ABSTRACT
Physical rehabilitation typically requires therapists to make judgements about patient movement and functional improvement using subjective observation. This process makes it challenging to quantitatively track, compute and predict long-term patient improvement. We therefore propose a novel methodical approach to the standardized and interpretable quantification of patient movement during rehabilitation. We describe the expert-led development of a movement assessment rubric and an accompanying quantitative rating system. We present our movement capture and annotation computational tools designed to implement the rubric and assist therapists in the quantitative documentation and assessment of rehabilitation. We describe results from a movement capture study of the tool with nine stroke survivors and a movement rating study with four therapists. Findings from these studies highlight potential optimal methodical process paths for individuals engaged in capturing, understanding and predicting human movement performance.
- Gazihan Alankus, Rachel Proffitt, Caitlin Kelleher, and Jack Engsberg, Stroke Therapy through Motion-Based Games: A Case Study. ACM Trans. Access. Comput., 2011. 4(1): p. 1--35.Google Scholar
- Craig Anderson, et al., Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? results of a randomized controlled trial : I: health outcomes at 6 months. Stroke, 2000. 31(5): p. 1024--31.Google Scholar
- Craig Anderson, Cliona Ni Mhurchu, PM Brown, and K Carter, Stroke rehabilitation services to accelerate hospital discharge and provide homebased care: an overview and cost analysis. Pharmacoeconomics, 2002. 20(8): p. 537--52.Google Scholar
- Madeline Balaam, et al., Motivating mobility: designing for lived motivation in stroke rehabilitation, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2011, ACM: Vancouver, BC, Canada. p. 3073--3082.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Baran, et al., Design of a home-based adaptive mixed reality rehabilitation system for stroke survivors. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2011. 2011: p. 7602--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Baran, et al., Interdisciplinary concepts for design and implementation of mixed reality interactive neurorehabilitation systems for stroke. Phys Ther, 2015. 95(3): p. 449--60.Google Scholar
- John Beard, et al., The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet, 2016. 387(10033): p. 2145--2154.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emeilia Benjamin, et al., Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2017. 135(10): p. e146-e603.Google Scholar
- Yinpeng Chen, Michael Baran, Hari Sundaram, and Thanassis Rikakis, A low cost, adaptive mixed reality system for home-based stroke rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2011. 2011: p. 1827--30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yinpeng Chen, et al., A Computational Framework for Quantitative Evaluation of Movement during Rehabilitation, in AIP Conferernce. 2011. p. 317--326.Google Scholar
- Karen Chua and Christopher Kuah, Innovating With Rehabilitation Technology in the Real World: Promises, Potentials, and Perspectives. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2017. 96(10 Suppl 1): p. S150-S156.Google Scholar
- Carmen Cirstea and Mindy Levin, Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2007. 21(5): p. 398--411.Google Scholar
- Margaret Duff, et al., An adaptive mixed reality training system for stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2010. 18(5): p. 531--41.Google Scholar
- Margaret Duff, et al., Adaptive mixed reality rehabilitation improves quality of reaching movements more than traditional reaching therapy following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2013. 27(4): p. 306--15.Google Scholar
- Pamela Duncan, et al., Adherence to Postacute Rehabilitation Guidelines Is Associated With Functional Recovery in Stroke. Stroke. 33(1): p. 167--178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aviv Elor, Mircea Teodorescu, and Sri Kurniawan, Project Star Catcher: A Novel Immersive Virtual Reality Experience for Upper Limb Rehabilitation. ACM Trans. Access. Comput., 2018. 11(4): p. 1--25.Google Scholar
- Elisa Ferrara, Sonia Nardotto, Serena Ponte, and Silvana G. Dellepiane, Infrastructure for data management and user centered rehabilitation in Rehab@Home project, in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 2014, ACM: Rhodes, Greece. p. 1--8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Axel Fugl-Meyer, Lisbeth Jaasko, Ingegerd Leyman, Sigyn Olsson, and Solveig Steglind, The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med, 1975. 7(1): p. 13--31.Google Scholar
- Brian Hanley, Catherine Tucker, and Athanassios Bissas, Differences between motion capture and video analysis systems in calculating knee angles in elite-standard race walking. J Sports Sci., 2018. 36(11): p. 1250 - 1255.Google Scholar
- Jocelyn Harris and Janice Eng, Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. . Phys Ther, 2007. 87: p. 88--97.Google Scholar
- Samar Hatem, et al., Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery. Front Hum Neurosci, 2016. 10: p. 442.Google Scholar
- Sarah Housman, Kelly Scott, and David Reinkensmeyer, A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2009. 23(5): p. 50514.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Huey Huang, et al., Novel design of interactive multimodal biofeedback system for neurorehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2006. 1: p. 4925--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aisling Kelliher, Jinwoo Choi, Jia-Bin Huang, Thanassis Rikakis, and Kris Kitani, HOMER: An Interactive System for Home Based Stroke Rehabilitation, in Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 2017, ACM: Baltimore, Maryland, USA. p. 379--380.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aisling Kelliher and Barbara Barry, Designing Therapeutic Experiences with AI in Mind, in AAAI 2018 Symposium, Designing the User Experience of Artificial Intelligence. 2018: Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- Aisling Kelliher, Andrew Gibson, Eric Bottelsen, and Edward Coe, Designing Modular Rehabilitation Objects for Interactive Therapy in the Home, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 2019, ACM: Tempe, Arizona, USA. p. 251--257.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Faisal Khan, Bilge Mutlu, and Zhu Jerry. How Do Humans Teach: On Curriculum Learning and Teaching Dimension. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2011. 2011.Google Scholar
- Silvia Koton, et al., Stroke incidence and mortality trends in US communities, 1987 to 2011. JAMA, 2014. 312(3): p. 259--68.Google Scholar
- John Krakauer, Arm function after stroke: from physiology to recovery. Semin Neurol, 2005. 25(4): p. 384--95.Google Scholar
- John Krakauer, Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol, 2006. 19(1): p. 84--90.Google Scholar
- Klaus Krippendorff Computing Krippendorff's alpha reliability. 2007. 43.Google Scholar
- Gert Kwakkel, Boudewijn Kollen, Jay van der Grond, and Arie Prevo, Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke, 2003. 34(9): p. 2181--6.Google Scholar
- Gert Kwakkel, Boudewijn Kollen, and Eline Lindeman, Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2004. 22(3--5): p. 281--99.Google Scholar
- Mikko Kytö, Laura Maye, and David McGookin, Using Both Hands: Tangibles for Stroke Rehabilitation in the Home, in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2019, ACM: Glasgow, Scotland Uk. p. 1--14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Lehrer, S. Attygalle, S. L. Wolf, and T. Rikakis, Exploring the bases for a mixed reality stroke rehabilitation system, part I: a unified approach for representing action, quantitative evaluation, and interactive feedback. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2011. 8: p. 51.Google Scholar
- Mindy Levin, Jeff Kleim, and Steven Wolf, What do motor recovery and compensation mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2008.Google Scholar
- Michelle McDonnell, Action research arm test. Aust J Physiother, 2008. 54(3): p. 220.Google Scholar
- Lewis Morgenstern, et al., Persistent ischemic stroke disparities despite declining incidence in Mexican Americans. Ann Neurol, 2013. 74(6): p. 778--85.Google Scholar
- A. Nordin, M. Alt Murphy, and A. Danielsson, Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability at the item level of the Action Research Arm Test for patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med, 2014. 46(8): p. 73845.Google Scholar
- Donald A. Norman, The design of everyday things. 1st Doubleday/Currency ed. 1990, New York: Doubleday. xv, 257 p.Google Scholar
- Cristina Ramírez-Fernández, Alberto L. Morán, Eloísa García-Canseco, and Felipe Orihue la Espina, Design Factors of Virtual Environments for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients, in Proceedings of the 5th Mexican Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 2014, ACM: Oaxaca, Mexico, Mexico. p. 22--25.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. J. Reinkensmeyer, et al., Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2016. 13(1): p. 42.Google Scholar
