skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376507acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Becoming a Robot - Overcoming Anthropomorphism with Techno-Mimesis

Published: 23 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Employing anthropomorphism in physical appearance and behavior is the most widespread strategy for designing social robots. In the present paper, we argue that imitating humans impedes the full exploration of robots' social abilities. In fact, their very 'thingness' (e.g., sensors, rationality) is able to create 'superpowers' that go beyond human abilities, such as endless patience. To better identify these special abilities, we develop a performative method called 'Techno-Mimesis' and explore it in a series of workshops with robot designers. Specifically, we create 'prostheses' to allow designers to transform themselves into their future robot to experience use cases from the robot's perspective, e.g., 'seeing' with a distance sensor rather than with eyes. This imperfect imitation helps designers to experience being human and being robot at the same time, making differences apparent and facilitating the discovery of a number of potential physical, cognitive, and communicational robotic superpowers.

References

[1]
Philip Van Allen. 2013. AniThings: Animism and Heterogeneous Multiplicity. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13), 2247--2256.
[2]
Christoph Bartneck and Jodi Forlizzi. 2004. A Design-Centred Framework for Social Human-Robot Interaction. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '04), 591--594. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374827
[3]
Gorman Beauchamp. 1980. The Frankenstein Complex and Asimov's Robots. Mosaic 13, 3: 83--94.
[4]
Nurit Bird-David. 1999. Animism Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology. Current Anthropology 40, S1: 67--91.
[5]
Mriganka Biswas and John Christopher Murray. 2015. Towards an Imperfect Robot for Long-Term Companionship: Case Studies Using Cognitive Biases. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '15), 5978--5983. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7354228
[6]
Eva Brandt and Camilla Grunnet. 2000. Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference (PDC '00), 11--20. Retrieved from http://www.itu.dk/courses/I/F2004/PDC00-drama-endelig.pdf
[7]
Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience prototyping. Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '00): 424--433. https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347802
[8]
Jacob Buur and Preben Friis. 2015. Object Theatre in Design Education. In Nordic Design Research Society Conference (NORDES '19), 1--8.
[9]
Álvaro Castro-González, José Carlos Castillo, Fernando Alonso-Martín, Olmer V. Olortegui-Ortega, Victor González-Pacheco, María Malfaz, and Miguel A. Salichs. 2016. The effects of an impolite vs. a polite robot playing rock-paper-scissors. In International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR '16), 306--316. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--47437--3_30
[10]
Eduardo Viveiros De Castro. 2004. Exchanging Perspectives. The Transformation of Objects into Subjects. Common knowledge 10, 3: 463--484.
[11]
Wen-wei Chang, Elisa Giaccardi, Lin-lin Chen, and Rung-huei Liang. 2017. 'Interview with Things:" A First-thing Perspective to Understand the Scooter's Everyday Socio-material Network in Taiwan. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17), 1001--1012.
[12]
Jeong-gun Choi and Myungsuk Kim. 2009. The Usage and Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Form in Robot Design. In Undisciplined! Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference (DRS '09), 331/1--331/14. Retrieved from http://shura.shu.ac.uk/533/
[13]
Paul Coulton and Joseph Galen Lindley. 2019. More-Than Human Centred Design: Considering Other Things. The Design Journal 22, 4: 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1614320
[14]
Erik Davis. 2015. TechGnosis: Myth, Magic, and Mysticism in the Age of Information. North Atlantic Books, Berkeley.
[15]
Philippe Descola. 1994. In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia. Camebridge University Press, Cambridge.
[16]
Carl Disalvo and Jonathan Lukens. 2011. Nonanthropocentrism and the Nonhuman in Design: Possibilities for Designing New Forms of Engagement with and through Technology. In From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement, Marcus Foth, Laura Forlano, Christine Satchell and Martin Gibbs (eds.). The MIT Press, 421--435.
[17]
Judith Dörrenbächer. 2016. Design zwischen Anthropomorphismus und Animismus. In Beseelte Dinge. Design aus Perspektive des Animismus, Judith Dörrenbächer and Kerstin Plüm (eds.). transcript, Bielefeld, 71--95.
[18]
Judith Dörrenbächer and Marc Hassenzahl. 2019. Changing Perspective: A Co-Design Approach to Explore Future Possibilities of Divergent Hearing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors (CHI '19), 1--12.
[19]
Judith Dörrenbächer, Diana Löffler, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2019. Negotiating Differences Between Humans and Robots with Techno-Mimesis. In Workshop 'Robots for social good: Exploring Critical Design for HRI" (HRI'19), 1--4. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/view/robots-for-social-good-hri19
[20]
Julia Fink. 2012. Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 199--208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--34103--8_20
[21]
Terrence Fong, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2003. A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots?: Concepts, Design, and Applications. Robotics and autonomous systems 42, 3--4: 143--166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921--8890(02)00372-X
[22]
Sigmund Freud. 1919. Totem and Taboo: Some Points of Agreement beween the Mental Lives of Savages and Neurotics. 1913. G. Routledge & Sons, London.
[23]
Elisa Giaccardi, Nazli Cila, Chris Speed, and Melissa Caldwell. 2016. Thing Ethnography. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16), March 2018: 377--387. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901905
[24]
Elisa Giaccardi, Chris Speed, Nazli Cila, and Melissa L Caldwell. 2016. Things as Co-ethnographers: Implications of a Thing Perspective for Design and Anthrolopogy. In Design Anthropological Futures, Rachel C. Smith, Kasper T. Vaskilde, Mette G. Kjaersgaard, Ton Otto, Joachim Halse and Thomas Binder (eds.). Bloomsbury Academic, London, New York, 235--248. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474280617.ch-015
[25]
Paul Green and Lisa Wei-Haas. 1985. The Rapid Development of User Interfaces: Experience with the Wizard of OZ Method. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Vol 29, 5: 470--474.
[26]
Bram Hendriks, Bernt Meerbeek, Stella Boess, Steffen Pauws, and Marieke Sonneveld. 2011. Robot Vacuum Cleaner Personality and Behavior. International Journal of Social Robotics 3, 2: 187--195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0084--5
[27]
Giulio Iacucci, Kari Kuutti, and Mervi Ranta. 2000. On the Move with a Magic Thing: Role Playing in Concept Design of Mobile Services and Devices. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '00), 193--202.
[28]
Don Ihde. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis.
[29]
Timo Kaerlein. 2015. The Social Robot as Fetish? Conceptual Affordances and Risks of Neo-Animistic Theory. International Journal of Social Robotics: 361--370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0275--6
[30]
Lenneke Kuijer. 2019. Automated Artefacts as Co-performers of Social Practices: Washing Machines, Laundering and Design. In Social Practices and Dynamic Non-humans. Nature, Materials and Technologies, Cecily; Yolande Strengers Maller (ed.). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 193--214.
[31]
Lenneke Kuijer and Elisa Giaccardi. 2018. Co-performance: Conceptualizing the Role of Artificial Agency in the Design of Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173699
[32]
Brenda Laurel. 2009. Designed Animism. In Symposium on Object-oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA '09), 251--274.
[33]
Kwan Min Lee, Wei Peng, Seung A. Jin, and Chang Yan. 2006. Can Robots Manifest Personality?: An Empirical Test of Personality Recognition, Social Responses, and Social Presence in Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Communication 56, 4: 754--772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460--2466.2006.00318.x
[34]
Betti Marenko. 2014. Neo-Animism and Design. Design and Culture 6, 2: 219--242.
[35]
Betti Marenko and Philip Van Allen. 2016. Animistic design: how to reimagine digital interaction between the human and the nonhuman. Digital Creativity 27, 1: 52--70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2016.1145127
[36]
David Maulsby, Saul Greenberg, and Richard Mander. 1993. Prototyping an Intelligent Agent through Wizard of Oz. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors (CHI '93), 277--284. https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169215
[37]
Philipp Mayring. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In Handbuch qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 601--613.
[38]
William Odom, John Zimmerman, Scott Davidoff, Jodi Forlizzi, Anind K. Dey, and Min Kyung Lee. 2012. A fieldwork of the future with user enactments. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12), 338--347. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318008
[39]
Antti Oulasvirta, Esko Kurvinen, and Tomi Kankainen. 2003. Understanding contexts by being there: Case studies in bodystorming. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 7, 2: 125--134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-003-0238--7
[40]
Jessica Riskin. 2003. Eighteenth-Century Wetware. Representations 83, 1: 97--125.
[41]
Ben Robins, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Janek Dubowski. 2004. Investigating Autistic Children's Attitudes Towards Strangers with the Theatrical Robot - A New Experimental Paradigm in Human-Robot Interaction Studies. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '04), 557--562. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374821
[42]
David Rose. 2015. Enchanted Objects: Innovation, Design, and the Future of Technology. Scribner, New York.
[43]
Maha Salem, Micheline Ziadee, and Majd Sakr. 2014. Marhaba, how may I help you? Effects of Politeness and Culture on Robot Acceptance and Anthropomorphization. In International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'14), 74--81. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559683
[44]
Amanda Sharkey and Noel Sharkey. 2012. Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology 14, 1: 27--40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010--9234--6
[45]
Elaine Short, Justin Hart, Michelle Vu, and Brian Scassellati. 2010. No fair!! An Interaction with a Cheating Robot. In International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '10), 219--226. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734454.1734546
[46]
Nancy Smith, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. Designing for Cohabitation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 1714--1725. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025948
[47]
Edward Burnett Tylor. 2010. Primitive Culture: Researches Into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. 1871. Camebride University Press, Cambridge.
[48]
Daniel Ullman, Iolanda Leite, Jonathan Phillips, Julia Kim-Cohen, and Brian Scassellati. 2014. Smart Human, Smarter Robot: How Cheating Affects Perceptions of Social Agency. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 36, 36: 2996--3001. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000141
[49]
Shensheng Wang, Scott O. Lilienfeld, and Philippe Rochat. 2015. The Uncanny Valley: Existence and Explanations. Review of General Psychology 19, 4: 393--407. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000056
[50]
Julika Welge and Marc Hassenzahl. 2016. Better Than Human?: About the Psychological Superpowers of Robots. In International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR '16), 993--1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--47437--3
[51]
Rane Willerslev. 2007. Soul Hunters. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)From care practices to speculative vignettes–design considerations for robots in good careFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2024.134736711Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Designing Our Way Through Abstractions: Calling for More Practice-based More-than-Human Design ResearchProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686195(1-10)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Reimagining the Design of Mobile Robotic Telepresence: Reflections from a Hybrid Design WorkshopProceedings of the Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems10.1145/3686038.3686055(1-7)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Becoming a Robot - Overcoming Anthropomorphism with Techno-Mimesis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2020
    10688 pages
    ISBN:9781450367080
    DOI:10.1145/3313831
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 April 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. anthropomorphism
    2. new animism
    3. performative design method
    4. service robots
    5. social robots

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)

    Conference

    CHI '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)167
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)From care practices to speculative vignettes–design considerations for robots in good careFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2024.134736711Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Designing Our Way Through Abstractions: Calling for More Practice-based More-than-Human Design ResearchProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686195(1-10)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Reimagining the Design of Mobile Robotic Telepresence: Reflections from a Hybrid Design WorkshopProceedings of the Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems10.1145/3686038.3686055(1-7)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Navigating the Paradox: Challenges of Designing Technology for NonhumansProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685363(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Enacting Human–Robot Encounters with Theater Professionals on a Mixed Reality StageACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/367818614:1(1-25)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024
    • (2024)The Room: Design and Embodiment of Spaces as Social BeingsProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia10.1145/3664647.3681689(2690-2699)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Co-design of Robotic Technology with Care Home Residents and Care WorkersProceedings of the 17th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3652037.3652070(177-186)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Voice Assistants' Accountability through Explanatory DialoguesProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665557(1-12)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
    • (2024)From Agent Autonomy to Casual Collaboration: A Design Investigation on Help-Seeking Urban RobotsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642389(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Bridging HRI Theory and Practice: Design Guidelines for Robot Communication in Dairy FarmingProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634991(137-146)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media