skip to main content
10.1145/3311890.3311906acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesflConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Making with Micro:bit: Teachers and Students Learning 21st Century Competences through the Innovation Process

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Innokas Network works with schools and other stakeholders to develop 21st Century Competences in education. In this work we present a maker pilot study in which Innokas Network introduced Finnish teachers to the Innovation Process and the Micro:bit programmable device for supporting students' 21st Century Competences. We show preliminary results of the study and discuss the relevance of maker projects and the Innovation Process for learning 21st Century Competences in the Finnish educational context.

100 participating Finnish teachers received in-service training in Micro:bit technology and learned to apply the technology within the Innovation Process. After the training, the teachers used the technology in class projects. They reported on their projects using blog narratives and research questionnaires. In addition, 850 participating students answered a questionnaire on their experiences. The results of an initial analysis point to a positive view of the maker-related Innovation Process and Micro:bit technology as a way for both teachers and students to learn 21st Century Competences.

References

  1. European Union, Education and Culture DG: Key competences for lifelong learning: European reference framework. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5719a044-b659-46de-b58b-606bc5b084c1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J Voogt and N.P Roblin. 2012. A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. B Trilling and C Fadel. 2009. 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M Binkley, O Erstad, J Herman, S Raizen, M Ripley, M Miller-Ricci, and M Rumble. 2012. Defining twenty-first century skills. In P Griffin, B McGaw, and E Care (Eds.). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills Vol. 9789400723. Springer, Netherlands, 17--66Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Finnish National Agency for Education. 2018. Transversal Competences. Retrieved November 11, 2018 from https://www.oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualifications/basic_education/curricula_2014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J Lavonen and T Korhonen. 2017. Towards 21st Century Education: Success Factors, Challenges, and the Renewal of Finnish Education. In S Choo, D Sawch, A Willanueva, and R Vinz (Eds.). Educating for the 21st Century: Perspectives, Policies and Practices from Around the World. Springer, Singapore, 243--264Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M Scardamalia and C Bereiter. 2006. Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K Sawyer (Ed.). Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 97--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S.L Martinez and G.S Stager. 2013. Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press, Torrance, CA, USAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S Paavola and K Hakkarainen. 2014. Trialogical approach for knowledge creation. In S.C Tan, H.J Jo, and J Yoe (Eds.). Knowledge creation in education. Springer, Singapore, 53--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, M Viilo and K Hakkarainen. 2010. Learning by collaborative designing: Technology-enhanced knowledge practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 109--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J Lavonen, O Autio, and V Meisalo. 2004. Creative and collaborative problem solving in technology education: a case study in primary school teacher education. Journal of Technology Studies, 30(2), 107--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. K Sormunen, K Juuti, and J Lavonen. 2019. Reflective discussion as a method of supporting participation in maker-centered science project. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S Sentance, J Waite, S Hodges, E MacLeod and L.E Yeomans. 2017. "Creating Cool Stuff" - Pupils' experience of the BBC Micro:bit. In Proceedings of the 48th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education: SIGCSE 2017 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Making with Micro:bit: Teachers and Students Learning 21st Century Competences through the Innovation Process

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        FL2019: Proceedings of FabLearn 2019
        March 2019
        206 pages
        ISBN:9781450362443
        DOI:10.1145/3311890

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 March 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        FL2019 Paper Acceptance Rate36of73submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate36of73submissions,49%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader