skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376545acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

On Being Iterated: The Affective Demands of Design Participation

Published: 23 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Iteration is a central feature of most HCI design methods, creating as it does opportunities for engagements with stakeholder groups. But what does iteration demand of those groups? Under what conditions do iterative engagements arise, and with what stakes? Building on experiences with Aboriginal Australian communities, and drawing on feminist and decolonial thinking, we examine the nature of iteration for HCI and how it frames encounters between design and use, with a focus on the affective dimension of engagement in iterative design processes.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File

References

[1]
Ahmed, S. 2012. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[2]
Ahmed, S. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[3]
Ali, S. M. 2016. A Brief Introduction to Decolonial Design. ACM XRDS, 22(4), 16--21.
[4]
Ames, M. 2019. The Charisma Machine: The Life, Death and Legacy of One Laptop Per Child. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[5]
Bailie, R. S. and Runcie, M. J. 2001. Household infrastructure in aboriginal communities and the implications for health improvement. Medical Journal of Australia, 175(7), 363--366.
[6]
Baumer, E. and Silberman, M. 2011. When the Implication is Not to Design (Technology). Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2011 (Vancouver, BC), 2271--2274.
[7]
Bardzell, J. and Bardzell, S. 2015. The User Reconfigured: On Subjectivities of Information. Proc. Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference: Critical Alternatives, 133--144.
[8]
Bidwell, N. 2016. Decolonising HCI and Interaction Design Discourse: Some considerations in planning AfriCHI. ACM XRDS, 22(4), 22--27.
[9]
Brereton, M. and Buur, J. 2008. New Challenges for design participation in the era of ubiquitous computing. Co-Design, 4(2), 101--113.
[10]
Brooks, F. 1975. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley.
[11]
Brooks, F. 1986. No Silver Bullet -- Essence and Accident in Software Engineering. Proceedings of the IFIP Tenth World Computing Conference, 1069--1076. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier Science B.V.
[12]
Bruckman, A., Karahalios, K., Kraut, R., Shehan Poole, E., Thomas, J. and Yardi, S. 2010. Revisiting research ethics in the facebook era: Challenges in emerging CSCW research. in Adjunct Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work ACM, Savannah, GA.
[13]
Clifford, J. 2013. Returns: Becoming Indigenous in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[14]
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. 2009. Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[15]
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed Books.
[16]
De la Cadena, M. and Blaser, M. (Eds). 2018. A World of Many Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[17]
DiSalvo, C. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[18]
Dourish, P. 2018. The Allure and the Paucity of Design: Cultures of Design and Design in Culture. Human-Computer Interaction.
[19]
Dourish, P. 2019. User Experience as Legitimacy Trap. Interactions, 26(6), 46--49.
[20]
Dourish, P. and Mainwaring, S. 2012. Ubicomp's Colonial Impulse. Proc. ACM Conf. Ubiquitous Computing Ubicomp 2012 (Pittsburgh, PA), 133--142.
[21]
Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[22]
Escobar, A. 1988. Power and Visibility: Development and the Invention and Management of the Third World. Cultural Anthropology, 3(4), 428--443.
[23]
Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[24]
Ferguson, J. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: Developed, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
[25]
Fiesler, C., Young, A., Peyton, T., Bruckman, A., Gray, M., Hancock, J., and Lutters, W. 2015. Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 289--292
[26]
Fry, T. 2012. Becoming Human by Design. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
[27]
Goyal, N., Miner, W., and Nawathe, N. 2012. Cultural differences across governmental website design. Proc. 4th international conference on Intercultural Collaboration (ICIC '12), 149--152.
[28]
Gupta, N., Medhi-Thies, I., Ferreira, P., O'Neill, J., and Cutrell, E. 2015. KrishiPustak: A Social Networking System for Low-Literate Farmers. Proc. 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion), 45--48.
[29]
Haggerty, K. 2004. Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27 (4). 391--414.
[30]
Hancock, J. 2015. The Facebook Study: A Personal Account of Data Science, Ethics and Change. in Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1--1.
[31]
Harding, S. (Ed). 1998. Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
[32]
Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[33]
Hayes, G. 2011. The Relationship of Action Research to Human-Computer Interaction. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction TOCHI, 18(3), 20pp.
[34]
Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., and Grinter, R. 2010. Postcolonial Computing: A Lens on Design and Development. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2010 (Atlanta, GA), 1311--1320.
[35]
Juul, J. 2013. The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[36]
Kyriakoullis, L. and Zaphiris, P. 2016. Culture and HCI: A Review of Recent Cultural Studies in HCI and Social Networks. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(4), 629--642.
[37]
Lampe, C., Wash, R., Velasquez, A. and Ozkaya, E. 2010. Motivations to participate in online communities. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2010 (Atlanta, GA), 1927--1936.
[38]
Land, C. 2015. Decolonizing Solidarity: Dilemmas and Directions for Supporters of Indigenous Struggles. London: Zed Books.
[39]
Lawrence, C. 2018. Digital Land Rights: Co-designing Technologies with Indigenous Australians. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/digital-landrights-co-designing-technologies-with-indigenousaustralians-99751
[40]
Leong, T.W., Lawrence, C. and Wadley, G (2019) Designing for Diversity in Aboriginal Australia: Insights from a national technology project, in OZCHI'19 Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, Fremantle, WA.
