skip to main content
10.1145/3311890.3311915acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesflConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Remixing Wakanda: Envisioning Critical Afrofuturist Design Pedagogies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

While maker education offers a method for increasing interest in STEM domains among youth, underrepresented communities possess a rich cultural history of making and STEM practices too often ignored by popular articulations of making. In this paper we describe the 8-week ReMixing Wakanda Project, which brings together youth of color, artists, designers, educators, and researchers to construct a new vision for a culturally relevant and sustaining STEAM-centered learning and making framework situated in an Afrofuturist design aesthetic. Here we highlight how the design of the physical space, discussions with guest artists, and a collective art construction supported participants as they explored the past to confront the present and imagine futures for and by and about themselves.

References

  1. Reynaldo Anderson. 2015. Critical Afrofuturism/A case study in visual, rhetoric, sequential art, and postapocalyptic Black identity. Blacker the ink: Constructions of Black identity in comics and sequential art: 171--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anne Balsamo. 2010. Design. International Journal of Learning and Media 1, 4: 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Paulo Blikstein. 2013. Digital fabrication and 'making' in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors: 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Leah Buechley. 2016. Inclusive Maker Education: STEM is Everywhere. Retrieved from https://edstream.stanford.edu/Video/Play/a33992cc9fb2496488c1afa9b6204a571dGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Octavia E. Butler. 2000. Parable of the Sower. Grand Central Publishing, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Angela Calabrese Barton and Edna Tan. 2018. A Longitudinal Study of Equity-Oriented STEM-Rich Making Among Youth From Historically Marginalized Communities. American Educational Research Journal 55, 4: 761--800.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mark Dery (ed.). 1994. Flame Wars: The Discourse of Cyberculture. Duke University Press Books, Durham, NC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. DiSalvo and K. DesPortes. 2017. Participatory design for value-driven learning. In Participatory Design In the Learning Sciences, B. DiSalvo, J. Yip, E. Bonsignore and C. DiSalvo (eds.). Routledge, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Dunne and F. Raby. 2005. Towards a critical design. Retrieved July 18, 2018 from http://www.dunneandraby.co.uk/content/bydandr/42/0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ron Eglash and Julian Bleecker. 2001. The Race For Cyberspace: Information Technology in the Black Diaspora. Science as Culture 10, 3: 353--374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Paulo Freire. 1974. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Seabury Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Paul Gilroy. 1993. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double-Consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kris D. Gutiérrez. 2008. Developing a Sociocritical Literacy in the Third Space. Reading Research Quarterly 43, 2: 148--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. N. Holbert. 2016. Leveraging cultural values and "ways of knowing" to increase diversity in maker activities. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 9--10: 33--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. bell hooks. 2006. Outlaw Culture: Resisting Representations (Routledge Classics) by bell hooks (1-May-2006) Paperback. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. John Jennings. 2017. Remixing the Trap: Race, Space, and the Speculative South.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. John Jennings and Clint Fluker. in preparation. Forms of Future/Past: Black Kirby Afrofuturism and the Visual Technologies of Resistance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yasmin B. Kafai and Kylie A. Peppler. 2014. Transparency Reconsidered: Creative, Critical, and Connected Making with E-textiles. In DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media. MIT Press, 179--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Audre Lorde and Cheryl Clarke. 2007. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Crossing Press, Berkeley, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. National Science Foundation. 2015. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Django Paris. 2012. Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A Needed Change in Stance, Terminology, and Practice. Educational Researcher 41, 3: 93--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. D. N. Perkins. 1986. Knowledge as design. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Daniel G. Solórzano and Tara J. Yosso. 2002. Critical Race Methodology: Counter-Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Education Research. Qualitative Inquiry 8, 1: 23--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Shirin Vossoughi, Paula K. Hooper, and Meg Escudé. 2016. Making Through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward Transformative Visions for Educational Equity. Harvard Educational Review 86, 2: 206--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    FL2019: Proceedings of FabLearn 2019
    March 2019
    206 pages
    ISBN:9781450362443
    DOI:10.1145/3311890

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 March 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    FL2019 Paper Acceptance Rate36of73submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate36of73submissions,49%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader