skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376534acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robustness of Eye Movement Biometrics Against Varying Stimuli and Varying Trajectory Length

Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent results suggest that biometric identification based on human's eye movement characteristics can be used for authentication. In this paper, we present three new methods and benchmark them against the state-of-the-art. The best of our new methods improves the state-of-the-art performance by 5.2 percentage points. Furthermore, we investigate some of the factors that affect the robustness of the recognition rate of different classifiers on gaze trajectories, such as the type of stimulus and the tracking trajectory length. We find that the state-of-the-art method only works well when using the same stimulus for testing that was used for training. By contrast, our novel method more than doubles the identification accuracy for these transfer cases. Furthermore, we find that with only 90 seconds of eye tracking data, 86.7% accuracy can be achieved.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a407-schroeder-presentation.mp4

mp4

40.1 MB

References

  1. Leo Breiman. 1996. Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning 24, 2 (1996), 123--140. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00058655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45, 1 (2001), 5--32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. David S. Broomhead and David Lowe. 1988. Multivariable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks. Complex Systems 2, 3 (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali Darwish and Michel Pasquier. 2013. Biometric identification using the dynamic features of the eyes. In IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems, BTAS 2013, Arlington, VA, USA, Sept. 29 - Oct. 2, 2013. 1--6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2013.6712724Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ali Alhaj Darwish. 2013. Biometric Identification Based on Eye Movements and Iris Features Using Task-Driven and Task-Independent Stimuli. Master's thesis. American University of Sharjah.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nastaran Maus Esfahani. 2016. A Brief Review of Human Identification Using Eye Movement. Journal of Pattern Recognition Research 11, 1 (2016), 15--24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3466.3924Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lee Friedman, Mark S. Nixon, and Oleg V. Komogortsev. 2017. Method to assess the temporal persistence of potential biometric features: Application to oculomotor, gait, face and brain structure databases. PLOS ONE 12, 6 (06 2017), 1--42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178501Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chiara Galdi and Michele Nappi. 2019. Eye Movement Analysis in Biometrics. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 171--183. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--981--13--1144--4_8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chiara Galdi, Michele Nappi, Daniel Riccio, and Harry Wechsler. 2016. Eye movement analysis for human authentication: a critical survey. Pattern Recognition Letters 84 (2016), 272--283. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2016.11.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Anjith George and Aurobinda Routray. 2016. A score level fusion method for eye movement biometrics. Pattern Recognition Letters 82 (2016), 207--215. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2015.11.020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tin Kam Ho. 1995. Random decision forests. In Third International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR 1995, August 14 - 15, 1995, Montreal, Canada. Volume I. 278--282. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Corey Holland and Oleg V. Komogortsev. 2011. Biometric identification via eye movement scanpaths in reading. In 2011 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics, IJCB 2011, Washington, DC, USA, Oct. 11--13, 2011. 1--8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IJCB.2011.6117536Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Corey D. Holland and Oleg V. Komogortsev. 2012. Biometric verification via complex eye movements: The effects of environment and stimulus. In IEEE Fifth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems, BTAS 2012, Arlington, VA, USA, September 23--27, 2012. 39--46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2012.6374556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Tilke Judd, Krista A. Ehinger, Frédo Durand, and Antonio Torralba. 2009. Learning to predict where humans look. In IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2009, Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 27 - Oct. 4, 2009. 2106--2113. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459462Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lukasz Kaiser, Aidan N. Gomez, Noam Shazeer, Ashish Vaswani, Niki Parmar, Llion Jones, and Jakob Uszkoreit. 2017. One Model To Learn Them All. arXiv:1706.05137 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05137Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Pawel Kasprowski, Oleg V. Komogortsev, and Alex Karpov. 2012. First eye movement verification and identification competition at BTAS 2012. In IEEE Fifth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems, BTAS 2012, Arlington, VA, USA, September 23--27, 2012. 195--202. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2012.6374577Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Pawel Kasprowski and Józef Ober. 2004. Eye Movements in Biometrics. In Biometric Authentication, ECCV 2004 International Workshop, BioAW 2004, Prague, Czech Republic, May 15, 2004, Proceedings. 248--258. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--25976--3_23Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Tomi Kinnunen and Haizhou Li. 2010. An overview of text-independent speaker recognition: From features to supervectors. Speech Communication 52, 1 (2010), 12--40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2009.08.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tomi Kinnunen, Filip Sedlak, and Roman Bednarik. 2010. Towards task-independent person authentication using eye movement signals. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications, ETRA 2010, Austin, Texas, USA, March 22--24, 2010. 187--190. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1743666.1743712Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Anneli Olsen and Ricardo Matos. 2012. Identifying parameter values for an I-VT fixation filter suitable for handling data sampled with various sampling frequencies. In Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research and Applications, ETRA 2012, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, March 28--30, 2012. 317--320. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2168556.2168625Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, and others. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of machine learning research 12, Oct (2011), 2825--2830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ken Pfeuffer, Matthias J. Geiger, Sarah Prange, Lukas Mecke, Daniel Buschek, and Florian Alt. 2019. Behavioural Biometrics in VR: Identifying People from Body Motion and Relations in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 110, 12 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300340Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ioannis Rigas and Oleg V. Komogortsev. 2017. Current research in eye movement biometrics: An analysis based on BioEye 2015 competition. Image Vision Comput. 58 (2017), 129--141. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2016.03.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Dario D. Salvucci and Joseph H. Goldberg. 2000. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research & Application Symposium, ETRA 2000, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, USA, November 6--8, 2000. 71--78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/355017.355028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Robustness of Eye Movement Biometrics Against Varying Stimuli and Varying Trajectory Length

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        10688 pages
        ISBN:9781450367080
        DOI:10.1145/3313831

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 April 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format