[41]
Light, A., Wakeford, T., Egglestone, P., and Rogers, J. 2011. Research on an Equal Footing? A UK Collaborative Inquiry into Community and Academic Knowledge. Proc. Embracing Indigenous Knowledge Systems, Windhoek, Namibia.
[42]
Lindtner, S., Bardzell, S., and Bardzell, J. 2018. Design and Intervention in the Age of ?No Alternative," Proceedings of the ACM Conference on HumanComputer Interaction - CSCW, Vol. 2, Article No. 109, November, 2018
[43]
Manzini, E. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[44]
Marcuse, H. 1965. Repressive Tolerance. In Robert Paul Wolff, Barrington Moore, Jr., and Herbert Marcuse, (Eds), A Critique of Pure Tolerance, 95--137, Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 95--137.
[45]
Markus, M. L. 1981. Toward a "critical mass" theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence and diffusion. Communication Research, 14(5), 491.
[46]
McPherson, T. 2018. Feminist in a Software Lab: Difference and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[47]
Migolo, W. and Walsh, C. 2018. On Decoloniality: Concept, Analytics, Praxis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[48]
Mookg, D.R. 2012. Minimum Viable Product and the Importance of Experimentation in Technology Startups. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(3), 23--26.
[49]
Moran, C., Harrington, G., and Sheehan, N. 2018. On Country Learning. Design and Culture, 10(1), 71--79.
[50]
Morozov, E. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
[51]
Naumann, J. D. and Jenkins, A. M. 1982. Prototyping: the new paradigm for systems development. MIS Quarterly, 29--44.
[52]
Olson, J. and Kellogg, W. (Eds.) 2014. Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer.
[53]
Parreñas, Juno Salazar. 2018. Decolonizing Extinction: The Work of Care in Orangutan Rehabilitation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[54]
Povinelli, E. 2011. Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[55]
Preece, J. 2002. Supporting Community and Building Social Capital. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 36--39.
[56]
Raban, D., Moldovan, M., and Jones, Q. 2010. An empirical study of critical mass and online community survival. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 71--80.
[57]
Rennie, E., Crouch, A., Thomas, J., and Taylor, P. 2010. Beyond public access? Reconsidering broadband for remote Indigenous communities. Communication, Politics & Culture, 43(1), 48--69.
[58]
Rose, D. 2004. Reports from a Wild Country: Ethics for Decolonisation. Sydney, NSW: UNSW Press.
[59]
Schultz, T., Abdulla, D., Ansari, A., Canli, E., Keshavarz, M., Kiem, M., Prado de O. Martins, L., and Vieira de Oliveira, Pß. 2018. Editors' Introduction, Design and Culture, 10:1, 1--6.
[60]
Scott, J. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[61]
Sharp, J. and Macklin, C. 2019. Iterate: Ten Lessons in Design and Failure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[62]
Simon, H. 1969. Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[63]
Smith, L.T. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books.
[64]
Sudar, S. and Anderson, R. 2015. DUCES: A Framework for Characterizing and Simplifying Mobile Deployments in Low-Resource Settings. Proc. 2015 Annual Symposium on Computing for Development (DEV '15), 23--30.
[65]
Taylor, A. 2011. Out There. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2011, 685--694.
[66]
Tonkinwise, C. 2015. Transition Design -- From and To What? Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), 85--92.
[67]
Tuck, E. and Yang, W. Decolonization is Not a Metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, and Society, 1(1), 1--40.
[68]
Vatrapu, R. and Suthers, D. 2010. Cultural influences in collaborative information sharing and organization. Proc. 3rd international conference on Intercultural collaboration (ICIC '10), 161--170.
[69]
Vempala, S., Chopra, N., Rajagopal, A., Nkengasong, J., and Akuro, S. 2016. C4G BLIS: Health Care Delivery via Iterative Collaborative Design in Resource-constrained Settings. Proc. Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '16), Article 21, 11 pages.
[70]
Verran, H. 2002. A Postcolonial Moment in Science Studies: Alternative Firing Regimes of Environmental Scientists and Aboriginal Landowners. Social Studies of Science, 32(5--6), pp.729--762.
[71]
Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford University Press.
[72]
Winograd, T. and Flores, F. 1987. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
[73]
Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Chivuno-Kuria, S., Kampuire, G., Bidwell, N., and Blake, E. 2010. Being Participated: A Community Approach. Proc. Participatory Design Conference PDF 2010 (Sydney, Australia), 1--10.
[74]
Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Bidwell, N., and Blake, E. 2012. Community Consensus: Design Beyond Participation. Design Issues, 28(3), 89--100.
[75]
Wong, P. 2019. Biographies of a Sociological Type: "Marginal Men" in the Establishment of "Middle American" Anthropology. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, published online 20 August.
[76]
Wong-Villacres, M., Arkaeep Kumar, A., Vishwanath, A., Karusala, N., DiSalvo, B., and Kumar, N. 2018. Designing for Intersections. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 45--58.
[77]
Zimmer, M. 2010. "But the data is already public": on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and information technology, 12 (4). 313--325.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Whose Participation Counts? Towards Technology-Mediated Equitable Futures of Development WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869798:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)DREEM: Moving from Empathy to Enculturation in Disability Related Human-Centered DesignProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675642(1-17)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Enhancing Reentry Support Programs Through Digital Literacy IntegrationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660730(2882-2896)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2020
10688 pages
ISBN:9781450367080
DOI:10.1145/3313831
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 April 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Badges

