skip to main content
10.1145/3310986.3310996acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improved collaborative filtering recommendations using quantitative implication rules mining in implication field

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 January 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Collaborative filtering recommendation based on association rule mining has become a research trend in the field of recommender systems. However, most research results only focus on binary data, whereas in practice sets of transactions are usually quantitative data. Moreover, association rule mining algorithms are designed to focus on optimizing for basket analysis, so that in order to better serve for recommendation, they need to be adjusted. Therefore, a solution for recommender systems to deal with association rules on both binary and quantitative data as well as improve the quality of recommendation based on the rule set is a challenge today. This paper proposes a new approach to improve the accuracy, the performance and the time of recommendation by the model based on quantitative implication rules mining in the implication field.

References

  1. Adomavicius Gediminas, Tuzhilin Alexander, Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions, IEEE transactions on Knowledge and Data engineering, Vol.17 No.6, pp. 734--749, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Adomavicius Gediminas, Tuzhilin Alexander, Context-aware recommender systems, Springer US, pp. 217--253, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach and Bracha Shapira, Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook, Springer-Verlag and Business Media LLC, pp.1--35, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Rahul Katarya, Om Prakash Verma (2016), Effective collaborative movie recommender system using asymmetric user similarity and matrix factorization, The 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation, pp.1--12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gavin Shaw, Yue Xu and Shlomo Geva (2010), Using Association Rules to Solve the Cold-Start Problem in Recommender Systems, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp.340--347, ISSN 0302-9743. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Timur Osadchiy, Ivan Poliakov, Patrick Olivier, Maisie Rowland, Emma Foster (2018), Recommender system based on pairwise association rules, Expert Systems with Applications 115 pp. 535--542.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ahmed Mohammed K. Alsalama (2015), A Hybrid Recommendation System Based On Association Rules, International Science Index, Computer and Information Engineering Vol:9, No:1, 2015 waset.org/Publication/ 10000147Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tzung Pei Hong, Chang Sheng Kuo, Sheng Chai Chi, (2001) Trade-off between computation time and number of rules for fuzzy mining from quantitative data, International journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems Vol.9 No.5, pp.587--604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Tzung-Pei Hong, Chun-Hao Chen, Yeong-Chyi Lee, and Yu-Lung Wu. (2008), Genetic-Fuzzy Data Mining with Divide-and-Conquer Strategy, IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, Vol.12, No.2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Guillaume S., Guillet F., Philipp6 J. (1998): Contribution of the integration of intensity of implication into the algorithm proposed by Agrawal, EMCSR'98, Vienna, vol. 2, pp. 805--810Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rakesh Agrawal, Imielinski, T., & Swami, T. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data (SIGMOD'93) (pp. 207--216). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rakesh Agrawal and Ramakrishnan Srikant Fast algorithms for mining association rules. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB, pages 487--499, Santiago, Chile, September 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hoang Tan Nguyen, Hung Huu Huynh and Hiep Xuan Huynh (2018), Collaborative filtering recommendation with threshold value of the equipotential plane in implication field, the 2nd International Conference on Machine learning and Soft computing (ICMLSC2018); Phu Quoc island, Vietnam, ISBN: 978-1-4503-6336-5 pp.39--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hoang Tan Nguyen, Hung Huu Huynh and Hiep Xuan Huynh (2018), Collaborative Filtering Recommendation in the Implication Field, International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, Volume 8 Number 3 (Jun. 2018), pp 214--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Régis Gras, Einoshin Suzuki Fabrice Guillet, Filippo Spagnolo (Eds.), Statistical Implicative Analysis, Theory and Application, Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Regis Gras, Raphael Couturier, Spécificités de l'Analyse Statistique Implicative (A.S.I.) par rapport à d'autres mesures de qualité de règles d'association, Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica - GRIM (ISSN on-line 1592--4424, p.19--57, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dominique Lahanier-Reuter, Didactics of Mathematics and Implicative Statistical Analysis, Statistical Implicative Analysis - Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp 277--298, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Régis Gras, Pascale Kuntz and Nicolas Greffard, Notion de champ implicatif en analysis statistique implicative, The 8th International Meeting on Statistical Implicative Analysis, Tunisia, pp 1--21, 2015 (in French).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yanchang Zhao, Chengqi Zhang, Longbing Cao, (2009) Post-Mining of Association Rules: Techniques for Effective Knowledge Extraction, Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global), USA, ISBN 978-1-60566-405-7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Herlocker J.L et al, 2004. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5--53 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sarwar, B and G. Karypis, 2000. Analysis of recommendation algorithms for ecommerce. EC '00. USA: ACM, pp. 158--167 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Yeong, et al, 2005. Mining changes in customer buying behavior for collaborative recommendations. Expert Syst. Appl. 28, 2 (February 2005), 359--369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2004.10.015 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improved collaborative filtering recommendations using quantitative implication rules mining in implication field

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICMLSC '19: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing
      January 2019
      268 pages
      ISBN:9781450366120
      DOI:10.1145/3310986

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 January 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader