skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376824acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards A Design For Life: Redesigning For Reminiscence With Looked After Children

Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

For 'looked-after' and adopted children, physical objects are often the only remaining link to their pasts; a portal to stories of former families, homes, and events. The act of reminiscence, known as 'life story work', can help children to process their pasts and overcome trauma. This paper describes the user-centred redesign of Trove, a digital and physical memory box for storing and curating stories about precious objects. We describe our redesign process, synthesising the insights from previous Trove evaluations with looked-after and adopted children, and three re-design workshops with 4 looked-after children at a therapeutic residential school. Our findings advocate for prioritisation of Trove's digital and physical security, the sustainability of its companionship, and the provision of multimedia storytelling to encourage the construction of identity narratives. Inspired by this, we present and discuss the redeveloped Trove, before analysing our participatory design approach with these complex and under-represented groups.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a695-gray-presentation.mp4

mp4

66.7 MB

References

  1. Heta Aali, Anna-Leena Perämäki, and Cathleen Sarti. 2014. Memory Boxes: An Experimental Approach to Cultural Transfer in History, 15002000. transcript Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Aaron C Ahuvia. 2005. Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers' identity narratives. J. Consum. Res. 32, 1 (2005), 171--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Karla A Badillo-Urquiola, Arup Kumar Ghosh, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2017. Understanding the unique online challenges faced by teens in the foster care system. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 139--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Scott Harpin, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2017. Abandoned but Not Forgotten: Providing Access While Protecting Foster Youth from Online Risks. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 17--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Karla Badillo-Urquiola and Pamela Wisniewski. 2017. For Those Who Need it Most: Helping'AtRisk'Youth Manage Online Risks. In BadilloUrquiola, K.*, Wisniewski, P.?(2017)"For Those Who Need It Most: Helping 'At-Risk' Youth Manage Online Risks," Extended Abstract presented at the Workshop on Equity and Inclusivity at the 2017 ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael Bamberg. 2011. Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory Psychol. 21, 1 (2011), 3--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Michael Bamberg. 2011. Narrative practice and identity navigation. Var. Narrat. Anal. (2011), 99-- 124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Brock Bass, Nicole Fink, Margaux Price, Lindsay Sturre, Erin Hentschel, and Richard Pak. 2011. How Does Anthropomorphism Affect User's Trust, Compliance, and Performance On a Decision Making Automation Task? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1952--1956.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Polly Baynes. 2008. Untold stories: A discussion of life story work. Adopt. Foster. 32, 2 (2008), 43--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Claus Bossen, Christian Dindler, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2010. User gains and PD aims: assessment from a participatory design project. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, 141--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Claus Bossen, Christian Dindler, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2012. Impediments to user gains: experiences from a critical participatory design project. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers-Volume 1, 31--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Karen Broadhurst, David Wastell, Sue White, Christopher Hall, Sue Peckover, Kellie Thompson, Andrew Pithouse, and Dolores Davey. 2009. Performing ?initial assessment': identifying the latent conditions for error at the front-door of local authority children's services. Br. J. Soc. Work 40, 2 (2009), 352--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Anna Buchanan. 2014. The Experience of Life Story Work: Reflections of young people leaving care.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dante Cicchetti and Adrienne Banny. 2014. A developmental psychopathology perspective on child maltreatment. In Handbook of developmental psychopathology. Springer, 723--741.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Catherine Cook-Cottone and Meredith Beck. 2007. A model for life'story work: Facilitating the construction of personal narrative for foster children. Child Adolesc. Ment. Health 12, 4 (2007), 193--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Department for Education. 2018. Children looked after in England (including adoption), year ending 31 March 2018. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government /uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7579 22/Children_looked_after_in_England_2018_Text_ revised.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mark Doel. 2017. Social Work in 42 Objects (and More). Kirwin Maclean Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behav. Inf. Technol. 21, 1 (2002), 1--25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110108659Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Pelle Ehn. 1988. Work-oriented design of computer artefacts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Augusto Esteves and Ian Oakley. 2010. Mementos: a tangible interface supporting travel. In Proceedings of the 6th nordic conference on human-computer interaction: Extending boundaries, 643--646.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Douglas Ezzy. 1998. Theorizing narrative identity: Symbolic interactionism and hermeneutics. Sociol. Q. 39, 2 (1998), 239--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. David Frohlich and Rachel Murphy. 2000. The memory box. Pers. Technol. 4, 4 (2000), 238--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Bernard Gallagher and Adam Green. 2012. In, out and after care: Young adults' views on their lives, as children, in a therapeutic residential establishment. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 34, 2 (2012), 437--450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Susan A Gelman and Natalie S Davidson. 2016. Young children's preference for unique owned objects. Cognition 155, (2016), 146--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Faith Gibson. 2011. Reminiscence and life story work: A practice guide. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Stuart Gray, Kirsten Cater, Chloe Meineck, Rachel Hahn, Debbie Watson, and Tom Metcalfe. 2019. Trove: A digitally enhanced memory box for looked-after and adopted children. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 458--463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ellen Grootegoed and Mark Smith. 2018. The emotional labour of austerity: How social workers reflect and work on their feelings towards reducing support to needy children and families. Br. J. Soc. Work 48, 7 (2018), 1929--1947.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Rachael Harker and Sarah Heath. 2012. Children in care in England: Statistics. London: House of Commons (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. C M Hill and J Watkins. 2003. Statutory health assessments for looked?after children: what do they achieve? Child. Care. Health Dev. 29, 1 (2003), 3-- 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Elaine Lynn-Ee Ho and Madeleine E Hatfield. 2011. Migration and everyday matters: Sociality and materiality. Popul. Space Place 17, 6 (2011), 707--713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Kate Hooley, Laura Stokes, and Helen Combes. 2016. Life story work with looked-after and adopted children: how professional training and experience determine perceptions of its value. Adopt. Foster. 40, 3 (2016), 219--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sarah L Jirek. 2017. Narrative reconstruction and post-traumatic growth among trauma survivors: The importance of narrative in social work research and practice. Qual. Soc. Work 16, 2 (2017), 166--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jasmine Jones, David Merritt, and Mark S Ackerman. 2017. KidKeeper: Design for capturing audio mementos of everyday life for parents of young children. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1864--1875.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Julie A Kientz, Rosa I Arriaga, and Gregory D Abowd. 2009. Baby steps: evaluation of a system to support record-keeping for parents of young children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1713-- 1722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Christine E Kiesinger. 2002. My father's shoes: The therapeutic value of narrative reframing. Ethnogr. Speak. Autoethnography, Lit. Aesthet. (2002), 95-- 114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Amanda Lazar, Hilaire Thompson, and George Demiris. 2014. A systematic review of the use of technology for reminiscence therapy. Heal. Educ. Behav. 41, 1_suppl (2014), 51S-61S.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Janice C Light, Kathryn D R Drager, and Jessica G Nemser. 2004. Enhancing the appeal of AAC technologies for young children: Lessons from the toy manufacturers. Augment. Altern. Commun. 20, 3 (2004), 137--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Lorne Loxterkamp. 2009. Contact and truth: the unfolding predicament in adoption and fostering. Clin. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 14, 3 (2009), 423-- 435.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Dan P McAdams. 1985. The "imago": A key narrative component of identity. In Review of personality and social psychology. Sage, 114--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Dan P McAdams and Lisa Janis. 2004. Narrative identity and narrative therapy. Handb. Narrat. Psychother. Pract. theory, Res. (2004), 159--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Dan P McAdams and Kate C McLean. 2013. Narrative identity. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22, 3 (2013), 233--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Isabella McMurray, Helen Connolly, Michael Preston Shoot, and Veronica Wigley. 2011. Shards of the old looking glass: restoring the significance of identity in promoting positive outcomes for looked?after children. Child Fam. Soc. Work 16, 2 (2011), 210--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Matthew Mosher. 2017. If These Walls Could Speak: Tangible Memories. In Proceedings of the 12th International Audio Mostly Conference on Augmented and Participatory Sound and Music Experiences, 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Eileen Munro. 2001. Empowering looked-after children. Child Fam. Soc. Work 6, 2 (2001), 129-- 137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Elsbeth Neil. 2012. Making sense of adoption: Integration and differentiation from the perspective of adopted children in middle childhood. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 34, 2 (2012), 409--416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. NSPCC. 2018. Looked after children. Retrieved from https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/children-andfamilies-at-risk/looked-after-children/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Alison Oldfield and Helen Manchester. 2016. Designing Playful Products. REACT, Bristol.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Terry Philpot and Richard Rose. 2004. The child's own story: Life story work with traumatized children. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. REACT Play Sandbox. 2014. Trove. Retrieved September 19, 2019 from http://old.reacthub.org.uk/playsandbox/projects/2014/Trove/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Janet C Read, Daniel Fitton, and Matthew Horton. 2014. Giving ideas an equal chance: inclusion and representation in participatory design with children. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children, 105--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Janet C Read, Matthew Horton, Daniel Fitton, and Gavin Sim. 2017. Empowered and Informed: Participation of Children in HCI. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 431-- 446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Janet C Read, Stuart MacFarlane, and Chris Casey. 2002. Endurability, engagement and expectations: Measuring children's fun. In Interaction design and children, 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Joy Rees. 2017. Life Story Books for Adopted and Fostered Children: A Family Friendly Approach. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Jörg Rogge, Hannu Salmi, Kristina MüllerBongard, Asko Nivala, Cathleen Sarti, Alexandra Schäfer, Heta Aali, Matthias Schnettger, Anna Leena Perämäki, and Juhana Saarelainen. 2014. Memory Boxes. Mainz Hist. Cult. Sci. Vol. 22 (2014), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Richard Rose. 2012. Life story therapy with traumatized children: A model for practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Tony Ryan and Rodger Walker. 1993. Life story work. British agencies for adoption and fostering London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Jw Santrock. 2008. Information processing. A topical approach to life span development, 272--275. New York: The Mc-Grow-Hill Companies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Vardit Sarne-Fleischmann, Noam Tractinsky, Tzvi Dwolatzky, and Inbal Rief. 2011. Personalized reminiscence therapy for patients with Alzheimer's disease using a computerized system. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, 48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Julie Selwyn, Dinithi Wijedasa, and Sarah Meakings. 2014. Beyond the Adoption Order: challenges, interventions and adoption disruption. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Gavin Sim, J Read, and Matthew Horton. 2016. Practical and ethical concerns in usability testing with children. inGames User Res. Study Approach, Case, A. Peters, Ed (2016), 1--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Karin Slegers, Sanne Ruelens, Jorick Vissers, and Pieter Duysburgh. 2015. Using game principles in ux research: A board game for eliciting future user needs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1225--1228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Molly M Stevens, Gregory D Abowd, Khai N Truong, and Florian Vollmer. 2003. Getting into the Living Memory Box: Family archives & holistic design. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 7, 3--4 (2003), 210--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Dag Svanaes and Gary Seland. 2004. Putting the users center stage: role playing and low-fi prototyping enable end users to design mobile systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 479--486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Sherry Turkle. 2007. Evocative objects: Things we think with. MIT press Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Barbara Tversky. 2002. What do sketches say about thinking. In 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium, Sketch Understanding Workshop, Stanford University, AAAI Technical Report SS-02-08, 148--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Jeandre Renette Viljoen. 2013. Identifying assets in the memory-box-making-process with vulnerable children.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Ewart J de Visser, Samuel S Monfort, Ryan McKendrick, Melissa A B Smith, Patrick E McKnight, Frank Krueger, and Raja Parasuraman. 2016. Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 22, 3 (2016), 331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Jayne Wallace, Peter C Wright, John McCarthy, David Philip Green, James Thomas, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. A design-led inquiry into personhood in dementia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2617--2626.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Harriet Ward. 2011. Continuities and discontinuities: Issues concerning the establishment of a persistent sense of self amongst care leavers. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 33, 12 (2011), 2512--2518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Harriet Ward and Tricia Skuse. 2001. Performance targets and stability of placements for children long looked-after away from home. Child. Soc. 15, 5 (2001), 333--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Debbie Watson, Rachel Hahn, and Jo Staines. 2019. Storying special objects: Material culture, narrative identity and life story work for children in care. Qual. Soc. Work (2019), 1473325019850616.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Debbie L Watson, Sandra Latter, and Rebecca Bellew. 2015. Adopted children and young people's views on their life storybooks: The role of narrative in the formation of identities. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 58, (2015), 90--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Debbie Watson, Sandra Latter, and Rebecca Bellew. 2015. Adopters' views on their children's life story books. Adopt. Foster. 39, 2 (2015), 119-- 134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Debbie Watson, Chloe Meineck, and Beth Lancaster. 2018. Adopted children's co-production and use of 'Trove'(a digitally enhanced memory box) to better understand their care histories through precious objects. Clin. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 23, 4 (2018), 614--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Adam Waytz, Joy Heafner, and Nicholas Epley. 2014. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 52, (2014), 113--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Penelope Welbourne. 2012. Social work with children and families: Developing advanced practice. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Daniel Welsh, Kellie Morrissey, Sarah Foley, Roisin McNaney, Christos Salis, John McCarthy, and John Vines. 2018. Ticket to talk: Supporting conversation between young people and people with dementia through digital media. In proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Keir Williams. 2016. Digital Media in a Special Educational Needs Classroom: A Study.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Rachel Willis and Sally Holland. 2009. Life story work: Reflections on the experience by looked-after young people. Adopt. Foster. 33, 4 (2009), 44--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. D Winnicott W. 1953. Transitional objects and transitional phenomena-a study of the first not-me possession. Int. J. Psychoanal. 34, (1953), 89--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Katie Wrench and Lesley Naylor. 2013. Life story work with children who are fostered or adopted: Creative ideas and activities. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Svetlana Yarosh, Iulian Radu, Seth Hunter, and Eric Rosenbaum. 2011. Examining values: an analysis of nine years of IDC research. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 136--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Chris Yuill. 2018. Social workers and alienation: the compassionate self and the disappointed juggler. Crit. Radic. Soc. Work 6, 3 (2018), 275--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Towards A Design For Life: Redesigning For Reminiscence With Looked After Children

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        10688 pages
        ISBN:9781450367080
        DOI:10.1145/3313831

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 April 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)89
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format