.
[82]
Richard Su, Thomas Watteyne, and Kristofer S. J. Pister. 2010. Comparison between preamble sampling and wake-up receivers in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--5.
[83]
Yanjun Sun, Shu Du, Omer Gurewitz, and David B. Johnson. 2008. DW-MAC: A low latency, energy efficient demand-wakeup MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing. ACM, New York, NY, 53--62.
[84]
Felix Sutton, Bernhard Buchli, Jan Beutel, and Lothar Thiele. 2015. Zippy: On-demand network flooding. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 45--58.
[85]
Felix Sutton, Reto Da Forno, David Gschwend, Tonio Gsell, Roman Lim, Jan Beutel, and Lothar Thiele. 2017. The design of a responsive and energy-efficient event-triggered wireless sensing system. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks. ACM, New York, NY, 144--155.
[86]
Felix Sutton, Marco Zimmerling, Reto Da Forno, Roman Lim, Tonio Gsell, Georgia Giannopoulou, Federico Ferrari, et al. 2015. Bolt: A stateful processor interconnect. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 267--280.
[87]
Swiss Federal Office of Communications. 2016. Radio Interface Regulation 1021-05. Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.ofcomnet.ch/api/rir/1021/05.
[88]
Tijs Van Dam and Koen Langendoen. 2003. An adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 171--180.
[89]
Ambuj Varshney, Oliver Harms, Carlos Pérez-Penichet, Christian Rohner, Frederik Hermans, and Thiemo Voigt. 2017. LoRea: A backscatter architecture that achieves a long communication range. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems.
[90]
Thomas Watteyne, Lance Doherty, Jonathan Simon, and Kris Pister. 2013. Technical overview of SmartMesh IP. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 547--551.
[91]
Thomas Watteyne, Joy Weiss, Lance Doherty, and Jonathan Simon. 2015. Industrial IEEE802.15.4e networks: Performance and trade-offs. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 604--609.
[92]
Martin Wollschlaeger, Thilo Sauter, and Juergen Jasperneite. 2017. The future of industrial communication: Automation networks in the era of the Internet of Things and Industry 4.0. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine 11, 1 (2017), 17--27.
[93]
Kshitij Yadav, Ioannis Kymissis, and Peter R. Kinget. 2013. A 4.4&mu;W wake-up receiver using ultrasound data communications. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 48, 3, 649--660.
[94]
Wei Ye, John Heidemann, and Deborah Estrin. 2002. An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the T21st Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Vol. 3. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1567--1576.
[95]
Hiroyuki Yomo, Kenichi Abe, Yuichiro Ezure, Tetsuya Ito, Akio Hasegawa, and Takeshi Ikenaga. 2015. Radio-on-demand sensor and actuator networks (ROD-SAN): System design and field trial. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1--6.
[96]
P. Zappi, E. Farella, and L. Benini. 2010. Tracking motion direction and distance with pyroelectric IR sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal 10, 9 (2010), 1486--1494.
[97]
Pengyu Zhang, Dinesh Bharadia, Kiran Raj Joshi, and Sachin Katti. 2016. HitchHike: Practical backscatter using commodity WiFi. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 259--271.
[98]
Pengyu Zhang, Pan Hu, Vijay Pasikanti, and Deepak Ganesan. 2014. EkhoNet: High speed ultra low-power backscatter for next generation sensors. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, New York, NY, 557--568.
[99]
Yan Zhang, Li Huang, Guido Dolmans, and Harmke de Groot. 2009. An analytical model for energy efficiency analysis of different wakeup radio schemes. In Proceedings of the IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1148--1152.
[100]
Xiaolong Zheng, Zhichao Cao, Jiliang Wang, Yuan He, and Yunhao Liu. 2017. Interference resilient duty cycling for sensor networks under co-existing environments. IEEE Transactions on Communications 65, 7 (2017), 2971--2984.
[101]
Marco Zimmerling. 2015. End-to-End Predictability and Efficiency in Low-Power Wireless Networks. Ph.D. Dissertation. ETH Zurich.
[102]
Marco Zimmerling, Federico Ferrari, Luca Mottola, Thiemo Voigt, and Lothar Thiele. 2012. pTunes: Runtime parameter adaptation for low-power MAC protocols. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM, New York, NY, 173--184.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Structure-Adaptive Many-to-Many Data-Sharing for Internet-of-ThingsIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2024.337637121:3(2596-2607)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2024)Divide-and-Conquer for Internet-of-Things: Discrete vs Continuous Groups2024 16th International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS)10.1109/COMSNETS59351.2024.10427391(700-704)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Network On or Off? Instant Global Binary Decisions over UWB with FlickProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks10.1145/3583120.3586967(261-273)Online publication date: 9-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. BLITZ: Low Latency and Energy-Efficient Communication for Event-Triggered Wireless Sensing Systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 15, Issue 2
      May 2019
      339 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/3311822
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Journal Family

      Publication History

      Published: 28 March 2019
      Accepted: 01 January 2019
      Revised: 01 January 2019
      Received: 01 February 2018
      Published in TOSN Volume 15, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Event-triggered wireless sensing
      2. cyber-physical systems
      3. energy efficient
      4. glossy
      5. interference
      6. network flooding
      7. on demand
      8. responsiveness
      9. synchronous transmissions
      10. wake-up radio
      11. wake-up receiver
      12. wireless sensor networks

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      • Swiss Confederation and Nano-Tera.ch

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Structure-Adaptive Many-to-Many Data-Sharing for Internet-of-ThingsIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2024.337637121:3(2596-2607)Online publication date: Jun-2024
      • (2024)Divide-and-Conquer for Internet-of-Things: Discrete vs Continuous Groups2024 16th International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS)10.1109/COMSNETS59351.2024.10427391(700-704)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
      • (2023)Network On or Off? Instant Global Binary Decisions over UWB with FlickProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks10.1145/3583120.3586967(261-273)Online publication date: 9-May-2023
      • (2023)LiteCast: Flexible Scalable and Uniform Local Data-Sharing in Real-Time2023 32nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN)10.1109/ICCCN58024.2023.10230145(1-10)Online publication date: Jul-2023
      • (2023)How AI-enabled SDN technologies improve the security and functionality of industrial IoT network: Architectures, enabling technologies, and opportunitiesDigital Communications and Networks10.1016/j.dcan.2022.07.0019:6(1351-1362)Online publication date: Dec-2023
      • (2022)Multihop Networking for Intermittent DevicesProceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems10.1145/3560905.3568104(878-884)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2022
      • (2022)ECO: Enabling Energy-Neutral IoT Devices Through Runtime Allocation of Harvested EnergyIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2021.31062839:7(4833-4848)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022
      • (2021)STeCProceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems10.1145/3485730.3485951(274-287)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2021
      • (2020)OpenWuR - An Open WSN Platform for WuR-based Application PrototypingProceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks10.5555/3400306.3400347(212-217)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2020
      • (2020)Synchronous Transmissions in Low-Power WirelessACM Computing Surveys10.1145/341015953:6(1-39)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2020
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media