- David Reinkensmeyer and Michael Boninger, Technologies and combination therapies for enhancing movement training for people with a disability. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2012. 9: p. 17.Google Scholar
- Thanassis Rikakis, et al., Semi-automated homebased therapy for the upper extremity of stroke survivors, in ACM PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA '18). 2018: Corfu.Google Scholar
- Thanassis Rikakis, et al., Semi-automated homebased therapy for the upper extremity of stroke survivors, in Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference. 2018, ACM: Corfu, Greece. p. 249256.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Schwarz, C. M. Kanzler, O. Lambercy, A. R. Luft, and J. M. Veerbeek, Systematic Review on Kinematic Assessments of Upper Limb Movements After Stroke. Stroke, 2019. 50(3): p. 718--727.Google Scholar
- D. Son, et al., Multifunctional wearable devices for diagnosis and therapy of movement disorders. Nat Nanotechnol, 2014. 9(5): p. 397--404.Google Scholar
- Standifird TW, et al., Influence of Total Knee Arthroplasty on Gait Mechanics of the Replaced and Non-Replaced Limb During Stair Negotiation. J Arthroplasty, 2016. 31(1): p. 278--283.Google Scholar
- Richard Tang, Xing-Dong Yang, Scott Bateman, Joaquim Jorge, and Anthony Tang, Physio@Home: Exploring Visual Guidance and Feedback Techniques for Physiotherapy Exercises, in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2015, ACM: Seoul, Republic of Korea. p. 4123--4132.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vinay Venkataraman, et al., Decision support for stroke rehabilitation therapy via describable attribute-based decision trees. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2014. 2014: p. 3154--9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Wade, R. Langton-Hewer, V. A. Wood, Clive Skilbeck, and H. M. Ismail, The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1983. 46(6): p. 5214.Google Scholar
- David Webster and Ozkan Celik, Systematic review of Kinect applications in elderly care and stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2014. 11: p. 108.Google Scholar
- Steven Wolf, et al., Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke, 2001. 32(7): p. 1635--1639.Google Scholar
- Steven Wolf, et al., Effect of constraint- induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the excite randomized clinical trial. J. Jama, 2006. 296(17): p. 2095--2104.Google Scholar
- Ching-Yi Wu, Catherine Trombly, Keh-Chung Lin, and Linda Tickle-Degnen, Effects of object affordances on reaching performance in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. Am J Occup Ther, 1998. 52(6): p. 447--56.Google Scholar
- Y. Yoshida, J. Zeni, and L. Snyder-Mackler, Do Patients Achieve Normal Gait Patterns 3 Years After Total Knee Arthroplasty? Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy, 2012. 42(12): p. 1039--1049.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Towards Standardized Processes for Physical Therapists to Quantify Patient Rehabilitation
Recommendations
Muscle Extension Model for FES-Assisted Knee Swinging Ergometer for Stroke Patient
CICSYN '13: Proceedings of the 2013 Fifth International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and NetworksThis work is focused on the development of physiological and mathematical model of muscle extension induced by FES-assisted knee swinging ergometer. A muscle model composed of muscle activation, muscle contraction and body segmental dynamics is ...
Towards customizable games for stroke rehabilitation
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsStroke is the leading cause of long term disability among adults in industrialized nations. The partial paralysis that stroke patients often experience can make independent living difficult or impossible. Research suggests that many of these patients ...
The toronto rehab stroke pose dataset to detect compensation during stroke rehabilitation therapy
PervasiveHealth '17: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for HealthcareStroke often leads to upper limb movement impairments. To accommodate new constraints, movement patterns are sometimes altered by stroke survivors to use stronger or unaffected joints and muscles. If used during rehabilitation exercises, however, such ...
Comments