  • Best Paper

Author Tags

  1. cultural computing
  2. decolonial theory
  3. feminist theory
  4. iteration
  5. participation
  6. postcolonial theory
  7. user-centered design

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • ARC

Conference

CHI '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)383
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)78
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Whose Participation Counts? Towards Technology-Mediated Equitable Futures of Development WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869798:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)DREEM: Moving from Empathy to Enculturation in Disability Related Human-Centered DesignProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675642(1-17)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Enhancing Reentry Support Programs Through Digital Literacy IntegrationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660730(2882-2896)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Data Stewardship in Clinical Computer Security: Balancing Benefit and Burden in Participatory SystemsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373168:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Remember the Human: A Systematic Review of Ethical Considerations in Reddit ResearchProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36330708:GROUP(1-33)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Participation in the age of foundation modelsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658992(1609-1621)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Examining the "Local" in ICT4D: A Postcolonial Perspective on ParticipationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642748(1-13)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Co-producing AIED Ethics Under Lockdown: an Empirical Study of Deliberative Democracy in ActionInternational Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/s40593-023-00380-z34:3(670-705)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2024)An In-Class Activity for Recognizing and Practicing the Power of Iteration in Human-Centered DesignundefinedOnline publication date: 12-Jun-2024
  • (2023)The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of PracticeProceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization10.1145/3617694.3623261(1-23)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media